Effects of discontinuation as well as intervention of cyclic therapy with etidronate on bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty

Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporotic Drugs in Preventing Periprosthetic Bone Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss is a well-known phenomenon following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the choice of drugs for prevention remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the best drug to treat periprosthetic bone loss by comparing changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at different times after THA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of five databases and two clinical trial registration platforms was undertaken from their inception through to August 31, 2023 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out for calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of the BMD in calcar (Gruen zone 7) at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months and over.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials involving 1427 patients and 10 different interventions were included. The results demonstrated that at 6 months, denosumab had the highest ranking (SUCRA = 0.90), followed by alendronate (SUCRA = 0.76), and zoledronate (SUCRA = 0.73). At 12 months, clodronate ranked highest (SUCRA = 0.96), followed by denosumab (SUCRA = 0.84) and teriparatide (SUCRA = 0.82). For interventions with a duration of 24 months and over, denosumab had the highest SUCRA value (SUCRA = 0.96), followed by raloxifene (SUCRA = 0.90) and zoledronate (SUCRA = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Investigating the existing body of evidence revealed that denosumab demonstrates potential as an intervention of superior efficacy at the three specifically examined time points. However, it remains crucial to conduct further research to confirm these findings and determine the most effective treatment strategy.

Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The scientific literature suggests that, if periprosthetic osteolysis (PPO) is not treated, it may have a negative impact on the results of a total hip replacement and possibly result in failure. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of using bisphosphonates preventatively to limit PPO after a total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A PICOS template was developed to ensure a structured approach. A search for relevant studies was performed across four databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane. They were all last searched on March 1st and were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised studies.

RESULTS

The final analysis included seven studies with a total of 126 study group participants and 144 control group participants. The studies looked at Bony Mass Density in terms of bone loss on Gruen's femoral zones after THA in a bisphosphonate (treatment) and control group (placebo/no treatment). The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in favour of the bisphosphonate group in many of the included studies at 6, 12, and 24 postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis, using the most recent applicable studies, showed the efficacy of bisphosphonates in limiting periprosthetic osteolysis after THA in a period between 6 and 24 postoperative months. Future studies should focus increasing group sizes and collecting results beyond the 2-year mark.

Anti-osteoporotic drug efficacy for periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty (THA) threatens prosthesis stability. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic drugs for measures of hip function according to functional outcomes, periprosthetic femoral bone mineral density loss in each Gruen zone, and revision surgery after THA.

METHODS

The systematic search of six literature databases was conducted in December 2021 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Adult participants who underwent primary THA were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework, and the confidence in the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the CINeMA tool, which assessed the credibility of results from the network meta-analysis. We included 22 randomized controlled trials (1243 participants) comparing the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates (including etidronate, clodronate, alendronate, risedronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate), denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulator, teriparatide, calcium + vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin D. We defined the period for revision surgery as the final follow-up period.

RESULTS

Raloxifene, bisphosphonate, calcium + vitamin D, and denosumab for prosthetic hip function might have minimal differences when compared with placebos. The magnitude of the anti-osteoporotic drug effect on periprosthetic femoral bone loss varied across different Gruen zones. Bisphosphonate, denosumab, teriparatide might be more effective than placebo in Gruen zone 1 at 12 months after THA. Additionally, bisphosphonate might be more effective than placebo in Gruen zones 2, 5, 6, and 7 at 12 months after THA. Denosumab was efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zones 6 and 7 at 12 months after THA. Teriparatide was likely to be efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zone 7 at 12 months after THA. Raloxifene was slightly efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zones 2 and 3 at 12 months after THA. Calcium was slightly efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zone 5 at 12 months after THA. None of the studies reported revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonate and denosumab may be effective anti-osteoporotic drugs for preventing periprosthetic proximal femoral bone loss due to stress shielding after THA, particularly in cementless proximal fixation stems, which are the most commonly used prostheses worldwide.

Incidence of bone loss after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective study of 396 cases

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The development of bone loss (BL) at the operated level after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has not been well recognized. The incidence of BL may be correlated with the prosthesis type. Currently, no study has reported the incidence of BL after CDA with the Prestige-LP disc, and this remains an active area of research.

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of BL after Prestige-LP CDA and evaluate the impact of BL on clinical and radiological outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 396 patients were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were evaluated. Cervical lordosis, disc angle, global and segmental range of motion (ROM), heterotopic ossification (HO), and BL were measured.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Prestige-LP disc from January 2008 to October 2018 at our institution. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using JOA, VAS, and NDI scores. Radiological variables, including cervical lordosis, disc angle, global and segmental ROM, HO, and BL, were retrieved.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients and 483 CDAs were evaluated. BL occurred in 56.6% of patients and 52.8% of CDA segments. Mild BL occurred in 30.2%, moderate BL in 37.3%, and severe BL in 32.5% of CDA segments. Notably, 88.2% of CDA segments developed BL within the first 3 months, and 19.1% of them progressed at 6 months. However, no progressive BL after 12 months was seen. About 50.2% of CDAs showed superior and inferior endplates involvement. The incidence of BL was associated with age, surgery type, level distribution, and incidence and grade of HO. Patients with BL had a better segmental ROM, but no relationships between patients with or without BL were found in clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

BL was a common but self-limited phenomenon after CDA at the early postoperative stage. It occurred more often in relatively young age patients, two-level CDA, and C5/6 segment. However, patients suffering from BL showed no deterioration of the clinical outcomes, more exceptional motion preservation at the arthroplasty level, and lower incidence with a lower grade of HO.

Prophylactic efficacy on periprosthetic bone loss in calcar region after total hip arthroplasty of antiosteoporotic drugs: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of antiosteoporotic drugs on preventing periprosthetic bone loss in calcar 6 and 12 months after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was conducted guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline. A systematic literature search was conducted and 21 studies that enrolled a total of 955 patients with 9 antiosteoporotic drugs met the inclusion criteria. Network meta-analysis and conventional meta-analysis were carried out for calculating standard mean difference (SMD) and the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of the bone mineral density (BMD) in calcar (Gruen zone 7) as well as bone turnover markers (BTMs) including bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and collagen type I cross-linked N telopeptide (NTX) at 6 and 12 months between different antiosteoporotic drugs.

RESULTS

At 6 months after total hip arthroplasty, zoledronate (SUCRA=86.4%), risedronate (SUCRA=51.3%) and etidronate (SUCRA=44.5%) were effective in retaining BMD in calcar; zoledronate was significantly more effective than etidronate (SMD=0.65, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.27). Teriparatide (SUCRA=84.5%), denosumab (SUCRA=82.5%), zoledronate (SUCRA=69.2%), alendronate+alfacalcidol (SUCRA=66.2%) and etidronate (SUCRA=51.5%) were the top five drugs in retaining BMD in calcar at 12 months after total hip arthroplasty and the efficacy were comparable. After simultaneously excluding studies in which the prosthesis were cement and the drug dosages as well as treatment durations were inconsistent with those in treating osteoporosis, the above results were robust with the exception that alendronate showed significant efficacy compared with placebo (SMD=1.22, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.99) and was comparable with those effective drugs at 12 months. Long-term residual effect was corroborated only in etidronate, alendronate and zoledronate from previous studies. BTMs were significantly decreased as early as 6 months (SMD of BSAP -0.49, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.13; SMD of NTX -0.93, 95% CI -1.21 to -0.64) and sustained until 12 months (SMD of BSAP -0.27, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.03; SMD of NTX -0.84, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.56) during the prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiosteoporotic drugs showed prophylactic efficacy on periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty in calcar, the effectiveness varied. Zoledronate was the best recommendation due to its optimal efficacy both within 6 and 12 months as well as its residual effect in the long term. BTMs could be used as indicators for monitoring through the treatment. More head-to-head clinical trials are needed to confirm those findings.

Effects of bisphosphonates in preventing periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty (THA) was a well-known phenomenon. This systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of bisphosphonates (BPs) for decreasing periprosthetic bone resorption.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to March 2018. Randomized controlled trials compared the effects between administrating BPs and placebo or no medication were eligible; the target participants were patients who underwent THA. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by using the random-effects models. Statistical analyses were performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials involving 620 patients underwent THA were retrieved. BPs significantly prevented the loss of periprosthetic bone mineral density at 1 year (MD, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.08], p < 0.001), between 2 and 4 years (MD, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07], p = 0.02), and more than 5 years after THA (MD, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11], p < 0.001). Both serum bone alkaline phosphatase (MD, - 7.28 [95% CI, - 9.81 to - 4.75], p < 0.001) and urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (MD, - 24.37 [95% CI, - 36.37 to - 12.37], p < 0.001) in BP group were significantly lower. Subgroup analyses showed that the third-generation BPs were more effective in decreasing periprosthetic bone loss than the first and second generation within 1 year after THA (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BPs were beneficial to decreasing periprosthetic bone loss. The third-generation BPs showed significantly efficacy for patients in short-term observation.

Bisphosphonates for the preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials

The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of bisphosphonates (BPs) on preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after joint arthroplasty. It confirmed the protective effect of BPs in a long-term follow-up, and found the influence factors on this effect.

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic bone loss is believed to cause aseptic loosening and failed prosthetic fixation in joint arthroplasty. This meta-analysis which included high-quality randomized controlled trials aimed to analyze the effect of bisphosphonates on maintaining periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-five RCTs were included and the total number of participants was 1163 by computerized searches of bibliographic databases. The weighted mean differences with 95% confidence interval were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of BPs on total periprosthetic BMD and the BMD of different Gruen zones. Subgroup analyses identified the potentially influencing factors such as surgical site, cement fixation, and generation of BPs. A descriptive review was conducted for BP-related adverse effects.

RESULTS

The BPs group presented significantly higher total periprosthetic BMD in the BPs group than that in the control group at 3, 6, 12 months, 2-4 years, and 5-10 years after arthroplasty (P < 0.05). The BPs group presented significantly higher periprosthetic BMD in femoral Gruen Zone 1 and 7 than that in the control group at 3, 6, 12 months, 2-4 years, and 5-10 years (P < 0.05). The heterogeneity was minimized by dividing THA and TKA into two subgroups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the effect of BPs on preservation of BMD was significantly greater in arthroplasty with cemented component than in that with uncemented component at 12 months and 5-10 years (P < 0.05), and the administration of the second and third generation BPs was significantly more effective than the first-generation BPs at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). None of the included studies described severe or fatal adverse effects related to BPs.

CONCLUSIONS

BPs have significantly long-term efficacy on the preservation of periprosthetic BMD after joint arthroplasty. To obtain a better efficacy, the cemented components and the second and third generation BPs are recommended.

The efficiency of risedronate in reducing bone resorption after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up

Background

Recently risedronate is suggested to be effective for the prevention and treatment of for osteoporosis in total hip arthroplasty. This meta-analysis aimes to evaluate the efficacy of risedronate in reducing femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density loss in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in Medline (1966-31 October 2017), PubMed (1966-31 October 2017), Embase (1980-31 October 2017), ScienceDirect (1985-31 October 2017) and the Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trial (RCT) were included. Fixed/random effect model was used according to the heterogeneity tested by I2 statistic. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 software. The outcome measures included periprosthetic bone mineral density, length of stay and adverse effects.

Results

Four RCTs including 198 patients met the inclusion criteria. The present meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences between treatment groups in terms of periprosthetic bone mineral density in Gruen zones 1 (standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.758, 95% CI 0.469 to 1.047, P = 0.000), 2 (SMD = 0.814, 95% CI 0.523 to 1.106, P = 0.000), 3 (SMD = 0.340, 95% CI 0.059 to 0.622, P = 0.018), 6 (SMD = 2.400, 95% CI 2.029 to 2.771, P = 0.000), and 7 (SMD = 2.400, 95% CI 2.029 to 2.771, P = 0.000).

Conclusion

Oral risedronate could significantly reduce periprosthetic bone resorption around an uncemented femoral stem (Gruen zones 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7) up to 6 months after THA. In addition, no severe adverse events were identified. Future trials of risedronate treatment after THA should focus on clinically relevant end points such as the risks of fracture and revision arthroplasty.

Risedronate reduces postoperative bone resorption after cementless total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of risedronate for reducing periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Two reviewers performed an electronic literature search for randomized controlled trial (RCTs) evaluating the risedronate in the management of periprosthetic bone loss after primary THA. The electronic databases include PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2018. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. STATA 14.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four RCTs were included in our study. Current meta-analysis indicated that postoperative reduciton of periprosthetic BMD in the risedronate group was significantly lower than that in the placebo group in zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. There was no increased risk of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The administration of risedronate was associates with a significantly improved periprosthetic BMD after primary THA. No increased risk of adverse events were observed. Higher quality RCTs are still required for further research.

Periprosthetic femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: systematic analysis of the effect of stem design

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic bone loss may lead to major complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA), including loosening, migration, and even fracture. This study analysed the influence of femoral implant designs on periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after THA.

METHODS

The results of all previous published studies reporting periprosthetic femoral BMD following THA were compiled. Using these results, we compared percent changes in bone loss as a function of: femoral stem fixation, material, and geometry.

RESULTS

The greatest bone loss was in the calcar region (Gruen Zone 7). Overall, cemented stems had more bone loss distally than noncemented stems, while noncemented stems had more proximal bone loss than cemented stems. Within noncemented stems, cobalt-chromium (CoCr) stems had nearly double the proximal bone loss compared to titanium (Ti) alloy stems. Finally, within noncemented titanium alloy group, straight stems had less bone loss than anatomical, tapered, and press-fit designs.

DISCUSSION

The findings from the present study quantified percent changes in periprosthetic BMD as a function of fixation method, alloy, and stem design. While no one stem type was identified as ideal, we now have a clearer understanding of the influence of stem design on load transfer to the surrounding bone.

Effect of one-year post-operative alendronate treatment on periprosthetic bone after total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to lead to a reduction in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD). In theory, this may lead to migration, instability and aseptic loosening of the prosthetic components. Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption and may reduce this loss in BMD. We hypothesised that treatment with bisphosphonates and calcium would lead to improved BMD and clinical outcomes compared with treatment with calcium supplementation alone following TKA. A total of 26 patients, (nine male and 17 female, mean age 67 years) were prospectively randomised into two study groups: alendronate and calcium (bisphosphonate group, n = 14) or calcium only (control group, n = 12). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements were performed post-operatively, and at three months, six months, one, two, four, and seven years post-operatively.

Mean femoral metaphyseal BMD was significantly higher in the bisphosphonate group compared with controls, up to four years following surgery in some areas of the femur (p = 0.045). BMD was observed to increase in the lateral tibial metaphysis in the bisphosphonate group until seven years (p = 0.002), and was significantly higher than that observed in the control group throughout (p = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the groups in the central femoral metaphyseal, tibial medial metaphyseal or diaphyseal regions of interest (ROI) of either the femur or tibia.

Bisphosphonate treatment after TKA may be of benefit for patients with poor bone quality. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to assess whether this is clinically beneficial.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:337–45.

Systematic analysis of bisphosphonate intervention on periprosthetic BMD as a function of stem design

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bisphosphonates periprosthetic BMD in THA patients as a function of stem design. Specifically, the goals were to determine if bisphosphonates as a group could significantly inhibit periprosthetic bone loss, time needed to see an effect, if one drug was more effective than the others, and if there was a difference due to stem design or cement. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, groups treated with bisphosphonate therapy preserved significantly more BMD than the control groups as early as six months postoperatively, and orally delivered bisphosphonates were most effective. Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.

A meta-analysis of bisphosphonates for periprosthetic bone loss after total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss, which is common after joint arthroplasty, may cause bone loosening and lead to failed prosthetic fixation. Two previous meta-analyses have confirmed the mid-term effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) in preventing bone loss after arthroplasty. To determine long-term efficacy and gender bias of BPs after joint arthroplasty, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 17 RCTs involving 781 patients to evaluate the effect of BPs.

METHODS

Meta-analysis was conducted after a systematic search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, CINAHL, and ISI Web of Science, and manual examination of references in selected articles and conference abstracts of key orthopedic journals. Methodological quality and abstracted relevant data were evaluated. In addition to analysis of bone mineral density (BMD), we also conducted systematic analysis of clinically relevant outcomes and bone biochemical markers.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials involving a total of 781 patients were assessed. Significantly less periprosthetic bone loss occurred in the BP-treated group than in the control group at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.0001). This protective effect was not noted at 3 months (p = 0.11) nor from 24-72 months (p = 0.14). The efficacy of BPs in the gender balance, shorter duration, and the non-nitrogenous BPs groups was no different from that for controls. Biochemical bone markers were suppressed in the BPs group. However, clinically relevant outcomes in the BPs group and controls were similar at all times.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall moderate-quality evidence from the RCTs confirmed the significant mid-term efficacy of BPs on periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty. Long-term efficacy of BPs was not observed, and the therapy was of more benefit to women, especially postmenopausal women. To achieve better efficacy, nitrogenous BPs and long duration of treatment may be recommended.

Bisphosphonates for periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials

The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the middle-term efficacy of bisphosphonates on maintaining periprosthetic bone mass after joint arthroplasty and the potential influential factors. It was found that the protective effect of bisphosphonates, probably modified by its generation and the prosthesis location, could persist in a middle-term follow-up after surgery and after drug discontinuation.

INTRODUCTION

A previous meta-analysis of 6 RCTs with follow-up of 12 months suggested that bisphosphonates (BPs) could prevent bone loss after arthroplasty up to 6 months. Our meta-analysis based on 14 RCTs involving 671 patients with follow-up up to 72 months aimed to evaluate the middle-term efficacy of BPs, understand the sources of heterogeneity, and comprehensively identify the potential influential factors.

METHODS

Electronic databases searching and hand searching of conference proceedings were conducted. We evaluated the methodological quality and abstracted relevant data. With fixed effect model we calculated the weighted mean differences to evaluate bone mineral density at different time points. We also conducted a systematic review for BP-related adverse effects.

RESULTS

The significantly less periprosthetic bone loss occurred in the BP-treated group than in the control group at 3, 6, and 12 months, and between 24 and 72 months after the index surgery. The protective effect persisted during 18 to 70 months after discontinuation of BPs. The heterogeneity was minimized with the separation of hip and knee trials during the analysis. The efficacy was more potent for the second and the third generation of BPs than the first generation. None of the trials noted serious or fatal adverse effects related to BPs.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall moderate evidence from the RCTs confirmed the significantly short-term and middle-term efficacy of BPs on periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty. To obtain a better efficacy, the second and the third generation of BPs may be the choice.

The effect of weekly risedronate on periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Bone loss leading to late-occurring periprosthetic femoral fracture is a mode of failure in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effect of a bisphosphonate, risedronate, on femoral periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

METHODS

We enrolled seventy-three patients between the ages of forty and seventy years who were scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty in a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 35 mg of risedronate (n = 36) or a placebo (n = 37) orally once weekly for six months. The primary end point was the change in bone mineral density in Gruen femoral zones 1 and 7. Bone mineral density scans were made preoperatively and at two days and three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months postoperatively. Secondary end points included migration of the femoral stem and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Seventy of the seventy-three patients (thirty-three in the risedronate group and thirty-seven in the placebo group) were analyzed for the primary end point. The mean bone mineral density in zone 1 was 9.2% higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 14.1%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 7.2% higher (95% CI, 1.0% to 13.3%) at one year. The mean bone mineral density in zone 7 was 8.0% higher (95% CI, 2.7% to 13.4%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 4.3% higher (95% CI, -1.5% to 10.1%) at one year. Migration of the femoral stem, the clinical outcome, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate taken once weekly for six months following total hip arthroplasty was effective in reducing periprosthetic bone resorption around an uncemented femoral stem up to one year after surgery but had no discernible effect on implant migration or clinical outcome. Future studies of bisphosphonate treatment following total hip arthroplasty should focus on clinically relevant end points such as the risks of fracture and revision arthroplasty.

Impact of trochanteric heterotopic ossification on measurement of femoral bone density following cemented total hip replacement

During a study of bone mineral density changes around cemented femoral implants, we recognized heterotopic ossification occurring regularly in a position anterior to the greater trochanter and proximal femur. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, distribution, and effect of this ossification on periprosthetic DXA scans following primary cemented total hip replacement. One hundred eleven patients underwent postoperative DXA examinations measuring changes in bone mineral density with heterotopic ossification identified and localized on standard radiographs with confirmation using DXA subtraction imaging. Male gender and age within the male group were significantly associated with occurrence of heterotopic ossification (p = 0.003 and 0.046, respectively). Femoral stem type, weight, and body mass index had no significant effect (p = 0.525, 0.372, and 0.243, respectively). Examining the Gruen zones in all patients suggested a median (plus interquartile range) zone 1 density drop of 4% (-12% to +7%). When separated and analyzed for the effect of heterotopic ossification, the 45 patients with heterotopic ossification showed a 2-year density gain of +6% (-5% to +15%), whereas those without heterotopic ossification showed a loss of 8% (-14% to 0%), a significant difference (p < 0.001). Zone 2 also showed a significant difference (p = 0.048). We therefore recommend that affected zones should be identified and excluded from analysis at all time points. Without this precaution, researchers risk underestimating periprosthetic bone loss in their studies and reporting misleading conclusions.

Effect of robotic milling on periprosthetic bone remodeling

The ROBODOC system has provided better fit and fill of the stem and less destruction of the bony architecture than with manual surgery. These benefits might affect femoral periprosthetic bone remodeling. We evaluated the effects of robotic milling in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a longitudinal 24-month follow-up study using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and plain radiographs of 29 patients (31 hips) after ROBODOC THA and 24 patients (27 hips) after manual THA with the same stem design. To minimize the influence of other factors on bone remodeling, only female osteoarthritis patients, who had no drugs that might affect bone metabolism were enrolled. Significantly less bone loss occurred at the proximal periprosthetic areas in the ROBODOC group. In zone 1, the decrease was 15.5 versus 29.9% using conventional rasping; in zone 7, the loss was 17.0% with ROBODOC compared to 30.5% with conventional rasping (p < 0.05). On radiographs, endosteal spot welds in the proximal medial portion were more pronounced in the ROBODOC group (48 vs. 11% in the conventional group, p < 0.05). Our results suggest that robotic milling is effective in facilitating proximal load transfer around the femoral component and minimizing bone loss after cementless THA.

Risedronate reduces postoperative bone resorption after cementless total hip arthroplasty

Forty-three patients who had undergone cementless THA were randomly assigned to receive no osteoactive drug or oral risedronate for 6 months. Postoperative decrease of BMD in the risedronate group was significantly lower than that seen in the control group in zones 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7.

INTRODUCTION

Proximal bone resorption around the femoral stem often has been observed after total hip arthroplasty (THA), could lead to late stem loosening. We previously reported the efficacy of etidronate on periprosthetic bone resorption after cementless THA. Recently risedronate is suggested to be effective for the prevention and treatment of for osteoporosis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of risedronate on periprosthetic bone loss after cementless THA.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who had undergone cementless THA were randomly assigned to receive no osteoactive drug (21 patients) or oral risedronate 2.5 mg/day (22 patients) for 6 months. Three patients were eliminated from the risedronate group because of dyspepsia. Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) in seven regions of interest based on the zones of Gruen et al. was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 6 months after surgery, postoperative decrease of BMD in the risedronate group was significantly lower than that seen in the control group in zones 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These outcomes suggested that risedronate might reduce the periprosthetic bone resorption after cementless THA.

Efficacy of different dosing schedules of etidronate for stress shielding after cementless total hip arthroplasty

Forty-four women who had undergone cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) were selected for determination of the optimum dosage of etidronate in the treatment of stress shielding after surgery. Patients were 55-86 years of age. The patients were randomized into three groups. The control group (n = 17) was not treated with osteoactive drugs. The low-dose group (n = 12) and the high-dose group (n = 15) received 200 mg or 400 mg etidronate daily for 2 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of calcium supplementation of 500 mg/day. These patients received four cycles of therapy over 1 year postoperatively. Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. At 12 months, bone loss in the low-dose and high-dose groups was significantly lower compared with the control group in Gruen zones 1 and 7. There were additional significant differences with regard to bone loss between the control group and the high-dose group in zones 2, 4, and 6. Our data suggest that high dosages are more effective in reducing postoperative bone loss after cementless THA.