Cardiac adverse events in bisphosphonate and teriparatide users: An international pharmacovigilance study

Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study

This study compared the effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab and teriparatide. The main finding was that there were no significant differences between the two drugs in fracture prevention and risk of major adverse cardiac events. This suggests that romosozumab and teriparatide are comparable options for treating osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the preventive effects of romosozumab versus teriparatide on fractures and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients initiating these drugs.

METHODS

We conducted an active comparator, a new user cohort design, with confounding controlled by inverse probability of treatment weighting using a Japanese administrative claims database (March 2019 to October 2022). This cohort study included 49,104 patients aged 50 years or older who initiated romosozumab (n = 16,125) or teriparatide (n = 32,979) for osteoporosis. The study exposure was the initiation of romosozumab or teriparatide. Effectiveness outcomes were nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture. The safety outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Follow-up period was 365 days.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence rate difference (IRD) for nonvertebral fracture between romosozumab versus teriparatide was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.17) events per 100 person-years (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12]); weighted IRD for hip fracture was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.16) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]); and weighted IRD for MACE was -0.06 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.09) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.19]).

CONCLUSION

In patients with osteoporosis, there was no significant difference in the prevention of nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture between romosozumab and teriparatide. In addition, the risk of MACE was comparable between the two drugs.

Adverse events associated with teriparatide: a real-world disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide is widely used for osteoporosis treatment in various patients, but its safety profile is not fully documented. This study analyzes the FDA pharmacovigilance database to assess teriparatide's safety.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2023 were extracted and analyzed for disproportionality between teriparatide and adverse effects (AE).

RESULTS

A total of 66,991 AE reports identified teriparatide as the principal suspect medication, aggregating to 222,116 individual AEs. Notably, healthcare professionals authored 16.1% of these reports (n = 10,809), whereas consumers accounted for the majority with 81.3% (n = 54,474). Teriparatide revealed a marked association with an increased propensity for musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (ROR,3.95; 95% CI, 3.91-3.99) at the System Organ Class (SOC) level. Concurrently, 199 preferred terms (PTs) displayed significant disproportionality across all four employed algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms several well-known adverse drug reactions and identifies potential safety issues associated with teriparatide treatment. This contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between adverse reactions and teriparatide. These findings emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and ongoing surveillance to promptly identify and effectively manage adverse reactions, thereby enhancing overall patient safety and well-being.

Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab vs. PTH Analogs for Osteoporosis Treatment: a Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

CONTEXT

Romosozumab, a monoclonal sclerostin antibody, is a recently approved highly potent anti-osteoporotic agent with osteoanabolic properties. Clinical use of Romosozumab is hindered by the fear of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events raised following the pivotal ARCH-trial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess real-world CV safety of romosozumab vs. alternative osteoanabolic therapies used for treatment of severe osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Data was obtained from TriNetX, a global federated health research network including real-time electronic medical records from 113 healthcare organizations with a total of 136,460,930 patients across 16 countries at time of analysis. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, a diagnosis of osteoporosis and prescription of romosozumab or a PTH analog (teriparatide/abaloparatide) during 8.2019-8.2022. 1:1 propensity score matched cohorts were created using demographic variables, comorbidities, and medications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of the outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Incident 3-point major adverse CV event or death (3P-MACE) during 1-year of follow-up after the initial prescription.

RESULTS

5,626 and 15,986 patients met the criteria for romosozumab and PTH analog cohorts, respectively, with 5,610 patients per group following propensity score matching. 3P-MACE was significantly less frequent in the romosozumab vs. PTH analog cohort (158 vs 211 patients with an outcome, p=0.003) with reductions in the individual components of the composite outcome: myocardial ischemic events (31 vs 58, p=0.003); cerebrovascular events 56 vs 79, p=0.037; deaths (83 vs 104, p=0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

In a diverse real-world setting, prescription of romosozumab for osteoporosis is associated with less adverse CV events when compared to PTH analog therapy.

Research progress of targeted therapy regulating Th17/Treg balance in bone immune diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) are common bone-immune diseases. The imbalance between helper (Th17) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) produced during differentiation of CD4+ T cells plays a key regulatory role in bone remodelling disorders in RA and PMOP. However, the specific regulatory mechanism of this imbalance in bone remodelling in RA and PMOP has not been clarified. Identifying the regulatory mechanism underlying the Th17/Treg imbalance in RA and PMOP during bone remodelling represents a key factor in the research and development of new drugs for bone immune diseases. In this review, the potential roles of Th17, Treg, and Th17/Treg imbalance in regulating bone remodelling in RA and PMOP have been summarised, and the potential mechanisms by which probiotics, traditional Chinese medicine compounds, and monomers maintain bone remodelling by regulating the Th17/Treg balance are expounded. The maintenance of Th17/Treg balance could be considered as an therapeutic alternative for the treatment of RA and PMOP. This study also summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of conventional treatments and the quality of life and rehabilitation of patients with RA and PMOP. The findings presented her will provide a better understanding of the close relationship between bone immunity and bone remodelling in chronic bone diseases and new ideas for future research, prevention, and treatment of bone immune diseases.

Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws: Clinical and forensic aspects

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and other relevant clinical and forensic aspects of a potentially severe complication known as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) while synthesizing state-of-the-art information on bisphosphonates and introducing a possible differential diagnosis.

DESIGN

An extensive search was conducted in PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine) without a time or language constraint, focusing on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, site specificity, signs and symptoms, differential diagnosis, prevention, and forensic aspects of MRONJ. All types of original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, opinion articles, guidelines, and letters to editors were considered to produce a complete review on this subject.

RESULTS

MRONJ prevention relies on a multidisciplinary approach and is critical since truly effective treatments are lacking. This therapeutic challenge is partly due to uncertainty regarding this condition's pathophysiology. Differential diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with krokodil abuse, one of the most dangerous and homemade psychoactive illicit substances, should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research into the etiology and site specificity of MRONJ is encouraged, aiming to develop novel treatment prospects. Indeed, comprehending this would allow for increased efficacy and therapeutic options while emphasizing the importance of prevention. In addition, we advocate for greater consensus among the various societies regarding MRONJ's treatment and management.

Antiosteoporosis medications and cardiovascular disease: a population-based nationwide nested case-control study

Purpose: Patients with osteoporosis are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several antiosteoporosis medications have been demonstrated with the benefit of preventing osteoporosis. Our aim is to assess the CVD risks associated with antiosteoporosis medications using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between 2000 and 2016. Methods: Among 41,102 patients of 40+ years old with newly diagnosed osteoporosis, 69.1% (N = 28,387) of patients were included in the user cohort of antiosteoporosis medicines, of whom 13, 472 developed CVD by the end of 2016, while 14,915 did not. Using the nested case-control analysis in the user cohort (88.0% women and 77.4% elderly), we applied conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of eight types of CVD for the users of denosumab, bisphosphonate, teriparatide, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Results: The adjusted ORs of overall CVDs were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.12-0.15) for denosumab users, 0.52 (95% CI: 0.45-0.61) for teriparatide users, and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) for bisphosphonate users. The HRT users were at higher odds of coronary artery and peripheral artery diseases, heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Denosumab, teriparatide, and bisphosphonate may have more protective effects against CVD than hormone therapy. Physicians may take subsequent cardiovascular risks into account when choosing an adequate antiosteoporosis medication for patients with osteoporosis.