Targeting osteocytes vs osteoblasts

Research progresses on mitochondrial-targeted biomaterials for bone defect repair

In recent years, the regulation of the cell microenvironment has opened up new avenues for bone defect repair. Researchers have developed novel biomaterials to influence the behavior of osteoblasts and immune cells by regulating the microenvironment, aiming to achieve efficient bone repair. Mitochondria, as crucial organelles involved in energy conversion, biosynthesis and signal transduction, play a vital role in maintaining bone integrity. Dysfunction of mitochondria can have detrimental effects on the transformation of the immune microenvironment and the differentiation of stem cells, thereby hindering bone tissue regeneration. Consequently, targeted therapy strategies focusing on mitochondria have emerged. This approach offers a wide range of applications and reliable therapeutic effects, thereby providing a new treatment option for complex and refractory bone defect diseases. In recent studies, more biomaterials have been used to restore mitochondrial function and promote positive cell differentiation. The main directions are mitochondrial energy metabolism, mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial quality control. In this review, we investigated the biomaterials used for mitochondria-targeted treatment of bone defect repair in recent years from the perspective of progress and strategies. We also summarized the micro-molecular mechanisms affected by them. Through discussions on energy metabolism, oxidative stress regulation and autophagy regulation, we emphasized the opportunities and challenges faced by mitochondria-targeted biomaterials, providing vital clues for developing a new generation of bone repair materials.

Crosstalk between ALK3(BMPR1A) deficiency and autophagy signaling mitigates pathological bone loss in osteoporosis

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is recognized to be one of the major skeleton diseases strongly associated with impaired bone formation. Previous reports have indicated that the importance of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling of osteoblast lineage in bone development via classical Smad signaling, however, its critical role in osteoporosis is still not well understood. In the current study, we aim to investigate the pathological role of BMPR1A, a key receptor of BMPs, in osteoporosis and its underlying mechanism. We first found that knockdown of BMPR1A by using Col1a1-creER in osteoblasts mitigated early bone loss of osteoporosis in mice, yet along with late bone maturation defects by reducing mineral adherence rate and bone formation rate in vivo. At the cellular level, we then observed that BMPR1A deficiency promoted the proliferation of pre-osteoblasts under osteoporotic conditions but hindered their late-stage mineralization. We finally elucidated that BMPR1A deficiency compensatorily triggered mTOR-autophagy perturbation by a higher level in early osteoporotic pre-osteoblasts thus resulting in the enhancement of transient cell proliferation but impairment of final mineralization. Taken together, this study indicated the significance of BMPR1A-mTOR/autophagy axis, as a double-edged sword, in osteoporotic bone formation and provided new cues for therapeutic strategies in osteoporosis.

Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, has led to a high risk of fatal osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that sexual dimorphism is a notable feature of osteoporosis, with sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Specifically, females are more susceptible than males to osteoporosis, while males are more prone to disability or death from the disease. To date, sex chromosome abnormalities and steroid hormones have been proven to contribute greatly to sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis by regulating the functions of bone cells. Understanding the sex-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications is essential for improving treatment strategies tailored to women and men. This literature review focuses on the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, mainly in a population of aging patients, chronic glucocorticoid administration, and diabetes. Moreover, we highlight the implications of sexual dimorphism for developing therapeutics and preventive strategies and screening approaches tailored to women and men. Additionally, the challenges in translating bench research to bedside treatments and future directions to overcome these obstacles will be discussed.

Regulation of the Osteocyte Secretome with Aging and Disease

As the most numerous and long-lived of all bone cells, osteocytes have essential functions in regulating skeletal health. Through the lacunar-canalicular system, secreted proteins from osteocytes can reach cells throughout the bone. Furthermore, the intimate connectivity between the lacunar-canalicular system and the bone vasculature allows for the transport of osteocyte-secreted factors into the circulation to reach the entire body. Local and endocrine osteocyte signaling regulates physiological processes such as bone remodeling, bone mechanoadaptation, and mineral homeostasis. However, these processes are disrupted by impaired osteocyte function induced by aging and disease. Dysfunctional osteocyte signaling is now associated with the pathogenesis of many disorders, including chronic kidney disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, and periodontitis. In this review, we focus on the targeting of bone and extraskeletal tissues by the osteocyte secretome. In particular, we highlight the secreted osteocyte proteins, which are known to be dysregulated during aging and disease, and their roles during disease progression. We also discuss how therapeutic or genetic targeting of osteocyte-secreted proteins can improve both skeletal and systemic health.

Morphology and cell biology - two sides of the same coin: Importance of morphology in choosing Cre experimental models for targeting osteoblasts vs osteocytes

The present letter to editor comments the manuscript entitled "Targeting osteocytes vs osteoblasts" by Y. Kitase and M. Prideaux, where we underlie the importance morphology in choosing Cre experimental models for targeting osteoblasts vs osteocytes.