Circadian rhythm of markers of bone turnover in patients with chronic kidney disease

Circadian Regulation of Bone Remodeling

Adult bones are continuously remodeled by the balance between bone resorption by osteoclasts and subsequent bone formation by osteoblasts. Many studies have provided molecular evidence that bone remodeling is under the control of circadian rhythms. Circadian fluctuations have been reported in the serum and urine levels of bone turnover markers, such as digested collagen fragments and bone alkaline phosphatase. Additionally, the expressions of over a quarter of all transcripts in bones show circadian rhythmicity, including the genes encoding master transcription factors for osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, osteogenic cytokines, and signaling pathway proteins. Serum levels of calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and calcitonin also display circadian rhythmicity. Finally, osteoblast- and osteoclast-specific knockout mice targeting the core circadian regulator gene Bmal1 show disrupted bone remodeling, although the results have not always been consistent. Despite these studies, however, establishing a direct link between circadian rhythms and bone remodeling in vivo remains a major challenge. It is nearly impossible to repeatedly collect bone materials from human subjects while following circadian changes. In addition, the differences in circadian gene regulation between diurnal humans and nocturnal mice, the main model organism, remain unclear. Filling the knowledge gap in the circadian regulation of bone remodeling could reveal novel regulatory mechanisms underlying many bone disorders including osteoporosis, genetic diseases, and fracture healing. This is also an important question for the basic understanding of how cell differentiation progresses under the influence of cyclically fluctuating environments.

Associations of Changes in Bone Turnover Markers with Change in Bone Mineral Density in Kidney Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Bone loss after kidney transplantation is highly variable. We investigated whether changes in bone turnover markers associate with bone loss during the first post-transplant year.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 0 and 12 months, with biointact parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), intact procollagen type I N -terminal propeptide (PINP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b) measured at 0, 3, and 12 months post-transplant ( N =209). Paired transiliac bone biopsies were available in a subset ( n =49). Between-group differences were evaluated by Student's t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or Pearson's chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Changes in BMD varied from -22% to +17%/yr. Compared with patients with no change (±2.5%/yr), patients who gained BMD had higher levels of parathyroid hormone (236 versus 136 pg/ml), BALP (31.7 versus 18.8 μ g/L), and Intact PINP (121.9 versus 70.4 μ g/L) at time of transplantation; a greater decrease in BALP (-40% versus -21%) and Intact PINP (-43% versus -13%) by 3 months; and lower levels of Intact PINP (36.3 versus 60.0 μ g/L) at 12 months post-transplant. Patients who lost BMD had a less marked decrease, or even increase, in Intact PINP (+22% versus -13%) and TRAP5b (-27% versus -43%) at 3 months and higher Intact PINP (83.7 versus 60.0 μ g/L) and TRAP5b (3.89 versus 3.16 U/L) at 12 months compared with patients with no change. If none of the biomarkers decreased by the least significant change at 3 months, an almost two-fold (69% versus 36%) higher occurrence of bone loss was seen at 12 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss after kidney transplantation was highly variable. Resolution of high bone turnover, as reflected by decreasing bone turnover markers, associated with BMD gain, while increasing bone turnover markers associated with bone loss.

Lower Bone Turnover and Skeletal PTH Responsiveness in Japanese Compared to European Patients on Hemodialysis

CONTEXT

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment targets for patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are lower in Japan than in Europe. Whether this translates to lower bone turnover is unknown and could depend on skeletal PTH responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates whether skeletal PTH responsiveness is better preserved in Japanese vs European patients receiving HD.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective cohort studies, using a case-control design. Patients receiving chronic intermittent HD therapy were eligible for inclusion. Participating Belgian and Japanese patients (n = 374) were matched 1:1 by age (59 ± 12 years), sex (66% male), diabetes (34%), and dialysis duration (39 months [22-63 months]). PTH, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b) were measured centrally in Liège, Belgium.

RESULTS

Japanese patients had lower levels of iPTH (207 vs 268 pg/mL; P < .001), BALP (15.3 vs 24.5 μg/L; P < .001), and TRAP5b (3.35 vs 5.79 U/L; P < .001). Linear regression analyses revealed lower levels of bone turnover markers for any given level of PTH in Japanese vs Belgian patients, indicating lower skeletal PTH responsiveness. Consistently, bone turnover markers were significantly lower in Japanese vs Belgian patients when stratifying or matching according to PTH levels. Male sex, obesity, and hyperphosphatemia were the main determinants of the bone turnover marker/PTH ratios.

CONCLUSION

Japanese patients receiving HD have lower bone turnover than their European counterparts, even at similar PTH levels. The rationale for the current regional differences in PTH treatment targets remains obscure and deserves further attention.