Chemiosmotic misunderstandings

Questioning rotary functionality in the bacterial flagellar system and proposing a murburn model for motility

Bacterial flagellar system (BFS) was the primary example of a purported 'rotary-motor' functionality in a natural assembly. This mandates the translation of a circular motion of components inside into a linear displacement of the cell body outside, which is supposedly orchestrated with the following features of the BFS: (i) A chemical/electrical differential generates proton motive force (pmf, including a trans-membrane potential, TMP), which is electro-mechanically transduced by inward movement of protons via BFS. (ii) Membrane-bound proteins of BFS serve as stators and the slender filament acts as an external propeller, culminating into a hook-rod that pierces the membrane to connect to a 'broader assembly of deterministically movable rotor'. We had disclaimed the purported pmf/TMP-based respiratory/photosynthetic physiology involving Complex V, which was also perceived as a 'rotary machine' earlier. We pointed out that the murburn redox logic was operative therein. We pursue the following similar perspectives in BFS-context: (i) Low probability for the evolutionary attainment of an ordered/synchronized teaming of about two dozen types of proteins (assembled across five-seven distinct phases) towards the singular agendum of rotary motility. (ii) Vital redox activity (not the gambit of pmf/TMP!) powers the molecular and macroscopic activities of cells, including flagella. (iii) Flagellar movement is noted even in ambiances lacking/countering the directionality mandates sought by pmf/TMP. (iv) Structural features of BFS lack component(s) capable of harnessing/achieving pmf/TMP and functional rotation. A viable murburn model for conversion of molecular/biochemical activity into macroscopic/mechanical outcomes is proposed herein for understanding BFS-assisted motility. HIGHLIGHTSThe motor-like functionalism of bacterial flagellar system (BFS) is analyzedProton/Ion-differential based powering of BFS is unviable in bacteriaUncouplers-sponsored effects were misinterpreted, resulting in a detour in BFS researchThese findings mandate new explanation for nano-bio-mechanical movements in BFSA minimalist murburn model for the bacterial flagella-aided movement is proposedCommunicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Why do cells need oxygen? Insights from mitochondrial composition and function

Mitochondrial membrane-embedded redox proteins are classically perceived as deterministic "electron transport chain" (ETC) arrays cum proton pumps; and oxygen is seen as an "immobile terminal electron acceptor." This is untenable because: (1) there are little free protons to be pumped out of the matrix; (2) proton pumping would be highly endergonic; (3) ETC-chemiosmosis-rotary ATP synthesis proposal is "irreducibly complex"/"non-evolvable" and does not fit with mitochondrial architecture or structural/distribution data of the concerned proteins/components; (4) a plethora of experimental observations do not conform to the postulates/requisites; for example, there is little evidence for viable proton-pumps/pH-gradient in mitochondria, trans-membrane potential (TMP) is non-fluctuating/non-trappable, oxygen is seen to give copious "diffusible reactive (oxygen) species" (DRS/DROS) in milieu, etc. Quite contrarily, the newly proposed murburn model's tenets agree with known principles of energetics/kinetics, and builds on established structural data and reported observations. In this purview, oxygen is needed to make DRS, the principal component of mitochondrial function. Complex V and porins respectively serve as proton-inlet and turgor-based water-exodus portals, thereby achieving organellar homeostasis. Complexes I to IV possess ADP-binding sites and their redox-centers react/interact with O₂ /DRS. At/around these complexes, DRS cross-react or activate/oxidize ADP/Pi via fast thermogenic one-electron reaction(s), condensing to form two-electron stabilized products (H₂ O₂ /H₂ O/ATP). The varied architecture and distribution of components in mitochondria validate DRS as (i) the coupling agent of oxidative reactions and phosphorylations, and (ii) the primary reason for manifestation of TMP in steady-state. Explorations along the new precepts stand to provide greater insights on mitochondrial function and pathophysiology.

Coupling mechanisms in ATP synthesis: Rejoinder to "Response to molecular-level understanding of biological energy coupling and transduction"

Recently, an exchange of views on key fundamental aspects of biological energy coupling and ATP synthesis in the vital process of oxidative phosphorylation appeared in the pages of this journal. The very difficult scientific problems are analyzed and clarified. Errors in the mathematical/thermodynamic equations of a previous analysis have been identified that invalidate previous assertions, and the correct equations are derived. The major differences between the two competing models - localized versus delocalized - for biological energy coupling and transduction are discussed from physical, chemical, and mathematical perspectives. The opposing views are summarized, so that the reader can assess for himself or herself the merits of the two coupling mechanisms. A fresh attempt has been made to go to the root of bioenergetics by calculating the desolvation free energy barrier, ∆G_desolvation for ion transport across biomembranes. Several constructive suggestions are made that have the power to resolve the basic contradictions and the areas of fundamental conflict, and reach a consensus by catalyzing the progress of future research in this interdisciplinary field.

Response to "Molecular-level understanding of biological energy coupling and transduction: Response to "Chemiosmotic misunderstandings""

The most recent contribution by Sunil Nath in these pages is, mostly, a repetition of his previous claims regarding failures of the chemiosmotic hypotheses, supplemented with some fresh misunderstandings of the points I had sought to clarify in my previous critique⁠. Considerable portions rehash 50-60 years-old controversies, with no apparent understanding that the current chemiosmotic hypothesis, while birthed by Mitchell, differs from Mitchell's details in many respects. As such, Nath has devoted much time dealing with a few errors (or wrong hypotheses) by Mitchell (in a few places I would almost venture to say "typographical mistakes in typesetting") and presents the ensuing conclusions as "refutations" of the chemiosmotic paradigm, completely neglecting that such details (such as the precise H⁺/ATP or H⁺:O ratios) are completely irrelevant to the reality (or not) of an electron-transport chain that uses the free energy liberated by electron-transfer to remove H⁺ from a compartment, to which it returns through and ATP synthase which uses the energy in that spontaneous return to drive ATP synthesis. The thermodynamical mistakes and misunderstandings of the relevant literature present in Nath's new contribution are so numerous, though, that I feel forced to call the attention of the readers of "Biophysical Chemistry" to them.

Molecular-level understanding of biological energy coupling and transduction: Response to "Chemiosmotic misunderstandings"

In a recent paper entitled "Chemiosmotic misunderstandings", it is claimed that "enough shortcomings in Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory have not been found and that a novel paradigm that offers at least as much explanatory power as chemiosmosis is not ready." This view is refuted by a wealth of molecular-level experimental data and strong new theoretical and computational evidence. It is shown that the chemiosmotic theory was beset with a large number of major shortcomings ever since the time when it was first proposed in the 1960s. These multiple shortcomings and flaws of chemiosmosis were repeatedly pointed out in incisive critiques by biochemical authorities of the late 20th century. All the shortcomings and flaws have been shown to be rectified by a quantitative, unified molecular-level theory that leads to a deeper and far more accurate understanding of biological energy coupling and ATP synthesis. The new theory is shown to be consistent with pioneering X-ray and cryo-EM structures and validated by state-of-the-art single-molecule techniques. Several new biochemical experimental tests are proposed and constructive ways for providing a revitalizing conceptual background and theory for integration of the available experimental information are suggested.