Diagnosis and initial management of gastroesophageal complications

Clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal diseases in the oral cavity

Aim

In this review, several gastrointestinal diseases that dentists may encounter in practice are highlighted and discussed.

Materials and methods

Using MEDLINE (PubMed), a comprehensive review of gastrointestinal diseases and their oral cavity manifestations was performed.

Results

Many gastrointestinal diseases present with oral symptoms that are detectable by dentists and dental hygienists. Often, oral manifestations of the disease may appear before systemic signs and symptoms. Managing patients with these conditions requires dentists to adjust their treatment and/or involve other health professionals.

Conclusion

Care must be taken when providing periodontal therapy or dental implants to patients suffering gastrointestinal diseases who are at high risk of bleeding, infection, or malnutrition, for example. Also, pharmacological therapy for these patients may need to be customized.

Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may prevent unnecessary treatment with acid-reducing medications

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects nearly 25 % of adults; however, an objective diagnosis is rarely established. We hypothesized that patients' symptoms and response to acid-reducing therapy are poor predictors of the outcome of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.

METHODS

A review of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring studies performed at an ambulatory tertiary care center between 2004 and 2011 was performed. Demographics, type of GERD symptoms, and duration and response to acid-reducing medications before referral for pH monitoring were collected. DeMeester score, symptom sensitivity index (SSI), and symptom index (SI) were tabulated and compared with the patients' symptoms and response to medical therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included. Of all reported symptoms, only heartburn was more common in patients with positive DeMeester scores, but there were no correlations between any symptoms and SSI or SI scores. Sixty-nine percent of patients with esophageal symptoms had a positive DeMeester score compared with only 29 % of patients with extraesophageal symptoms (P < 0.01). Esophageal symptoms and endoscopic evidence of GERD significantly increased the likelihood of having a positive DeMeester score, but they had no influence on SSI or SI scores. There was no correlation between response to acid-reducing medications and DeMeester, SSI, or SI scores. A total of 536 person-years of acid-reducing medications were prescribed to the study population, of which 151 (28 %) were prescribed to patients who had a negative pH study.

CONCLUSIONS

Extraesophageal symptoms and response to empiric trials of acid-reducing medications are poor predictors of the presence of GERD and the DeMeester score is more likely to identify GERD in patients who met other empiric diagnostic criteria than SSI or SI. Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may avoid lengthy periods of unnecessary medical therapy.

Pediatric patients with dyspepsia have chronic symptoms, anxiety, and lower quality of life as adolescents and adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about long-term health outcomes of children with dyspeptic symptoms. We studied the natural history of pediatric patients with dyspeptic symptoms, with and without histologic reflux, compared with healthy controls.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of consecutive new patients, ages 8-16 years, who underwent evaluation for dyspepsia, including upper endoscopy. Patients were assigned to groups with histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis (n = 50), or normal histology results (n = 53). Healthy children were followed up as controls (n = 143). Patients and controls were evaluated 5-15 years later. They provided self-reports on severity of dyspeptic symptoms, use of acid suppression, quality of life, anxiety, and depression.

RESULTS

When the study began, the groups with histologic evidence of esophagitis and normal histologies did not differ in severity of dyspeptic symptoms, functional disability, or depression. After a mean 7.6-year follow-up period, each group had significantly lower quality-of-life scores and more severe dyspeptic symptoms and functional disability than controls, but did not differ significantly from each other; both groups were significantly more likely than controls to meet criteria for an anxiety disorder. At time of follow-up evaluation, use of acid-suppression medication was significantly greater in the group with histologic evidence for esophagitis, compared with patients who had normal histology findings when the study began.

CONCLUSIONS

Among pediatric patients with dyspepsia evaluated by endoscopy and biopsy, those with histologic evidence for esophagitis or normal histology findings are at increased risk for chronic dyspeptic symptoms, anxiety disorder, and reduced quality of life in adolescence and young adulthood.

24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring

BACKGROUND

Historical ambulatory pH monitoring systems for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease have been catheter based and uncomfortable for patients, commonly limiting both their diet and activities. Catheter-based studies have also been reported to underestimate the amount of reflux a patient may have in a normal, routine day. Compared with conventional catheter-based pH monitoring systems, wireless (Bravo) pH monitoring is better tolerated by patients and allows for an increased duration of pH recording. Currently, there is lack of data regarding the optimal duration of wireless studies and concern that day 1 results are not typical of a patient's routine lifestyle, given the effects of sedation. Few studies have evaluated the merits of 24 versus 48-hour wireless pH monitoring.

AIMS

The aims of this study were (1) to identify differences in reflux parameters between 24 versus 48-hour testing as measured by wireless pH monitoring and (2) to assess the effect of 48-hour studies on the number of reflux episodes and symptom correlation as compared with 24-hour studies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 124 consecutive patients who underwent 48-hour wireless esophageal pH monitoring studies was prepared. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy using intravenous conscious sedation before wireless capsule placement. Acid reflux variables (including total reflux time, number of reflux episodes, and total percent time of pH<4) and symptom-association probability (SAP) scores were compared for day 1 versus day 2 versus total.

RESULTS

Forty-eight-hour SAP scores were significantly higher when compared with the first 24 hours for all reported primary symptoms. SAP scores were calculated at 24 and 48 hours, respectively for heartburn (56 vs. 65, P<0.0001), regurgitation (65 vs. 80, P<0.0001), chest pain (59 vs. 78, P=0.0009), and cough (55 vs. 64, P=0.0027). In addition, the percentage of SAP scores >95 was significantly higher for both heartburn and regurgitation (34% vs. 48%, P=0.003 and 38% vs. 62%, P=0.005). As expected, 48-hour testing also captured a significantly higher number of reflux episodes as compared with day 1 results alone (97 vs. 47, P<0.0001). There were no statistical differences noted between the 2 days for total percent time of pH <4.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-eight-hour wireless (Bravo) pH monitoring strengthens symptom correlation as compared with 24-hour results alone and yields a greater percentage of SAP scores >95 for typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Prolonged recording of patient symptoms and/or sedation effects may account for the better symptom correlation. Although there were no statistical differences seen in this study between 24 and 48-hour studies for total percent time pH <4, 48-hour studies captured significantly more reflux episodes as compared with 24 hours of monitoring alone. These results suggest that patients undergoing wireless pH monitoring should have 48-hour studies performed as a standard of practice.