Liver, pancreas and small bowel transplantation: current ethical issues

Current Challenges in Pancreas and Islet Transplantation: A Scoping Review

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β-cells, necessitating insulin therapy to prevent life-threatening complications such as diabetic ketoacidosis. Despite advancements in glucose monitoring and pharmacological treatments, managing this disease remains challenging, often leading to long-term complications and psychological burdens, including diabetes distress. Advanced treatment options, such as whole-pancreas transplantation and islet transplantation, aim to restore insulin production and improve glucose control in selected patients with diabetes. The risk of transplant rejection necessitates immunosuppressive therapy, which increases susceptibility to infections and other adverse effects. Additionally, surgical complications, including infection and bleeding, are significant concerns, particularly for whole-pancreas transplantation. Recently, stem cell-derived therapies for type 1 diabetes have emerged as a promising alternative, offering potential solutions to overcome the limitations of formerly established transplantation methods. The purpose of this scoping review was to: (1) summarize the current evidence on achieved insulin independence following various transplantation methods of insulin-producing cells in patients with type 1 diabetes; (2) compare insulin independence rates among whole-pancreas transplantation, islet cell transplantation, and stem cell transplantation; and (3) identify limitations, challenges and potential future directions associated with these techniques. We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to November 2024, focusing on English-language, peer-reviewed clinical studies. The search terms used were 'transplantation' AND 'type 1 diabetes' AND 'insulin independence'. Studies were included if they reported on achieved insulin independence, involved more than 10 patients with type 1 diabetes, and had a mean follow-up period of at least one year. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data on transplant type, study population size, follow-up duration, and insulin independence rates. We identified 1380 papers, and after removing duplicates, 705 papers remained for title and abstract screening. A total of 139 English-language papers were retrieved for full-text review, of which 48 studies were included in this review. The findings of this scoping review indicate a growing body of literature on transplantation therapy for type 1 diabetes. However, significant limitations and challenges, like insufficient rates of achieved insulin independence, risks related to immunosuppression, malignant diseases, and ethical issues remain with each of the established techniques, highlighting the need for innovative approaches such as stem cell-derived islet transplantation to promote β-cell regeneration and protection.

Pancreatic transplant surgery and stem cell therapy: Finding the balance between therapeutic advances and ethical principles

The latest achievements in the field of pancreas transplantation and stem cell therapy require an effort by the scientific community to clarify the ethical implications of pioneering treatments, often characterized by high complexity from a surgical point of view, due to transplantation of multiple organs at the same time or at different times, and from an immunological point of view for stem cell therapy. The fundamental value in the field of organ transplants is, of course, a solidarity principle, namely that of protecting the health and life of people for whom transplantation is a condition of functional recovery, or even of survival. The nature of this value is that of a concept to which the legal discipline of transplants entrusts its own ethical dignity and for which it has ensured a constitutional recognition in different systems. The general principle of respect for human life, both of the donor and of the recipient, evokes the need not to put oneself and one’s neighbor in dangerous conditions. The present ethical reflection aims to find a balance between the latest therapeutic advances and several concepts including the idea of the person, the respect due to the dead, the voluntary nature of the donation and the consent to the same, the gratuitousness of the donation, the scientific progress and the development of surgical techniques, and the policies of health promotion.