Complications of endoscopic resection techniques for upper GI tract lesions

Risk of tuberculosis after endoscopic resection and gastrectomy in gastric cancer: nationwide population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the association between gastrectomy and endoscopic resection for gastric cancer and the subsequent tuberculosis incidence.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide matched cohort study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service from 2013 to 2019. We created two cohorts: patients who underwent gastrectomy and those who had endoscopic resection. Each patient was matched 1:1 with an unexposed individual based on index year, age, sex, income, and various comorbidities. The primary outcome was the incidence of tuberculosis during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Our study comprised 90,886 gastrectomy patients and 46,759 endoscopic resection patients. The tuberculosis incidence was significantly higher in the gastrectomy group compared to its matched non-gastrectomy group (IRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.43-1.99, p < .001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in tuberculosis incidence between the endoscopic resection group and its matched non-resection group (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.19, p = 0.627). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence also did not differ between the two groups. However, tuberculosis incidence significantly increased in the first year after endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSION

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with a higher incidence of subsequent tuberculosis, while no significant association was observed for endoscopic resection. However, tuberculosis incidence increases significantly during the first year after endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of  > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.

Recent approach for preventing complications in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment method for upper gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, patients undergoing upper GI ESD sometimes fall into a serious condition from complications. Thus, it is important to fully understand how to prevent complications when performing upper GI ESD. One of the major complications in esophageal and gastric ESD is intraoperative perforation. To prevent this complication, blind dissection should be avoided. Traction-assisted ESD is a useful technique for maintaining good endoscopic view. This method was proven to reduce the incidence of intraoperative perforation, which would become a standard technique in esophageal and gastric ESD. In gastric ESD, delayed bleeding is the most common complication. Recently, a novel prediction model (BEST-J score) consisting of 10 factors with four risk categories for delayed bleeding in gastric ESD was established, and a free mobile application is now available. For reducing delayed bleeding in gastric ESD, vonoprazan ≥20 mg/day is the sole reliable method in the current status. Duodenal ESD is still challenging with a much higher frequency of complications, such as perforation and delayed bleeding, than ESD in other organs. However, with the development of improved devices and techniques, the frequency of complications in duodenal ESD has been decreasing. To prevent intraoperative perforation, some ESD techniques, such as using the distal tips of the Clutch Cutter, were developed. An endoscopic mucosal defect closure technique would be mandatory for preventing delayed complications. However, several unresolved issues, including standardization of duodenal ESD, remain and further studies are demanded.

Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer in the West

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In Western countries, its lower prevalence and the absence of mass screening programmes contribute to late diagnosis and a slower implementation of minimally invasive treatments. A secondary prevention strategy through endoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma or by screening gastric cancer within colorectal screening programmes is cost-effective in intermediate-risk countries, though the identification of these patients remains challenging. Virtual chromoendoscopy with narrow-band imaging improves the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, significantly increasing the sensitivity for intestinal metaplasia while preserving specificity. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia is feasible, correlates well with histological staging systems and also with gastric neoplasia risk and can be used to stratify risk. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West achieves efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those reported for Eastern countries, and the long-term disease-specific survival is higher than 95%. A prospective comparative study with gastrectomy confirms its higher safety and its benefits concerning health-related quality of life. However, ESD is associated with a 5% risk of postprocedural bleeding and a 20% risk of non-curative resection. The knowledge of risk factors for adverse events and non-curative resection can improve patient selection. The risk of metachronous lesions after ESD is high (3–5% per year), and endoscopic surveillance is needed. The management of patients with non-curative resection can be optimized using risk scoring systems for lymph node metastasis.

Transarterial embolisation for gastroduodenal bleeding following endoscopic resection

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) is widely used to treat gastrointestinal bleeding. This paper reports the safety and efficacy of TAE for bleeding following endoscopic resection, including endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive patients (13 males, two females; mean age 62.2 years) from two tertiary medical centres who underwent TAE for gastroduodenal bleeding after endoscopic resection from November 2001 to December 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, angiographic findings, and TAE details were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Immediate bleeding during endoscopic resection was noted in four patients. Delayed bleeding 1-30 days after endoscopic resection in nine patients presented with haematochezia (n = 4), haematemesis (n = 6) and melaena (n = 1). Endoscopic haemostasis was attempted in 11 patients (73.3%) but failed due to continued bleeding despite haemostasis (n = 6), failure to secure endoscopic field (n = 3) and unstable vital signs (n = 2). Eleven patients had positive angiographic findings for bleeding, and all bleeding arteries were embolised except one owing to failed superselection of the bleeder. In the other four patients with negative angiographic findings, the left gastric artery with/without the right gastric artery or the accessory left gastric artery was empirically embolised using gelatin sponge particles. Both technical and clinical success rates were 93.3% (14/15). No procedure-related complications occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

TAE is safe and effective in the treatment of immediate and delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection procedures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first and largest 20-year bicentric study published in English on this topic. Empirical TAE for angiographically negative bleeding sites was also effective without significant complications.

Efficacy of a new image-enhancement technique for achieving hemostasis in endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can sometimes be challenging and stressful for the endoscopist. Therefore, we aimed to assess the usefulness of dual red imaging (DRI), a new image enhancement technique that uses 3 wavelengths (540, 600, and 630 nm) to visualize bleeding points and to examine the efficacy of DRI in shortening the time required to achieve hemostasis (hemostasis time) during ESD.

METHODS

DRI and white-light imaging (WLI) were used alternately for managing 378 bleeding events in 97 patients undergoing ESD. Hemostasis time for each hemostasis event was measured. Using portable eye-tracking glasses, 4 experienced endoscopists were shown random videos of intraoperative bleeding during ESD (20 cases each on WLI and DRI) and identified the bleeding point in each video. The mean distances of eye movement per unit of time until the bleeding point were identified in each video and compared between the WLI and DRI groups.

RESULTS

Average hemostasis time was significantly shorter in the DRI group. The mean distance of eye movement was significantly shorter in the DRI group than in the WLI group for all endoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS

DRI can offer useful images to help in clearly detecting bleeding points and in facilitating hemostasis during ESD. It is feasible and may help in successfully performing ESD that is safer and faster than WLI. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000018309.).

Application of a novel self-assembling peptide to prevent hemorrhage after EMR, a feasibility and safety study

Background

A novel self-assembling peptide (SAP) can be applied to the post-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) defect to treat oozing bleedings. It has been suggested to stimulate early healing of damaged vessels. We hypothesized that SAP application could prevent delayed bleeding (DB) after EMR and performed a prospective cohort study to determine feasibility and safety.

Methods

A total of 48 consecutive patients who underwent EMR between June 2018 and August 2019 for large lesions in the esophagus, duodenum (> 1 cm) or colorectum (> 2 cm) were treated with adjuvant SAP application. Duration and ease of SAP application were measured, as well as DB outcome.

Results

The EMR defects of 48 patients were treated with SAP; 17 in the esophagus, 13 in the duodenum and 18 in the colorectum. SAP was easy to apply on the EMR defect with a median duration of 2.0 min. A dose of 3 cc was generally enough to cover a defect between 10 and 50 mm. An exploratory analysis of the prophylactic ability of SAP showed that 15.9% of patients (7/44) treated with SAP still had a DB, mostly in the duodenum (4/11). No adverse events related to gel exposure were reported.

Conclusions

SAP application after EMR was found to be feasible and safe, and did not delay the procedure; however, DB was still relatively common. Future comparative studies are needed to evaluate whether SAP is able to reduce DB after EMR, particularly for lesions with an increased bleeding risk, such as in the duodenum.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07819-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Risk factors for complications after endoscopic treatment in Chinese patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for complications after endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions and provides evidence for developing preventive measures against these complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions treated in the Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College from January 2009 to December 2015 were analyzed. The risk factors related to delayed bleeding, perforation, and stenosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 459 patients, 15 (3.3%) had delayed bleeding, 16 (3.5%) had perforation, and 82 (17.9%) had stenosis. Conservative treatment was performed for patients with bleeding and perforation, and endoscopic dilation was performed to relieve stenosis. The independent risk factors for delayed bleeding were lesion size (OR = 1.51, P = 0.020), circumferential diameter [odds ratio (OR) = 1.24, P = 0.037]. The kind of operation method [endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/cap-based endoscopic resection (EMR-Cap): OR = 15.38, P = 0.013) was the independent risk factor for perforation. The independent predictors of stenosis were circumferential diameter (OR = 1.58, P < 0.001), lesion in the neck (OR = 0.12, P = 0.003), and surgical time (OR = 1.02, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Few complications occur after the endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions which can be treated by endoscopic and conservative medical therapies. Strict operational training is required for ESD treatment.

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk factors for poor short-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now established as the first option to manage early gastric neoplasms, but its efficacy may vary according to diverse factors. We aimed to systematically identify risk factors for poor short-term outcomes of gastric ESD with the purpose to improve patients' selection and management.

METHODS

Three online databases (MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus) were searched (last search on June 2018) for poor outcomes of gastric ESD (deep submucosal invasion, piecemeal/incomplete resection, noncurative resection and local recurrence).

RESULTS

One hundred five studies were included referring to 52.126 ESDs. Undifferentiated histology and upper location (vs lower) were associated with submucosal invasion [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-3.61] and OR = 3.20 (1.04-9.86), respectively] and deep submucosal invasion [OR = 2.98 (2.02-4.39) and OR = 2.35 (1.45-3.81), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm and ulceration were associated with piecemeal resection [OR = 2.78 (1.17-6.60) and OR = 2.76 (1.23, 6.20), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm, ulceration, upper location and fibrosis were risk factors for incomplete resection [OR = 3.83 (2.68-5.49), OR = 4.06 (1.62-10.16), OR = 3.71 (2.49-5.54) and OR = 4.46 (1.66-11.96), respectively]. A noncurative resection was more often observed for lesions located in the upper third of the stomach [OR = 1.49 (1.24-1.79)], depressed morphology [OR = 1.49 (1.04-2.12)] and those outside standard criteria [OR = 3.56 (2.31-5.48)]. Older age was significantly linked with local recurrence rates [OR = 3.08 (1.13-5.02)].

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors influence poor efficacy short-term outcomes of gastric ESD that may be used to inform both patients and health providers about the expected efficacy.

Risk factors for Mallory-Weiss Tear during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Adverse events during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial esophageal neoplasms, such as perforation and bleeding, have been well-documented. However, the Mallory-Weiss Tear (MWT) during esophageal ESD remains under investigation.

AIM

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of the MWT during esophageal ESD.

METHODS

From June 2014 to July 2017, patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms who received ESD in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. Patients were divided into an MWT group and non-MWT group based on whether MWT occurred during ESD. The incidence of MWTs was determined, and the risk factors for MWT were then further explored.

RESULTS

A total of 337 patients with 373 lesions treated by ESD were analyzed. Twenty patients developed MWTs during ESD (5.4%). Multivariate analysis identified that female sex (OR = 5.36, 95%CI: 1.47-19.50, P = 0.011) and procedure time longer than 88.5 min (OR = 3.953, 95%CI: 1.497-10.417, P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for an MWT during ESD. The cutoff value of the procedure time for an MWT was 88.5 min (sensitivity, 65.0%; specificity, 70.8%). Seven of the MWT patients received endoscopic hemostasis. All patients recovered satisfactorily without surgery for the laceration.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MWTs during esophageal ESD was much higher than expected. Although most cases have a benign course, fatal conditions may occur. We recommend inspection of the stomach during and after the ESD procedure for timely management in cases of bleeding MWTs or even perforation outside of the procedure region.

Haemostasis treatment using dual red imaging during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients scheduled to undergo oesophageal, gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are to be investigated to verify the efficacy of dual red imaging (DRI) for establishing haemostasis during ESD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The trial is designed as a multicentre, open-label randomised, parallel-group, controlled intervention study. Registered patients will be randomly assigned to DRI and white light imaging (WLI) groups. In the DRI group, the mucosal incision and submucosal dissection will be performed by WLI, and haemostasis will be managed by DRI when bleeding occurs. In the WLI group, the mucosal incision and submucosal dissection are to be performed by WLI and the haemostasis management is to be performed by WLI. The primary endpoint is the time from the recognition of bleeding up to the achievement of complete haemostasis (haemostasis time). The secondary endpoints are the operation time, the proportion of cases in which perforation occurs, and the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during haemostasis treatment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Keio University Review Board for Clinical Trials (5 December 2016).

DISCUSSION

This will be the first multicentre collaborative research using DRI for haemostasis treatment during ESD. When the safety and simplicity of DRI as a treatment for haemostasis during ESD can be proven, the ESD procedure can be simplified and disseminated more widely in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000025134.

Absence of Complications after Endoscopic Mucosal Biopsy

BACKGROUND

There is no clarity with regard to the occurrence of serious complications from EGD-driven mucosal biopsy. This is important for considering both clinically indicated procedures and mucosal sampling for research.

METHODS

We sought to quantify rates of serious complications from esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy. We studied 13,233 patients undergoing outpatient EGD with biopsy over 5 years in 2 North Dakota community hospitals, based on the reasoning that serious complications would cause hospitalization within 30 days. We reviewed the records of all patients with a diagnostic or procedure code or admission within 30 days after the outpatient EGD with biopsy.

RESULTS

Of the 13,233 patients who underwent outpatient EGD with biopsy, 411 were admitted within 30 days, most of them because of their underlying diagnosis. Two patients were admitted due to complications that resulted because of additional simultaneous procedures. No patient was admitted because of complications that could be ascribed to conscious sedation, upper GI endoscopic access, or mucosal biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that EGD biopsy is safe within community settings and suggest that the risk/benefit ratio for performing EGD biopsy for research is likely to be favorable if the research has scientific merit. Serious complications or perforation following EGD biopsy did not occur in 13,233 patients in community hospitals in North Dakota.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric and duodenal subepithelial lesions using a new, flat-based over-the-scope clip

Background

Surgical resection of upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A new over-the-scope (OTS) clip can be used for endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR). We aimed to prospectively evaluate feasibility and safety of upper GI eFTR with a new, flat-based OTS clip.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a gastric or duodenal SET < 20 mm were prospectively included. After identification of the lesion, the clip was placed and lesions were resected. Patients were followed for 1 month to assess severe adverse events (SAEs); 3–6 months after eFTR, endoscopy was performed.

Results

eFTR was performed on 13 lesions in 12 patients: 7 gastric and 6 duodenal SETs. Technical success was achieved in 11 cases (85%). In all 11 cases, R0-resection was achieved. In all 6 duodenal cases and in one gastric case, FTR was achieved (64%). One SAE (pain) was observed after eFTR of a gastric SET. After eFTR of duodenal SETs, several SAEs were observed: perforation (n = 1), microperforation (n = 3), and hemorrhage (n = 1). During follow-up endoscopy, the clip was no longer in situ in most patients (7 of 10; 70%).

Conclusions

eFTR with this new flat-based OTS clip is feasible and effective. Although gastric eFTR was safe, eFTR in the duodenum was complicated by (micro)perforation in several patients. Therefore, the design of the clip or the technique of resection needs further refinement to improve safety of resection of SET in thin-walled areas such as the duodenum before being applied in clinical practice.

Dutch trial register: NTR5023.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-017-5989-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The safety of endoscopic esophageal procedures under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

With the increasing demand for general anesthesia for endoscopic esophageal procedures, anesthesiologists should understand the clinical characteristics of post-procedural complications (PPCs).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the incidence of and risk factors associated with PPCs of endoscopic esophageal procedures performed under general anesthesia from July 2013 to November 2016. The final analysis included 129 patients; 114 who underwent esophageal endoscopic dissection for esophageal tumors and 15 cases of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Frank perforation during the procedure was defined as an endoscopically recognizable or clinically detected perforation during the procedures. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for PPCs.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PPCs was 19.4% (25/129). All of the PPCs were managed successfully with conservative measures. The most common PPC was symptomatic, radiologically documented atelectasis (11/25, 44.0%), followed by esophageal perforation-related PPCs (symptomatic pneumomediastinum or pneumoperitoneum; 9/25, 36.0%). In the multivariable analysis, frank perforation during the procedure was the only independent risk factor for PPCs (odds ratio, 8.470, 95% CI, 2.051-34.974, P = 0.003). Although frank perforation during the procedure occurred in 13 patients, 38.5% (5/13) of them did not develop any clinical sequelae after their procedures. Compared with patients without PPCs, patients who developed PPCs took longer to their first oral intake and had prolonged hospital stays (P = 0.047 and 0.026, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic perforation during endoscopic esophageal procedures under general anesthesia was the only independent risk factor for PPCs; therefore, proactive measures and close follow-up are necessary.