1
|
Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel K, Fowler P, Frutos Fernandez MJ, Fürst P, Gundert‐Remy U, Gürtler R, Husøy T, Manco M, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Passamonti S, Shah R, Waalkens‐Berendsen I, Wölfle D, Corsini E, Cubadda F, De Groot D, FitzGerald R, Gunnare S, Gutleb AC, Mast J, Mortensen A, Oomen A, Piersma A, Plichta V, Ulbrich B, Van Loveren H, Benford D, Bignami M, Bolognesi C, Crebelli R, Dusinska M, Marcon F, Nielsen E, Schlatter J, Vleminckx C, Barmaz S, Carfí M, Civitella C, Giarola A, Rincon AM, Serafimova R, Smeraldi C, Tarazona J, Tard A, Wright M. Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive. EFSA J 2021; 19:e06585. [PMID: 33976718 PMCID: PMC8101360 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico-chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut-off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. Based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ng H, Becirovic Agic M, Hultström M, Isackson H. Optimal cutting temperature medium embedding and cryostat sectioning are valid for cardiac myofilament function assessment. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2020; 319:H235-H241. [PMID: 32469635 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00194.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
To maximize data obtainment from valuable cardiac tissue, we hypothesized that myocardium fixed in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) medium for histology could also be used to investigate the function of myofilament proteins in situ. We compared tissue prepared via conventional liquid nitrogen (LN) snap freezing with tissue fixed in OCT and then sectioned in fiber-parallel orientation. We found that actin-myosin Ca2+ sensitivity, activation rate by Ca2+, cooperativity along the thin filament, as well as cross-bridge cycling rate were unaffected by OCT storage and could reliably be interpreted after sectioning. Absolute values in maximum force generation per cross-sectional area, as well as passive strain, are difficult to investigate after sectioning, as myofibrillar continuity along the preparation cannot be guaranteed. We have shown that myocardial tissue stored in OCT and sectioned before analysis is available for functional analysis, a valuable means of maximizing usage of precious cardiac biopsies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Myocardial tissue in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) fixation and cryostat sectioning was tested as a means of storing and preparing tissue for myofilament function analysis in relation to conventional liquid nitrogen freezing and dissection. Actomyosin interaction, Ca2+ force activation, and passive compliance were tested. The study concluded that OCT storage and cryostat sectioning do not interfere with the actomyosin cross-bridge dynamics or Ca2+ activation but that absolute tension values suffer and may not be investigated by this method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ng
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Integrative Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden
| | - Mediha Becirovic Agic
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Integrative Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden
| | - Michael Hultström
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Integrative Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Henrik Isackson
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Integrative Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|