Rotation-Activated and Cooperative Zipping Characterize Class I Viral Fusion Protein Dynamics

The interaction of viral fusion peptides with lipid membranes

In this paper, we studied fusogenic peptides of class I-III fusion proteins, which are relevant to membrane fusion for certain enveloped viruses, in contact with model lipid membranes. We resolved the vertical structure and examined the adsorption or penetration behavior of the fusogenic peptides at phospholipid Langmuir monolayers with different initial surface pressures with x-ray reflectometry. We show that the fusion loops of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) glycoprotein E and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G-protein are not able to insert deeply into model lipid membranes, as they adsorbed mainly underneath the headgroups with only limited penetration depths into the lipid films. In contrast, we observed that the hemagglutinin 2 fusion peptide (HA2-FP) and the VSV-transmembrane domain (VSV-TMD) can penetrate deeply into the membranes. However, in the case of VSV-TMD, the penetration was suppressed already at low surface pressures, whereas HA2-FP was able to insert even into highly compressed films. Membrane fusion is accompanied by drastic changes of the membrane curvature. To investigate how the peptides affect the curvature of model lipid membranes, we examined the effect of the fusogenic peptides on the equilibration of cubic monoolein structures after a phase transition from a lamellar state induced by an abrupt hydrostatic pressure reduction. We monitored this process in presence and absence of the peptides with small-angle x-ray scattering and found that HA2-FP and VSV-TMD drastically accelerate the equilibration, while the fusion loops of TBEV and VSV stabilize the swollen state of the lipid structures. In this work, we show that the class I fusion peptide of HA2 penetrates deeply into the hydrophobic region of membranes and is able to promote and accelerate the formation of negative curvature. In contrast, we found that the class II and III fusion loops of TBEV and VSV tend to counteract negative membrane curvature.

Coronavirus rotational diffusivity

Just 11 weeks after the confirmation of first infection, one team had already discovered and published [D. Wrapp et al., "Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation," Science 367(6483), 1260-1263 (2020)] in exquisite detail about the new coronavirus, along with how it differs from previous viruses. We call the virus particle causing the COVID-19 disease SARS-CoV-2, a spherical capsid covered with spikes termed peplomers. Since the virus is not motile, it relies on its own random thermal motion, specifically the rotational component of this thermal motion, to align its peplomers with targets. The governing transport property for the virus to attack successfully is thus the rotational diffusivity. Too little rotational diffusivity and too few alignments are produced to properly infect. Too much, and the alignment intervals will be too short to properly infect, and the peplomer is wasted. In this paper, we calculate the rotational diffusivity along with the complex viscosity of four classes of virus particles of ascending geometric complexity: tobacco mosaic, gemini, adeno, and corona. The gemini and adeno viruses share icosahedral bead arrangements, and for the corona virus, we use polyhedral solutions to the Thomson problem to arrange its peplomers. We employ general rigid bead-rod theory to calculate complex viscosities and rotational diffusivities, from first principles, of the virus suspensions. We find that our ab initio calculations agree with the observed complex viscosity of the tobacco mosaic virus suspension. From our analysis of the gemini virus suspension, we learn that the fine detail of the virus structure governs its rotational diffusivity. We find the characteristic time for the adenovirus from general rigid bead-rod theory. Finally, from our analysis of the coronavirus suspension, we learn that its rotational diffusivity descends monotonically with its number of peplomers.

Elongation factor-Tu can repetitively engage aminoacyl-tRNA within the ribosome during the proofreading stage of tRNA selection

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) facilitates rapid and accurate selection of aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) by the bacterial ribosome during protein synthesis. We show that EF-Tu dissociates from the ribosome as aa-tRNA navigates the accommodation corridor en route to peptide bond formation. We find that EF-Tu’s release from the ribosome during aa-tRNA selection can be reversible. We also demonstrate that new ternary complex formation, accompanied by futile cycles of GTP hydrolysis, can occur on aa-tRNA bound within the ribosome. These findings inform on the decoding mechanism, the contributions of EF-Tu to the fidelity of translation, and the potential consequences of reduced rates of peptide bond formation on cellular physiology.

The substrate for ribosomes actively engaged in protein synthesis is a ternary complex of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), and GTP. EF-Tu plays a critical role in mRNA decoding by increasing the rate and fidelity of aa-tRNA selection at each mRNA codon. Here, using three-color single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging and molecular dynamics simulations, we examine the timing and role of conformational events that mediate the release of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu and EF-Tu from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis. Our investigations reveal that conformational changes in EF-Tu coordinate the rate-limiting passage of aa-tRNA through the accommodation corridor en route to the peptidyl transferase center of the large ribosomal subunit. Experiments using distinct inhibitors of the accommodation process further show that aa-tRNA must at least partially transit the accommodation corridor for EF-Tu⋅GDP to release. aa-tRNAs failing to undergo peptide bond formation at the end of accommodation corridor passage after EF-Tu release can be reengaged by EF-Tu⋅GTP from solution, coupled to GTP hydrolysis. These observations suggest that additional rounds of ternary complex formation can occur on the ribosome during proofreading, particularly when peptide bond formation is slow, which may serve to increase both the rate and fidelity of protein synthesis at the expense of GTP hydrolysis.

Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Supports Independent Membrane-Interfacial Fusion Peptide and Transmembrane Domains in Subunit 2 of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Protein, a Structured and Aqueous-Protected Connection between the Fusion Peptide and Soluble Ectodomain, and the Importance of Membrane Apposition by the Trimer-of-Hairpins Structure

The influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein has HA1 and HA2 subunits, which form an initial complex. HA1's bind host cell sialic acids, which triggers endocytosis, HA1/HA2 separation, and HA2-mediated fusion between virus and endosome membranes. We report hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) on the HA2 subunit without HA1. HA2 contains the fusion peptide (FP), soluble ectodomain (SE), transmembrane domain (TM), and endodomain. FP is a monomer by itself, while SE is a trimer of hairpins that includes an interior bundle of residue 38-105 helices, turns, and residue 154-178 strands packed antiparallel to the bundle. FP and TM extend from the same side of the SE hairpin, and fusion models often depict a FP/TM complex with membrane traversal of both domains that is important for membrane pore expansion. The HDX-MS data of this study do not support this complex and instead support independent FP and TM with respective membrane-interfacial and traversal locations. The data also show a low level of aqueous exposure of the 22-38 segment, consistent with retention of the 23-35 antiparallel β sheet observed in the initial HA1/HA2 complex. We propose the β sheet as a semirigid connector between FP and SE that enables close membrane apposition prior to fusion. The I173E mutant exhibits greater exchange for residues 22-69 and 150-191, consistent with dissociation of SE C-terminal strands from interior N-helices. Similar trends are observed for the G1E mutant as well as less exchange for G1E FP. Fusion is highly impaired with either mutant, which correlates with reduced membrane apposition and, for G1E, FP binding to SE rather than the target membrane.