Minimal Network Topologies for Signal Processing during Collective Cell Chemotaxis

Differential cell motion: A mathematical model of anterior posterior sorting

Here, we investigate how a subpopulation of cells can move through an aggregate of cells. Using a stochastic force-based model of Dictyostelium discoideum when the population is forming a slug, we simulate different strategies for prestalk cells to reliably move to the front of the slug while omitting interaction with the substrate thus ignoring the overall motion of the slug. Of the mechanisms that we simulated, prestalk cells being more directed is the best strategy followed by increased asymmetric motive forces for prestalk cells. The lifetime of the cell adhesion molecules, while not enough to produce differential motion, did modulate the results of the strategies employed. Finally, understanding and simulating the appropriate boundary conditions are essential to correctly predict the motion.

Picking winners in cell-cell collisions: Wetting, speed, and contact

Groups of eukaryotic cells can coordinate their crawling motion to follow cues more effectively, stay together, or invade new areas. This collective cell migration depends on cell-cell interactions, which are often studied by colliding pairs of cells together. Can the outcome of these collisions be predicted? Recent experiments on trains of colliding epithelial cells suggest that cells with a smaller contact angle to the surface or larger speeds are more likely to maintain their direction ("win") upon collision. When should we expect shape or speed to correlate with the outcome of a collision? To investigate this question, we build a model for two-cell collisions within the phase field framework, which allows for cell shape changes. We can reproduce the observation that cells with high speed and small contact angles are more likely to win with two different assumptions for how cells interact: (1) velocity aligning, in which we hypothesize that cells sense their own velocity and align to it over a finite timescale, and (2) front-front contact repolarization, where cells polarize away from cell-cell contact, akin to contact inhibition of locomotion. Surprisingly, though we simulate collisions between cells with widely varying properties, in each case, the probability of a cell winning is completely captured by a single summary variable: its relative speed (in the velocity-aligning model) or its relative contact angle (in the contact repolarization model). Both models are currently consistent with reported experimental results, but they can be distinguished by varying cell contact angle and speed through orthogonal perturbations.

Collective gradient sensing with limited positional information

Eukaryotic cells sense chemical gradients to decide where and when to move. Clusters of cells can sense gradients more accurately than individual cells by integrating measurements of the concentration made across the cluster. Is this gradient-sensing accuracy impeded when cells have limited knowledge of their position within the cluster, i.e., limited positional information? We apply maximum likelihood estimation to study gradient-sensing accuracy of a cluster of cells with finite positional information. If cells must estimate their location within the cluster, this lowers the accuracy of collective gradient sensing. We compare our results with a tug-of-war model where cells respond to the gradient by polarizing away from their neighbors without relying on their positional information. As the cell positional uncertainty increases, there is a trade-off where the tug-of-war model responds more accurately to the chemical gradient. However, for sufficiently large cell clusters or sufficiently shallow chemical gradients, the tug-of-war model will always be suboptimal to one that integrates information from all cells, even if positional uncertainty is high.

Simple Rho GTPase Dynamics Generate a Complex Regulatory Landscape Associated with Cell Shape

Migratory cells exhibit a variety of morphologically distinct responses to their environments that manifest in their cell shape. Some protrude uniformly to increase substrate contacts, others are broadly contractile, some polarize to facilitate migration, and yet others exhibit mixtures of these responses. Prior studies have identified a discrete collection of shapes that the majority of cells display and demonstrated that activity levels of the cytoskeletal regulators Rac1 and RhoA GTPase regulate those shapes. Here, we use computational modeling to assess whether known GTPase dynamics can give rise to a sufficient diversity of spatial signaling states to explain the observed shapes. Results show that the combination of autoactivation and mutually antagonistic cross talk between GTPases, along with the conservative membrane binding, generates a wide array of distinct homogeneous and polarized regulatory phenotypes that arise for fixed model parameters. From a theoretical perspective, these results demonstrate that simple GTPase dynamics can generate complex multistability in which six distinct stable steady states (three homogeneous and three polarized) coexist for a fixed set of parameters, each of which naturally maps to an observed morphology. From a biological perspective, although we do not explicitly model the cytoskeleton or resulting cell morphologies, these results, along with prior literature linking GTPase activity to cell morphology, support the hypothesis that GTPase signaling dynamics can generate the broad morphological characteristics observed in many migratory cell populations. Further, the observed diversity may be the result of cells populating a complex morphological landscape generated by GTPase regulation rather than being the result of intrinsic cell-cell variation. These results demonstrate that Rho GTPases may have a central role in regulating the broad characteristics of cell shape (e.g., expansive, contractile, polarized, etc.) and that shape heterogeneity may be (at least partly) a reflection of the rich signaling dynamics regulating the cytoskeleton rather than intrinsic cell heterogeneity.

Clustered cell migration: Modeling the model system of Drosophila border cells

In diverse developmental contexts, certain cells must migrate to fulfill their roles. Many questions remain unanswered about the genetic and physical properties that govern cell migration. While the simplest case of a single cell moving alone has been well-studied, additional complexities arise in considering how cohorts of cells move together. Significant differences exist between models of collectively migrating cells. We explore the experimental model of migratory border cell clusters in Drosophila melanogaster egg chambers, which are amenable to direct observation and precise genetic manipulations. This system involves two special characteristics that are worthy of attention: border cell clusters contain a limited number of both migratory and non-migratory cells that require coordination, and they navigate through a heterogeneous three-dimensional microenvironment. First, we review how clusters of motile border cells are specified and guided in their migration by chemical signals and the physical impact of adjacent tissue interactions. In the second part, we examine questions around the 3D structure of the motile cluster and surrounding microenvironment in understanding the limits to cluster size and speed of movement through the egg chamber. Mathematical models have identified sufficient gene regulatory networks for specification, the key forces that capture emergent behaviors observed in vivo, the minimal regulatory topologies for signaling, and the distribution of key signaling cues that direct cell behaviors. This interdisciplinary approach to studying border cells is likely to reveal governing principles that apply to different types of cell migration events.

Collective gradient sensing and chemotaxis: modeling and recent developments

Cells measure a vast variety of signals, from their environment's stiffness to chemical concentrations and gradients; physical principles strongly limit how accurately they can do this. However, when many cells work together, they can cooperate to exceed the accuracy of any single cell. In this topical review, I will discuss the experimental evidence showing that cells collectively sense gradients of many signal types, and the models and physical principles involved. I also propose new routes by which experiments and theory can expand our understanding of these problems.