Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Histone Proteins in Cells: Role in Chromatin Organization

Fundamental Aspects of Phase-Separated Biomolecular Condensates

Biomolecular condensates, formed through phase separation, are upending our understanding in much of molecular, cell, and developmental biology. There is an urgent need to elucidate the physicochemical foundations of the behaviors and properties of biomolecular condensates. Here we aim to fill this need by writing a comprehensive, critical, and accessible review on the fundamental aspects of phase-separated biomolecular condensates. We introduce the relevant theoretical background, present the theoretical basis for the computation and experimental measurement of condensate properties, and give mechanistic interpretations of condensate behaviors and properties in terms of interactions at the molecular and residue levels.

Epigenetic marks uniquely tune the material properties of HP1α condensates

Biomolecular condensates have emerged as a powerful new paradigm in cell biology with broad implications to human health and disease, particularly in the nucleus where phase separation is thought to underly elements of chromatin organization and regulation. Specifically, it has been recently reported that phase separation of heterochromatin protein 1alpha (HP1α) with DNA contributes to the formation of condensed chromatin states. HP1α localization to heterochromatic regions is mediated by its binding to specific repressive marks on the tail of histone H3, such as trimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3K9me3). However, whether epigenetic marks play an active role in modulating the material properties of HP1α and dictating emergent functions of its condensates remains to be understood. Here, we leverage a reductionist system, composed of modified and unmodified histone H3 peptides, HP1α, and DNA, to examine the contribution of specific epigenetic marks to phase behavior of HP1α. We show that the presence of histone peptides bearing the repressive H3K9me3 is compatible with HP1α condensates, whereas peptides containing unmodified residues or bearing the transcriptional activation mark H3K4me3 are incompatible with HP1α phase separation. Using fluorescence microscopy and rheological approaches, we further demonstrate that H3K9me3 histone peptides modulate the dynamics and viscoelastic network properties of HP1α condensates in a concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, in cells exposed to uniaxial strain, we find there to be a decreased ratio of nuclear H3K9me3 to HP1α. These data suggest that HP1α-DNA condensates are viscoelastic materials, whose properties may provide an explanation for the dynamic behavior of heterochromatin in cells and in response to mechanostimulation.

Mechanism of phase condensation for chromosome architecture and function

Chromosomal phase separation is involved in a broad spectrum of chromosome organization and functional processes. Nonetheless, the intricacy of this process has left its molecular mechanism unclear. Here, we introduce the principles governing phase separation and its connections to physiological roles in this context. Our primary focus is contrasting two phase separation mechanisms: self-association-induced phase separation (SIPS) and bridging-induced phase separation (BIPS). We provide a comprehensive discussion of the distinct features characterizing these mechanisms and offer illustrative examples that suggest their broad applicability. With a detailed understanding of these mechanisms, we explore their associations with nucleosomes and chromosomal biological functions. This comprehensive review contributes to the exploration of uncharted territory in the intricate interplay between chromosome architecture and function.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in DNA and chromatin systems from the perspective of colloid physical chemistry

DNA is a highly charged polyelectrolyte and is prone to associative phase separation driven by the presence of multivalent cations, charged surfactants, proteins, polymers and colloids. The process of DNA phase separation induced by positively charged species is often called DNA condensation. Generally, it refers to either intramolecular DNA compaction (coil-globule transition) or intermolecular DNA aggregation with macroscopic phase separation, but the formation of a DNA liquid crystalline system is also displayed. This has traditionally been described by polyelectrolyte theory and qualitative (Flory-Huggins-based) polymer theory approaches. DNA in the cell nucleus is packed into chromatin wound around the histone octamer (a protein complex comprising two copies each of the four histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) to form nucleosomes separated by linker DNA. During the last decade, the phenomenon of the formation of biomolecular condensates (dynamic droplets) by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has emerged as a generally important mechanism for the formation of membraneless organelles from proteins, nucleic acids and their complexes. DNA and chromatin droplet formation through LLPS has recently received much attention by in vitro as well as in vivo studies that established the importance of this for compartmentalisation in the cell nucleus. Here, we review DNA and chromatin LLPS from a general colloid physical chemistry perspective. We start with a general discussion of colloidal phase separation in aqueous solutions and review the original (pre-LLPS era) work on DNA (macroscopic) phase separation for simpler systems with DNA in the presence of multivalent cations and well-defined surfactants and colloids. Following that, we discuss and illustrate the similarities of such macroscopic phase separation with the general behaviour of LLPS droplet formation by associative phase separation for DNA-protein systems, including chromatin; we also note cases of segregative association. The review ends with a discussion of chromatin LLPS in vivo and its physiological significance.

Molecular Crowding: The History and Development of a Scientific Paradigm

It is now generally accepted that macromolecules do not act in isolation but "live" in a crowded environment, that is, an environment populated by numerous different molecules. The field of molecular crowding has its origins in the far 80s but became accepted only by the end of the 90s. In the present issue, we discuss various aspects that are influenced by crowding and need to consider its effects. This Review is meant as an introduction to the theme and an analysis of the evolution of the crowding concept through time from colloidal and polymer physics to a more biological perspective. We introduce themes that will be more thoroughly treated in other Reviews of the present issue. In our intentions, each Review may stand by itself, but the complete collection has the aspiration to provide different but complementary perspectives to propose a more holistic view of molecular crowding.

Imaging analysis of six human histone H1 variants reveals universal enrichment of H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 at the nuclear periphery and nucleolar H1X presence

Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.

Liquid-liquid phase separation of H3K27me3 reader BP1 regulates transcriptional repression

BACKGROUND

Bromo-adjacent homology-plant homeodomain domain containing protein 1 (BP1) is a reader of histone post-translational modifications in fungi. BP1 recognizes trimethylation of lysine 27 in histone H3 (H3K27me3), an epigenetic hallmark of gene silencing. However, whether and how BP1 participates in transcriptional repression remains poorly understood.

RESULTS

We report that BP1 forms phase-separated liquid condensates to modulate its biological function in Fusarium graminearum. Deletion assays reveal that intrinsically disordered region 2 (IDR2) of BP1 mediates its liquid-liquid phase separation. The phase separation of BP1 is indispensable for its interaction with suppressor of Zeste 12, a component of polycomb repressive complex 2. Furthermore, IDR2 deletion abolishes BP1-H3K27me3 binding and alleviates the transcriptional repression of secondary metabolism-related genes, especially deoxynivalenol mycotoxin biosynthesis genes.

CONCLUSIONS

BP1 maintains transcriptional repression by forming liquid-liquid phase-separated condensates, expanding our understanding of the relationship between post-translational modifications and liquid-liquid phase separation.

Sequestration within peptide coacervates improves the fluorescence intensity, kinetics, and limits of detection of dye-based DNA biosensors

Peptide-based liquid-liquid phase separated domains, or coacervates, are a biomaterial gaining new interest due to their exciting potential in fields ranging from biosensing to drug delivery. In this study, we demonstrate that coacervates provide a simple and biocompatible medium to improve nucleic acid biosensors through the sequestration of both the biosensor and target strands within the coacervate, thereby increasing their local concentration. Using the well-established polyarginine (R9) - ATP coacervate system and an energy transfer-based DNA molecular beacon we observed three key improvements: i) a greater than 20-fold reduction of the limit of detection within coacervates when compared to control buffer solutions; ii) an increase in the kinetics, equilibrium was reached more than 4-times faster in coacervates; and iii) enhancement in the dye fluorescent quantum yields within the coacervates, resulting in greater signal-to-noise. The observed benefits translate into coacervates greatly improving bioassay functionality.

Chromosome compartmentalization: causes, changes, consequences, and conundrums

The spatial segregation of the genome into compartments is a major feature of 3D genome organization. New data on mammalian chromosome organization across different conditions reveal important information about how and why these compartments form and change. A combination of epigenetic state, nuclear body tethering, physical forces, gene expression, and replication timing (RT) can all influence the establishment and alteration of chromosome compartments. We review the causes and implications of genomic regions undergoing a 'compartment switch' that changes their physical associations and spatial location in the nucleus. About 20-30% of genomic regions change compartment during cell differentiation or cancer progression, whereas alterations in response to a stimulus within a cell type are usually much more limited. However, even a change in 1-2% of genomic bins may have biologically relevant implications. Finally, we review the effects of compartment changes on gene regulation, DNA damage repair, replication, and the physical state of the cell.

Doxorubicin catalyses self-assembly of p53 by phase separation

Liquid-liquid phase separation plays a crucial role in cellular physiology, as it leads to the formation of membrane-less organelles in response to various internal stimuli, contributing to various cellular functions. However, the influence of exogenous stimuli on this process in the context of disease intervention remains unexplored. In this current investigation, we explore the impact of doxorubicin on the abnormal self-assembly of p53 using a combination of biophysical and imaging techniques. Additionally, we shed light on the potential mechanisms behind chemoresistance in cancer cells carrying mutant p53. Our findings reveal that doxorubicin co-localizes with both wild-type p53 (WTp53) and its mutant variants. Our in vitro experiments indicate that doxorubicin interacts with the N-terminal-deleted form of WTp53 (WTp53ΔNterm), inducing liquid-liquid phase separation, ultimately leading to protein aggregation. Notably, the p53 variants at the R273 position exhibit a propensity for phase separation even in the absence of doxorubicin, highlighting the destabilizing effects of point mutations at this position. The strong interaction between doxorubicin and p53 variants, along with its localization within the protein condensates, provides a potential explanation for the development of chemotherapy resistance. Collectively, our cellular and in vitro studies emphasize the role of exogenous agents in driving phase separation-mediated p53 aggregation.

Modified histone peptides uniquely tune the material properties of HP1α condensates

Biomolecular condensates have emerged as a powerful new paradigm in cell biology with broad implications to human health and disease, particularly in the nucleus where phase separation is thought to underly elements of chromatin organization and regulation. Specifically, it has been recently reported that phase separation of heterochromatin protein 1alpha (HP1α) with DNA contributes to the formation of condensed chromatin states. HP1α localization to heterochromatic regions is mediated by its binding to specific repressive marks on the tail of histone H3, such as trimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3K9me3). However, whether epigenetic marks play an active role in modulating the material properties of HP1α and dictating emergent functions of its condensates, remains only partially understood. Here, we leverage a reductionist system, comprised of modified and unmodified histone H3 peptides, HP1α and DNA to examine the contribution of specific epigenetic marks to phase behavior of HP1α. We show that the presence of histone peptides bearing the repressive H3K9me3 is compatible with HP1α condensates, while peptides containing unmodified residues or bearing the transcriptional activation mark H3K4me3 are incompatible with HP1α phase separation. In addition, inspired by the decreased ratio of nuclear H3K9me3 to HP1α detected in cells exposed to uniaxial strain, using fluorescence microscopy and rheological approaches we demonstrate that H3K9me3 histone peptides modulate the dynamics and network properties of HP1α condensates in a concentration dependent manner. These data suggest that HP1α-DNA condensates are viscoelastic materials, whose properties may provide an explanation for the dynamic behavior of heterochromatin in cells in response to mechanostimulation.

Physiology and pharmacological targeting of phase separation

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in biology describes a process by which proteins form membraneless condensates within a cellular compartment when conditions are met, including the concentration and posttranslational modifications of the protein components, the condition of the aqueous solution (pH, ionic strength, pressure, and temperature), and the existence of assisting factors (such as RNAs or other proteins). In these supramolecular liquid droplet-like inclusion bodies, molecules are held together through weak intermolecular and/or intramolecular interactions. With the aid of LLPS, cells can assemble functional sub-units within a given cellular compartment by enriching or excluding specific factors, modulating cellular function, and rapidly responding to environmental or physiological cues. Hence, LLPS is emerging as an important means to regulate biology and physiology. Yet, excessive inclusion body formation by, for instance, higher-than-normal concentrations or mutant forms of the protein components could result in the conversion from dynamic liquid condensates into more rigid gel- or solid-like aggregates, leading to the disruption of the organelle's function followed by the development of human disorders like neurodegenerative diseases. In summary, well-controlled formation and de-formation of LLPS is critical for normal biology and physiology from single cells to individual organisms, whereas abnormal LLPS is involved in the pathophysiology of human diseases. In turn, targeting these aggregates or their formation represents a promising approach in treating diseases driven by abnormal LLPS including those neurodegenerative diseases that lack effective therapies.

Macromolecular Crowding and DNA: Bridging the Gap between In Vitro and In Vivo

The cellular environment is highly crowded, with up to 40% of the volume fraction of the cell occupied by various macromolecules. Most laboratory experiments take place in dilute buffer solutions; by adding various synthetic or organic macromolecules, researchers have begun to bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo measurements. This is a review of the reported effects of macromolecular crowding on the compaction and extension of DNA, the effect of macromolecular crowding on DNA kinetics, and protein-DNA interactions. Theoretical models related to macromolecular crowding and DNA are briefly reviewed. Gaps in the literature, including the use of biologically relevant crowders, simultaneous use of multi-sized crowders, empirical connections between macromolecular crowding and liquid-liquid phase separation of nucleic materials are discussed.

Heterochromatin organization and phase separation

The eukaryotic nucleus displays a variety of membraneless compartments with distinct biomolecular composition and specific cellular activities. Emerging evidence indicates that protein-based liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) plays an essential role in the formation and dynamic regulation of heterochromatin compartmentalization. This feature is especially conspicuous at the pericentric heterochromatin domains. In this review, we will describe our understanding of heterochromatin organization and LLPS. In addition, we will highlight the increasing importance of multivalent weak homo- and heteromolecular interactions in LLPS-mediated heterochromatin compartmentalization in the complex environment inside living cells.

Transcription factor condensates and signaling driven transcription

Transcription Factor (TF) condensates are a heterogenous mix of RNA, DNA, and multiple co-factor proteins capable of modulating the transcriptional response of the cell. The dynamic nature and the spatial location of TF-condensates in the 3D nuclear space is believed to provide a fast response, which is on the same pace as the signaling cascade and yet ever-so-specific in the crowded environment of the nucleus. However, the current understanding of how TF-condensates can achieve these feet so quickly and efficiently is still unclear. In this review, we draw parallels with other protein condensates and share our speculations on how the nucleus uses these TF-condensates to achieve high transcriptional specificity and fidelity. We discuss the various constituents of TF-condensates, their properties, and the known and unknown functions of TF-condensates with a particular focus on steroid signaling-induced transcriptional programs.

Through the lens of phase separation: intrinsically unstructured protein and chromatin looping

The establishment, maintenance and dynamic regulation of three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structures provide an important means for partitioning of genome into functionally distinctive domains, which helps to define specialized gene expression programs associated with developmental stages and cell types. Increasing evidence supports critical roles for intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) harbored within transcription factors (TFs) and chromatin-modulatory proteins in inducing phase separation, a phenomenon of forming membrane-less condensates through partitioning of biomolecules. Such a process is also critically involved in the establishment of high-order chromatin structures and looping. IDR- and phase separation-driven 3D genome (re)organization often goes wrong in disease such as cancer. This review discusses about recent advances in understanding how phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) modulates chromatin looping and gene expression.

Impact of Ion-Mixing Entropy on Orientational Preferences of DNA Helices: FRET Measurements and Computer Simulations

Biological processes require DNA and RNA helices to pack together in specific interhelical orientations. While electrostatic repulsion between backbone charges is expected to be maximized when helices are in parallel alignment, such orientations are commonplace in nature. To better understand how the repulsion is overcome, we used experimental and computational approaches to investigate how the orientational preferences of DNA helices depend on the concentration and valence of mobile cations. We used Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to probe the relative orientations of two 24-bp helices held together via a freely rotating PEG linker. At low cation concentrations, the helices preferred more "cross"-like orientations over those closer to parallel, and this preference was reduced with increasing salt concentrations. The results were in good quantitative agreement with Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) calculations for monovalent salt (Na+). However, PB underestimated the ability of mixtures of monovalent and divalent ions (Mg2+) to reduce the conformational preference. As a complementary approach, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and found better agreement with the experimental results. While MD and PB predict similar electrostatic forces, MD predicts a greater accumulation of Mg2+ in the ion atmosphere surrounding the DNA. Mg2+ occupancy is predicted to be greater in conformations close to the parallel orientation than in conformations close to the crossed orientation, enabling a greater release of Na+ ions and providing an entropic gain (one bound ion for two released). MD predicts an entropy gain larger than that of PB because of the increased Mg2+ occupancy. The entropy changes have a negligible effect at low Mg2+ concentrations because the free energies are dominated by electrostatic repulsion. However, as the Mg2+ concentration increases, charge screening is more effective and the mixing entropy produces readily detectable changes in packing preferences. Our results underline the importance of mixing entropy of counterions in nucleic acid interactions and provide a new understanding on the impact of a mixed ion atmosphere on the packing of DNA helices.

Single-molecule study reveals Hmo1, not Hho1, promotes chromatin assembly in budding yeast

Linker histone H1 plays a crucial role in various biological processes, including nucleosome stabilization, high-order chromatin structure organization, gene expression, and epigenetic regulation in eukaryotic cells. Unlike higher eukaryotes, little about the linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is known. Hho1 and Hmo1 are two long-standing controversial histone H1 candidates in budding yeast. In this study, we directly observed at the single-molecule level that Hmo1, but not Hho1, is involved in chromatin assembly in the yeast nucleoplasmic extracts (YNPE), which can replicate the physiological condition of the yeast nucleus. The presence of Hmo1 facilitates the assembly of nucleosomes on DNA in YNPE, as revealed by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Further single-molecule analysis showed that the lysine-rich C-terminal domain (CTD) of Hmo1 is essential for the function of chromatin compaction, while the second globular domain at the C-terminus of Hho1 impairs its ability. In addition, Hmo1, but not Hho1, forms condensates with double-stranded DNA via reversible phase separation. The phosphorylation fluctuation of Hmo1 coincides with metazoan H1 during the cell cycle. Our data suggest that Hmo1, but not Hho1, possesses some functionality similar to that of linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, even though some properties of Hmo1 differ from those of a canonical linker histone H1. Our study provides clues for the linker histone H1 in budding yeast and provides insights into the evolution and diversity of histone H1 across eukaryotes. IMPORTANCE There has been a long-standing debate regarding the identity of linker histone H1 in budding yeast. To address this issue, we utilized YNPE, which accurately replicate the physiological conditions in yeast nuclei, in combination with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and magnetic tweezers. Our findings demonstrated that Hmo1, rather than Hho1, is responsible for chromatin assembly in budding yeast. Additionally, we found that Hmo1 shares certain characteristics with histone H1, including phase separation and phosphorylation fluctuations throughout the cell cycle. Furthermore, we discovered that the lysine-rich domain of Hho1 is buried by its second globular domain at the C-terminus, resulting in the loss of function that is similar to histone H1. Our study provides compelling evidence to suggest that Hmo1 shares linker histone H1 function in budding yeast and contributes to our understanding of the evolution of linker histone H1 across eukaryotes.

Single-Molecular Dissection of Liquid-Liquid Phase Transitions

Interaction between peptides and nucleic acids is a ubiquitous process that drives many cellular functions, such as replications, transcriptions, and translations. Recently, this interaction has been found in liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a process responsible for the formation of newly discovered membraneless organelles with a variety of biological functions inside cells. In this work, we studied the molecular interaction between the poly-l-lysine (PLL) peptide and nucleic acids during the early stage of an LLPS process at the single-molecule level using optical tweezers. By monitoring the mechanical tension of individual nucleic acid templates upon PLL addition, we revealed a multistage LLPS process mediated by the long-range interactions between nucleic acids and polyelectrolytes. By varying different types (ssDNA, ssRNA, and dsDNA) and sequences (A-, T-, G-, or U-rich) of nucleic acids, we pieced together transition diagrams of the PLL-nucleic acid condensates from which we concluded that the propensity to form rigid nucleic acid-PLL complexes reduces the condensate formation during the LLPS process. We anticipate that these results are instrumental in understanding the transition mechanism of LLPS condensates, which allows new strategies to interfere with the biological functions of LLPS condensates inside cells.

Beyond SAHF: An integrative view of chromatin compartmentalization during senescence

Cellular senescence, a persistent form of cell cycle arrest, has been linked to the formation of heterochromatic foci, accompanied by additional concentric epigenetic layers. However, senescence is a highly heterogeneous phenotype, and the formation of these structures is context dependent. Recent developments in the understanding of the high-order chromatin organization have opened new avenues for contextualizing the nuclear and chromatin phenotypes of senescence. Oncogene-induced senescence displays prominent foci and typically exhibits increased chromatin compartmentalization, based on the chromosome conformation assays, as marked by increased transcompaction and segregation of the heterochromatin and euchromatin. However, other types of senescence (e.g., replicative senescence) exhibit comparatively lower levels of compartmentalization. Thus, a more integrative view of the global rearrangement of the chromatin architecture that occurs during senescence is emerging, with potential functional implications for the heterogeneity of the senescence phenotype.

Extreme dynamics in a biomolecular condensate

Proteins and nucleic acids can phase-separate in the cell to form concentrated biomolecular condensates^1-4. The functions of condensates span many length scales: they modulate interactions and chemical reactions at the molecular scale⁵, organize biochemical processes at the mesoscale⁶ and compartmentalize cells⁴. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of these processes will require detailed knowledge of the rich dynamics across these scales⁷. The mesoscopic dynamics of biomolecular condensates have been extensively characterized⁸, but their behaviour at the molecular scale has remained more elusive. Here, as an example of biomolecular phase separation, we study complex coacervates of two highly and oppositely charged disordered human proteins⁹. Their dense phase is 1,000 times more concentrated than the dilute phase, and the resulting percolated interaction network¹⁰ leads to a bulk viscosity 300 times greater than that of water. However, single-molecule spectroscopy optimized for measurements within individual droplets reveals that at the molecular scale, the disordered proteins remain exceedingly dynamic, with their chain configurations interconverting on submicrosecond timescales. Massive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations reproduce the experimental observations and explain this apparent discrepancy: the underlying interactions between individual charged side chains are short-lived and exchange on a pico- to nanosecond timescale. Our results indicate that, despite the high macroscopic viscosity of phase-separated systems, local biomolecular rearrangements required for efficient reactions at the molecular scale can remain rapid.

G-Quadruplexes in Nuclear Biomolecular Condensates

G-quadruplexes (G4s) have long been implicated in the regulation of chromatin packaging and gene expression. These processes require or are accelerated by the separation of related proteins into liquid condensates on DNA/RNA matrices. While cytoplasmic G4s are acknowledged scaffolds of potentially pathogenic condensates, the possible contribution of G4s to phase transitions in the nucleus has only recently come to light. In this review, we summarize the growing evidence for the G4-dependent assembly of biomolecular condensates at telomeres and transcription initiation sites, as well as nucleoli, speckles, and paraspeckles. The limitations of the underlying assays and the remaining open questions are outlined. We also discuss the molecular basis for the apparent permissive role of G4s in the in vitro condensate assembly based on the interactome data. To highlight the prospects and risks of G4-targeting therapies with respect to the phase transitions, we also touch upon the reported effects of G4-stabilizing small molecules on nuclear biomolecular condensates.

Phase transitions in heterochromatin organization

Heterochromatin formation has been proposed to involve phase transitions on the level of the three-dimensional folding of heterochromatin regions and the liquid-liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Here, I outline the hallmarks of such transitions and the current challenges to detect them in living cells. I further discuss the abundance and properties of prominent heterochromatin proteins and relate them to their potential role in driving phase transitions. Recent data from mouse fibroblasts indicate that pericentric heterochromatin is organized via a reordering transition on the level of heterochromatin regions that does not necessarily involve liquid-liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Evaluating key hallmarks of the different candidate phase transition mechanisms across cell types and species will be needed to complete the current picture.

The bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, HU, and Dps, condense DNA into context-dependent biphasic or multiphasic complex coacervates

The bacterial chromosome, known as its nucleoid, is an amorphous assemblage of globular nucleoprotein domains. It exists in a state of phase separation from the cell's cytoplasm, as an irregularly-shaped, membrane-less, intracellular compartment. This state (the nature of which remains largely unknown) is maintained through bacterial generations ad infinitum. Here, we show that HU, and Dps, two of the most abundant nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) of Escherichia coli, undergo spontaneous complex coacervation with different forms of DNA/RNA, both individually and in each other's presence, to cause accretion and compaction of DNA/RNA into liquid-liquid phase separated (LLPS) condensates in vitro. Upon mixing with nucleic acids, HU-A and HU-B form (a) bi-phasic heterotypic mixed condensates in which HU-B helps to lower the C_sat of HU-A; and also (b) multi-phasic heterotypic condensates, with Dps, in which de-mixed domains display different contents of HU and Dps. We believe that these modes of complex coacervation that are seen in vitro can serve as models for the in vivo relationships amongst NAPs in nucleoids, involving local and global variations in the relative abundances of the different NAPs, especially in de-mixed sub-domains that are characterized by differing grades of phase separation. Our results clearly demonstrate some quantitative, and some qualitative, differences in the coacervating abilities of different NAPs with DNA, potentially explaining (i) why E. coli has two isoforms of HU, and (ii) why changes in the abundances of HU and Dps facilitate the lag, logarithmic and stationary phases of E. coli growth.

Phase Separation: Direct and Indirect Driving Force for High-Order Chromatin Organization

The multi-level spatial chromatin organization in the nucleus is closely related to chromatin activity. The mechanism of chromatin organization and remodeling attract much attention. Phase separation describes the biomolecular condensation which is the basis for membraneless compartments in cells. Recent research shows that phase separation is a key aspect to drive high-order chromatin structure and remodeling. In addition, chromatin functional compartmentalization in the nucleus which is formed by phase separation also plays an important role in overall chromatin structure. In this review, we summarized the latest work about the role of phase separation in spatial chromatin organization, focusing on direct and indirect effects of phase separation on 3D chromatin organization and its impact on transcription regulation.

The Chromatin Regulator HMGA1a Undergoes Phase Separation in the Nucleus

The protein high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) is an important regulator of chromatin organization and function. However, the mechanisms by which it exerts its biological function are not fully understood. Here, we report that the HMGA isoform, HMGA1a, nucleates into foci that display liquid-like properties in the nucleus, and that the protein readily undergoes phase separation to form liquid condensates in vitro. By bringing together machine-leaning modelling, cellular and biophysical experiments and multiscale simulations, we demonstrate that phase separation of HMGA1a is promoted by protein-DNA interactions, and has the potential to be modulated by post-transcriptional effects such as phosphorylation. We further show that the intrinsically disordered C-terminal tail of HMGA1a significantly contributes to its phase separation through electrostatic interactions via AT hooks 2 and 3. Our work sheds light on HMGA1 phase separation as an emergent biophysical factor in regulating chromatin structure.

Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Phase Separation

A quantitative understanding of the forces controlling the assembly and functioning of biomolecular condensates requires the identification of phase boundaries at which condensates form as well as the determination of tie-lines. Here, we describe in detail how Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) provides a versatile approach to estimate phase boundaries of single-component and multicomponent solutions as well as insights about the transport properties of the condensate.

Drosophila insulator proteins exhibit in vivo liquid-liquid phase separation properties

Drosophila insulator proteins and the cohesin subunit Rad21 coalesce in vivo to form liquid-droplet condensates, suggesting that liquid–liquid phase separation mediates their function in 3D genome organization.

Mounting evidence implicates liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS), the condensation of biomolecules into liquid-like droplets in the formation and dissolution of membraneless intracellular organelles (MLOs). Cells use MLOs or condensates for various biological processes, including emergency signaling and spatiotemporal control over steady-state biochemical reactions and heterochromatin formation. Insulator proteins are architectural elements involved in establishing independent domains of transcriptional activity within eukaryotic genomes. In Drosophila, insulator proteins form nuclear foci known as insulator bodies in response to osmotic stress. However, the mechanism through which insulator proteins assemble into bodies is yet to be investigated. Here, we identify signatures of LLPS by insulator bodies, including high disorder tendency in insulator proteins, scaffold–client–dependent assembly, extensive fusion behavior, sphericity, and sensitivity to 1,6-hexanediol. We also show that the cohesin subunit Rad21 is a component of insulator bodies, adding to the known insulator protein constituents and γH2Av. Our data suggest a concerted role of cohesin and insulator proteins in insulator body formation and under physiological conditions. We propose a mechanism whereby these architectural proteins modulate 3D genome organization through LLPS.

Linking transcriptional silencing with chromatin remodeling, folding, and positioning in the nucleus

Chromatin organization is important for many DNA-templated processes in eukaryotic cells such as replication and transcription. Recent studies have uncovered the capacity of epigenetic modifications, phase separation, and nuclear architecture and spatial positioning to regulate chromatin organization in both plants and animals. Here, we provide an overview of the recent progress made in understanding how chromatin is organized within the nucleus at both the local and global levels with respect to the regulation of transcriptional silencing in plants. To be concise while covering important mechanisms across a range of scales, we focus on how epigenetic modifications and chromatin remodelers alter local chromatin structure, how liquid-liquid phase separation physically separates broader chromatin domains into distinct droplets, and how nuclear positioning affects global chromatin organization.

Phase separation in epigenetics and cancer stem cells

Accumulating evidence indicates that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is the basis of the formation of membrane-less compartments in cells. This biomolecular condensate represented by phase separation may influence epigenetics in cancer stem cells (CSCs), a small subpopulation of cancer cells responding to the initiation, maintenance, metastasis, and therapy resistance of cancer. Understanding the underlying biophysical principles and the specific characteristics of biocondensates would provide insights into the precise blocking of potential tumor targets, thereby fundamentally curbing tumor occurrence, recurrence and metastasis. In this review, we summarized the key phenomenon and experimental detection of phase separation and the possibility of regulating the stemness of CSCs through phase separation. We believe that the mechanism of phase separation in CSCs will open up new avenues for the mystery of tumor formation, and modulating phase separation will be a great strategy for CSC-targeted tumor therapy.

Epithelial cells-enriched lncRNA SNHG8 regulates chromatin condensation by binding to Histone H1s

Linker histone H1 proteins contain many variants in mammalian and can stabilize the condensed state of chromatin by binding to nucleosomes and promoting a more inaccessible structure of DNA. However, it is poorly understood how the binding of histone H1s to chromatin DNA is regulated. Screened as one of a collection of epithelial cells-enriched long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), here we found that small nucleolar RNA host gene 8 (SNHG8) is a chromatin-localized lncRNA and presents strong interaction and phase separation with histone H1 variants. Moreover, SNHG8 presents stronger ability to bind H1s than linker DNA, and outcompetes linker DNA for H1 binding. Consequently, loss of SNHG8 increases the amount of H1s that bind to chromatin, promotes chromatin condensation, and induces an epithelial differentiation-associated gene expression pattern. Collectively, our results propose that the highly abundant SNHG8 in epithelial cells keeps histone H1 variants out of nucleosome and its loss contributes to epithelial cell differentiation.

Molecular organization of the early stages of nucleosome phase separation visualized by cryo-electron tomography

It has been proposed that the intrinsic property of nucleosome arrays to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in vitro is responsible for chromatin domain organization in vivo. However, understanding nucleosomal LLPS has been hindered by the challenge to characterize the structure of the resulting heterogeneous condensates. We used cryo-electron tomography and deep-learning-based 3D reconstruction/segmentation to determine the molecular organization of condensates at various stages of LLPS. We show that nucleosomal LLPS involves a two-step process: a spinodal decomposition process yielding irregular condensates, followed by their unfavorable conversion into more compact, spherical nuclei that grow into larger spherical aggregates through accretion of spinodal materials or by fusion with other spherical condensates. Histone H1 catalyzes more than 10-fold the spinodal-to-spherical conversion. We propose that this transition involves exposure of nucleosome hydrophobic surfaces causing modified inter-nucleosome interactions. These results suggest a physical mechanism by which chromatin may transition from interphase to metaphase structures.

Phase Separation-Mediated Chromatin Organization and Dynamics: From Imaging-Based Quantitative Characterizations to Functional Implications

As an effective and versatile strategy to compartmentalize cellular components without the need for lipid membranes, phase separation has been found to underpin a wide range of intranuclear processes, particularly those involving chromatin. Many of the unique physico-chemical properties of chromatin-based phase condensates are harnessed by the cell to accomplish complex regulatory functions in a spatially and temporally controlled manner. Here, we survey key recent findings on the mechanistic roles of phase separation in regulating the organization and dynamics of chromatin-based molecular processes across length scales, packing states and intranuclear functions, with a particular emphasis on quantitative characterizations of these condensates enabled by advanced imaging-based approaches. By illuminating the complex interplay between chromatin and various chromatin-interacting molecular species mediated by phase separation, this review sheds light on an emerging multi-scale, multi-modal and multi-faceted landscape that hierarchically regulates the genome within the highly crowded and dynamic nuclear space. Moreover, deficiencies in existing studies also highlight the need for mechanism-specific criteria and multi-parametric approaches for the characterization of chromatin-based phase separation using complementary techniques and call for greater efforts to correlate the quantitative features of these condensates with their functional consequences in close-to-native cellular contexts.

A simulation model of heterochromatin formation at submolecular detail

Heterochromatin is a physical state of the chromatin fiber that maintains gene repression during cell development. Although evidence exists on molecular mechanisms involved in heterochromatin formation, a detailed structural mechanism of heterochromatin formation needs a better understanding. We made use of a simple Monte Carlo simulation model with explicit representation of key molecular events to observe molecular self-organization leading to heterochromatin formation. Our simulations provide a structural interpretation of several important traits of the heterochromatinization process. In particular, this study provides a depiction of how small amounts of HP1 are able to induce a highly condensed chromatin state through HP1 dimerization and bridging of sequence-remote nucleosomes. It also elucidates structural roots of a yet poorly understood phenomenon of a nondeterministic nature of heterochromatin formation and subsequent gene repression. Experimental chromatin in vivo assay provides an unbiased estimate of time scale of repressive response to a heterochromatin-triggering event.

Liquid-liquid phase separation in tumor biology

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a novel principle for explaining the precise spatial and temporal regulation in living cells. LLPS compartmentalizes proteins and nucleic acids into micron-scale, liquid-like, membraneless bodies with specific functions, which were recently termed biomolecular condensates. Biomolecular condensates are executors underlying the intracellular spatiotemporal coordination of various biological activities, including chromatin organization, genomic stability, DNA damage response and repair, transcription, and signal transduction. Dysregulation of these cellular processes is a key event in the initiation and/or evolution of cancer, and emerging evidence has linked the formation and regulation of LLPS to malignant transformations in tumor biology. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the detailed mechanisms of biomolecular condensate formation and biophysical function and review the recent major advances toward elucidating the multiple mechanisms involved in cancer cell pathology driven by aberrant LLPS. In addition, we discuss the therapeutic perspectives of LLPS in cancer research and the most recently developed drug candidates targeting LLPS modulation that can be used to combat tumorigenesis.

Phase Separation in the Nucleus and at the Nuclear Periphery during Post-Mitotic Nuclear Envelope Reformation

Membrane-enclosed organelle compartmentalization is not the only way by which cell processes are spatially organized. Phase separation is emerging as a new driver in the organization of membrane-less compartments and biological processes. Liquid–liquid phase separation has been indicated as a new way to control the kinetics of molecular reactions and is based on weak multivalent interactions affecting the stoichiometry of the molecules involved. In the nucleus, liquid–liquid phase separation may represent an ancestral means of controlling genomic activity by forming discrete chromatin regions, regulating transcriptional activity, contributing to the assembly of DNA damage response foci, and controlling the organization of chromosomes. Liquid–liquid phase separation also contributes to chromatin function through its role in the reorganization of the nuclear periphery in the post-mitotic phase. Herein, we describe the basic principles regulating liquid–liquid phase separation, analyze examples of phase separation occurring in the nucleus, and dedicate attention to the implication of liquid–liquid phase separation in the reorganization of the nuclear periphery by the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Although some caution is warranted, current scientific knowledge allows for the hypothesis that many factors and processes in the cell are yet to be discovered which are functionally associated with phase separation.

On the stability and layered organization of protein-DNA condensates

Multi-component phase separation is emerging as a key mechanism for the formation of biological condensates that play essential roles in signal sensing and transcriptional regulation. The molecular factors that dictate these condensates' stability and spatial organization are not fully understood, and it remains challenging to predict their microstructures. Using a near-atomistic, chemically accurate force field, we studied the phase behavior of chromatin regulators that are crucial for heterochromatin organization and their interactions with DNA. Our computed phase diagrams recapitulated previous experimental findings on different proteins. They revealed a strong dependence of condensate stability on the protein-DNA mixing ratio as a result of balancing protein-protein interactions and charge neutralization. Notably, a layered organization was observed in condensates formed by mixing HP1, histone H1, and DNA. This layered organization may be of biological relevance, as it enables cooperative DNA packaging between the two chromatin regulators: histone H1 softens the DNA to facilitate the compaction induced by HP1 droplets. Our study supports near-atomistic models as a valuable tool for characterizing the structure and stability of biological condensates.

Single-stranded nucleic acid binding and coacervation by linker histone H1

The H1 linker histone family is the most abundant group of eukaryotic chromatin-binding proteins. However, their contribution to chromosome structure and function remains incompletely understood. Here we use single-molecule fluorescence and force microscopy to directly visualize the behavior of H1 on various nucleic acid and nucleosome substrates. We observe that H1 coalesces around single-stranded DNA generated from tension-induced DNA duplex melting. Using a droplet fusion assay controlled by optical tweezers, we find that single-stranded nucleic acids mediate the formation of gel-like H1 droplets, whereas H1-double-stranded DNA and H1-nucleosome droplets are more liquid-like. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that multivalent and transient engagement of H1 with unpaired DNA strands drives their enhanced phase separation. Using eGFP-tagged H1, we demonstrate that inducing single-stranded DNA accumulation in cells causes an increase in H1 puncta that are able to fuse. We further show that H1 and Replication Protein A occupy separate nuclear regions, but that H1 colocalizes with the replication factor Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, particularly after DNA damage. Overall, our results provide a refined perspective on the diverse roles of H1 in genome organization and maintenance, and indicate its involvement at stalled replication forks.

GraPES: The Granule Protein Enrichment Server for prediction of biological condensate constituents

Phase separation-based condensate formation is a novel working paradigm in biology, helping to rationalize many important cellular phenomena including the assembly of membraneless organelles. Uncovering the functional impact of cellular condensates requires a better knowledge of these condensates’ constituents. Herein, we introduce the webserver GraPES (Granule Protein Enrichment Server), a user-friendly online interface containing the MaGS and MaGSeq predictors, which provide propensity scores for proteins’ localization into cellular condensates. Our webpage contains models trained on human (Homo sapiens) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) stress granule proteins. MaGS utilizes experimentally-based protein features for prediction, whereas MaGSeq is an entirely protein sequence-based implementation. GraPES is implemented in HTML/CSS and Javascript and is freely available for public use at https://grapes.msl.ubc.ca/. Documentation for using the provided webtools, descriptions of their methodology, and implementation notes can be found on the webpage.

H1.0 C Terminal Domain Is Integral for Altering Transcription Factor Binding within Nucleosomes

The linker histone H1 is a highly prevalent protein that compacts chromatin and regulates DNA accessibility and transcription. However, the mechanisms behind H1 regulation of transcription factor (TF) binding within nucleosomes are not well understood. Using in vitro fluorescence assays, we positioned fluorophores throughout human H1 and the nucleosome, then monitored the distance changes between H1 and the histone octamer, H1 and nucleosomal DNA, or nucleosomal DNA and the histone octamer to monitor the H1 movement during TF binding. We found that H1 remains bound to the nucleosome dyad, while the C terminal domain (CTD) releases the linker DNA during nucleosome partial unwrapping and TF binding. In addition, mutational studies revealed that a small 16 amino acid region at the beginning of the H1 CTD is largely responsible for altering nucleosome wrapping and regulating TF binding within nucleosomes. We then investigated physiologically relevant post-translational modifications (PTMs) in human H1 by preparing fully synthetic H1 using convergent hybrid phase native chemical ligation. Both individual PTMs and combinations of phosphorylation and citrullination of H1 had no detectable influence on nucleosome binding and nucleosome wrapping, and had only a minor impact on H1 regulation of TF occupancy within nucleosomes. This suggests that these H1 PTMs function by other mechanisms. Our results highlight the importance of the H1 CTD, in particular, the first 16 amino acids, in regulating nucleosome linker DNA dynamics and TF binding within the nucleosome.

Nucleic Acids Modulate Liquidity and Dynamics of Artificial Membraneless Organelles

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) emerges as a fundamental underlying mechanism for the biological organization, especially the formation of membraneless organelles (MLOs) hosting intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) as scaffolds. Nucleic acids are compositional biomacromolecules of MLOs with wide implications in normal cell functions as well as in pathophysiology caused by aberrant phase behavior. Exploiting a minimalist artificial membraneless organelles (AMLO) from LLPS of IDP-mimicking polymer-oligopeptide hybrid (IPH), we investigated the effect of nucleic acids with different lengths and sequence variations on AMLO. The behavior of this AMLO in the presence of DNAs and RNAs resembled natural MLOs in multiple aspects, namely, modulated propensity of formation, morphology, liquidity, and dynamics. Both DNA and RNA could enhance the LLPS of AMLO, while compared with RNA, DNA had a higher tendency to solidify and diminish dynamics thereof. These findings suggest its potential as a concise model system for the understanding of the interaction between nucleic acids and natural MLOs and for studying the molecular mechanism of diseases involving MLOs.

Tuning Formation of Protein-DNA Coacervates by Sequence and Environment

The high concentration of nucleic acids and positively charged proteins in the cell nucleus provides many possibilities for complex coacervation. We consider a prototypical mixture of nucleic acids together with the polycationic C-terminus of histone H1 (CH1). Using a minimal coarse-grained model that captures the shape, flexibility, and charge distributions of the molecules, we find that coacervates are readily formed at physiological ionic strengths, in agreement with experiment, with a progressive increase in local ordering at low ionic strength. Variation of the positions of charged residues in the protein tunes phase separation: for well-mixed or only moderately blocky distributions of charge, there is a modest increase of local ordering with increasing blockiness that is also associated with an increased propensity to phase separate. This ordering is also associated with a slowdown of rotational and translational diffusion in the dense phase. However, for more extreme blockiness (and consequently higher local charge density), we see a qualitative change in the condensed phase to become a segregated structure with a dramatically increased ordering of the DNA. Naturally occurring proteins with these sequence properties, such as protamines in sperm cells, are found to be associated with very dense packing of nucleic acids.

Kinetic interplay between droplet maturation and coalescence modulates shape of aged protein condensates

Biomolecular condensates formed by the process of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) play diverse roles inside cells, from spatiotemporal compartmentalisation to speeding up chemical reactions. Upon maturation, the liquid-like properties of condensates, which underpin their functions, are gradually lost, eventually giving rise to solid-like states with potential pathological implications. Enhancement of inter-protein interactions is one of the main mechanisms suggested to trigger the formation of solid-like condensates. To gain a molecular-level understanding of how the accumulation of stronger interactions among proteins inside condensates affect the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of biomolecular condensates, and their shapes over time, we develop a tailored coarse-grained model of proteins that transition from establishing weak to stronger inter-protein interactions inside condensates. Our simulations reveal that the fast accumulation of strongly binding proteins during the nucleation and growth stages of condensate formation results in aspherical solid-like condensates. In contrast, when strong inter-protein interactions appear only after the equilibrium condensate has been formed, or when they accumulate slowly over time with respect to the time needed for droplets to fuse and grow, spherical solid-like droplets emerge. By conducting atomistic potential-of-mean-force simulations of NUP-98 peptides-prone to forming inter-protein [Formula: see text]-sheets-we observe that formation of inter-peptide [Formula: see text]-sheets increases the strength of the interactions consistently with the loss of liquid-like condensate properties we observe at the coarse-grained level. Overall, our work aids in elucidating fundamental molecular, kinetic, and thermodynamic mechanisms linking the rate of change in protein interaction strength to condensate shape and maturation during ageing.

Direct Measurement of Interhelical DNA Repulsion and Attraction by Quantitative Cross-Linking

To better understand the forces that mediate nucleic acid compaction in biology, we developed the disulfide cross-linking approach xHEED (X-linking of Helices to measure Electrostatic Effects at Distance) to measure the distance-dependent encounter frequency of two DNA helices in solution. Using xHEED, we determined the distance that the electrostatic potential extends from DNA helices, the dependence of this distance on ionic conditions, and the magnitude of repulsion when two helices approach one another. Across all conditions tested, the potential falls to that of the bulk solution within 15 Å of the major groove surface. For separations of ∼30 Å, we measured a repulsion of 1.8 kcal/mol in low monovalent ion concentration (30 mM Na+), with higher Na+ concentrations ameliorating this repulsion, and 2 M Na+ or 100 mM Mg2+ eliminating it. Strikingly, we found full screening at very low Co3+ concentrations and net attraction at higher concentrations, without the higher-order DNA condensation that typically complicates studies of helical attraction. Our measurements define the relevant distances for electrostatic interactions of nucleic-acid helices in biology and introduce a new method to propel further understanding of how these forces impact biological processes.

Histone H3 and H4 tails play an important role in nucleosome phase separation

Chromatin organization and its dynamic regulation are crucial in governing the temporal and spatial accessibility of DNA for proper gene expression. Disordered chains of nucleosomes comprise the basis of eukaryotic chromatin, forming higher-level organization across a range of length scales. Models of chromatin organization involving phase separation driven by chromatin-associating proteins have been proposed. More recently, evidence has emerged that nucleosome arrays can phase separate in the absence of other protein factors, yet questions remain regarding the molecular basis of chromatin phase separation that governs this dynamic nuclear organization. Here, we break chromatin down into its most basic subunit, the nucleosome core particle, and investigate phase separation using turbidity assays in conjunction with differential interference contrast microscopy. We show that, at physiologically-relevant concentrations, this fundamental subunit of chromatin undergoes phase separation. Individually removing the H3 and H4 tails abrogates phase separation under the same conditions. Taking a reductionist approach to investigate H3 and H4 tail peptide interactions in-trans with DNA and nucleosome core particles supports the direct involvement of these tails in chromatin phase separation. These results provide insight into fundamental mechanisms underlying phase separation of chromatin, which starts at the level of the nucleosome core particle, and support that long-range inter-nucleosomal interactions are sufficient to drive phase separation at nuclear concentrations. Additionally, our data have implications for understanding crosstalk between histone tails and provide a lens through which to interpret the effect of histone post-translational modifications and sequence variants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Emerging models propose that chromatin organization is based in phase separation, however, mechanisms that drive this dynamic nuclear organization are only beginning to be understood. Previous focus has been on phase separation driven by chromatin-associating proteins, but this has recently shifted to recognize a direct role of chromatin in phase separation. Here, we take a fundamental approach in understanding chromatin phase separation and present new findings that the basic subunit of chromatin, the nucleosome core particle, undergoes phase separation under physiological concentrations of nucleosome and monovalent salt. Furthermore, the histone H3 and H4 tails are involved in phase separation in a manner independent of histone-associating proteins. These data suggest that H3 and H4 tail epigenetic factors may modulate chromatin phase separation.

Disordered regions tune order in chromatin organization and function

Intrinsically disordered proteins or hybrid proteins with ordered domains and disordered regions (both collectively designated as IDP(R)s) defy the well-established structure-function paradigm due to their ability to perform multiple biological functions even in the absence of a well-defined 3D structure. IDP(R)s have a unique ability to exist as a functional heterogeneous ensemble, where they adopt multiple thermodynamically stable conformations with low energy barriers between states. The resultant structural plasticity or conformational adaptability provides them with a high functional diversity and ease of regulation. Hence, IDP(R)s are highly efficient biological machinery to mediate intricate cellular functions such as signaling, gene expression, and assembly of complex structures. One such structure is the nucleoprotein complex known as Chromatin. Interestingly, the proteins involved in shaping up the structure and function of chromatin are abundant in disordered regions, which serve more than just as mere flexible linkers. The disordered regions are involved in crucial processes such as gene expression regulation, chromatin architecture maintenance, and liquid-liquid phase separation initiation. This review is an attempt to explore the advantages and the functional and regulatory roles of intrinsic disorder in several Chromatin Associated Proteins from a mechanistic standpoint.

Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Chromatin

In eukaryotic cells, protein and RNA factors involved in genome activities like transcription, RNA processing, DNA replication, and repair accumulate in self-organizing membraneless chromatin subcompartments. These structures contribute to efficiently conduct chromatin-mediated reactions and to establish specific cellular programs. However, the underlying mechanisms for their formation are only partly understood. Recent studies invoke liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and RNAs in the establishment of chromatin activity patterns. At the same time, the folding of chromatin in the nucleus can drive genome partitioning into spatially distinct domains. Here, the interplay between chromatin organization, chromatin binding, and LLPS is discussed by comparing and contrasting three prototypical chromatin subcompartments: the nucleolus, clusters of active RNA polymerase II, and pericentric heterochromatin domains. It is discussed how the different ways of chromatin compartmentalization are linked to transcription regulation, the targeting of soluble factors to certain parts of the genome, and to disease-causing genetic aberrations.