Logic and lineage impacts on functional transcription factor deployment for T-cell fate commitment

Stomatal cell fate commitment via transcriptional and epigenetic control: Timing is crucial

The formation of stomata presents a compelling model system for comprehending the initiation, proliferation, commitment and differentiation of de novo lineage-specific stem cells. Precise, timely and robust cell fate and identity decisions are crucial for the proper progression and differentiation of functional stomata. Deviations from this precise specification result in developmental abnormalities and nonfunctional stomata. However, the molecular underpinnings of timely cell fate commitment have just begun to be unravelled. In this review, we explore the key regulatory strategies governing cell fate commitment, emphasizing the distinctions between embryonic and postembryonic stomatal development. Furthermore, the interplay of transcription factors and cell cycle machineries is pivotal in specifying the transition into differentiation. We aim to synthesize recent studies utilizing single-cell as well as cell-type-specific transcriptomics, epigenomics and chromatin accessibility profiling to shed light on how master-regulatory transcription factors and epigenetic machineries mutually influence each other to drive fate commitment and maintenance.

The unique function of Runx1 in skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration is mediated by an ETS interaction domain

The conserved Runt-related (RUNX) transcription factor family are well-known master regulators of developmental and regenerative processes. Runx1 and Runx2 are both expressed in satellite cells (SC) and skeletal myotubes. Conditional deletion of Runx1 in adult SC negatively impacted self-renewal and impaired skeletal muscle maintenance. Runx1- deficient SC retain Runx2 expression but cannot support muscle regeneration in response to injury. To determine the unique molecular functions of Runx1 that cannot be compensated by Runx2 we deleted Runx1 in C2C12 that retain Runx2 expression and established that myoblasts differentiation was blocked in vitro due in part to ectopic expression of Mef2c, a target repressed by Runx1 . Structure-function analysis demonstrated that the Ets-interacting MID/EID region of Runx1, absent from Runx2, is critical to regulating myoblasts proliferation, differentiation, and fusion. Analysis of in-house and published ChIP-seq datasets from Runx1 (T-cells, muscle) versus Runx2 (preosteoblasts) dependent tissue identified enrichment for a Ets:Runx composite site in Runx1 -dependent tissues. Comparing ATACseq datasets from WT and Runx1KO C2C12 cells showed that the Ets:Runx composite motif was enriched in peaks open exclusively in WT cells compared to peaks unique to Runx1KO cells. Thus, engagement of a set of targets by the RUNX1/ETS complex define the non-redundant functions of Runx1 .

The many faces of the zinc finger protein 335 in brain development and immune system

Zinc finger protein 335 (ZNF335) plays a crucial role in the methylation and, consequently, regulates the expression of a specific set of genes. Variants of the ZNF335 gene have been identified as risk factors for microcephaly in a variety of populations worldwide. Meanwhile, ZNF335 has also been identified as an essential regulator of T-cell development. However, an in-depth understanding of the role of ZNF335 in brain development and T cell maturation is still lacking. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of ZNF335 in neuronal and T cell development across a wide range of pre-clinical, post-mortem, ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical studies. We also review the current limitations regarding the study of the pathophysiological functions of ZNF335. Finally, we hypothesize a potential role for ZNF335 in brain disorders and discuss the rationale of targeting ZNF335 as a therapeutic strategy for preventing brain disorders.

A variegated model of transcription factor function in the immune system

Specific combinations of transcription factors (TFs) control the gene expression programs that underlie specialized immune responses. Previous models of TF function in immunocytes had restricted each TF to a single functional categorization [e.g., lineage-defining (LDTFs) vs. signal-dependent TFs (SDTFs)] within one cell type. Synthesizing recent results, we instead propose a variegated model of immunological TF function, whereby many TFs have flexible and different roles across distinct cell states, contributing to cell phenotypic diversity. We discuss evidence in support of this variegated model, describe contextual inputs that enable TF diversification, and look to the future to imagine warranted experimental and computational tools to build quantitative and predictive models of immunocyte gene regulatory networks.

Self-Organization and Genomic Causality in Models of Morphogenesis

The debate about what causes the generation of form and structure in embryological development goes back to antiquity. Most recently, it has focused on the divergent views as to whether the generation of patterns and form in development is a largely self-organized process or is mainly determined by the genome, in particular, complex developmental gene regulatory processes. This paper presents and analyzes pertinent models of pattern formation and form generation in a developing organism in the past and the present, with a special emphasis on Alan Turing's 1952 reaction-diffusion model. I first draw attention to the fact that Turing's paper remained, at first, without a noticeable impact on the community of biologists because purely physical-chemical models were unable to explain embryological development and often also simple repetitive patterns. I then show that from the year 2000 and onwards, Turing's 1952 paper was increasingly cited also by biologists. The model was updated to include gene products and now seemed able to account for the generation of biological patterns, though discrepancies between models and biological reality remained. I then point out Eric Davidson's successful theory of early embryogenesis based on gene-regulatory network analysis and its mathematical modeling that not only was able to provide a mechanistic and causal explanation for gene regulatory events controlling developmental cell fate specification but, unlike reaction-diffusion models, also addressed the effects of evolution and organisms' longstanding developmental and species stability. The paper concludes with an outlook on further developments of the gene regulatory network model.

Multi-modular structure of the gene regulatory network for specification and commitment of murine T cells

T cells develop from multipotent progenitors by a gradual process dependent on intrathymic Notch signaling and coupled with extensive proliferation. The stages leading them to T-cell lineage commitment are well characterized by single-cell and bulk RNA analyses of sorted populations and by direct measurements of precursor-product relationships. This process depends not only on Notch signaling but also on multiple transcription factors, some associated with stemness and multipotency, some with alternative lineages, and others associated with T-cell fate. These factors interact in opposing or semi-independent T cell gene regulatory network (GRN) subcircuits that are increasingly well defined. A newly comprehensive picture of this network has emerged. Importantly, because key factors in the GRN can bind to markedly different genomic sites at one stage than they do at other stages, the genes they significantly regulate are also stage-specific. Global transcriptome analyses of perturbations have revealed an underlying modular structure to the T-cell commitment GRN, separating decisions to lose "stem-ness" from decisions to block alternative fates. Finally, the updated network sheds light on the intimate relationship between the T-cell program, which depends on the thymus, and the innate lymphoid cell (ILC) program, which does not.

Dynamic chromatin accessibility deploys heterotypic cis/trans-acting factors driving stomatal cell-fate commitment

Chromatin architecture and transcription factor (TF) binding underpin cell-fate specification during development, but their mutual regulatory relationships remain unclear. Here we report an atlas of dynamic chromatin landscapes during stomatal cell-lineage progression, in which sequential cell-state transitions are governed by lineage-specific bHLH TFs. Major reprogramming of chromatin accessibility occurs at the proliferation-to-differentiation transition. We discover novel co-cis regulatory elements (CREs) signifying the early precursor stage, BBR/BPC (GAGA) and bHLH (E-box) motifs, where master-regulatory bHLH TFs, SPEECHLESS and MUTE, consecutively bind to initiate and terminate the proliferative state, respectively. BPC TFs complex with MUTE to repress SPEECHLESS expression through a local deposition of repressive histone marks. We elucidate the mechanism by which cell-state-specific heterotypic TF complexes facilitate cell-fate commitment by recruiting chromatin modifiers via key co-CREs.