The management of women with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy

Antenatal and postnatal cervical precancer screening to increase coverage: experience from Battor, Ghana

Background

Cervical precancer screening in low-resource settings is largely opportunistic with low coverage. Many women in these settings, where the burden of cervical cancer is highest, only visit health institutions when pregnant or after delivery. We explored screening during antenatal and postnatal visits aimed at increasing coverage.

Methods

Pregnant women (in any trimester) attending antenatal care (ANC) and women attending postnatal care (PNC; 6-10 weeks) clinics were screened at Catholic Hospital, Battor and at outreach clinics from February to August 2022 (08/02/2022 to 02/08/2022). At the same visit, cervical specimens were obtained for high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) DNA testing (with the Sansure MA-6000 PCR platform) followed by either visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or mobile colposcopy with the enhanced visual assessment system.

Results

Two hundred and seventy and 107 women were screened in the antenatal and postnatal groups, respectively. The mean ages were 29.4 (SD, 5.4) in the ANC group and 28.6 (SD, 6.4) years in the PNC group. The overall hr-HPV prevalence rate was 25.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21.1-29.9) disaggregated as 26.7% (95% CI, 21.4-31.9) in the ANC group and 22.4% (95% CI, 14.5-30.3) in the PNC group (p = 0.3946). Overall, 58.9% of pregnant women (28.3% hr-HPV+) and 66.4% of postnatal women (22.5% hr-HPV+) only visited a health facility when pregnant or after delivery (at Child Welfare Clinics). The VIA 'positivity' rate for all screened women was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.1-7.6), disaggregated into 5.2% (95% CI, 2.5-7.8) in the ANC group and 5.7% (95% CI, 1.3-10.1) in the PNC group (p-value = 0.853).

Conclusion

A significant number of women in Ghana only visit a health facility during pregnancy or after delivery. ANC and PNC clinics would offer opportunities to increase coverage in cervical precancer screening in low-resource settings. Relying on community nurses ensures that such programs are readily integrated into routine care of women and no opportunity is missed.

Clinical outcome of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: A 10-year experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical outcome of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosed by colposcopy-directed biopsy during pregnancy and to evaluate the risk factors for persistent disease.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included pregnant women who were diagnosed with CIN2+ by colposcopy-directed biopsy from January 2005 to December 2014. The clinical characteristics, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus (HPV) test results were reviewed. The final histopathologic result after delivery was compared with the initial diagnosis to determine disease progression, persistence, or regression.

RESULTS

During the 10-year period, 215 pregnant women were diagnosed with high-grade CIN (75 CIN2, 140 CIN3) by colposcopy-directed biopsy. The mean age of the patients was 30.4 years. A total of 187 patients (87.0%) had high-risk HPV infections, with 76 (35.3%) infections identified as HPV genotype 16 or 18. Excisional procedures for diagnosis and treatment were not performed during pregnancy. The histopathologic results of 160 patients (normal in 43, CIN1 in 10, CIN2 in 15, CIN3 in 89, and invasive cancer in 3) were evaluated during the postpartum period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and postpartum high-risk HPV infection (OR 5.09; 95% CI 2.15-12.05; P < 0.001) was identified as a significant independent predictor of CIN2+ persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management of CIN2-3 during pregnancy is acceptable. However, persistent high-risk HPV infection is a major risk factor for CIN2+ persistence. Close follow-up with HPV testing, and postpartum colposcopy evaluation are necessary.

Premalignant disease in the genital tract in pregnancy

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the most common premalignant disease of the lower genital tract encountered during pregnancy. As in the non-pregnant state, abnormal cytology should be referred for colposcopy. However, the role of colposcopy in pregnant women is to exclude invasive cancer by visual inspection and defer biopsy and definitive treatment until the post-partum period. Colposcopic exclusion of invasive disease is the only absolute indication for conisation in pregnancy. It is now evident that treatment for CIN outside of pregnancy, that involves >15 mm deep excision is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery. Vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) rarely present in women of childbearing age; nevertheless, medical management should be postponed until after delivery, unless symptoms are particularly severe.

Cervical screening within HIV care: findings from an HIV-positive cohort in Ukraine

INTRODUCTION

HIV-positive women have an increased risk of invasive cervical cancer but cytologic screening is effective in reducing incidence. Little is known about cervical screening coverage or the prevalence of abnormal cytology among HIV-positive women in Ukraine, which has the most severe HIV epidemic in Europe.

METHODS

Poisson regression models were fitted to data from 1120 women enrolled at three sites of the Ukraine Cohort Study of HIV-infected Childbearing Women to investigate factors associated with receiving cervical screening as part of HIV care. All women had been diagnosed as HIV-positive before or during their most recent pregnancy. Prevalence of cervical abnormalities (high/low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) among women who had been screened was estimated, and associated factors explored.

RESULTS

Overall, 30% (337/1120) of women had received a cervical screening test as part of HIV care at study enrolment (median 10 months postpartum), a third (115/334) of whom had been tested >12 months previously. In adjusted analyses, women diagnosed as HIV-positive during (vs before) their most recent pregnancy were significantly less likely to have a screening test reported, on adjusting for other potential risk factors (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75 p<0.01 for 1(st)/2(nd) trimester diagnosis and APR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63 p<0.01 for 3(rd) trimester/intrapartum diagnosis). Among those with a cervical screening result reported at any time (including follow-up), 21% (68/325) had a finding of cervical abnormality. In adjusted analyses, Herpes simplex virus 2 seropositivity and a recent diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were associated with an increased risk of abnormal cervical cytology (APR 1.83 95% CI 1.07-3.11 and APR 3.49 95% CI 2.11-5.76 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this high risk population, cervical screening coverage as part of HIV care was low and could be improved by an organised cervical screening programme for HIV-positive women. Bacterial vaginosis testing and treatment may reduce vulnerability to cervical abnormalities.