Long-term contraceptives

Factors Associated With the Use of the Contraceptive Implant Among Women Attending a Primary Health Clinic in Cape Town, South Africa

Background: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), which include the subdermal contraceptive implant and intrauterine contraception, offer women safe, highly effective, long-term pregnancy prevention, and have expanded contraceptive options. The implant greatly expands LARC options for South African women as it is available free of charge at public health facilities, but little is known about factors associated with its uptake. This study describes factors associated with the intention to use the implant, including knowledge and beliefs about the implant and perceived outcome expectancies of implant use among women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2016, the authors conducted a quantitative, cross-sectional survey among adult women attending a public, primary health clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. Using a structured questionnaire, they measured knowledge, awareness, and attitudes, perceived outcome expectancy, and the intention to use the contraceptive implant in future among the women.

Results: The authors surveyed 481 women (mean age 29.1 years). Most of the participants (n = 364, 75.6%) had heard about the implant, 45 (9.4%) were currently using it, and 97 (20.2%) intended to use it in the future. Knowledge about the safety of the implant, beliefs about its effectiveness, and the ease of insertion and removal, and support from intimate partners were positively associated with the current use and intentions to use the implant in the future.

Conclusions: Limited knowledge of the implant, having completed secondary schooling, support from partner for women to use implant and the perceived outcome expectancies of using the implant were factors significantly associated with the intention to use the implant. Ensuring that the contraception information is available in all South African languages, regardless of education levels in women, and that comprehensive contraception education and counseling is provided during all family planning might help improve the uptake of contraceptives, including the use of the implant in the country.

The value of ultrasound guidance during IUD insertion in women with RVF uterus: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The study objective is to evaluate the benefits of using ultrasound guidance during insertion of Intrauterine device IUD in women with retroverted flexed RVF uteri.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial conducted on 400 women with RVF uteri eligible for IUD insertion. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent IUD insertion under ultrasound guidance while in group 2 no ultrasound guidance was used. The primary outcome measure was the(Visual Analogue Scale) VAS pain score reported by the women during insertion. Other outcome included easiness of insertion, the procedure time and occurrence of complications as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, failure of insertion, uterine perforation and bleeding.

RESULTS

The VAS pain score was significantly lower (2.36 ± 1.77 vs. 4.74 ± 2.35, p < 0.001), the insertion was much easier (score 4.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.27, p < 0.001) and the time needed for the procedure was significantly shorter (5.82 ± 2.56 vs. 9.4 ± 4.99 min, p < 0.001) in women within the ultrasound guided group when compared to control group. The total rate of complications was significantly lower (6 vs. 16 %, p 0.001) especially bleeding (2 vs. 9%, p = 0.002), abdominal cramps (10.5 vs. 28 %, p 0.012) and failure of the procedure (0 vs. 3%, p = 005) in ultrasound guided group women when compared to control.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of Intrauterine device IUD under ultrasound guidance in women with Retroverted flexed RVF uterus easier and less painful than the blind standard technique.

Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the rate of return for repeat abortion in relation to postabortion contraceptive method choice 24 months onward from an intervention study.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study involving a hospital note search for 510 women 24 months after an abortion.

RESULTS

Women using long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods (intrauterine device [IUD] and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) had significantly lower return rates for repeat abortion (6.45%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-9.8) than non-LARC users, of whom 14.5% returned (95% CI, 9.9-20.2). A Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the postabortion method choice was significantly related to the likelihood of returning for a repeat abortion (P = .002), controlling for major demographic factors and previous pregnancy history. Using the pill as a reference group for risk of repeat abortion, the IUD hazard ratio (HR) was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.17-0.77), the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate HR was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.21-1.45), and the HR for all other methods was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.83-3.92).

CONCLUSION

This study provides strong support for the promotion of immediate postabortion access to LARC methods (particularly intrauterine devices) to prevent repeat abortion.