1
|
Kanani A, Fatemi-Ardakani A, Owrangi AM, Yazdi M, Baghbani H, Mosleh-Shirazi MA. Quantification of Artifacts and Image Distortions in 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images of a Commercial Multi-Channel Vaginal Cylinder Brachytherapy Applicator Set. J Biomed Phys Eng 2023; 13:523-534. [PMID: 38148963 PMCID: PMC10749412 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2309-1665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Background The BEBIG Portio multi-channel applicator provides better target dose coverage and sparing organs-at-risk compared to a single-channel cylinder. However, artifacts and distortions of Portio in magnetic resonance images (MRI) have not yet been reported. Objective We aimed to quantify the artifacts and distortions in its 1.5-Tesla MR images before clinical use. Material and Methods In this experimental study, we employed a gelatin-filled phantom to conduct our measurements. T2-weighted (T2W) images were examined for artifacts and distortions. Computed tomography (CT) images were used as a reference to assess image distortions. Artifact severity was measured by recording the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) image pixel values at various positions along the length of the applicator/channels. CT and MRI-based applicator reconstruction accuracy were then compared, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast were also determined for the applicator images. Results The applicator distortion level for the Portio applicator was less than the image spatial resolution (0.5±0.5 pixels). The average FWHM for the tandem applicator images was 5.23±0.39 mm, while it was 3.21±0.37 mm for all channels (compared to their actual diameters of 5.0 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively). The average applicator reconstruction difference between CT and MR images was 0.75±0.30 mm overall source dwell positions. The image SNR and contrast were both acceptable. Conclusion These findings indicate that the Portio applicator has a satisfactory low level of artifacts and image distortions in 1.5-Tesla, T2W images. It may, therefore, be a promising option for MRI-guided multi-channel vaginal brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abolfazl Kanani
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Fatemi-Ardakani
- Department of Physics, Jackson State University (JSU), Jackson, Mississippi, USA
- SpinTecx, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Health Systems (CHS) Cancer Network, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Amir M Owrangi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, EC2.242, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Mehran Yazdi
- Signal and Image Processing Lab (SIPL), School of Electrical and Computer Eng, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hadi Baghbani
- Department of Radiology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacobsen MC, Beriwal S, Dyer BA, Klopp AH, Lee SI, McGinnis GJ, Robbins JB, Rauch GM, Sadowski EA, Simiele SJ, Stafford RJ, Taunk NK, Yashar CM, Venkatesan AM. Contemporary image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: Consensus imaging recommendations from the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:369-388. [PMID: 35725550 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present recommendations for the use of imaging for evaluation and procedural guidance of brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients. METHODS An expert panel comprised of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease Focused Panel and the American Brachytherapy Society jointly assessed the existing literature and provide data-driven guidance on imaging protocol development, interpretation, and reporting. RESULTS Image-guidance during applicator implantation reduces rates of uterine perforation by the tandem. Postimplant images may be acquired with radiography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT or MRI are preferred due to a decrease in severe complications. Pre-brachytherapy T2-weighted MRI may be used as a reference for contouring the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) when CT is used for treatment planning. Reference CT and MRI protocols are provided for reference. CONCLUSIONS Image-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer is essential for optimal patient management. Various imaging modalities, including orthogonal radiographs, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, remain integral to the successful execution of image-guided brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Jacobsen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, TX
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Allegheny Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Brandon A Dyer
- Legacy Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Portland, OR
| | - Ann H Klopp
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - Susanna I Lee
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA
| | - Gwendolyn J McGinnis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Abdominal Imaging, Houston, TX
| | | | - Samantha J Simiele
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX
| | - R Jason Stafford
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, TX
| | - Neil K Taunk
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- University of California San Diego, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Diego, CA
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Abdominal Imaging, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A review of brachytherapy physical phantoms developed over the last 20 years: clinical purpose and future requirements. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:101-115. [PMID: 34025743 PMCID: PMC8117707 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.103593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Within the brachytherapy community, many phantoms are constructed in-house, and less commercial development is observed as compared to the field of external beam. Computational or virtual phantom design has seen considerable growth; however, physical phantoms are beneficial for brachytherapy, in which quality is dependent on physical processes, such as accuracy of source placement. Focusing on the design of physical phantoms, this review paper presents a summary of brachytherapy specific phantoms in published journal articles over the last twenty years (January 1, 2000 – December 31, 2019). The papers were analyzed and tabulated by their primary clinical purpose, which was deduced from their associated publications. A substantial body of work has been published on phantom designs from the brachytherapy community, but a standardized method of reporting technical aspects of the phantoms is lacking. In-house phantom development demonstrates an increasing interest in magnetic resonance (MR) tissue mimicking materials, which is not yet reflected in commercial phantoms available for brachytherapy. The evaluation of phantom design provides insight into the way, in which brachytherapy practice has changed over time, and demonstrates the customised and broad nature of treatments offered.
Collapse
|
4
|
Richart J, Carmona-Meseguer V, García-Martínez T, Herreros A, Otal A, Pellejero S, Tornero-López A, Pérez-Calatayud J. Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 23:547-561. [PMID: 30534019 PMCID: PMC6277512 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy plays an essential role in the curative intent management of locally advanced cervical cancer. The introduction of the magnetic resonance (MR) as a preferred image modality and the development of new type of applicators with interstitial components have further improved its benefits. The aim of this work is to review the current status of one important aspect in the cervix cancer brachytherapy procedure, namely catheter reconstruction. MR compatible intracavitary and interstitial applicators are described. Considerations about the use of MR imaging (MRI) regarding appropriate strategies for applicator reconstruction, technical requirements, MR sequences, patient preparation and applicator commissioning are included. It is recommendable to perform the reconstruction process in the same image study employed by the physician for contouring, that is, T2 weighted (T2W) sequences. Nevertheless, a clear identification of the source path inside the catheters and the applicators is a challenge when using exclusively T2W sequences. For the intracavitary component of the implant, sometimes the catheters may be filled with some substance that produces a high intensity signal on MRI. However, this strategy is not feasible for plastic tubes or titanium needles, which, moreover, induce magnetic susceptibility artifacts. In these situations, the use of applicator libraries available in the treatment planning system (TPS) is useful, since they not only include accurate geometrical models of the intracavitary applicators, but also recent developments have made possible the implementation of the interstitial component. Another strategy to improve the reconstruction process is based on the incorporation of MR markers, such as small pellets, to be used as anchor points. Many institutions employ computed tomography (CT) as a supporting image modality. The registration of CT and MR image sets should be carefully performed, and its uncertainty previously assessed. Besides, an important research work is being carried out regarding the use of ultrasound and electromagnetic tracking technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Richart
- Hospital Clínica Benidorm, Medical Physics Department, Alicante, Spain
| | - Vicente Carmona-Meseguer
- Hospital La Fe-IRIMED, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Section, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Herreros
- Hospital Clínic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Section, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Otal
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Medical Physics Department, Lleida, Spain
| | - Santiago Pellejero
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Medical Physics Department, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Tornero-López
- Hospital Dr. Negrín, Medical Physics Department, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - José Pérez-Calatayud
- Hospital La Fe-IRIMED, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Section, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment position: Results of a prospective quality assurance protocol. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:13-19. [PMID: 29594224 PMCID: PMC5862642 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 09/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Uncertainties related to geometric distortion are a major obstacle for effectively utilizing MRI in radiation oncology. We aim to quantify the geometric distortion in patient images by comparing their in-treatment position MRIs with the corresponding planning CTs, using CT as the non-distorted gold standard. Methods Twenty-one head and neck cancer patients were imaged with MRI as part of a prospective Institutional Review Board approved study. MR images were acquired with a T2 SE sequence (0.5 × 0.5 × 2.5 mm voxel size) in the same immobilization position as in the CTs. MRI to CT rigid registration was then done and geometric distortion comparison was assessed by measuring the corresponding anatomical landmarks on both the MRI and the CT images. Several landmark measurements were obtained including; skin to skin (STS), bone to bone, and soft tissue to soft tissue at specific levels in horizontal and vertical planes of both scans. Inter-observer variability was assessed and interclass correlation (ICC) was calculated. Results A total of 430 landmark measurements were obtained. The median distortion for all landmarks in all scans was 1.06 mm (IQR 0.6–1.98). For each patient 48% of the measurements were done in the right-left direction and 52% were done in the anteroposterior direction. The measured geometric distortion was not statistically different in the right-left direction compared to the anteroposterior direction (1.5 ± 1.6 vs. 1.6 ± 1.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.4). The magnitude of distortion was higher in the STS peripheral landmarks compared to the more central landmarks (2.0 ± 1.9 vs. 1.2 ± 1.3 mm, p < 0.0001). The mean distortion measured by observer one was not significantly different compared to observer 2, 3, and 4 (1.05, 1.23, 1.06 and 1.05 mm, respectively, p = 0.4) with ICC = 0.84. Conclusion MRI geometric distortions were quantified in radiotherapy planning applications with a clinically insignificant error of less than 2 mm compared to the gold standard CT.
Collapse
|
6
|
Consecutive magnetic resonance imaging during brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: predictive value of volume measurements with respect to persistent disease and prognosis. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:252. [PMID: 26642877 PMCID: PMC4672558 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0559-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is associated with a high yearly mortality. The presence of persistent disease after radiotherapy is a significant predictor of patient survival. The aim of our study was to assess if tumor volume regression measured with MR imaging at the time of brachytherapy can discriminate between patients who eventually will achieve a complete response to radiotherapy from those who will not. The second objective was to evaluate whether tumor volume regression predicts overall treatment failure. METHODS MRI was evaluated quantitatively in 35 patients; by means of tumor volumetry on T2-weighted MR images before treatment, at the first BCT application, and at the final BCT. The MR images were independently analyzed by two investigators. As a reference standard histopathologic confirmation of residual tumor and/or clinical exam during follow-up > 1 year were used. Area under the curve were compared, P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS There was a good correlation between volume measurements made by the two observers. A residual tumor volume >9.4 cm(3) at final BCT and tumor volume regression < 77 % of the pre-treatment volume were significantly associated with local residual tumor after completion of therapy (p < 0.02) (AUC, 0.98-1.00). A volume >2.8 cm(3) at final BCT was associated with overall treatment failure (p < 0.03). CONCLUSION Our study shows that volume analysis during BCT is a predictive tool for local tumor response and overall treatment outcome. The potential of local response assessment to identify patients at high risk of overall treatment failure is promising.
Collapse
|
7
|
Etebari M, Navari M, Piccaluga PP. SNPs Array Karyotyping in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. MICROARRAYS 2015; 4:551-69. [PMID: 27600240 PMCID: PMC4996401 DOI: 10.3390/microarrays4040551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The traditional methods for detection of chromosomal aberrations, which included cytogenetic or gene candidate solutions, suffered from low sensitivity or the need for previous knowledge of the target regions of the genome. With the advent of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, genome screening at global level in order to find chromosomal aberrations like copy number variants, DNA amplifications, deletions, and also loss of heterozygosity became feasible. In this review, we present an update of the knowledge, gained by SNPs arrays, of the genomic complexity of the most important subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Etebari
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine; Hematopathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna 40138, Italy.
| | - Mohsen Navari
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine; Hematopathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna 40138, Italy.
| | - Pier Paolo Piccaluga
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine; Hematopathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna 40138, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kirisits C, Rivard MJ, Baltas D, Ballester F, De Brabandere M, van der Laarse R, Niatsetski Y, Papagiannis P, Hellebust TP, Perez-Calatayud J, Tanderup K, Venselaar JLM, Siebert FA. Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM. Radiother Oncol 2013; 110:199-212. [PMID: 24299968 PMCID: PMC3969715 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2013] [Revised: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose A substantial reduction of uncertainties in clinical brachytherapy should result in improved outcome in terms of increased local control and reduced side effects. Types of uncertainties have to be identified, grouped, and quantified. Methods A detailed literature review was performed to identify uncertainty components and their relative importance to the combined overall uncertainty. Results Very few components (e.g., source strength and afterloader timer) are independent of clinical disease site and location of administered dose. While the influence of medium on dose calculation can be substantial for low energy sources or non-deeply seated implants, the influence of medium is of minor importance for high-energy sources in the pelvic region. The level of uncertainties due to target, organ, applicator, and/or source movement in relation to the geometry assumed for treatment planning is highly dependent on fractionation and the level of image guided adaptive treatment. Most studies to date report the results in a manner that allows no direct reproduction and further comparison with other studies. Often, no distinction is made between variations, uncertainties, and errors or mistakes. The literature review facilitated the drafting of recommendations for uniform uncertainty reporting in clinical BT, which are also provided. The recommended comprehensive uncertainty investigations are key to obtain a general impression of uncertainties, and may help to identify elements of the brachytherapy treatment process that need improvement in terms of diminishing their dosimetric uncertainties. It is recommended to present data on the analyzed parameters (distance shifts, volume changes, source or applicator position, etc.), and also their influence on absorbed dose for clinically-relevant dose parameters (e.g., target parameters such as D90 or OAR doses). Publications on brachytherapy should include a statement of total dose uncertainty for the entire treatment course, taking into account the fractionation schedule and level of image guidance for adaptation. Conclusions This report on brachytherapy clinical uncertainties represents a working project developed by the Brachytherapy Physics Quality Assurances System (BRAPHYQS) subcommittee to the Physics Committee within GEC-ESTRO. Further, this report has been reviewed and approved by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, The Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Jack L M Venselaar
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dimopoulos JCA, Petrow P, Tanderup K, Petric P, Berger D, Kirisits C, Pedersen EM, van Limbergen E, Haie-Meder C, Pötter R. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103:113-22. [PMID: 22296748 PMCID: PMC3336085 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 310] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2011] [Revised: 11/28/2011] [Accepted: 12/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The GYN GEC-ESTRO working group issued three parts of recommendations and highlighted the pivotal role of MRI for the successful implementation of 3D image-based cervical cancer brachytherapy (BT). The main advantage of MRI as an imaging modality is its superior soft tissue depiction quality. To exploit the full potential of MRI for the better ability of the radiation oncologist to make the appropriate choice for the BT application technique and to accurately define the target volumes and the organs at risk, certain MR imaging criteria have to be fulfilled. Technical requirements, patient preparation, as well as image acquisition protocols have to be tailored to the needs of 3D image-based BT. The present recommendation is focused on the general principles of MR imaging for 3D image-based BT. Methods and parameters have been developed and progressively validated from clinical experience from different institutions (IGR, Universities of Vienna, Leuven, Aarhus and Ljubljana) and successfully applied during expert meetings, contouring workshops, as well as within clinical and interobserver studies. It is useful to perform pelvic MRI scanning prior to radiotherapy (“Pre-RT-MRI examination”) and at the time of BT (“BT MRI examination”) with one MR imager. Both low and high-field imagers, as well as both open and close magnet configurations conform to the requirements of 3D image-based cervical cancer BT. Multiplanar (transversal, sagittal, coronal and oblique image orientation) T2-weighted images obtained with pelvic surface coils are considered as the golden standard for visualisation of the tumour and the critical organs. The use of complementary MRI sequences (e.g. contrast-enhanced T1-weighted or 3D isotropic MRI sequences) is optional. Patient preparation has to be adapted to the needs of BT intervention and MR imaging. It is recommended to visualise and interpret the MR images on dedicated DICOM-viewer workstations, which should also assist the contouring procedure. Choice of imaging parameters and BT equipment is made after taking into account aspects of interaction between imaging and applicator reconstruction, as well as those between imaging, geometry and dose calculation. In a prospective clinical context, to implement 3D image-based cervical cancer brachytherapy and to take advantage of its full potential, it is essential to successfully meet the MR imaging criteria described in the present recommendations of the GYN GEC-ESTRO working group.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bibliography. Lymphoma. Current world literature. Curr Opin Oncol 2011; 23:537-41. [PMID: 21836468 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0b013e32834b18ec] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|