A comparison of the biological effective dose of 50-kV electronic brachytherapy with (192)Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal cuff irradiation

Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers - a systematic review

Background

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an in-depth literature review of the management of endometrial and cervical cancers with electronic brachytherapy.

Materials and methods

An extensive literature search was performed and 9 articles were selected based on preset criteria.

Results

The reviewed studies provided dosimetric and clinical results. Patient populations were diverse and prescribed doses varied. When treatment plans were compared to those using cobalt 60 (⁶⁰Co) and iridium 192 (¹⁹²Ir) sources researchers found lower or equivalent doses in organs at risk while the doses at the applicator surface were significantly higher for electronic brachytherapy. In the eligible studies, a total of 72 patients received treatment with AxxentXoft vaginal applicator, 29 were treated with the Intrabeam vaginal applicator, and 8 with AxxentXoft cervical applicator.

Conclusions

All authors found that electronic brachytherapy was safe and well tolerated as higher mucosal doses did not present as adverse clinical effects. Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers has the potential to achieve equivalent tumor control while minimizing bowel and urinary toxicity thus improving the quality of life. More clinical data is needed to stratify patients who would benefit the most.

Feasibility of electronic brachytherapy in cervix cancer-A dosimetric comparison of different brachytherapy techniques

INTRODUCTION

This study analyzes cases in which electronic brachytherapy (eBT) led to acceptable treatment plans in cervical cancer. Findings were compared with dosimetry values obtained in ¹⁹²Ir-based treatments according to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and the disease stage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with cervical cancer from two centers. The patients were treated with ¹⁹²Ir based on MRI. It was possible to use interstitial needles via an Utrecht-type applicator. Dosimetry was simulated using eBT and the parameters D90 and D98 (HR-CTV) and D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc (bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon) were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison. The overall cohort of patients was analyzed, as were the sub-cohorts based on stage (FIGO stages I+IIA, IIB and III-IV). Finally, the dosimetry of the eBT plans was evaluated, and the plans obtained were classified as "good", "acceptable", or "poor".

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found between the eBT and ¹⁹²Ir plans for D98 (HR-CTV), D1cc and D0.1cc (bladder), and D1cc and D0.1cc (sigmoid colon). A total of 31 cases (64.6%) were considered good, seven (14.6%) were considered acceptable, and 10 (20.8%) were considered poor. For volumes <30 cc, all the plans were good or acceptable; for volumes >30 cc, 54.3% were good, and 71.4% were good or acceptable. By stage, eBT plans for patients with stage IB-IIA disease were good in 100%, whereas those for patients with stage IIB were good in 70.6% and III-IV disease were good in 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

eBT provides appropriate dosimetry for treatment of cervical cancer in selected cases.

Adjuvant electronic brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma: A 4-year outcomes report

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes of a single-center adjuvant electronic brachytherapy (e-BT) experience for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were retrospectively assessed. Intracavitary e-BT was applied through a cylindrical applicator (diameters 2.5-3.5 cm). e-BT single doses ranged between 4 and 7 Gy (EQD2 ∼ 6-12, α/β of 10 Gy and an relative biological effectiveness of 1.3) at 5-mm depth. Adverse events are reported at first week, 1-3 months, 3-12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months. The overall survival, disease-free survival, distant disease control rate, and local control rate were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were assessed. The median age was 68 [48-86] years. External beam radiotherapy was added in n = 8 (27.6%) patients. Staging was 13.8% for T1a, 51.7% for T1b, 24.1% for T2, 6.9% for T3a, and 3.4% for T3b. Grading was G3 in 51.7% (n = 15), G2 in 20.7% (n = 6), and G1 in 27.6% (n = 8). Median followup was 47 months [5-88]. Overall Grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity was 89.7% (n = 26), 17.2% (n = 5), and 6.9% (n = 2), respectively. No Grade 3 cystitis or proctitis or any Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred during followup. No local recurrences were detected. Estimated distant disease control rate was 92.1% (n = 2, distant metastasis at 7 and 11 months). Estimated 4-year overall survival was 84.8% (n = 4 events, two unrelated to disease) and disease-free survival was 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that e-BT resembles a very-low-toxicity profile and a high local control rate in the adjuvant scenario for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Maximum RBE change in 192Ir, 125I, and 169Yb brachytherapy and the corresponding effect on treatment planning

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine RBE variation as a function of distance from the radioactive source, and the potential impact of this variation on a realistic prostate brachytherapy treatment plan.

METHODS

Three brachytherapy sources (¹²⁵I, ¹⁹²Ir, and ¹⁶⁹Yb) were modelled in Geant4 Monte Carlo code, and the resulting electron energy spectrum in water in 3D space around these sources was scored (voxel size of 2 mm³). With this energy spectrum, microdosimetric techniques were used to calculate the maximum RBE, RBE_M, as a function of distance from the source. RBE_M of ¹²⁵I relative to ¹⁹²Ir was calculated in order to validate simulations against literature; all other RBE_M calculations were done by normalizing electron fluence at various distances to the source position. In order to examine the impact of RBE_M variation in treatment planning, a realistic ¹⁹²Ir prostate plan was re-evaluated in terms of RBE instead of absorbed dose.

RESULTS

The RBE_M of ¹²⁵I, ¹⁹²Ir, and ¹⁶⁹Yb at 8 cm away from the source was 0.994 (+/-0.002), 1.030 (+/-0.003), and 1.066 (+/-0.008), respectively. RBE_M in the HDR prostate treatment plan exhibited several hot (+3.6% in RBE_M) spots.

CONCLUSIONS

The large increase RBE_M observed in ¹⁶⁹Yb has not yet been described in the literature. Despite the presence of radiobiological hotspots in the HDR treatment, these variations are likely nominal and clinically insignificant.

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide guidance on quality management for electronic brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The task group used the risk-assessment approach of Task Group 100 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Because the quality management program for a device is intimately tied to the procedure in which it is used, the task group first designed quality interventions for intracavitary brachytherapy for both commercial electronic brachytherapy units in the setting of accelerated partial-breast irradiation. To demonstrate the methodology to extend an existing risk analysis for a different application, the task group modified the analysis for the case of post-hysterectomy, vaginal cuff irradiation for one of the devices.

RESULTS

The analysis illustrated how the TG-100 methodology can lead to interventions to reduce risks and improve quality for each unit and procedure addressed.

CONCLUSION

This report provides a model to guide facilities establishing a quality management program for electronic brachytherapy.

Treatment of cervical cancer with electronic brachytherapy

PURPOSE

We report the first cervical cancer cases treated with interstitial electronic brachytherapy (eBT) at our hospital and compare them with plans made with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy based on Ir192 (HDR-BT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients with cervical cancer were treated with the Axxent eBT device (Xoft, Inc.). Planning was with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography following the recommendations of the EMBRACE protocol. The dosimetry parameters of organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon (D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc). In addition, the V150 and V200 of irradiated tissue were compared for both eBT and HDR-BT. All patients received intensity-modulated external beam radiation therapy with a regimen of 23 sessions of 2 Gy followed by four sessions of 7 Gy of eBT performed over 2 weeks (two sessions followed by another two sessions a week later) following the EMBRACE recommendations. Each of the eight patients was followed to assess acute toxicity associated with treatment.

RESULTS

The doses reaching OAR for eBT plans were lower than for HDR-BT plans. As for acute toxicity associated with eBT, very few cases of mucositis were detected. No cases of rectal toxicity and one case with grade 1 urinary toxicity were detected. The results at 1 month are equally good, and no relapses have occurred to date.

CONCLUSIONS

The first results of treatment with the Axxent eBT device are promising, as no recurrences have been observed and toxicity is very low. eBT is a good alternative for treating cervical cancer in centers without access to conventional HDR.

Postoperative endometrial cancer treatments with electronic brachytherapy source

Purpose

This study is a dosimetric and acute toxicity comparison of endometrial cancer patients treated with either Axxent (Xoft, Inc., San José, CA, USA) electronic and interstitial brachytherapy versus interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT).

Materials and Methods

Between 2015 and 2017, 94 patients with postoperative endometrial cancer were treated in our centre with the Axxent electronic brachytherapy (eBT) system. The V150 and V200 are evaluated prospectively for each plan. The mean age of patients was 65.9 years (age range 33–84 years), with different tumour staging. Of the 94 patients, 37 received exclusive adjuvant brachytherapy (25 Gy in five sessions); the remaining patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with a regimen of 23 sessions of 2 Gy each to the entire pelvis, followed by eBT (15 Gy in three sessions). Additionally, the absorbed doses received by the organs at risk (OAR), urinary bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were compared with HDRBT plans, evaluating D2cc, V50% and V35%. Median follow-up was done for each of the 94 patients to assess the toxicity of the treatment: vaginal mucosa toxicity, rectal and urinary toxicity; and results are presented for acute toxicity, toxicity at 1 month after the end of treatment and follow-up after 12 months for a portion of patients according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity criteria.

Results

The doses in OAR for eBT plans were lower than that for HDRBT plans, both Ir-192 and Co-60 plans, whose doses were similar. The dose in bladder with eBT was 63.8% of the prescribed dose for D2cc versus 70.1% for HDRBT Ir-192, for V50% was 7.2% versus 12.7% and for V35% was 15.2% versus 28.2%. In rectum the D2cc was 61.2% versus 68.4%, for V50% was 7.9% versus 14.3% and for V35% was 16.7% versus 32%. Results demonstrated lower doses to OAR in all eBT plans. Acute toxicity in eBT was very low in cases of mucositis, with only one case of toxicity greater than grade 1, rectal toxicity and urinary toxicity; results at 1 month are equally good, toxicity symptoms disappeared and no relapses have occurred to date.

Conclusions

The results of treatment with the Axxent eBT unit for 94 patients are very good, as no recurrence has been observed and the toxicity of the treatment is very low. The increase in V150 and V200 has not produced an increase in vaginal mucosa toxicity, and the doses in the OAR are lower than in the plans implemented for HDRBT with Ir-192 or Co-60. eBT is a good alternative to treat endometrial cancer in centres without conventional HDR availability. To date, there are limited published studies reporting on outcomes from patients treated with eBT.

Dosimetric comparison of brachytherapy sources for high-dose-rate treatment of endometrial cancer: (192)Ir, (60)Co and an electronic brachytherapy source

OBJECTIVE

To compare high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy systems with (192)Ir, (60)Co and electronic brachytherapy source (EBS) for treatment of endometrial cancers.

METHODS

Two additional plans were generated per patient fraction using a (60)Co source and Xoft-EBS on 10 selected patients, previously treated with a vaginal cylinder applicator using a (192)Ir source. Dose coverage of "PTV_CYLD", a 5-mm shell surrounding the cylinder, was evaluated. Doses to the following organs at risk (OARs) the rectum, bladder and sigmoid were evaluated in terms of V35% and V50%, the percentage volume receiving 35% and 50% of the prescription dose, respectively, and D2cm(3), the highest dose to a 2-cm(3) volume of an OAR.

RESULTS

Xoft-EBS reduces doses to all OARs in the lower dose range, but it does not always provide better sparing of the rectum in higher dose range as does evaluation using D2cm3. V150% and V200% for PTV_CYLD was up to four times greater for Xoft-EBS plans than for plans generated with (192)Ir or (60)Co. Surface mucosal (vaginal cylinder surface) doses were also 23% higher for Xoft-EBS than for (192)Ir or (60)Co plans.

CONCLUSION

Xoft-EBS is a suitable HDR source for vaginal applicator treatment with advantages of reducing radiation exposure to OARs in the lower dose range, while simultaneously increasing the vaginal mucosal dose.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This work presents newer knowledge in dosimetric comparison between (192)Ir or (60)Co and Xoft-EBS sources for endometrial vaginal cylinder HDR planning.

Comparison of Axxent-Xoft, (192)Ir and (60)Co high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources for image-guided brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dosimetric differences and similarities between treatment plans generated with Axxent-Xoft electronic brachytherapy source (Xoft-EBS), (192)Ir and (60)Co for tandem and ovoids (T&O) applicators.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we replanned 10 patients previously treated with (192)Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Prescription was 7 Gy × 4 fractions to Point A. For each original plan, we created two additional plans with Xoft-EBS and (60)Co. The dose to each organ at risk (OAR) was evaluated in terms of V(35%) and V(50%), the percentage volume receiving 35% and 50% of the prescription dose, respectively, and D(2cc), highest dose to a 2 cm(3) volume of an OAR.

RESULTS

There was no difference between plans generated by (192)Ir and (60)Co, but the plans generated using Xoft-EBS showed a reduction of up to 50% in V(35%), V(50%) and D(2cc). The volumes of the 200% and 150% isodose lines, however, were 74% and 34% greater than the comparable volumes generated with the (192)Ir source. Point B dose was on average only 16% of the Point A dose for plans generated with Xoft-EBS compared with 30% for plans generated with (192)Ir or (60)Co.

CONCLUSION

The Xoft-EBS can potentially replace either (192)Ir or (60)Co in T&O treatments. Xoft-EBS offers either better sparing of the OARs compared with (192)Ir or (60)Co or at least similar sparing. Xoft-EBS-generated plans had higher doses within the target volume than (192)Ir- or (60)Co-generated ones.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This work presents newer knowledge in dosimetric comparison between Xoft-EBS, (192)Ir or (60)Co sources for T&O implants.