1
|
Hepel JT, Leonard KL, Yashar CM, Einck JP, Sha SJ, DiPetrillo TA, Wiggins DL, Graves TA, Edmonson DA, Gass JS, Rivard MJ, Wazer DE. Phase II Trial of Five-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Noninvasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:878-883. [PMID: 38151190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) NIBB has potential advantages over other APBI techniques by delivering highly conformal radiation with minimal collateral dose to the heart and lung compared with external beam techniques, but unlike other brachytherapy techniques NIBB is non-invasive. Previous data has shown encouraging outcomes using a 10-fraction regimen. To improve efficiency, convenience, and cost, reduction in the fraction number is desirable. Final results of a prospective phase II trial are reported. MATERIALS/METHODS NIBB APBI was delivered using 28.5Gy in 5 fractions daily over 1 week. Patient eligibility criteria required: invasive carcinoma ≤2.0 cm or DCIS ≤3.0 cm, ER positive (if invasive), lymph node negative, LVI absent, and lumpectomy with margins negative by 2mm. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration <30%. Secondary endpoints included any late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and local control. RESULTS 40 patients were treated with a median follow-up of 59.7 months. The mean age was 67 years (50-89 years) and tumor size was 1.0cm (0.3-2.0cm). 80% had invasive carcinoma. The mean breast separation with compression was 6.7cm (3.5-8.9cm). The 5-year actuarial local control was 96.6% and overall survival was 96.9%. Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were 15% and 0%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration was 2.5% (+/-2.5%) meeting the study's primary endpoint. The most common late toxicity of any grade was skin telangiectasia; 22.5% grade 1 and 15% grade 2. Only breast separation was associated with telangiectasia risk, p=0.002. Overall cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 75%, 25%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS NIBB APBI delivered in 5 fractions results in a low rate of late toxicity and a high rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcomes. Telangiectasia risk can be minimized by keeping breast separation ≤7.0cm. The local failure rate was appropriately low. Further investigation of this technique is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Kara L Leonard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sandra J Sha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida
| | - Thomas A DiPetrillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Doreen L Wiggins
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Theresa A Graves
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David A Edmonson
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jennifer S Gass
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David E Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Multi-institutional registry study evaluating the feasibility and toxicity of accelerated partial breast irradiation using noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:631-637. [PMID: 33642174 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) technique is a novel noninvasive yet targeted method for accelerated partial breast irradiation. We established a multi-institutional registry to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this technique across various practice settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS Institutions using the NIBB technique were invited to participate. Data for acute/late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and tumor recurrence were collected. Toxicity and cosmetic outcome were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, respectively. Treatment variables were analyzed for association with outcomes. RESULTS A total of 252 patients from eight institutions were analyzed. The median age was 69 years. The mean tumor size was 1.1 cm (0.1-4.0 cm). Treatment was delivered 10 fractions (34-36 Gy) in 75% and five fractions (28.5 Gy) in 22%. B.i.d. fractionation was used in 9%. Acute radiation dermatitis was Grade 0-1, 2, and 3 in 77%, 19%, and 4%, respectively. One hundred ninety-one patients with a median followup of 18 months (4-72 months) were evaluable for late outcomes. Late toxicity Grades 2 and 3 were observed in 8.8% and 1%, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 62%, 36%, and 2%, respectively. B.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher acute and late toxicity. Second-generation applicators were associated with lower late toxicity and better cosmetic outcome. Actuarial freedom from ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and true recurrence were 98.3% and 98.3% at 2 years and 90.9% and 95.4% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated partial breast irradiation using NIBB was well tolerated with a low rate of acute and late toxicity across various practice settings. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and cosmetic outcomes were favorable. b.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher toxicity. Longer followup is needed to confirm late endpoints.
Collapse
|
3
|
Automated position and size selection of round applicators for AccuBoost breast brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 12:586-592. [PMID: 33437307 PMCID: PMC7787202 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose AccuBoost is a complex non-invasive brachytherapy procedure for breast treatment. This technique requires a radiation oncologist to manually select applicator grid position and size by overlaying transparencies over a mammographic image to encompass surgical clips and resected tumor bed. An algorithm was developed in MATLAB™ to automate the selection of round applicators based on surgical clip position. Material and methods A total of 42 mammograms belonging to 10 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Images were pre-processed by masking imprinted localization grid and regions around the grid. A threshold was applied to isolate high-intensity pixels and generate a binary image. A set of morphological operations including region dilation, filling, clearing border structures, and erosion were performed to segment the different regions. A support vector machine classification model was trained to categorize segmented regions as either surgical clips or miscellaneous objects based on different region properties (area, perimeter, eccentricity, circularity, minor axis length, and intensity-derived quantities). Applicator center position was determined by calculating the centroid of detected clips. Size of the applicator was determined with the smallest circle that encompassed all clips with an isotropic 1.0 cm margin. Results The clip identification model classified 946 regions, with a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 98.2%. Applicator position was correctly predicted for 20 of 42 fractions and was within 0.5 cm of physician-selected position for 33 of 42 fractions. Applicator size was correctly predicted for 25 out of 42 fractions. Conclusions The proposed algorithm provided a method to quantitatively determine applicator position and size for AccuBoost treatments, and may serve as a tool for independent verifications. The discrepancy between physician-selected and algorithm-predicted determinations of applicator position and size suggests that the methodology may be further improved by considering radiomic features of breast tissue in addition to clip position.
Collapse
|
4
|
Leonard KL, Wazer DE, Listo M, Hepel JT. Mammographically guided noninvasive breast brachytherapy: Preoperative partial breast radiotherapy markedly improves targeting accuracy and decreases irradiated volume. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:339-344. [PMID: 33293214 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mammographically based noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) partial breast irradiation (PBI) is ideally suited for preoperative treatment. We hypothesize that delivering NIBB PBI to the preoperative tumor volume compared with the postoperative lumpectomy bed would simplify target identification and allow for a reduction in irradiated volume along each orthogonal axis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with invasive breast cancer treated with NIBB PBI at our institution were identified. Preoperative NIBB treatments were modeled along orthogonal craniocaudal and mediolateral axes with an applicator encompassing the gross lesion plus a 1 cm clinical target volume margin. Preoperative treatment volumes were calculated along each axis using the selected applicator surface area multiplied by the preoperative mammogram separation. The actual applicator size and breast separation from the first fraction of postoperative treatment was used to calculate the postoperative treatment volume. Paired -test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative treatment separation, area, and volume for each patient. RESULTS Forty-eight patients with Stage I-II breast cancer had imaging and treatment data available for review. Along the axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (116 cm 3 vs. 204 cm 3, respectively; p < 0.0001). Similarly, along the mediolateral axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (125 cm 3 vs. 216 cm 3, respectively; p < 0001). CONCLUSIONS Based on our retrospective comparison, PBI delivered using NIBB to the preoperative tumor may reduce the volume of healthy breast tissue receiving radiation as compared with NIBB to the postoperative tumor bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara L Leonard
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
| | - David E Wazer
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Listo
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah C, Vicini F. Accelerated partial breast irradiation-Redefining the treatment target for women with early stage breast cancer. Breast J 2019; 25:408-417. [PMID: 30950133 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Following breast conserving surgery, the standard of care has been to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy directed to the whole breast (WBI) over a period of 3-7 weeks. Over the past decade, increasing data have supported the concept that treatment to the whole breast may not be required in selected patients, allowing for the emergence of partial breast irradiation (PBI). Multiple randomized trials with 5-10 years of follow-up have been published documenting the safety and efficacy associated with PBI using multiple techniques. Questions that remain to be answered include (a) what is the optimal PBI technique for each clinical scenario, (b) are there additional patients that can be effectively managed with PBI approaches, and (c) are there different techniques/dose schedules that allow for further reduction in treatment duration and/or toxicities? Partial breast irradiation represents a standard approach for appropriately selected patients. PBI provides comparable clinical outcomes to WBI while allowing for a reduction in the duration treatment and the potential for reduced toxicities. Future studies may also help to better define which patients require no radiation, PBI, hypofractionated WBI or conventional WBI, based upon patient, clinical, pathologic features as well as potentially using tumor genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Frank Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|