A national survey of HDR source knowledge among practicing radiation oncologists and residents: Establishing a willingness-to-pay threshold for cobalt-60 usage

The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries

A disproportionate burden of gynecologic malignancies occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Radiation therapy is an integral component of treatment for gynecologic malignancies both from a curative (locally advanced cervical cancer) and palliative (bleeding cervical or pelvic mass) standpoint. Critical to understanding how better to serve patients in this regard is understanding both the extent of disease epidemiology and the radiotherapy infrastructure to treat these diseases. In this review, we explore various geographic regions and how they address a unique set of challenges specific to the peoples and culture of the region. We identify common threads across regions, including sparse distribution of radiation equipment, geographic access, and specialized training. We also highlight examples of success in the use of telemedicine and cross-cultural partnerships to help bolster access to training to ensure increased access to adequate and appropriate treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

Adjuvant electronic brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma: A 4-year outcomes report

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes of a single-center adjuvant electronic brachytherapy (e-BT) experience for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were retrospectively assessed. Intracavitary e-BT was applied through a cylindrical applicator (diameters 2.5-3.5 cm). e-BT single doses ranged between 4 and 7 Gy (EQD2 ∼ 6-12, α/β of 10 Gy and an relative biological effectiveness of 1.3) at 5-mm depth. Adverse events are reported at first week, 1-3 months, 3-12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months. The overall survival, disease-free survival, distant disease control rate, and local control rate were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were assessed. The median age was 68 [48-86] years. External beam radiotherapy was added in n = 8 (27.6%) patients. Staging was 13.8% for T1a, 51.7% for T1b, 24.1% for T2, 6.9% for T3a, and 3.4% for T3b. Grading was G3 in 51.7% (n = 15), G2 in 20.7% (n = 6), and G1 in 27.6% (n = 8). Median followup was 47 months [5-88]. Overall Grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity was 89.7% (n = 26), 17.2% (n = 5), and 6.9% (n = 2), respectively. No Grade 3 cystitis or proctitis or any Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred during followup. No local recurrences were detected. Estimated distant disease control rate was 92.1% (n = 2, distant metastasis at 7 and 11 months). Estimated 4-year overall survival was 84.8% (n = 4 events, two unrelated to disease) and disease-free survival was 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that e-BT resembles a very-low-toxicity profile and a high local control rate in the adjuvant scenario for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with low energy x-rays for primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) resembles a safe and efficient for STS treatment. The first data on electronic-IORT (eIORT) using low-energy photons is herein presented.

Methods

Thirty-one patients with newly and recurrent STS were retrospectively assessed. EIORT was applied with low-energy photons during surgery. The dose was either prescribed to the applicator surface (spherical applicators) or 5 mm depth (flat applicators). Overall progression-free survival (O-PFS), local progression-free survival (L-PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Median follow-up was 4.88 (1.0–8.95) years. Twenty-five patients (80.6%) had recurrent STS with prior treatment. The resection status was R1 in 25.8% and R2 in 6.5%. The distribution was 51.7% for extremities, 35.5% for abdomen and pelvis, 9.7% for thorax and 3.2% for head and neck tumors. The median O-PFS was 11.0 months, with 42.6% 5-year estimated O-PFS. The only local recurrence in the primary setting occurred after 22 months. Median L-PFS in recurrent STS was 12.5 months, with 65.5% 5-year estimated L-PFS. The 5-year OS estimated rate was 94.7% (3 events after 7 years). No G3 toxicity related to eIORT was observed. Two patients exhibited G2 acute neuropathic pain. Late neuropathic pain was seen in 6 patients being 3 graded as G1 and 3 as G2. No wound-related toxicity was found.

Conclusion

Electronic IORT with low-energy photons is a safe treatment option for STS, yielding similar outcomes as historical series reporting IORT with electrons or HDR brachytherapy.

Cost in perspective: direct assessment of American market acceptability of Co-60 in gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy and contrast with experience abroad

Purpose

While Ir-192 remains the mainstay isotope for gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the U.S., Co-60 is used abroad. Co-60 has a longer half-life than Ir-192, which may lead to long-term cost savings; however, its higher energy requires greater shielding. This study analyzes Co-60 acceptability based on a one-time expense of additional shielding and reports the financial experience of Co-60 in Peru’s National Cancer Institute, which uses both isotopes.

Material and methods

A nationwide survey was undertaken assessing physician knowledge of Co-60 and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for additional shielding, assuming a source more cost-effective than Ir-192 was available. With 440 respondents, 280 clinicians were decision-makers and provided WTPs, with results previously reported. After completing a shielding report, we estimated costs for shielding expansion, noting acceptability to decision makers’ WTP. Using activity-based costing, we note the Peruvian fiscal experience.

Results

Shielding estimates ranged from $173,000 to $418,000. The percentage of respondents accepting high-density modular or lead shielding (for union and non-union settings) were 17.5%, 11.4%, 3.9%, and 3.2%, respectively. Shielding acceptance was associated with greater number of radiation oncologists in a respondent’s department but not time in practice or the American Brachytherapy Society membership. Peru’s experience noted cost savings with Co-60 of $52,400 annually.

Conclusions

By comparing the cost of additional shielding for a sample institution’s HDR suite with radiation oncologists’ WTP, this multi-institutional collaboration noted < 20% of clinicians would accept additional shielding. Despite low acceptability in the US, Co-60 demonstrates cost-favorability in Peru and may similarly in other locations.