Opioid consumption and pain in gynecological cancer patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy

Comparison of three analgesic regimens in women undergoing cervical brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Effective periprocedural analgesia is an important aspect of cervical brachytherapy delivery, with implications for patient comfort and attendance for subsequent fractions. We compared the efficacy and safety of three analgesic modalities: intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and programmed-intermittent epidural bolus with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PIEB-PCEA).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-seven brachytherapy episodes involving 36 patients between July 2016 and June 2019 in a single tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. Episodes were divided into two key phases: Phase 1 (while applicator remained in situ) and Phase 2 (following applicator removal until discharge or 4 h). For the primary endpoint, pain scores were retrieved and analyzed by analgesic modality with respect to median score and an internally defined "unacceptable" pain experience (>20% of scores being ≥4/10; i.e., moderate or greater). Total nonepidural oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) and toxicity/complication events were reported as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, there was a significantly higher median pain score (p < 0.001) and more episodes with unacceptable pain scores (46%) in the IV-PCA group compared with either epidural modality (6-14%; p < 0.001). In Phase 2, we observed a greater median pain score (p = 0.007) and higher proportion of patient episodes with unacceptable pain scores (38%) in the CEI group compared with both the IV-PCA (13%) and PIEB-PCEA (14%) groups (p = 0.001). There was a significant difference in median OMED used throughout all phases across the PIEB-PCEA (0 mg), IV-PCA (70 mg), and CEI (15 mg) groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PIEB-PCEA is safe and offers superior analgesia compared to IV-PCA or CEI for pain control after applicator placement in cervical brachytherapy.

The MRI-guided two adaptive brachytherapy fractions versus one adaptive brachytherapy fraction in one application for the cervical cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively compared the clinical and toxicity outcomes for the cervical cancer of the MRI-guided two adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) fractions versus one IGABT fraction in one application.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with cervical cancer received external beam radiotherapy combined with or without concurrent chemotherapy, which was followed by the IGABT. The IGABT in 63 patients had one IGABT in each application (Arm 1), while in the other 57 patients, at least one treatment was two continuous IGABT every other day in one application (Arm 2). Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) were analyzed. Brachytherapy-related toxicities were evaluated, which included pain, dizziness, nausea/vomiting, fever/infection, blood loss during the removal of applicator and needles, the deep venous thrombosis, and other acute toxicities. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE 5.0) was used to evaluate the incidence and severity of toxicities of the urinary system, lower digestive system, and reproduction system. Kaplan-Meier and the Log-rank test were used to analyze the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of the patients in Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 23.5 and 12.0 months, respectively. The overall treatment time was significantly shorter in Arm 2 than Arm 1 (60 vs. 64 d; P = 0.017). The OS, CSS, PFS, and LC in Arm1 and Arm 2 was 77.8% vs. 86.0% (P = 0.632), 77.8% vs. 87.7% (P = 0.821), 68.3% vs. 70.2% (P = 0.207), and 92.1% vs. 94.7% (P = 0.583), respectively. The highest NRS of the pain during brachytherapy waiting period (2.22 ± 1.84 vs. 3.02 ± 1.65; P < 0.001) and at the time of the removal of the applicator (4.69 ± 1.49 vs. 5.30 ± 1.18; P < 0.001) in the patients who received one hybrid intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in one application and two continuous IC/ISBT every other day in one application were significantly different. So far four patients with grade 3 late toxicities have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrated that the two continuous IGABT every other day in one application is a logistically applicable, safe, and effective treatment strategy that could shorten the overall treatment time and reduce the medical cost, comparing with the one IGABT in one application.

Opioid consumption and pain in patients with gynecological cancer who underwent spinal anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for interstitial brachytherapy

AIMS

Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is an effective option for delivering conformal high dose radiation to the target volume with better organ-at risk sparing but is thought to be more invasive and painful than other methods. This study investigated pain levels and opioid consumption in patients who received spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA) for their ISBT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients that underwent ISBT from April 2014 to September 2018 were analyzed from a prospective institutional database. The most prevalent malignancies were cervical (45%), recurrent endometrial (27%) and vaginal (20%) cancers. Baseline patient characteristics, radiation treatment details, anesthesia records, and inpatient charts were obtained. Opioid consumption was quantified as oral morphine equivalent per day (OMEq/day) from implantation until removal. Pain score levels were collected by using an 11-point scoring system.

RESULTS

Ninety nine patients received GA and 40 patients received SA as their anesthesia for ISBT. During their first admission, 76 patients (55%) required intravenous opioids. Patients receiving SA had significantly lower mean pain scores on the morning of their procedure 6 (Interquartile range [IQR] 2-8) vs. 0 (IQR: 0-1); p < 0.001]. Pain did not significantly differ between cohorts at any other time. During the first admission, SA patients had a lower median opioid usage of 23 (IQR: 9-47) mg/day compared to GA patients at 38 (IQR: 21-71) mg/day (p = 0.011). No difference in opioid consumption was seen during subsequent admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing ISBT, SA provides better immediate pain control post insertion compared to GA. Patients who received SA used lower amounts of opioids during their first ISBT insertion.

Bone pain from spinal metastases: Iodine-125 brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of CT-guided iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy in patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who were not suitable to receive radiotherapy.

METHODS

A cohort of 68 patients with spinal metastasis induced pain not fully relieved by opioids and did not receive external beam radiation therapy due to poor general status were enrolled and underwent CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for analgesic treatment.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 8 weeks after brachytherapy. Mean Numerical Rating Scale score before brachytherapy was 7.3±1.3 and decreased to 3.3±0.9, 2.6±0.8, 2.7±0.8, 2.9±0.9 and 3.3±1.1 at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Daily dose of morphine equivalent was 105.1±28.0 mg before brachytherapy and decreased to 45.3±13.7, 39.9±14.2, 40.4±14.9, 48.5±18.0 and 62.4±17.5 mg at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Patients had fewer daily episodes of breakthrough pain after brachytherapy (p<0.001). Patients had improvement in pain-related functional interference and in hospital anxiety and depression score after brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is an effective and safe intervention for patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who are not able to receive radiation therapy.

Demographic and clinical factors associated with variations in opioid administration using conscious sedation during HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To examine patient characteristics that predispose to higher opioid administration during tandem and ovoid (T&O) high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Patients were included if they received at least one fraction of HDR T&O brachytherapy with analgesia administration recorded in the Medication Administration Record. Fentanyl dose was dichotomized as "low" (mean <125 μg per fraction), or "high" (mean ≥ 125 μg per fraction). Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed comparing mean opioid dose per fraction with demographic and clinical information. RESULTS From July 2014 through May 2020, 113 patients underwent 531 T&O HDR brachytherapy fractions with oral benzodiazepine and intravenous opioid fentanyl for conscious sedation. The median opioid dose per fraction was 100 μg fentanyl (range 0-250 μg). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, younger age (OR 1.071, p = 0.002) and higher BMI (OR 1.091, p = 0.019) were associated with increased opioid administration during brachytherapy. Black women received less opioid during brachytherapy when compared to White women (OR 0.296, p = 0.047). FIGO stage, ECOG score, smoking status, prior narcotic use, prior illicit drug use, parity, prior cervical procedure, Smit sleeve placement, and distance to treatment center were not associated with high opioid dose. CONCLUSION Cervical cancer patients who are younger or have higher BMI receive more narcotic analgesia during HDR brachytherapy whereas Black women received less narcotic analgesia, irrespective of age and BMI. This underscores the immediate need to address how pain is assessed and managed during brachytherapy.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, and conventional intravenous opioids for gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy: A single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE Interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies is stressful physically and mentally; however, optimal analgesic methods remain unclear. We investigated the effect of analgesic methods on pain and adverse events during interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS The data of 73 patients who underwent interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies between April 2015 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), and conventional intravenous opioid administration were used for analgesia during treatment. We compared the analgesic effects based on a numerical rating scale (NRS), the number of additional analgesics, and the adverse events associated with analgesia. The NRS score was calculated as an average value for every 12 h (NRS1: treatment on the 1st day from 12 to 24 o'clock; NRS2: treatment on the 2nd day from 0 to 12 o'clock; NRS3: treatment on the 2nd day from 12 to 24 o'clock). The mean NRS score differences between the methods were evaluated using mixed models for repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS The NRS score was significantly lower at all times for PCEA (NRS1: p = 0.003; NRS2: p = 0.011; NRS3: p < 0.001). NRS2 and NRS3 were significantly lower for PCIA (NRS2: p = 0.043; NRS3: p < 0.001) than for the conventional method. The NRS scores for PCEA and PCIA were not significantly different. Moreover, additional analgesics and adverse events did not differ between the three treatments. CONCLUSION PCEA and PCIA were superior to conventional intravenous opioids for analgesia in interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies. However, adverse events associated with PCEA and PCIA were not reduced.

Interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies: Complications, toxicities, and management

From both a disease and management perspective, locally advanced gynecologic cancers present a significant challenge. Dose escalation with brachytherapy serves as a key treatment, providing conformal radiation while sparing at-risk organs. Intracavitary brachytherapy techniques have been shown to be effective, with improving tumor control and toxicity profiles with the advent of three-dimensional image planning. Despite this, the variations in tumor size, location, and pelvic anatomy may lead to suboptimal dosimetry with standard intracavitary applicators in some clinical scenarios. The addition of interstitial needles (interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT)) can improve the conformality of brachytherapy treatments by adding needles to peripheral (and central) regions of the target volume, improving the ability to escalate doses in these undercovered regions while sparing organs at risk. Interstitial brachytherapy can be delivered by intracavitary and interstitial hybrid applicators (ICBT/ISBT), perineal template (P-ISBT), or by free-hand technique. ISBT has however yet to be widely available because of concerns of complications and toxicities from this specialized treatment. However, with the increasing use of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy, there is an opportunity to increase the level of expertise in the gynecologic radiation oncology community with an improved understanding of the potential complications and morbidity. In this article, we review the acute and long-term toxicity in both ICBT/ISBT and P-ISBT using image-guided brachytherapy.

Evaluation of an MR-only interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy workflow using MR-line marker for catheter reconstruction

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent soft-tissue contrast enabling the contouring of targets and organs at risk (OARs) during gynecological interstitial brachytherapy procedure. Despite its benefit, one of the main challenges toward MRI-only workflows is that the implanted catheters are not reliably visualized on MR images. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of MR-only workflow using an in-house MR line marker during interstitial gynecological high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy were included in this study. The hybrid CT/MR-treated plan was used as the study reference plan. Five users manually reconstructed the catheter's path on MR images (3D T1- and T2-weighted). Subsequently, the dwell positions from the users' plans were superimposed on the reference plans to evaluate the dosimetric impact of the using MR-only for catheter reconstruction in comparison with hybrid CT/MR approach. Variability of dwell positions between users and reconstruction time was also evaluated.

RESULTS

More than 96.90% of catheter reconstruction variations were < 2 mm. No statistical differences were reported between MR-only and hybrid CT/MR in gross tumor volume D₉₈ and high-risk clinical target volume D₉₀, respectively. For the OARs (bladder, sigmoid, rectum, and bowel), no significant changes were observed in any dose metrics between MR-only and hybrid CT/MR. The average reconstruction time was 51 ± 10 minutes across all ten patients.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of MR-only workflow using MR line marker during interstitial gynecological HDR brachytherapy has been validated in this study. The results show that the MR-only workflow is equivalent to the conventional hybrid CT/MR approach in terms of gross tumor volume and high-risk clinical target volume coverage and respecting of OARs dose limits.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).