Pattern of relapse and dose received by the recurrent intraprostatic nodule in low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with single fraction 19 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Single-dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus two and three fractions for locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Single-dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SD-HDR-BT) was compared to two or three fraction HDR BT in intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer with median follow-up of 10 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

293 patients received 1 × 19Gy or 1 × 20Gy (Group A = 49), 2 × 13Gy (Group B = 138), or 3 × 10.5 Gy (Group C = 106) HDR BT. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free interval (bRFI). Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity used RTOG scales and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Freedom from biochemical relapse (bRFI), overall survival (OS) and GU, GI and IPSS morbidity were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were obtained using Cox's proportional hazard.

RESULTS

At 10 years, K-M estimates of bRFI were 64 % (Group A), 72 % (Group B), and 76 % (Group C) (p = 0.2). No statistically significant difference was seen in OS. In multivariate analysis risk-category and ADT administration, but not dose, were significant predictors of relapse (p = 0.0003 and 0.03, respectively). At ten years, GU grade 3 events were 8 % (A), 2 % (B) and 13 % (C); (p = 0.01). IPSS ≥ 20 was 31 % (A), 20 % (B) and 23 % (C); (p = 0.6) and grade 3 GI was 0 % in groups A and B and 2 % in C; (p = 0.3). No GU or GI grade-4 events were observed. Pre-treatment IPSS was a highly significant predictor of failure in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcome data show reduced but not statistically significant difference in PSA control, and no difference in overall survival, between SD-HDR-BT and 2 or 3 fractions of HDR-BT.

AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy

Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.

Efficacy of focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with low or favourable: intermediate-risk prostate cancer-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer (PCa) is men's second most predominant cancer worldwide. Because the prostate-specific antigen test is used in diagnostics, PCa is more often diagnosed in the early stages, making radical treatment of the disease possible. However, it is estimated that over a million men worldwide suffer from radical treatment-related complications. Thus, focal treatment has been proposed as a solution, which aims to destroy the predominant lesson that determines the progression of the disease. The main objective of our study is to compare the quality of life and efficacy of patients diagnosed with PCa before and after the treatment with focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy and to compare results with focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy and active surveillance.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

150 patients diagnosed with low-risk or favourable intermediate-risk PCa who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Patients are going to be randomly assigned to the study groups: focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 1), focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 2) and active surveillance (group 3). The study's primary outcomes are quality of life after the procedure and time without biochemical disease recurrence. The secondary outcomes are early and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal reactions after the focal high-dose and low-dose-rate brachytherapies and evaluation of the importance and significance of in vivo dosimetry used for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Bioethics committee approval was obtained before this study. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Vilnius regional bioethics committee; approval ID 2022/6-1438-911.

Safety and efficacy associated with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SFHDR) for localized prostate cancer has been tried in clinical trials, relevant medical evidence is currently lacking. It is necessary to systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of SFHDR.

METHODS

Comprehensive and systematic searches for eligible studies were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints included safety and efficacy, represented by toxic effects and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), respectively. The proportion rates were used as the effect measure for each study and were presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and related 95% prediction interval (PI). Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator (REML) and the Hartung-Knapp method were used in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1440 patients. The median age of patients was 66.9 years old (62-73 years old) and the median follow-up was 47.5 months (12-75 months). The estimates of cumulative occurrence for severe gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxic effects were 0.1% (95% CI 0-0.2%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0-1.2%), and for grade 2 toxic effects were 1.6% (95% CI 0.1-4.7%) and 17.1% (95% CI 5.4-33.5%), respectively. The estimate of 3‑year bRFS was 87.5% (95% CI 84.4-90.3%) and 71.0% (95% CI 63.0-78.3%) for 5‑year bRFS. The pooled bRFS rates for low-risk patients were 99.0% (95% CI 85.2-100.0%) at 3 years and 80.9% (95% CI 75.4-85.9%) at 5 years, and the risk group was found to be statistically correlated with bRFS (3-year bRFS, P < 0.01; 5‑year bRFS, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

SFHDR is associated with favorable tolerability and suboptimal clinical benefit in patients with localized prostate cancer. Ongoing and planned high-quality prospective studies are necessary to verify its safety and efficacy.

Simultaneous ThermoBrachytherapy: Electromagnetic Simulation Methods for Fast and Accurate Adaptive Treatment Planning

The combination of interstitial hyperthermia treatment (IHT) with high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) can improve clinical outcomes since it highly enhances the efficiency of cell kill, especially when applied simultaneously. Therefore, we have developed the ThermoBrachy applicators. To effectively apply optimal targeted IHT, treatment planning is considered essential. However, treatment planning in IHT is rarely applied as it is regarded as difficult to accurately calculate the deposited energy in the tissue in a short enough time for clinical practice. In this study, we investigated various time-efficient methods for fast computation of the electromagnetic (EM) energy deposition resulting from the ThermoBrachy applicators. Initially, we investigated the use of an electro-quasistatic solver. Next, we extended our investigation to the application of geometric simplifications. Furthermore, we investigated the validity of the superpositioning principle, which can enable adaptive treatment plan optimization without the need for continuous recomputation of the EM field. Finally, we evaluated the accuracy of the methods by comparing them to the golden standard Finite-Difference Time-Domain calculation method using gamma-index analysis. The simplifications considerably reduced the computation time needed, improving from >12 h to a few seconds. All investigated methods showed excellent agreement with the golden standard by showing a >99% passing rate with 1%/0.5 mm Dose Difference and Distance-to-Agreement criteria. These results allow the proposed electromagnetic simulation method to be used for fast and accurate adaptive treatment planning.

Patterns of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Brachytherapy Determined by Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Imaging

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize the patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after brachytherapy (BT) using 2-(3-[1-carboxy-5-([6-¹⁸F-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl]-amino)-pentyl]-ureido)-pentanedioic acid ([¹⁸F]DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were selected from an ongoing prospective institutional trial investigating the use of [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT in recurrent prostate cancer (NCT02899312). This report included patients who underwent BT (either monotherapy or boost) and experienced a biochemical failure (BF) defined by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 2 ng/mL above nadir).

RESULTS

Between March 2017 and April 2020, 670 patients underwent [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT imaging. Of these 670 patients, 93 were treated with BT; 73 underwent monotherapy, and 20 underwent BT boost (19 low-dose rate and 1 high-dose rate). To report on patterns of recurrence outcomes, 86 patients (median prescan PSA 6.0) with a positive [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT scan and true BF were included. The most common location of relapse was local; 62.8% had a component of local failure (defined as prostate and/or seminal vesicles), and 46.5% had isolated local failure only, with no other sites of involvement. Regional failure occurred in 40.7% of patients, and 36.0% had metastatic failure. Isolated local recurrence was seen in 54.3% of monotherapy patients versus only in 12.5% of boost patients. Metastatic failure was seen in 28.6% of monotherapy patients versus 68.8% of the boost patients. Local recurrences (69.0%) were found within the same prostate biopsy sextant involved with the tumor at diagnosis, and 76.0% of patients with seminal vesicle recurrences had prostate-base involvement at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to previous evidence, our study suggests that in prostate BT patients with biochemical recurrence, the most common site of failure is local for the patients treated with monotherapy and metastatic for patients treated with a combination of external beam radiation and BT boost.

Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go?

Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.

Design of the novel ThermoBrachy applicators enabling simultaneous interstitial hyperthermia and high dose rate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

In High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for prostate cancer there is a need for a new way of increasing cancer cell kill in combination with a stable dose to the organs at risk. In this study, we propose a novel ThermoBrachy applicator that offers the unique ability to apply interstitial hyperthermia while simultaneously serving as an afterloading catheter for high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. This approach achieves a higher thermal enhancement ratio than in sequential application of radiation and hyperthermia and has the potential to decrease the overall treatment time.

METHODS

The new applicator uses the principle of capacitively coupled electrodes. We performed a proof of concept experiment to demostrate the feasibility of the proposed applicator. Moreover, we used electromagnetic and thermal simulations to evaluate the power needs and temperature homogeneity in different tissues. Furthermore we investigated whether dynamic phase and amplitude adaptation can be used to improve longitudinal temperature control.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrate that the electrodes achieve good temperature homogeneity in a homogenous phantom when following current applicator spacing guidelines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by dynamic phase and amplitude adaptation provides a great advancement for further adaptability of the heating pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

This newly designed ThermoBrachy applicator has the potential to revise the interest in interstitial thermobrachytherapy, since the simultaneous application of radiation and hyperthermia enables maximum thermal enhancement and at maximum efficiency for patient and organization.

Predicting Biochemical Failure in Irradiated Patients With Prostate Cancer by Tumour Volume Measured by Multiparametric MRI

BACKGROUND/AIM

We examined the prognostic value of intraprostatic gross tumour volume (GTV) as measured by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients with prostate cancer following (primary) external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective monocentric study, we analysed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after EBRT. GTV was delineated in pre-treatment mpMRI (GTV-MRI) using T2-weighted images. Cox-regression analyses were performed considering biochemical failure recurrence-free survival (BRFS) as outcome variable.

RESULTS

Among 131 patients, after a median follow-up of 57 months, biochemical failure occurred in 27 (21%). GTV-MRI was not correlated with % of positive biopsy cores, Gleason score and initial PSA (all r<0.2) and only moderately correlated with cT stage (r=0.32). In univariate analysis, cT stage, Gleason score and GTV-MRI were higher in subjects with shorter BRFS (p<0.05). GTV-MRI remained a significant predictor for BRFS in multivariate analyses, independent of Gleason score and cT stage.

CONCLUSION

GTV, defined using mpMRI, provides incremental prognostic value for BRFS, independent of established risk factors. This supports the implementation of imaging-based GTV for risk-stratification, although further validation is needed.

Dosimetry of local failure with single dose 19 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Long-term follow up of single dose high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) for localised prostate cancer has revealed higher than expected rates of biochemical and local failure. This study aimed (i) to investigate the pattern of relapse within the prostate with reference to the initial site of disease in those patients; and (ii) to examine if there were any relationships between the HDR BT dosimetric parameters to these areas of recurrence.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review of treatment records of patients who received 19 Gy single fraction of HDR BT was carried out. A matched pair analysis used one control for each biochemical recurrence case matched with pre-treatment Clinical target volume (CTV) size, Gleason score, T stage, risk category and presence of an identifiable dominant intraprostatic nodule (DIL) for each biochemical recurrence case identified. For all datasets, the pre HDR BT DILs were delineated on the diagnostic pre-treatment T2-weighted MRI and planning CT images. For patients with local recurrence post HDR BT, the recurrent nodules were contoured on the diagnostic T2-weighted MRI and choline PET which were registered to the original HDR BT planning CT. Dosimetric parameters of CTV, planning target volume (PTV), DIL and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to investigate if there were any significant differences in dosimetric parameters between cases and controls. Cox regression analysis was performed to explore if there were any clinical and dosimetric parameters predicting for biochemical progression free survival (bPFS), local recurrence free survival (LR-PFS) and DIL recurrence free survival (DIL-PFS).

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, 180 patients received 19 Gy HDR-BT monotherapy. With a median follow up of 36 months, 19 (10.6%) patients developed biochemical recurrence. Of the 19 patients with biochemical failure, 13 had a local recurrence, including 7 who occurred at the site of DIL. Thirty-eight intermediate/high risk patients were included in the matched pair analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in all CTV, PTV, DIL and OAR dosimetric parameters between cases and controls (p > 0.05). For the Cox regression analysis, none of the covariates investigated were found to be statistically significant factors to predict for bPFS, LC-PFS and DIL-PFS.

CONCLUSION

No associations between biochemical recurrences and HDR BT dosimetry were identified in our cohort of patients receiving 19 Gy single fraction HDR BT. A large proportion of recurrences occurred at the site of original disease. HDR BT for intermediate/high risk prostate cancer should be undertaken using a minimum of two fractions.

A radiobiological study of the schemes with a low number of fractions in high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

Schemes with high doses per fraction and small number of fractions are commonly used in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer. Our aim was to analyze the differences between published clinical results and the predictions of radiobiological models for absorbed dose required in a single fraction monotherapy HDR-BT.

Material and methods

Published HDR-BT clinical results for low- and intermediate-risk patients with prostate cancer were revised. For 13 clinical studies with 16 fractionation schedules between 1 and 9 fractions, a dose-response relation in terms of the biochemical control probability (BC) was established using Monte Carlo-based statistical methods.

Results

We obtained a value of α/β = 22.8 Gy (15.1-60.2 Gy) (95% CI) much larger than the values in the range 1.5-3.0 Gy that are usually considered to compare the results of different fractionation schemes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using doses per fraction below 6 Gy. The doses in a single fraction producing BC = 90% and 95% were 22.3 Gy (21.5-24.2 Gy) and 24.3 Gy (23.0-27.9 Gy), respectively.

Conclusions

The α/β obtained in our analysis of 22.8 Gy for a range of dose per fraction between 6 and 20.5 Gy was much greater than the one currently estimated for prostate cancer using low doses per fraction. This high value of α/β explains reasonably well the data available in the region of high doses per fraction considered.

Efficacy and toxicity outcomes for patients treated with focal salvage high dose rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer

•

Local recurrence of prostate cancer may be treated with salvage therapies.

•

Focal salvage high dose rate brachytherapy provides good biochemical control.

•

Severe genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities are low.

Introduction

Isolated local recurrence of prostate cancer following primary radiotherapy or brachytherapy may be treated with focal salvage high dose rate brachytherapy, although there remains an absence of high quality evidence to support this approach.

Methods

Men with prostate cancer treated consecutively between 2015 and 2018 using 19 Gy in a single fraction high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) for locally recurrent prostate cancer were identified from an institutional database. Univariable analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between patient, disease and treatment factors with biochemical progression free survival (bPFS).

Results

43 patients were eligible for evaluation. Median follow up duration was 26 months (range 1–60). Median bPFS was 35 months (95% confidence interval 25.6–44.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates for bPFS at 1, 2 and 3 years post salvage were 95.2%, 70.6% and 41.8% respectively. On univariable Cox regression analysis, only nadir PSA was significantly associated with bPFS although the majority of patients were also treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Only one late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was observed.

Conclusion

Focal salvage HDR brachytherapy may provide good biochemical control with a low risk of severe toxicity. Further evaluation within clinical trials are needed to establish its role in the management of locally recurrent prostate cancer.

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is a treatment option for localized prostate cancer, but optimal dose and fractionation is unknown. We report efficacy results of a randomized phase II trial of HDR monotherapy delivered as either one or two fractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had low or intermediate risk prostate cancer, prostate volume <60 cc, and no androgen deprivation use. 170 patients were randomized to receive HDR as either a single fraction of 19 Gy or as two fractions of 13.5 Gy one week apart. Median age was 65 years, median PSA was 6.33 ng/ml, and Grade Group 1, 2 and 3 was present in 28%, 60%, and 12%, respectively. There was no difference in baseline factors between arms and 19%, 51% and 30% had low risk, favourable intermediate and unfavourable intermediate risk disease, respectively. The Phoenix definition was used to define biochemical failure, all local failures were confirmed by biopsy and toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v.4.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 60 months. PSA decreased more quickly in the 2-fraction arm (p = 0.009). Median PSA at 5-years was 0.65 ng/ml in the single fraction and 0.16 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival and cumulative incidence of local failure was 73.5% and 29% in the single fraction arm and 95% (p = 0.001) and 3% (p < 0.001) in the 2-fraction arm, respectively. Recurrence was not associated with initial stage, grade group, or risk group. Grade 2 late rectal toxicity occurred in 1% while the incidence of grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity was 45% and 1%, respectively, with no difference between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR monotherapy delivered as two fraction of 13.5 Gy is well tolerated with a high cancer control rate at 5 years. Single fraction monotherapy is inferior and should not be used.

Pattern of relapse and dosimetric analysis of a single dose 19 Gy HDR-brachytherapy phase II trial

PURPOSE

To report the pattern of relapse within the prostate with reference to the initial site of disease in patients treated with single fraction 19-Gy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients were treated according to a prospective study of single-fraction HDR-brachytherapy. Treatment was delivered using 192Ir to a dose of 19 Gy prescribed to the prostate. Patients who experienced a biochemical failure underwent a re-staging multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy to rule-out local recurrence. In patients with visible Dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) on pretreatment mpMRI, the site of local relapse was compared with the initial site of disease. The dose received by the site of recurrence was investigated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 48 months (range 29-63). The PSA nadir was reached at 24 months follow-up, with a median value of 1.07 ng/mL. To date, 14 patients (32%) have experienced biochemical failure (4 patients low-risk and 10 intermediate-risk; p = 0.013). Re-staging mpMRI was performed in 11/14 patients. Eleven patients underwent MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy confirming local relapse in all patients. The analysis of DVH of all 44 patients revealed that patients with biochemical failure had received significantly lower doses in terms of V100, V125 and D90 (p = 0.032, p = 0.018 and p = 0.018 respectively). In patients with DILs on diagnostic mpMRI, the mean D90 and D98 on DIL were lower for patients with biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This dosimetric analysis demonstrates a dose-response relationship in patients treated with single fraction 19 Gy. Patients with intermediate risk disease, with visible DIL on mpMRI and patients treated with cooler implants have higher incidence of biochemical and local failure.

Single dose high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer: Early results of a UK national cohort study

BACKGROUND

HDR brachytherapy alone is effective for the treatment of localised prostate cancer when given in 2-4 or more fractions. Single dose treatment has been explored in small cohort studies to date. This paper reports a large patient population with localised prostate cancer treated with single dose HDR brachytherapy delivering 19 Gy providing early outcome data from this approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven centres across the UK collaborated in this national protocol to deliver 19 Gy to the PTV defined by the prostate capsule and a 3 mm expansion with clearly defined planning constraints for the urethra and rectum. Entry criteria allowed all risk groups provided PSA ≤40 µg/L and staging investigations were negative for metastases. The primary end point was biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) defined using the Phoenix definition. Toxicity was measured using CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients were entered with median follow up 26 months (range 2-56). Median age was 73 (range 54-84) and 10% were low risk, 65% intermediate risk and 25% high risk. ADT was received by 37.6% overall and 90% of high risk patients for a median period of 6 months. Three year bRFS was overall 88%: this was 100% in low risk, 86% in intermediate risk and 75% in high risk. Only Gleason score was an independent predictor of bRFS. Relapse in 25 patients was assessed radiologically and occurred in the prostate in 15 of these, 11 of whom had localised prostate relapse only. Acute toxicity was low with no grade 3 or 4 events; there were two cases of late urinary stricture and two grade 3 late rectal events.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cohort of single dose HDR brachytherapy patients treated with a single dose published to date. It shows that with 19 Gy there is 100% bRFS at 3 years in low risk patients but results in intermediate and high risk groups are less encouraging falling to 86% and 75% at 3 years with relapse predominantly in the prostate. Limited by the short follow up period of this study, the long-term outcomes of this single dose HDR approach remains uncertain. It is important to have close ongoing surveillance of this cohort as the data matures.

Individualized Dose-Escalation of HDR Prostate Brachytherapy Implant to Decrease Required External Beam Radiation Dose: A Retrospective Feasibility Study

Purpose

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is commonly combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Escalating the HDR-BT dose as far as organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints allow, on a personalized basis, would allow for a reduction in EBRT dose while achieving similar total biologic equivalence. The primary objective of this study was to determine the dosimetric feasibility of escalating the HDR-BT dose from 15 Gy to 16 or 17 Gy while continuing to meet OAR constraints from the original 15 Gy plan on an individualized basis.

Methods and materials

A total of 53 consecutive HDR-BT plans were retrospectively assessed to determine what percentage of plans could be reoptimized to deliver a dose of 16 Gy or 17 Gy, while meeting defined 15-Gy OAR constraints. Factors independently associated with dose escalation were examined.

Results

Thirty-nine plans (74%) and 2 plans (4%) were successfully escalated to a dose of 16 Gy and 17 Gy, respectively. Rectum V80 and urethra D_max were independently predictive of the ability to dose escalate to 16 Gy.

Conclusions

Individualized HDR-BT dose escalation beyond 15 Gy without compromising OAR constraints is dosimetrically feasible. This approach could allow for a corresponding reduction of EBRT fractions (ie, from 15 to 12 fractions) and would be beneficial in terms of resource savings for departments, convenience for patients, and potentially better tolerance of treatment with the expected reduction in biologically equivalent doses to OARs. A clinical trial is being developed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of personalized HDR-BT/EBRT dose fractionation for localized intracapsular prostate cancer.

The current state of randomized clinical trial evidence for prostate brachytherapy

Interstitial brachytherapy is one of several curative therapeutic options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this review, we summarize all available randomized data to support the optimal use of prostate brachytherapy. Evidence from completed randomized controlled trials is the focus of this review with a presentation also of important ongoing trials. Gaps in knowledge are identified where future investigation may be fruitful with intent to inspire well-designed prospective studies with standardized treatment that focuses on improving oncological outcomes, reducing morbidity, or maintaining quality of life.

A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

Purpose

To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial.

Methods and Materials

Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB to 144 Gy or single-fraction Iridium-192 HDRB to 19 Gy. HRQOL and urinary toxicity were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scoring and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Independent samples t test and mixed effects modeling were performed for continuous variables. Time to IPSS resolution, defined as return to its baseline score ±5 points, was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimator curves with the log-rank test. A multiple-comparison adjusted P value of ≤.05 was considered significant.

Results

LDRB and HDRB were performed in 15 and 16 patients, respectively, for a total of 31 patients. At 3 months, patients treated with LDRB had a higher IPSS score (mean, 15.5 vs 6.0, respectively; P = .003) and lower EPIC urinary irritative score (mean, 69.2 vs 85.3, respectively; P = .037) compared with those who received HDRB. On repeated measures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, the IPSS (P = .003) and EPIC urinary irritative scores (P = .019) were significantly better in the HDR arm, translating into a lower urinary toxicity profile. There were no significant differences in the EPIC urinary incontinence, sexual, or bowel habit scores between the 2 groups at any measured time point. Time to IPSS resolution was significantly shorter in the HDRB group (mean, 2.0 months) compared with the LDRB group (mean, 6.0 months; P = .028).

Conclusions

HDRB monotherapy is a promising modality associated with a lower urinary toxicity profile and higher HRQOL in the first 12 months compared with LDRB.

Five-Year Outcomes of a Single-Institution Prospective Trial of 19-Gy Single-Fraction High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To update outcome and toxicity results of a prospective trial of 19-Gy single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were treated on a prospective study of single-fraction HDR brachytherapy. All patients had low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patients with prostate volumes >50 cm³, taking alpha-blockers for urinary symptoms, or with baseline American Urologic Association symptom scores >12 were ineligible. Patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided interstitial implant of the prostate followed by single-fraction HDR brachytherapy to a prescription dose of 19 Gy.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Median age was 62 years. Median gland volume at the time of treatment was 35 cm³, 92.6% of patients had T1 disease, 63.2% had a Gleason score of 6, and median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was 5.0 ng/mL. Chronic grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 14.7%. No grade 3 urinary toxicity occurred. A single patient experienced grade 2+ rectal toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea) that was transient and resolved with medical management. The 5-year estimated disease-free survival was 77.2% with no significant difference between low- and intermediate-risk patients. A single patient developed distant metastases during the follow-up period. Biopsy-proven local failure at 5 years was 18.8%, occurring at a median interval of 4.0 years posttreatment. No deaths occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With extended follow-up, toxicity rates after single-fraction 19-Gy HDR brachytherapy remain low. Higher-than-expected rates of biochemical and local failure, however, raise concerns regarding the adequacy of this dose. Additional investigation to define the optimal single-fraction HDR brachytherapy dose is warranted, and single-fraction treatment currently should not be offered outside the context of a clinical trial.

Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer

Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.