1
|
Kashihara T, Urago Y, Okamoto H, Takemori M, Nakayama H, Mikasa S, Nakaichi T, Iijima K, Chiba T, Kuwahara J, Nakamura S, Chang W, Matsui Y, Igaki H. A preliminary study on rectal dose reduction associated with hyaluronic acid implantation in brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:286-293. [PMID: 38680582 PMCID: PMC11053323 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Hydrogel spacer (HS) was developed to reduce rectal toxicities caused by radiotherapy, but has been reported to cause major adverse events. Our institute has attempted to introduce a hyaluronic acid (HA) as an alternative spacer. This study aimed to compare rectal doses and geometric distributions between the HS and HA implantation in prostate cancer. Methods HS and HA were inserted in 20 and 18 patients undergoing high-dose brachytherapy, respectively. The rectum spacer volumes injected were 10 mL and 22 mL, respectively. In the treatment planning system, 13.5 Gy was administered with common catheter positions. The rectal dose indices were assessed between the spacer groups for dosimetry evaluation. Distances between the prostate and rectum and configurations of the spacers were compared. Results The mean doses irradiated to 0.1 and 2 mL of the rectum were 10.45 Gy and 6.71 Gy for HS, and 6.73 Gy and 4.90 Gy for HA (p<0.001). The mean minimum distances between the prostate and rectum were 1.23 cm and 1.79 cm for HS and HA, respectively (p<0.05). Geometrical configuration comparisons revealed that HA has a higher ability to expand the space than HS. Conclusion The rectal dose reduction ability of HA is significantly greater than that of HS, suggesting its potential as a new spacer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tairo Kashihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Urago
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihiro Takemori
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakayama
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Mikasa
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Nakaichi
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kotaro Iijima
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahito Chiba
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kuwahara
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Weishan Chang
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdelhakiem MK, Keller A, Bajpai RR, Smith RP, Beriwal S, Benoit R. Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy boost and effect of hydrogel rectal spacer on long-term patient-reported rectal bleeding and bowel quality of life. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:808-821. [PMID: 37648596 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates long-term patient-reported bowel quality of life (QOL), rectal bleeding, and bleeding bother in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and Cesium-131 LDR brachytherapy (LDR-BT) boost with and without hydrogel rectal spacer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2022 with 45 Gy EBRT followed by 85 Gy Cs-131 LDR-BT boost with or without hydrogel rectal spacer. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) QOL questionnaires pre-treatment and at each follow-up were collected. Patient-reported rectal bleeding occurring more than "rarely" and bother from rectal bleeding occurring more than a "very small problem" were deemed clinically significant. Fisher's exact test was used to test the association of rectal spacer use and the incidence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother. Paired samples t-test was used to analyze mean bowel scores at each time point. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-one patients were included in the analysis. The rectal spacer was used in 108 patients. Overall median follow-up was 48 months (IQR, 24-72), with a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 12-37.5) for the hydrogel group and 60 months (IQR, 36-84) for the non-hydrogel group. EPIC questionnaire response rates at median follow-up were 33% and 37% for the hydrogel and non-hydrogel groups, respectively. A clinically significant decrease in mean bowel domain scores was seen in the bowel bother domain at 6 and 12 months for patients who did not receive a rectal spacer. At the last follow-up of 60 months, the prevalence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother were 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding was 2.8% and 18.9% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term bowel bother was 4.6% and 19.7% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of hydrogel rectal spacer with EBRT and Cs-131 LDR-BT boost was significantly associated with a lower incidence of patient-reported rectal bleeding and bother from rectal bleeding, and better long-term bowel QOL. Cumulative incidence was 2.8% (hydrogel group) versus 18.9% (non-hydrogel group) and 4.6% (hydrogel group) versus 19.7% (non-hydrogel group) for clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding and long-term bleeding bother, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Keller
- Radiation Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
| | - Rajesh R Bajpai
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ryan P Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHN Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Varian Medical Systems, Charlottesville, VA.
| | - Ronald Benoit
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakiri M, Ueda K, Hoshino R, Ogasawara N, Kurose H, Nishihara K, Muraki K, Hattori C, Ogo E, Igawa T. Seed lost to perineum from hydrogel spacer after brachytherapy for prostate cancer. IJU Case Rep 2023; 6:169-172. [PMID: 37144085 PMCID: PMC10151205 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We describe a rare case of brachytherapy for prostate cancer in which a seed was lost from the perineum after a hydrogel injection. Case presentation A 71-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with localized high-risk prostate cancer. Trimodality therapy with I-125 brachytherapy was selected, and combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated. Brachytherapy and hydrogel injection were performed 7 months after combined androgen blockade initiation; 6 months later, the patient visited our hospital with complaints of redness and bleeding in the perineum. Serous effusion and loss of a seed on the right side of the perineal anus were observed. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a tunnel like discharge of hydrogel from the dorsal prostate to the perineum. The fistula was incised, the seed was removed, and drainage was performed. Conclusion Appropriate diagnosis and treatment with careful follow-up are required in patients at high risk of infection after brachytherapy with hydrogel injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nakiri
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Kosuke Ueda
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Ryuji Hoshino
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Naoyuki Ogasawara
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kurose
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Kiyoaki Nishihara
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Koichiro Muraki
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Chikayuki Hattori
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Tsukasa Igawa
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harvey M, Ong WL, Chao M, Udovicich C, McBride S, Bolton D, Eastham J, Perera M. Comprehensive review of the use of hydrogel spacers prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2023; 131:280-287. [PMID: 35689413 PMCID: PMC9734283 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the published data on the impact of hydrogel spacers on rectal dosimetry and toxicity and to outline the practicalities of inserting hydrogel spacers. RESULTS A growing body of evidence suggests that the administration of hydrogel spacers is safe and is associated with limited peri-operative morbidity. The impact on rectal dosimetry has been clearly established and use of hydrogel spacers is associated with reduced rectal morbidity. These results have been corroborated by several Phase II and III clinical trials and subsequent meta-analysis. There are several areas for future research, including the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate stereotactic beam radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Hydrogel spacers provide a low-morbidity method to potential reduce rectal toxicity after radiation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Data outlining sexual function and oncological outcomes are limited to date. Future studies, currently being conducted, may provide further clarification of the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Harvey
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3000 Victoria
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Victoria 3135, Australia
| | - Cristian Udovicich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Sean McBride
- Radiation Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Damien Bolton
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - James Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Marlon Perera
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Newman NB, Rajkumar A, Cleary RK, Shinohara ET, Kirschner AN. Patient Reported Quality of Life Outcomes After Definitive Radiation Therapy With Absorbable Spacer Hydrogel for Prostate Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100755. [PMID: 34934855 PMCID: PMC8655415 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose SpaceOAR is a device approved for conventional radiation in prostate cancer. We sought to observe prospectively how SpaceOAR Hydrogel effected quality of life and dosimetry to organs at risk at our institution. Methods and Materials We prospectively enrolled patients with low risk or favorable-intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. Baseline Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) scores along with baseline American Urology Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) scores were collected. SpaceOAR was placed for all patients who then received stereotactic body radiation therapy, low dose rate brachytherapy, conventionally fractionated radiation therapy, or moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy. We evaluated postimplant dosimetry to critical structures, and prospectively collected follow-up EPIC-26 and AUA-SI scores. We performed a repeated measures analysis of variance to compare patient-specific responses and correlated survey data with dosimetric metrics by generating linear regression models. Results We enrolled 59 patients in this study with a median follow-up of 366 days (interquartile range, 507). At final follow-up, the "?>prostate-specific antigen had a significant decline compared with baseline (P < .0001). There were no grade 3 toxicities on treatment. There were no significant changes in the AUA-SI score (P = .69) at final follow-up compared with baseline, nor was there any change in EPIC-26 domain scores (P = .19) during the course of the study period. There were no significant associations between AUA scores and EPIC-26 scores and the dose to the rectum, bladder, or urethra with the exception being dose to the 2 mL rectum correlated with decline in EPIC-26 rectal score (β, −0.002; P = .006). Patient-reported declines in bowel domains were less than previously reported data. Conclusions Use of SpaceOAR results in favorable dosimetry to the organs at risk and portends excellent short-term quality of life as measured by the association with the patient reported outcome measures. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing and necessary to assess the long-term effect and association of the hydrogel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil B Newman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Anne Rajkumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ryan K Cleary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Eric T Shinohara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Austin N Kirschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pepe P, Tamburo M, Pennisi M, Marletta D, Marletta F. Clinical Outcomes of Hydrogel Spacer Injection Space OAR in Men Submitted to Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. In Vivo 2021; 35:3385-3389. [PMID: 34697173 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM To evaluate the clinical outcomes of men with prostate cancer (PCa) submitted to hydrogel spacer injection before hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS From April 2018 to April 2020, 32 patients with clinically localized PCa underwent hydrogel injection Space OAR before HRT to the prostate and seminal vesicle; the prescription dose was 60 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 days/week over 4 weeks. PSA levels, genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, and sexual function were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS PSA levels at the median follow up of 15 months was 0.52 ng/ml; 28.1% vs. 78.1% patients had GI vs. GU Grade 0 acute toxicity and 93.7% vs. 0% had GI vs. GU Grade 0 late toxicity. Furthermore, 88.1% of patients kept pretreatment sexual potency. CONCLUSION The use of the hydrogel Spacer OAR before HRT is useful for reducing acute and late GU and GI toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Pepe
- Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Tamburo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hydrogel spacers and prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:75-78. [PMID: 34711449 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
8
|
Vaggers S, Rai BP, Chedgy ECP, de la Taille A, Somani BK. Polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel rectal spacers for prostate brachytherapy: a systematic review with a focus on technique. World J Urol 2021; 39:1769-1780. [PMID: 32840655 PMCID: PMC8217059 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03414-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose to the rectum in prostate brachytherapy (PBT) can be reduced by the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacers. This reduces the rate of rectal toxicity and allows dose escalation to the prostate. Our objectives were to provide an overview of technique for injection of a PEG hydrogel spacer, reduction in rectal dosimetry, gastrointestinal toxicity and potential complications. METHODS We systematically reviewed the role of PEG hydrogel spacers in PBT using the Cochrane and PRISMA methodology for all English-language articles from January 2013 to December 2019. Data was extracted for type of radiotherapy, number of patients, type of PEG-hydrogel used, mean prostate-rectum separation, rectal dosimetry, acute and late GI toxicity, procedure-related complications and the technique used for hydrogel insertion. RESULTS Nine studies (671 patients and 537 controls) met our inclusion criteria. Of these 4 used DuraSeal® and 5 used SpaceOAR®. The rectal spacing achieved varied between 7.7-16 mm. Failure of hydrogel insertion was seen only in 12 patients, mostly related to failure of hydrodissection in patients undergoing salvage PBT. Where reported, the rectal D2 cc was reduced by between 21.6 and 52.6% and the median rectal V75% cc was reduced by between 91.8-100%. Acute GI complications were mostly limited to grade 1 or 2 toxicity (n = 153, 33.7%) with low levels of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (n = 1, 0.22%). Procedure-related complications were limited to tenesmus (0.14%), rectal discomfort (1.19%), and bacterial prostatitis (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS PEG hydrogel spacers are safe to insert. Gel insertion is easy, fast and has a low rate of failure. These studies convincingly demonstrate a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. Although the results of spacers in reducing rectal toxicity is promising, these need to be confirmed in prospective randomised trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Vaggers
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - A. de la Taille
- Department of Urology, Robotic and Miniinvasive Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - B. K. Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Armstrong N, Bahl A, Pinkawa M, Ryder S, Ahmadu C, Ross J, Bhattacharyya S, Woodward E, Battaglia S, Binns J, Payne H. SpaceOAR Hydrogel Spacer for Reducing Radiation Toxicity During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review. Urology 2021; 156:e74-e85. [PMID: 34029607 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between SpaceOAR and radiation dosing, toxicity and quality-of-life vs no spacer across all radiotherapy modalities for prostate cancer. METHODS A systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase was performed from database inception through May 2020. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full papers. Data extraction was performed, and quality assessed by 1 reviewer and checked by a second, using a third reviewer as required. The synthesis was narrative. RESULTS 19 studies (3,622 patients) were included (only 1 randomized controlled trial, in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT), 18 comparatives non-randomized controlled trials in external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, and combinations thereof). No hypofractionation studies were found. Regardless of radiotherapy type, SpaceOAR significantly reduced rectal radiation dose (eg, V40 average difference -6.1% in high dose-rate brachytherapy plus IG-IMRT to -9.1% in IG-IMRT) and reduced gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities (eg, late gastrointestinal toxicity 1% vs 6% (P = .01), late genitourinary toxicity of 15% vs 32% (P < .001) in stereotactic body radiotherapy). Improvements were observed in most Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite quality-of-life domains (eg, bowel function score decrease at 3 and 6 months: Average change of zero vs -6.25 and -3.57 respectively in low dose-rate brachytherapy plus EBRT). CONCLUSION The randomized controlled trial in IG-IMRT demonstrated that SpaceOAR reduces rectal radiation dose and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities, with urinary, bowel, and sexual quality-of-life improvement. These advantages were verified in observational studies in various radiotherapy types. Further research is required in hypofractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel Armstrong
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom.
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steve Ryder
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom
| | | | - Janine Ross
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Jean Binns
- Boston Scientific Corporation, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kashihara T, Inaba K, Komiyama M, Nakayama H, Iijima K, Nishioka S, Okamoto H, Kikkawa N, Kubo Y, Shima S, Nakamura S, Takahashi A, Takahashi K, Okuma K, Murakami N, Igaki H, Nakayama Y, Fukunaga A, Matsui Y, Fujimoto H, Itami J. The use of hyperbaric oxygen to treat actinic rectal fistula after SpaceOAR use and radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a case report. BMC Urol 2020; 20:196. [PMID: 33317509 PMCID: PMC7737272 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00767-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer, the SpaceOAR® System, a hydrogel spacer, is widely used to decrease the irradiated dose and toxicity of rectum. On the other hand, periprostatic abscesses formation and rectal perforation are known as rare adverse effects of SpaceOAR. Nevertheless, there is a lack of reports clarifying the association between aggravation of abscesses and radiation therapy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is effective for a peri-SpaceOAR abscess and rectal perforation. Case presentation We report a case of a 78-year-old high-risk prostate cancer patient. After SpaceOAR insertion into the correct space, he started to receive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). He developed a fever, perineal pain and frequent urination after the completion of EBRT, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a peri-SpaceOAR abscess. Scheduled brachytherapy was postponed, administration of antibiotics and opioid via intravenous drip was commenced, and transperineal drainage was performed. After the alleviation of the abscess, additional EBRT instead of brachytherapy was performed with MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT). On the last day of the MRgRT, perineal pain reoccurred, and MRI and colonoscopy detected the rectal perforation. He received an intravenous antibiotics drip and HBOT, and fully recovered from the rectal perforation. Conclusions Our report indicates that EBRT can lead to a severe rectum complication by causing inflammation for patients with a peri-SpaceOAR abscess. Furthermore, HBOT was effective for the peri-SpaceOAR abscess and rectal perforation associated with EBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tairo Kashihara
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motokiyo Komiyama
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakayama
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kotaro Iijima
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shie Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nao Kikkawa
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kubo
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Shima
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kae Okuma
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Nakayama
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arinobu Fukunaga
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Fujimoto
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The impact of a rectal hydrogel spacer on dosimetric and toxicity outcomes among patients undergoing combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:296-301. [PMID: 33199175 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rectal hydrogel spacers have been shown to decrease rectal radiation dose and toxicity. In this study, we compared prostate and rectal dosimetry and acute toxicity outcomes in patients who had and had not received a rectal hydrogel spacer prior to combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer who received combination therapy at our institution were identified between 2014 and 2019. Dosimetric outcomes of brachytherapy implants and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were compared between patients who had and had not received a hydrogel spacer. RESULTS A Total of 168 patients meeting our inclusion criteria were identified. Twenty-two patients had received a rectal hydrogel spacer, among whom the mean separation between the rectum and prostate was 7.5 mm, and the V100rectum was reduced by 47% (0.09 cc vs. 0.17 cc, p = 0.04). There was no difference in the percentage of patients achieving a D90 of ≥100 Gy between those who had and had not received a spacer. The mean rate of change in I-PSS and SHIM scores did not differ between the two groups at 2 months after PID. CONCLUSION LDR brachytherapy appears feasible after the placement of a rectal hydrogel spacer. While there was a significantly reduced V100rectum among patients who had received a hydrogel spacer, there was no statistically significant difference in patients achieving a D90prostate of ≥100 Gy. Although there was no difference appreciated in QOL scores, the length of follow-up was limited in the rectal-spacer group.
Collapse
|
12
|
Iijima K, Murakami N, Nakamura S, Nishioka S, Chiba T, Kuwahara J, Takemori M, Nakayama H, Kashihara T, Okuma K, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Igaki H, Okamoto H, Itami J. Configuration analysis of the injection position and shape of the gel spacer in gynecologic brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:95-103. [PMID: 33011091 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this single-institution retrospective study, configuration analysis was performed to determine the optimal location and volume of hyaluronic acid gel spacer injection into the rectovaginal or vesicovaginal septum for effective dose reduction (DR) to the organs at risk (OARs), the rectum and bladder. METHODS AND MATERIALS 70 and 50 intracavitary brachytherapy treatment plans used only vaginal cylinders with gel spacers for the rectal and bladder sides, respectively, whereas 28 did not use spacers. Correlation analysis was performed between the geometrical parameters and injection position of the gel spacers and the 2-cm3 covering doses of the OARs for each treatment. RESULTS A higher DR was predicted for hyaluronic acid gel spacer injection within ±5 mm and ±2.5 mm in the lateral-medial direction from the midpoint on the rectal and bladder sides, and ±10 mm in the cranial-caudal direction from the midpoint on the rectal side. There were correlations between 2-cm3 covering doses and the gel spacer parameters: the volume on the rectal (p = 0.02) and bladder (p = 0.04) sides; the craniocaudal length on the rectal side (p << 0.05); and ventrodorsad thickness on each OAR (p << 0.05) sides. There was no significant difference in the DR between a volume of ∼10 cm3 and that of a higher volume (p >> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A gel spacer volume of ∼10 cm3 provides sufficient OAR DR if its gravity point is on the midpoint between the cylinder applicator and OAR, and its craniocaudal length covers the active length of the cylinder applicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Iijima
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shie Nishioka
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahito Chiba
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kuwahara
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihiro Takemori
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakayama
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tairo Kashihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kae Okuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Proposed Hydrogel-Implant Quality Score and a Matched-Pair Study for Prostate Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:202-208. [PMID: 32088428 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE SpaceOAR hydrogel has been Food and Drug Administration approved to reduce rectal toxicity in prostate radiation therapy. Training and certification for this procedure is performed by the manufacturer, without independent quality measures. We propose a Hydrogel-Implant Quality Score (HIQS) as a surrogate to quantify hydrogel placement accuracy, to assist clinicians in tracking their implant proficiency, and to support quality improvement. A matched-pair study was designed to investigate the benefit of SpaceOAR in rectal dose reduction for low-dose-rate brachytherapy and to validate the principle of the proposed HIQS. METHODS Eighty-one prostate patients were retrospectively selected for this study. Each patient had SpaceOAR implantation under manufacturer supervision. Postprocedure computed tomography and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging were acquired for radiation planning. A HIQS system was proposed to evaluate the hydrogel placement quality. Hydrogel implantation was performed immediately after LDR seed placement. For each LDR patient, a non-SpaceOAR patient was matched based upon intraoperative rectal dose and prostate coverage. Intraoperative and postoperative rectal dose reduction was compared between SpaceOAR and non-SpaceOAR groups. RESULTS The average HIQS was 77 ± 10.8 (range, 49-97). Rectal anatomic distortions were seen in 17 cases. Significant rectal dose reductions between intraoperative and postoperative plans were found for SpaceOAR patients compared with non-SpaceOAR patients (25.1 Gy vs -5.0 Gy for ΔD2cc and 65.7 Gy vs 13.0 for ΔD0.1cc). Additional rectal dose reductions (8.4 Gy for ΔD2cc and 12.7 Gy for ΔD0.1cc) were found for patients without rectal distortion when SpaceOAR was used. CONCLUSIONS The proposed HIQS system measured the hydrogel placement quality and provided insights into clinician learning and DVH outcome. SpaceOAR was shown to be effective in reducing rectal dose for LDR patients.
Collapse
|
14
|
In regard to ‘What is the quality of hydrogel spacer insertions? and which patients will benefit? A literature review’. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
15
|
Ghaffari H, Afkhami Ardekani M, Molana SH, Haghparast M, Sanei M, Mahdavi SR, Mofid B, Rostami A. Application of rectal retractor for postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy of prostate cancer: A case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep 2019; 7:2102-2107. [PMID: 31788259 PMCID: PMC6878068 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Using a rectal retractor (RR) during salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy is a promising approach for reducing dose to the rectum. The patient well tolerated the daily RR insertion. This area of research encourages researchers for a comprehensive evaluation of the role of the RR in postprostatectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Ghaffari
- Department of Medical PhysicsSchool of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of Para‐MedicineHormozgan University of Medical SciencesBandare‐AbbasIran
| | - Seyed Hadi Molana
- Department of Radiation OncologySchool of MedicineAJA University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mohammad Haghparast
- Department of Medical PhysicsSchool of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of Para‐MedicineHormozgan University of Medical SciencesBandare‐AbbasIran
| | - Mastaneh Sanei
- Department of Radiation OncologySchool of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Seied Rabi Mahdavi
- Department of Medical PhysicsSchool of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Bahram Mofid
- Department of Radiation OncologyShohada‐e‐Tajrish Medical CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Aram Rostami
- Department of Medical PhysicsSchool of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
- Department of Medical PhysicsRoshana Cancer InstituteTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dalwadi S, Suri A, Kamat A, Butler EB, Farach AM. Laparoscopic Allograft Spacer Placement to Minimize Bowel Dose During Re-irradiation with Interstitial Brachytherapy. Cureus 2019; 11:e5958. [PMID: 31799096 PMCID: PMC6863581 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In primary or re-irradiation of gynecologic malignancies, achieving optimal dosimetry with adjacent normal tissue becomes challenging. Surgical spacers are tissue-equivalent materials placed within the patient to protect organs at risk from long-term radiation effects and are commonly used in prostate cancer. We report the use of an allograft mesh to protect adhesed bowel from high-dose radiation for definitive treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer. An 88-year-old female was diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II endometrial cancer after she developed urinary frequency, hesitancy, and hematuria. She underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation, followed by laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy. She developed 1.8 cm bilateral vaginal cuff recurrence and was dispositioned for interstitial brachytherapy. An allograft mesh spacer was placed laparoscopically before repeat, high dose rate brachytherapy to protect nearby structures. Dose-escalation was achieved without compromising normal tissue constraints. The patient tolerated the procedure without evidence of long-term toxicity at one year. Multidisciplinary discussion may help identify patients who would benefit from spacer placement before select dose-escalated radiation therapy. Laparoscopic allograft mesh is one of many types of surgical spacers available for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anuj Suri
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - Aparna Kamat
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - Andrew M Farach
- Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morita M, Fukagai T, Hirayama K, Yamatoya J, Noguchi T, Ogawa Y, Igarashi A, Niiya A, Kato M, Morota M, Oshinomi K, Ogawa Y, Lederer JL. Placement of SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer patients treated with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Urol 2019; 27:60-66. [PMID: 31587417 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to report on our early experience with hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR) placement in combination with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS From April 2018, SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer was placed in 100 consecutive patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Complications and the status of the placement were evaluated. Deformation of the prostate by the spacer was examined measuring prostate diameters and evaluating the change from preoperative status. The position of the prostate was similarly examined by evaluating the change in distance between the pubic symphysis and the prostate. Post-plan dosimetric data were compared with 200 patients treated without a spacer. RESULTS No complications were found during either the intraoperative or perioperative periods. The mean displacement distance of 11.64 mm was created, the mean value before spacer placement was 0.28 mm (P < 0.0001). The change of the prostate diameters showed a positive increase in all directions, with no significant negative change in any one direction. Regarding the change in distance between pubic symphysis and the prostate, no significant shortening trend was observed between the two groups (P = 0.14). Whereas the dosimetric parameters showed means of 0.001 and 0.026 cc for RV150 and RV100 in the spacer group, they were 0.025 and 0.318 cc, respectively, in the non-spacer group, showing a significant decrease in both parameters (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prostate deformation secondary to hydrogel placement might adversely affect dosimetric parameters in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, a significant reduction in the rectal dose can be adopted without adversely affecting the other parameters related to treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Morita
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukagai
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kidai Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jin Yamatoya
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Noguchi
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Igarashi
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akifumi Niiya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masako Kato
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Madoka Morota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Oshinomi
- Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshio Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - John L Lederer
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Afkhami Ardekani M, Ghaffari H. Optimization of prostate brachytherapy techniques with polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacers: A systematic review. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:13-23. [PMID: 31542390 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this overview was to critically evaluate the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel spacers during prostate brachytherapy with regard to dosimetric and clinical benefits, as well as procedure-related toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search in the PubMed database was performed. RESULTS A total of 12 studies, involving 615 patients with PEG hydrogel injection, were included. Overall, patients well tolerated the implantation of PEG hydrogel spacers with an excellent safety profile. However, although there were some procedure-related complications, rates of these complications were very rare. Toxicities related to the spacer were limited to Grade 1 rectal discomfort and pain (9/615 patients), Grade 2 rectal ulceration (1 in 615 patients), perineal abscess (1 in 615 patients), and bacterial prostatitis (2/615 patients) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. The application of PEG hydrogel spacers significantly reduced radiation doses to the rectum during prostate brachytherapy in the different setting. Although there was no prospective randomized clinical trial, retrospective studies showed that reducing rectal doses by the implantation of PEG hydrogel may result in an improvement in rectal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The insertion of hydrogel spacers is safe, resulting in a significant decrease in rectal doses. This may lead to a reduction in rectal or gastrointestinal toxicity. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm the clinical impact of rectal dosimetric improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
| | - Hamed Ghaffari
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Improving rectal dosimetry for patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy with hydrogel space. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:8-13. [PMID: 30911304 PMCID: PMC6431099 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.82836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report on rectal dosimetric and toxicity outcomes of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing combined high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without hydrogel spacer (HS) insertion. Material and methods A total of 97 patients were analyzed in this study, with 32 patients (33%) who had HS insertion compared with a preceding group of 65 patients (67%) without HS. HS safety, the dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectal, urethral, penile bulb, and bladder) as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicity were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results The median prostate-rectal separation achieved with HS was 10 mm (range, 5-14 mm). There were no post-operative complications following HS insertion. Patients with HS had significantly lower radiation dose to the rectum across all rectal dose volumes from rV30 to rV80, whether in absolute volume (cc) or as percentage of contoured OAR (p < 0.001). There was also significantly less acute > grade 1 GI toxicity (12.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.05) and a trend towards less late grade 1 GI toxicity (0% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.11) in the HS group compared to the non-HS group. Conclusions Insertion of HS in prostate cancer patients receiving combined HDR and EBRT is safe and has resulted in a significant radiation dose reduction to the rectum, resulting in significantly less acute GI toxicity and a trend towards less late GI toxicity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tang Q, Zhao F, Yu X, Wu L, Lu Z, Yan S. The role of radioprotective spacers in clinical practice: a review. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2018; 8:514-524. [PMID: 30050786 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.06.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The delivery of high dose radiotherapy to tumors is often limited by the proximity of the surrounding radiosensitive normal tissues, even using modern techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Previous studies have reported that placement of a spacer can effectively displace normal tissues. So that they are some distance away from the lesion, thus allowing for the safe delivery of high-dose radiation. The application of radioprotective spacers was first reported 30 years ago regarding radiotherapy of tongue and abdominal cancers; more recently, they are increasingly being used in prostate cancer. This review focuses on the published data concerning the features of different types of spacers and their application in various tumor sites. Placement-related complications and the cost-effectiveness of the spacers are also discussed. With the increasing use of high-precision radiotherapy in clinical practice, especially the paradigm-changing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), more robust studies are warranted to further establish the role of radioprotective spacers through materials development and novel placement techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuying Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xiaokai Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Lingyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Zhongjie Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Senxiang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| |
Collapse
|