1
|
Hepel JT, Leonard KL, Yashar CM, Einck JP, Sha SJ, DiPetrillo TA, Wiggins DL, Graves TA, Edmonson DA, Gass JS, Rivard MJ, Wazer DE. Phase II Trial of Five-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Noninvasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:878-883. [PMID: 38151190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) NIBB has potential advantages over other APBI techniques by delivering highly conformal radiation with minimal collateral dose to the heart and lung compared with external beam techniques, but unlike other brachytherapy techniques NIBB is non-invasive. Previous data has shown encouraging outcomes using a 10-fraction regimen. To improve efficiency, convenience, and cost, reduction in the fraction number is desirable. Final results of a prospective phase II trial are reported. MATERIALS/METHODS NIBB APBI was delivered using 28.5Gy in 5 fractions daily over 1 week. Patient eligibility criteria required: invasive carcinoma ≤2.0 cm or DCIS ≤3.0 cm, ER positive (if invasive), lymph node negative, LVI absent, and lumpectomy with margins negative by 2mm. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration <30%. Secondary endpoints included any late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and local control. RESULTS 40 patients were treated with a median follow-up of 59.7 months. The mean age was 67 years (50-89 years) and tumor size was 1.0cm (0.3-2.0cm). 80% had invasive carcinoma. The mean breast separation with compression was 6.7cm (3.5-8.9cm). The 5-year actuarial local control was 96.6% and overall survival was 96.9%. Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were 15% and 0%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration was 2.5% (+/-2.5%) meeting the study's primary endpoint. The most common late toxicity of any grade was skin telangiectasia; 22.5% grade 1 and 15% grade 2. Only breast separation was associated with telangiectasia risk, p=0.002. Overall cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 75%, 25%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS NIBB APBI delivered in 5 fractions results in a low rate of late toxicity and a high rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcomes. Telangiectasia risk can be minimized by keeping breast separation ≤7.0cm. The local failure rate was appropriately low. Further investigation of this technique is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Kara L Leonard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sandra J Sha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida
| | - Thomas A DiPetrillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Doreen L Wiggins
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Theresa A Graves
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David A Edmonson
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jennifer S Gass
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David E Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Shen J, Gu P, Wang Z. Recent advances progress in radiotherapy for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: a review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1195266. [PMID: 37671064 PMCID: PMC10475720 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1195266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery has become an integral part of the treatment of breast cancer. In recent years, the development of radiotherapy technology has made great progress in this field, including the comparison of the curative effects of various radiotherapy techniques and the performance of the segmentation times. The choice of radiotherapy technology needs to be co-determined by clinical evidence practice and evaluated for each individual patient to achieve precision radiotherapy. This article discusses the treatment effects of different radiotherapy, techniques, the risk of second cancers and short-range radiation therapy techniques after breast-conserving surgery such as hypo fractionated whole breast irradiation and accelerated partial breast irradiation. The choice of radiotherapy regimen needs to be based on the individual condition of the patient, and the general principle is to focus on the target area and reduce the irradiation of the normal tissues and organs. Short-range radiotherapy and hypofractionated are superior to conventional radiotherapy and are expected to become the mainstream treatment after breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shidong Hospital, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingjing Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shidong Hospital, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Peihua Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shidong Hospital, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhongming Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shidong Hospital, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anderson B, Vicini F, Wazer D, Arthur D. Breast brachytherapy: Building a bright future on the foundation of a rich history of advancement in technology, technique, and patient-centered care. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:368-380. [PMID: 36740541 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
For over 20 years, the concept of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has received considerable attention. Initially concentrating on the appropriateness of APBI as an alternative treatment to whole breast radiotherapy, investigation and innovation evolved towards dose delivery and technique appropriateness. The purpose of this article is to review the pertinent literature that supports the role brachytherapy serves in delivering APBI and the recognized brachytherapy techniques for dose delivery. Publications establishing techniques utilizing multicatheter brachytherapy, single-entry brachytherapy applicators, permanent breast seed implantation brachytherapy, noninvasive breast brachytherapy and electronic brachytherapy are described. The use of brachytherapy for repeat breast conservation therapy is additionally reviewed. A historical perspective and potential direction of future investigation and innovation are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Anderson
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | | | - David Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson B, Arthur D, Hannoun-Levi JM, Kamrava M, Khan A, Kuske R, Scanderbeg D, Shah C, Shaitelman S, Showalter T, Vicini F, Wazer D, Yashar C. Partial breast irradiation: An updated consensus statement from the American brachytherapy society. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:726-747. [PMID: 36117086 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques. METHODS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed. RESULTS The majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age >45 years with tumor size <3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS This updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Anderson
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | - Atif Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Kuske
- Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Daniel Scanderbeg
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Simona Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - David Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Catheryn Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cozzi S, Augugliaro M, Ciammella P, Botti A, Trojani V, Najafi M, Blandino G, Ruggieri MP, Giaccherini L, Alì E, Iori F, Sardaro A, Finocchi Ghersi S, Deantonio L, Gutierrez Miguelez C, Iotti C, Bardoscia L. The Role of Interstitial Brachytherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Overview of Indications, Applications, and Technical Notes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102564. [PMID: 35626168 PMCID: PMC9139312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the female population. Adjuvant radiotherapy has become increasingly important as conservative treatment. Muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a type of radiation technique wherein the radioactive sources are directly implanted into or close to the target tissue and may be considered an extremely precise, versatile, and variable radiation technique. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique. Abstract Breast cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the female population, despite continuing advances in treatment options that have significantly accelerated in recent years. Conservative treatments have radically changed the concept of healing, also focusing on the psychological aspect of oncological treatments. In this scenario, radiotherapy plays a key role. Brachytherapy is an extremely versatile radiation technique that can be used in various settings for breast cancer treatment. Although it is invasive, technically complex, and requires a long learning curve, the dosimetric advantages and sparing of organs at risk are unequivocal. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy, with longer follow-up than new, emerging radiation techniques, whose effectiveness is proven by over 20 years of experience. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy to perform breast lumpectomy boost, breast-conserving accelerated partial breast irradiation, and salvage reirradiation for ipsilateral breast recurrence, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-329-731-7608
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran 1997667665, Iran;
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Federico Iori
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Sebastiano Finocchi Ghersi
- Radiation Oncolgy Unit, AOU Sant’Andrea, Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia, Università La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Letizia Deantonio
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, 6500 Lugano, Switzerland;
| | - Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez
- Brachytherapy Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, 55100 Lucca, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vicini F, Broughman J, Halima A, Mayo Z, Obi E, Al-Hilli Z, Arthur D, Wazer D, Shah C. Delivery of Adjuvant Radiation in 5 Days or Less After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:1090-1104. [PMID: 34921906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data have been published supporting the application of ultra-short radiation therapy (RT) regimens for women with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery (BCS). What has remained controversial is whether and how to apply accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) or accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches in these patients, as well as the consideration of intraoperative RT (IORT) for this population. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature searching for randomized and prospective data published evaluating ultra-short RT delivered in 5-days or less with APBI, AWBI, or IORT. RESULTS We identified two randomized studies applying AWBI (n=5,011 patients) with 5 to 10 year follow up, which supported the use of ultra-short course AWBI (5 fractions in one week) as compared to hypofractionated WBI. We identified six randomized trials evaluating APBI (as compared to WBI) in 5 days or less (n= 8,415) with numerous (n=55) prospective studies as well, with the data supporting short course APBI as compared to WBI. Finally, we identified two randomized trials evaluating IORT; however, both trials demonstrated elevated rates of recurrence with IORT as compared to WBI. CONCLUSIONS The current body of data available for ultra-short adjuvant RT regimens delivered in 5-days or less after BCS overwhelming support their utilization. While data for both exists, APBI regimens have, by far, greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up as compared to AWBI. Also, given increased rates of recurrence seen with IORT with long-term follow-up, this should not be considered a standard approach at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Broughman
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zachary Mayo
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Elizabeth Obi
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - David Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harkenrider MM, Albuquerque K, Brown D, Kamrava M, King M, Mourtada F, Orio P, Patel R, Price M, Rassiah P, Solanki AA, Small W, Schechter NR. ACR-ABS-ASTRO practice parameter for the performance of radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1071-1082. [PMID: 34588143 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This practice parameter aims to detail the processes, qualifications of personnel, patient selection, equipment, patient and personnel safety, documentation, and quality control and improvement necessary for an HDR brachytherapy program. METHODS AND MATERIALS This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). RESULTS Brachytherapy is a radiotherapeutic modality in which radionuclide or electronic sources are used to deliver a radiation dose at a distance of up to a few centimeters by surface, intracavitary, intraluminal, or interstitial application. Brachytherapy alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy plays an important role in the management and treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy uses radionuclides, such as iridium-192, at dose rates of ≥12 Gy/hr to a designated target point or volume, and it is an important treatment for a variety of malignant and benign conditions. Its use allows for application of high doses of radiation to defined target volumes with relative sparing of adjacent critical structures. CONCLUSIONS HDR brachytherapy requires detailed attention to personnel, equipment, patient and personnel safety, and continuing staff education. Coordination between the radiation oncologist and treatment planning staff and effective quality assurance procedures are important components of successful HDR brachytherapy programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Albuquerque
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Martin King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Peter Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Michael Price
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Prema Rassiah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Naomi R Schechter
- Keck Medical Center of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Multi-institutional registry study evaluating the feasibility and toxicity of accelerated partial breast irradiation using noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:631-637. [PMID: 33642174 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) technique is a novel noninvasive yet targeted method for accelerated partial breast irradiation. We established a multi-institutional registry to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this technique across various practice settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS Institutions using the NIBB technique were invited to participate. Data for acute/late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and tumor recurrence were collected. Toxicity and cosmetic outcome were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, respectively. Treatment variables were analyzed for association with outcomes. RESULTS A total of 252 patients from eight institutions were analyzed. The median age was 69 years. The mean tumor size was 1.1 cm (0.1-4.0 cm). Treatment was delivered 10 fractions (34-36 Gy) in 75% and five fractions (28.5 Gy) in 22%. B.i.d. fractionation was used in 9%. Acute radiation dermatitis was Grade 0-1, 2, and 3 in 77%, 19%, and 4%, respectively. One hundred ninety-one patients with a median followup of 18 months (4-72 months) were evaluable for late outcomes. Late toxicity Grades 2 and 3 were observed in 8.8% and 1%, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 62%, 36%, and 2%, respectively. B.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher acute and late toxicity. Second-generation applicators were associated with lower late toxicity and better cosmetic outcome. Actuarial freedom from ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and true recurrence were 98.3% and 98.3% at 2 years and 90.9% and 95.4% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated partial breast irradiation using NIBB was well tolerated with a low rate of acute and late toxicity across various practice settings. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and cosmetic outcomes were favorable. b.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher toxicity. Longer followup is needed to confirm late endpoints.
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah C, Keisch M, Khan A, Arthur D, Wazer D, Vicini F. Ultra-Short Fraction Schedules as Part of De-intensification Strategies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5005-5014. [PMID: 33442837 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09526-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) represents a standard approach for most patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer. The first-generation of adjuvant RT schedules delivered daily treatment to the whole breast over 5-7 weeks. Although efficacious, this presented patients with a protracted course of treatment, reducing compliance and quality of life. While hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard, and part of the second-generation of RT regimens, it still requires 3-4 weeks. Concurrently, partial-breast irradiation (PBI) has also been explored as a technique to complete RT in a much shorter time period (1-3 weeks). There are now seven trials confirming the efficacy of this shorter treatment approach compared with standard WBI. In an effort to further reduce treatment duration, ultra-short WBI and PBI regimens have recently emerged as the third-generation of breast radiation schedules, allowing for the completion of treatment in 5 days or less. With respect to WBI, recent data from the FAST-Forward trial (which evaluated five fractions of WBI delivered in 1 week) demonstrated no difference in clinical outcomes at 5 years, with limited difference in toxicity, compared with hypofractionated 3-week WBI. Regarding PBI, published data on five-fraction regimens delivered in 2 weeks have also demonstrated comparable outcomes at 10 years, with reduced toxicities with long-term follow-up. This report will review additional ongoing studies evaluating even shorter courses of adjuvant RT treatment (one to five fractions), including single-fraction PBI or WBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Atif Khan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - David Wazer
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Frank Vicini
- Michigan Healthcare Professionals, GenesisCare, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leonard KL, Wazer DE, Listo M, Hepel JT. Mammographically guided noninvasive breast brachytherapy: Preoperative partial breast radiotherapy markedly improves targeting accuracy and decreases irradiated volume. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:339-344. [PMID: 33293214 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mammographically based noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) partial breast irradiation (PBI) is ideally suited for preoperative treatment. We hypothesize that delivering NIBB PBI to the preoperative tumor volume compared with the postoperative lumpectomy bed would simplify target identification and allow for a reduction in irradiated volume along each orthogonal axis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with invasive breast cancer treated with NIBB PBI at our institution were identified. Preoperative NIBB treatments were modeled along orthogonal craniocaudal and mediolateral axes with an applicator encompassing the gross lesion plus a 1 cm clinical target volume margin. Preoperative treatment volumes were calculated along each axis using the selected applicator surface area multiplied by the preoperative mammogram separation. The actual applicator size and breast separation from the first fraction of postoperative treatment was used to calculate the postoperative treatment volume. Paired -test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative treatment separation, area, and volume for each patient. RESULTS Forty-eight patients with Stage I-II breast cancer had imaging and treatment data available for review. Along the axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (116 cm 3 vs. 204 cm 3, respectively; p < 0.0001). Similarly, along the mediolateral axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (125 cm 3 vs. 216 cm 3, respectively; p < 0001). CONCLUSIONS Based on our retrospective comparison, PBI delivered using NIBB to the preoperative tumor may reduce the volume of healthy breast tissue receiving radiation as compared with NIBB to the postoperative tumor bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara L Leonard
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
| | - David E Wazer
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Listo
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hepel JT, Leonard KL, Sha S, Graves TA, Wiggins DL, Mastras D, Pittier A, Wazer DE. Phase 2 Trial of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Using Noninvasive Image Guided Breast Brachytherapy (NIBB). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1143-1149. [PMID: 32721422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Noninvasive image guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) is a novel approach to delivery of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) that may hold advantages over established techniques. NIBB is not invasive but maintains a high level of precision by using breast immobilization via breast compression and image guidance; it therefore does not require large planning tumor volume margins. We present the primary outcomes of this prospective phase 2 study (BrUOG Br-251). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients with early-stage breast cancer underwent NIBB APBI using a dose 34 Gy in 10 fractions delivered daily or twice a day. Treatment was delivered using an Ir-192 high-dose-rate source via specialized applicators. Two orthogonal treatment axes were used for each fraction. The primary endpoints were late toxicity and cosmesis assessed at 2 and 5 years. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Cosmesis was assessed using the NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was defined as any recurrence or new primary in the treated breast. RESULTS Forty patients underwent protocol treatment. Median patient age was 68 years (50-92 years). Mean tumor size was 1.1 cm (0.3-3.0 cm). Among the cohort, 62.5% had invasive carcinoma and 37.5% had ductal carcinoma in situ. Thirty-nine percent elected to receive hormone therapy. No grade ≥3 late toxicities were observed at any time point. Grade 2 toxicity was 5% and 10% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Telangiectasia grade 1 and 2 occurred in 27.5% and 5%, respectively. Breast separation of >7 cm was associated with telangiectasia (P < .01). The rate of good to excellent cosmetic outcome was 95% at 2 years and 100% at 5 years. With a median follow-up of 68 months, the actuarial 5-year freedom from ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 93.3% (±4.8%), and overall survival was 93.7% (±4.4%). CONCLUSIONS NIBB to deliver APBI is well tolerated with a low incidence of significant late toxicity and has favorable cosmetic outcomes. Continued evaluation of the NIBB APBI technique in a larger cohort is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kara L Leonard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sandra Sha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida
| | - Theresa A Graves
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Doreen L Wiggins
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Dean Mastras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tacoma Valley Radiation, Tacoma, Washington
| | - Ann Pittier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tacoma Valley Radiation, Tacoma, Washington
| | -
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David E Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Breast brachytherapy represents a radiation technique that can be utilized as both monotherapy and as a tumor bed boost following breast conserving surgery. As monotherapy, the rationale for brachytherapy is that the majority of residual disease and therefore recurrences occur in close proximity to the lumpectomy cavity; for boost treatment, brachytherapy represents a technique that provided a more conformal approach prior to 3D treatment planning, and more recently can be used in conjunction with oncoplastic surgery. Multiple guidelines are available to assist clinicians with patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), and recent guidelines support brachytherapy as an appropriate technique to deliver APBI. Modern breast brachytherapy can be performed with interstitial or applicator-based brachytherapy with multilumen and strut devices offering the ability to provide greater skin, chest wall, and normal breast sparing than previous devices. Novel strategies are being evaluated, including high dose rate perioperative/intraoperative radiotherapy, permanent breast seed implants, and noninvasive breast brachytherapy. Additionally, studies are evaluating shorter courses of brachytherapy. Multiple Level I studies are now available supporting interstitial brachytherapy to deliver APBI while prospective data and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 trial are available with applicator brachytherapy and provide standardized prescriptions, target volume definitions, and dosimetric goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alvaro Martinez
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, MI
| | - Matthew Kolar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Frank Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hepel JT, Wazer DE. Update on Partial Breast Irradiation. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 21:96-102. [PMID: 32448706 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
For early-stage breast cancer, partial breast irradiation (PBI) allows for reduction in the irradiated volume of normal tissues by confining the radiation target to the area surrounding the lumpectomy cavity after breast-conserving surgery. This approach has been supported by phase 2 data. However, widespread adoption of PBI has awaited the results of randomized controlled trials. This review discusses the results of randomized controlled trials comparing whole breast irradiation to PBI, including the recently published National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B39/Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0413, and the Canadian RAPID trials. PBI techniques, dose/fractionation schedules, and patient selection are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw T Hepel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
| | - David E Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|