1
|
von Eyben FE, Kairemo K, Kapp DS. Prostate-Specific Antigen as an Ultrasensitive Biomarker for Patients with Early Recurrent Prostate Cancer: How Low Shall We Go? A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2024; 12:822. [PMID: 38672176 PMCID: PMC11048591 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) needs to be monitored with ultrasensitive PSA assays (uPSAs) for oncologists to be able to start salvage radiotherapy (SRT) while PSA is <0.5 µg/L for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) relapsing after a radical prostatectomy (RP). Our systematic review (SR) aimed to summarize uPSAs for patients with localized PCa. The SR was registered as InPLASY2023110084. We searched for studies on Google Scholar, PUBMED and reference lists of reviews and studies. We only included studies on uPSAs published in English and excluded studies of women, animals, sarcoidosis and reviews. Of the 115 included studies, 39 reported PSA assay methods and 76 reported clinical findings. Of 67,479 patients, 14,965 developed PSA recurrence (PSAR) and 2663 died. Extremely low PSA nadir and early developments of PSA separated PSAR-prone from non-PSAR-prone patients (cumulative p value 3.7 × 1012). RP patients with the lowest post-surgery PSA nadir and patients who had the lowest PSA at SRT had the fewest deaths. In conclusion, PSA for patients with localized PCa in the pre-PSAR phase of PCa is strongly associated with later PSAR and survival. A rising but still exceedingly low PSA at SRT predicts a good 5-year overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kalevi Kairemo
- Department of Molecular Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine, Docrates Cancer Center, FI-00185 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Daniel S. Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang Y, Ishikawa H, Inaniwa T, Iwai Y, Matsufuji N, Kasuya G, Okonogi N, Liu Y, Chao Y, Wakatsuki M, Tsujii H, Tsuji H. The clinical relative biological effectiveness and prostate-specific antigen kinetics of carbon-ion radiotherapy in low-risk prostate cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 12:1540-1551. [PMID: 35852142 PMCID: PMC9883571 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the clinical relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for prostate cancer. METHODS The records of 262 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (median age, 65 [47-80] years) treated with C-ion RT at QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology in Japan during 2000-2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Four different protocol outcomes and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were evaluated. The median follow-up was 8.4 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the biochemical or clinical failure-free rate (BCFFR). Clinical RBE was calculated using the tumor control probability model. RESULTS The 5-, 7-, and 10-year BCFFRs were 91.7%, 83.8%, and 73.2%, respectively. The 10-year BCFFRs of patients who received C-ion RT at 66 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions, 63 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions, and 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions were 81.4%, 70.9%, and 68.9%, respectively. The PSA level and density during follow-up were better in the patients treated with the lower fraction size. A higher PSA nadir and shorter time to PSA nadir were risk factors for biochemical or clinical failure by multivariate Cox regression. The tumor control probability analysis showed that the estimated clinical RBE values to achieve an 80% BCFFR at 10 years for 20, 16, and 12 fractions were 2.19 (2.18-2.24), 2.16 (2.14-2.23), and 2.12 (2.09-2.21), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using clinical data from low-risk prostate cancer patients, we showed the clinical RBE of C-ion RT decreased with increasing dose per fraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu‐Mei Kang
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan,Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of OncologyTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan,Faculty of MedicineNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan,Department of Accelerator and Medical PhysicsNational Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yuma Iwai
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan,Department of Accelerator and Medical PhysicsNational Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Goro Kasuya
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Noriyuki Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yu‐Ming Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of OncologyTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan,Faculty of MedicineNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yee Chao
- Faculty of MedicineNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan,Department of OncologyTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Hirohiko Tsujii
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: toxicities and early outcomes from a single institutional experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:399-408. [PMID: 31749847 PMCID: PMC6854868 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.89367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) delivered in a single fraction as monotherapy is a potential treatment modality for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (LIR-PC); however, outcome data with this technique remain limited. Here we describe our institutional HDR monotherapy experience and report the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment. Material and methods LIR-PC patients who received a definitive single fraction HDR-BT during 2013-2017 were retrospectively identified. The intended HDR monotherapy dose was 19 Gy in one fraction. Acute (< 90 days) and late (≥ 90 days) toxicity was assessed using CTCAE version 4.03. Trends in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and American Urological Association (AUA) symptom scores after treatment were assessed using Bayesian linear mixed models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS). Results 28 patients with median follow-up of 23.6 months were identified. The median age at treatment was 65 years (48-83). The NCCN risk groups were low in 14, favorable intermediate in 10, and unfavorable intermediate in 4 patients. There were 5 (18%) and 0 (0%) acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, respectively, and one (4%) acute grade 3 GU toxicity. There were no late grade 3 toxicities, and 5 (18%) and 0 (0%) late grade 2 GU and GI toxicities respectively. PSA values and AUA symptom scores decreased significantly after treatment. There were 3 biochemical failures with the two- and three-year BFFS of 90.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Conclusions Early results from a single institution suggest that single fraction HDR-BT with 19 Gy has limited toxicity, although with suboptimal biochemical control.
Collapse
|
4
|
Martell K, Mendez LC, Chung HT, Tseng CL, Alayed Y, Cheung P, Liu S, Vesprini D, Chu W, Wronski M, Szumacher E, Ravi A, Loblaw A, Morton G. Results of 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of over 500 patients. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:149-155. [PMID: 31522882 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE To report biochemical control associated with single fraction 15 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost followed by external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review of all patients with intermediate-risk disease treated with a real-time ultrasound-based 15 Gy HDR-BT boost followed by EBRT between 2009 and 2016 at a single quaternary cancer center was performed. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy use for biochemical or clinical failure post-treatment (CI of ADT) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) outcomes were measured. RESULTS 518 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Median age at HDR-BT was 67 years (IQR 61-72). 506 (98%) had complete pathologic information available. Of these, 146 (28%) had favorable (FIR) and 360 (69%) had unfavorable (UIR) intermediate-risk disease. 83 (16%) received short course hormones with EBRT + HDR. Median overall follow-up was 5.2 years. FFBF was 91 (88-94)% at 5 years. Five-year FFBF was 94 (89-99)% and 89 (85-94)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.045). CI of ADT was 4 (2-6)% at 5 years. Five-year CI of ADT was 1 (0-3)% and 5 (2-8)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.085). MFS was 97 (95-98)% at 5 years. Five-year MFS was 100 (N/A-100)% and 95 (92-98)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION In this large cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT results in durable biochemical control and low rates of ADT use for biochemical failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Martell
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - L C Mendez
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Western University, Department of Radiation Oncology, London, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - C L Tseng
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Alayed
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - P Cheung
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - S Liu
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - W Chu
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Wronski
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Szumacher
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Ravi
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Morton
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|