1
|
Mahantshetty U, Gurram L, Bushra S, Ghadi Y, Aravindakshan D, Paul J, Hande V, Pilar A, Chopra S, Ghosh J, Shylasree TS, Popat P, Sable N, Maheswari A, Gupta S. Single Application Multifractionated Image Guided Adaptive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:826-834. [PMID: 34146636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety of single-application multifractionated (SA-MF), high-dose-rate (HDR), image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients (N = 41) with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IIB-IVA disease recruited between 2017 and 2019 underwent SA-MF. After completion of external beam radiation therapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, patients received magnetic resonance IGABT. The IGABT protocol consisted of a single brachytherapy (BT) application and treatment with 3 fractions of HDR (9 Gy on day 1; 2 fractions of 7 Gy with a minimum 6-hour gap on day 2) after achieving planning aims of the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) receiving >84 Gy EQD2 and 2 cm3 of the bladder and rectum/sigmoid receiving ≤85 Gy and <71 Gy, respectively. Interfraction variation was addressed by performing computed tomography planning and coregistration using a mutual information-based coordinate system on day 2 before the second fraction. Organ at risk contouring was done on computed tomography, and doses were re-evaluated and reoptimized if required. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were treated as per the protocol. All patients underwent Intracavitary + Interstitial BT with needles (median, 4; range, 3-11). The mean ± standard deviation HRCTV volume was 41 ± 21 cm3 and HRCTV D90 dose was 87.2 ± 3.6Gy. The 0.1 cm3 and 2 cm3 to bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were -103.2 ± 10.6 Gy and -84.6 ± 6.8 Gy, 82.2 ± 9.5 Gy and -68.3 ± 5.7 Gy, and 83.5 ± 9.8 Gy and -69.5 ± 5.9 Gy, respectively. Six patients required reoptimization before the second fraction to meet planning aims. Mean overall treatment time was 47 ± 6 days. With a median follow up of 22 months (range, 2-37), 2-year local control and disease-free and overall survival were 90.1%, 85%, and 94.5%, respectively. So far 1 patient with grade II and 2 patients with grade III rectal toxicities have been reported. CONCLUSION Magnetic resonance IGABT with SA-MF BT was feasible in 95% of patients. The dosimetric parameters and clinical results achieved so far look promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India; Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | | | - Yogesh Ghadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Dheera Aravindakshan
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - John Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Vinod Hande
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Avinash Pilar
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Jaya Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - T S Shylasree
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Palak Popat
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Nilesh Sable
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Amita Maheswari
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|