1
|
Schupper AJ, Chanenchuk T, Racanelli A, Price G, Hadjipanayis CG. Laser hyperthermia: Past, present, and future. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:S42-S51. [PMID: 36322099 PMCID: PMC9629480 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an ablative procedure using heat from a laser to provide cytoreduction in tissue. It is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used in intracranial pathologies such as high-grade gliomas, metastatic lesions, epilepsy, and other lesions. While LITT may offer a more acceptable complication profile compared to open surgery, the role of laser therapy for intracranial lesions in current treatment paradigms continues to evolve. This review will focus on the background and application of LITT, the current evidence for its use, and future directions for the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Schupper
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tori Chanenchuk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna Racanelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gabrielle Price
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Constantinos G Hadjipanayis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Downtown Union Square, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. GammaTile: Comprehensive Review of a Novel Radioactive Intraoperative Seed-Loading Device for the Treatment of Brain Tumors. Cureus 2022; 14:e29970. [PMID: 36225241 PMCID: PMC9541893 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
GammaTile is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-licensed device consisting of four cesium-131 (Cs-131) radiation-emitting seeds in the collagen tile about the postage stamp size. The tiles are utilized to line the brain cavity immediately after tumor resection. GammaTile therapy is a surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) that helps provide instant, dose-intense treatment after the completion of resection. The objective of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy for brain tumors. This study also reviews the differences between GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) and other traditional treatment options for brain tumors. The electronic database searches utilized in this study include PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 4,150 articles were identified based on the search strategy. Out of these articles, 900 articles were retrieved. A total of 650 articles were excluded for various reasons, thus retrieving 250 citations. We applied the exclusion and inclusion criteria to these retrieved articles by screening their full text and excluding 180 articles. Therefore, 70 citations were retrieved and included in this comprehensive literature review, as outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Based on the findings of this study, GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) is safe and effective for treating brain tumors. Similarly, the findings have also shown that the efficacy of GammaTile therapy can be enhanced by combining it with other standard-of-care treatment options/external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Also, the results show that patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) exhibit poor median overall survival because of the possibility of the tumor returning. Therefore, combining STaRT with other standard-of-care treatment options/EBRT can improve the patient's overall survival (OS). GammaTile therapy enhances access to care, guarantees 100% compliance, and eliminates patients' need to travel regularly to hospitals for radiation treatments. Its implementation requires collaboration from various specialties, such as radiation oncology, medical physics, and neurosurgery.
Collapse
|
3
|
Prasad K, Dauer LT, Chu BP, Aramburu‐Nunez D, Cohen G, Beal K, Imber BS, Moss NS. Patient‐specific radiological protection precautions following Cs collagen embedded Cs‐131 implantation in the brain. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13776. [PMID: 36109179 PMCID: PMC9588267 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Cesium‐131 brachytherapy is an adjunct for brain tumor treatment, offering potential clinical and radiation protection advantages over other isotopes including iodine‐125. We present evidence‐based radiation safety recommendations from an initial experience with Cs‐131 brachytherapy in the resection cavities of recurrent, previously irradiated brain metastases. Methods Twenty‐two recurrent brain metastases in 18 patients were resected and treated with permanent Cs‐131 brachytherapy implantation using commercially procured seed‐impregnated collagen tiles (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies). Exposure to intraoperative staff was monitored with NVLAP‐accredited ring dosimeters. For patient release considerations, NCRP guidelines were used to develop an algorithm for modeling lifetime exposure to family and ancillary staff caring for patients based on measured dose rates. Results A median of 16 Cs‐131 seeds were implanted (range 6–46) with median cumulative strength of 58.72U (20.64‐150.42). Resulting dose rates were 1.19 mSv/h (0.28–3.3) on contact, 0.08 mSv/h (0.01–0.35) at 30 cm, and 0.01 mSv/h (0.001–0.03) at 100 cm from the patient. Modeled total caregiver exposure was 0.91 mSv (0.16–3.26), and occupational exposure was 0.06 mSv (0.02–0.23) accounting for patient self‐shielding via skull and soft tissue attenuation. Real‐time dose rate measurements were grouped into brackets to provide close contact precautions for caregivers ranging from 1–3 weeks for adults and longer for pregnant women and children, including cases with multiple implantations. Conclusions Radiological protection precautions were developed based on patient‐specific emissions and accounted for multiple implantations of Cs‐131, to maintain exposure to staff and the public in accordance with relevant regulatory dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavya Prasad
- Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Lawrence T. Dauer
- Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Bae P. Chu
- Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - David Aramburu‐Nunez
- Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Gilad Cohen
- Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Brandon S. Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Nelson S. Moss
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Brain Metastasis Center Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imber BS, Young RJ, Beal K, Reiner AS, Giantini-Larsen AM, Yang JT, Aramburu-Nunez D, Cohen GN, Brennan C, Tabar V, Moss NS. Salvage resection plus cesium-131 brachytherapy durably controls post-SRS recurrent brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:609-618. [PMID: 35896906 PMCID: PMC9328626 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04101-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage of recurrent previously irradiated brain metastases (rBrM) is a significant challenge. Resection without adjuvant re-irradiation is associated with a high local failure rate, while reirradiation only partially reduces failure but is associated with greater radiation necrosis risk. Salvage resection plus Cs131 brachytherapy may offer dosimetric and biologic advantages including improved local control versus observation, with reduced normal brain dose versus re-irradiation, however data are limited. METHODS A prospective registry of consecutive patients with post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) rBrM undergoing resection plus implantation of collagen-matrix embedded Cs131 seeds (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies) prescribed to 60 Gy at 5 mm from the cavity was analyzed. RESULTS Twenty patients underwent 24 operations with Cs131 implantation in 25 tumor cavities. Median maximum preoperative diameter was 3.0 cm (range 1.1-6.3). Gross- or near-total resection was achieved in 80% of lesions. A median of 16 Cs131 seeds (range 6-30), with a median air-kerma strength of 3.5 U/seed were implanted. There was one postoperative wound dehiscence. With median follow-up of 1.6 years for survivors, two tumors recurred (one in-field, one marginal) resulting in 8.4% 1-year progression incidence (95%CI = 0.0-19.9). Radiographic seed settling was identified in 7/25 cavities (28%) 1.9-11.7 months post-implantation, with 1 case of distant migration (4%), without clinical sequelae. There were 8 cases of radiation necrosis, of which 4 were symptomatic. CONCLUSIONS With > 1.5 years of follow-up, intraoperative brachytherapy with commercially available Cs131 implants was associated with favorable local control and toxicity profiles. Weak correlation between preoperative tumor geometry and implanted tiles highlights a need to optimize planning criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Aramburu-Nunez
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gil'ad N Cohen
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cameron Brennan
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viviane Tabar
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmisciano P, Haider AS, Balasubramanian K, D'Amico RS, Wernicke AG. The role of cesium-131 brachytherapy in brain tumors: a scoping review of the literature and ongoing clinical trials. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:117-133. [PMID: 35696019 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cesium-131 radioactive isotope has favored the resurgence of intracavitary brachytherapy in neuro-oncology, minimizing radiation-induced complications and maximizing logistical and clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. METHODS PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to include published studies and ongoing trials reporting cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. RESULTS We included 27 published studies comprising 279 patients with 293 lesions, and 3 ongoing trials. Most patients had brain metastases (63.1%), followed by high-grade gliomas (23.3%), of WHO Grade III (15.2%) and Grade IV (84.8%), and meningiomas (13.6%), mostly of WHO Grade II (62.8%) and Grade III (27.9%). Most brain metastases were newly diagnosed (72.3%), while most gliomas and meningiomas were recurrent (95.4% and 88.4%). Patients underwent gross-total (91.1%) or subtotal (8.9%) resection, with median postoperative cavity size of 3.5 cm (range 1-5.8 cm). A median of 20, 28, and 16 seeds were implanted in gliomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases, with median seed activity of 3.8 mCi (range 2.4-5 mCi). Median follow-up was 16.2 months (range 0.6-72 months). 1-year freedom from progression rates were local 94% (range 57-100%), regional 85.1% (range 55.6-93.8%), and distant 53.5% (range 26.3-67.4%). Post-treatment radiation necrosis, seizure, and surgical wound infection occurred in 3.4%, 4.7%, and 4.3% patients. CONCLUSION Initial data suggest that cesium-131 brachytherapy is safe and effective in primary or metastatic malignant brain tumors. Ongoing trials are evaluating long-term locoregional tumor control and future studies should analyze its role in multimodal systemic tumor management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Palmisciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ali S Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alla Gabriella Wernicke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brenner AW, Patel AJ. Review of Current Principles of the Diagnosis and Management of Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:857622. [PMID: 35686091 PMCID: PMC9171239 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.857622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are increasing in incidence as overall cancer survival improves. Diagnosis of brain metastases involves both clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment may involve a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic medical therapy depending on the patient's neurologic status, performance status, and overall oncologic burden. Advances in these domains have substantially impacted the management of brain metastases and improved performance status and survival for some patients. Indications for surgery have expanded with improved patient selection, imaging, and intraoperative monitoring. Robust evidence supports the use of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, for both standalone and adjuvant indications, in almost all patients. Lastly, while systemic medical therapy has historically provided little benefit, modern immunotherapeutic agents have demonstrated promise. Current investigation seeks to determine the utility of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and laser interstitial thermal therapy, which have shown benefit in limited studies to date. This article provides a review of the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of brain metastases and the corresponding supporting evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akash J. Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brachytherapy for central nervous system tumors. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:393-403. [PMID: 35546384 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04026-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiation is a mainstay of treatment for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Brachytherapy involves the placement of a localized/interstitial radiation source into a tumor or resection bed and has distinct advantages that can make it an attractive form of radiation when used in the appropriate setting. However, the data supporting use of brachytherapy is clouded by variability in radiation sources, techniques, delivered doses, and trial designs. The goal of this manuscript is to identify consistent themes, review the highest-level evidence and potential indications for brachytherapy in CNS tumors, as well as highlight avenues for future work. Improved understanding of the underlying biology, indications, complications, and evolving industry-academic collaborations, place brachytherapy on the brink of a resurgence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu KKH, Imber BS, Moss NS. Multimodality durable salvage of recurrent brain metastases refractory to LITT, SRS and immunotherapy with resection and cesium-131 brachytherapy: case report and literature review. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e245369. [PMID: 34920997 PMCID: PMC8685948 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BrM) are treated with multimodality therapy, however the optimal combination and timing of modalities in the setting of recurrent tumours that have failed prior treatments remain poorly defined. We present a case of a patient with biopsy-confirmed renal cell carcinoma BrM with good performance status initially treated with laser interstitial thermal ablation therapy (LITT) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery and dual checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. He subsequently developed rapid in-field recurrence which was treated with salvage surgical resection and implantation of intracavitary cesium-131 brachytherapy. The patient's disease remained stable through 18 months postoperatively. This case illustrates the range of options available and provides a combination salvage therapy strategy in a select group of locally recurrent patients who have exhausted conventional treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny Kwok Hei Yu
- Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
As the epidemiological and clinical burden of brain metastases continues to grow, advances in neurosurgical care are imperative. From standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to functional neuroimaging, preoperative workups for metastatic disease allow high-resolution detection of lesions and at-risk structures, facilitating safe and effective surgical planning. Minimally invasive neurosurgical approaches, including keyhole craniotomies and tubular retractors, optimize the preservation of normal parenchyma without compromising extent of resection. Supramarginal surgery has pushed the boundaries of achieving complete removal of metastases without recurrence, especially in eloquent regions when paired with intraoperative neuromonitoring. Brachytherapy has highlighted the potential of locally delivering therapeutic agents to the resection cavity with high rates of local control. Neuronavigation has become a cornerstone of operative workflow, while intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and intraoperative brain mapping generate real-time renderings of the brain unaffected by brain shift. Endoscopes, exoscopes, and fluorescent-guided surgery enable increasingly high-definition visualizations of metastatic lesions that were previously difficult to achieve. Pushed forward by these multidisciplinary innovations, neurosurgery has never been a safer, more effective treatment for patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick R Ng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bryan D Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Julie DA, Lazow SP, Vanderbilt DB, Taube S, Yondorf MZ, Sabbas A, Pannullo S, Schwartz TH, Wernicke AG. A matched-pair analysis of clinical outcomes after intracavitary cesium-131 brachytherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:1447-1454. [PMID: 32413856 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.jns193419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), such as cesium-131 (Cs-131) brachytherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), reduces local recurrence (LR) of brain metastases (BM). However, SRS is less efficacious for large cavities, and the delay between surgery and SRS may permit tumor repopulation. Cs-131 has demonstrated improved local control, with reduced radiation necrosis (RN) compared to SRS. This study represents the first comparison of outcomes between Cs-131 brachytherapy and SRS for resected BM. METHODS Patients with BM treated with Cs-131 and SRS following gross-total resection were retrospectively identified. Thirty patients who underwent Cs-131 brachytherapy were compared to 60 controls who received SRS. Controls were selected from a larger cohort to match the patients treated with Cs-131 in a 2:1 ratio according to tumor size, histology, performance status, and recursive partitioning analysis class. Overall survival (OS), LR, regional recurrence, distant recurrence (DR), and RN were compared. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 17.5 months for Cs-131-treated and 13.0 months for SRS-treated patients, the LR rate was significantly lower with brachytherapy; 10% for the Cs-131 cohort compared to 28.3% for SRS patients (OR 0.281, 95% CI 0.082-0.949; p = 0.049). Rates of regional recurrence, DR, and OS did not differ significantly between the two cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing showed a significantly higher likelihood of freedom from LR (p = 0.027) as well as DR (p = 0.018) after Cs-131 compared to SRS treatment (p = 0.027), but no difference in likelihood of OS (p = 0.093). Six (10.0%) patients who underwent SRS experienced RN compared to 1 (3.3%) patient who received Cs-131 (p = 0.417). CONCLUSIONS Postresection patients with BM treated with Cs-131 brachytherapy were more likely to achieve local control compared to SRS-treated patients. This study provides preliminary evidence of the potential of Cs-131 to reduce LR following gross-total resection of single BM, with minimal toxicity, and suggests the need for a prospective study to address this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Julie
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Stefanie P Lazow
- 2Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - Daniel B Vanderbilt
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Shoshana Taube
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Menachem Z Yondorf
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Albert Sabbas
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Susan Pannullo
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spine Center, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Theodore H Schwartz
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spine Center, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- 1Stich Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spine Center, Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choi M, Zabramski JM. Re-Irradiation Using Brachytherapy for Recurrent Intracranial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Cureus 2020; 12:e9666. [PMID: 32923261 PMCID: PMC7485916 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation using brachytherapy for patients with locally recurrent brain tumors after previous radiation therapy. Methods We performed a systematic review of the major biomedical databases from 2005 to 2020 for eligible studies where patients were treated with re-irradiation for recurrent same site tumors using brachytherapy. Tumor types included high-grade gliomas (HGG) (World Health Organization (WHO) Grades 3 and 4), meningiomas, and metastases. The outcomes of interest were median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after re-irradiation, the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN), and other relevant radiation-related adverse events (AE). We used a fixed-effect meta-analysis regression moderation model to compared results of interstitial versus intracavitary therapy, treatment with low-dose-rate (LDR) versus high-dose-rate (HDR) techniques, and outcomes by tumor type. Results The search resulted in a total of 194 articles. A total of 16 articles with 695 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. For high-grade glioma, meningioma, and brain metastasis the pooled meta-analysis showed mean symptomatic RN rates of 3.3% (standard error (SE) = 0.8%), 17.3% (SE = 5.0%), and 22.4% (SE = 7.0%), respectively, and mean rates of RN requiring surgical intervention of 3.0% (SE = 1.0%), 11.9% (SE = 5.3%), and 10.0% (SE = 7.3%), respectively. The mean symptomatic RN rates in the meta-analysis comparing interstitial versus intracavitary therapy were 3.4% and 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.36), and for the comparison of LDR versus HDR, the rates were 2.6% and 5.7%, respectively (p = 0.046). In comparing the symptomatic RN rates in comparison to HGG versus meningioma, the means were 3.3% and 17.3%, respectively (p = 0.006), and in HGG versus metastatic tumors, the means were 3.3% and 22.4%, respectively (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in rates of RN requiring surgery in any of these groups. Due to the small number of studies and inconsistent recording of OS and PFS, statistical analysis of these parameters could not be performed. Conclusion Published literature on the same site re-irradiation using brachytherapy for recurrent brain tumors is highly limited, with inconsistent reporting of safety and efficacy outcomes. To overcome these shortcomings, we utilized a structured meta-analysis approach to show that re-irradiation with modern brachytherapy is generally safe in terms of the risks of symptomatic RN. We also found that symptomatic RN rates for brachytherapy are significantly lower in recurrent HGG compared to recurrent meningiomas (p = 0.006) and metastatic tumors (p = 0.007). Re-irradiation with brachytherapy is a feasible option for appropriately selected patients. The availability of Cesium-131 (Cs-131) shows promise in reducing toxicity while achieving excellent local control due to its physical properties, and the recent introduction of a novel surgically targeted radiation therapy device, that makes brachytherapy less technically demanding, may allow for more widespread adoption. Prospective trials with consistent reporting of endpoints are needed to explore whether these advances improve safety and efficacy in patients with recurrent, previously irradiated tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehee Choi
- Radiation Oncology, GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mohindra P, Beriwal S, Kamrava M. Proposed brachytherapy recommendations (practical implementation, indications, and dose fractionation) during COVID-19 pandemic. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:390-400. [PMID: 32423787 PMCID: PMC7252026 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Provide an overview, the indications for use, and a synopsis of current literature regarding two evolving neurosurgical interventions-GammaTile therapy (GTT) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). RECENT FINDINGS GTT delivers immediate, uniform, high-dose radiation with avoidance of direct brain-to-seed contact. Innate properties of the novel carrier system and cesium-131 source may explain lower observed rate of radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) and support use in larger and previously irradiated lesions. LITT delivers focal laser energy to cause heat-generated necrosis. Case series suggest use in difficult-to-access lesions and treatment of RIN. Collaboration among subspecialties and remaining up-to-date on evolving technology is critical in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with brain cancer. While patients should be thoroughly counseled that these interventions are not standard of care, in optimal clinical scenarios, GTT and LITT could extend quantity and quality of life for patients with few remaining options. Prospective studies are needed to establish specific treatment parameters.
Collapse
|
14
|
Michaelidesová A, Konířová J, Bartůněk P, Zíková M. Effects of Radiation Therapy on Neural Stem Cells. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:E640. [PMID: 31450566 PMCID: PMC6770913 DOI: 10.3390/genes10090640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain and nervous system cancers in children represent the second most common neoplasia after leukemia. Radiotherapy plays a significant role in cancer treatment; however, the use of such therapy is not without devastating side effects. The impact of radiation-induced damage to the brain is multifactorial, but the damage to neural stem cell populations seems to play a key role. The brain contains pools of regenerative neural stem cells that reside in specialized neurogenic niches and can generate new neurons. In this review, we describe the advances in radiotherapy techniques that protect neural stem cell compartments, and subsequently limit and prevent the occurrence and development of side effects. We also summarize the current knowledge about neural stem cells and the molecular mechanisms underlying changes in neural stem cell niches after brain radiotherapy. Strategies used to minimize radiation-related damages, as well as new challenges in the treatment of brain tumors are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Michaelidesová
- Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Dosimentry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Na Truhlářce 39/64, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Konířová
- Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Dosimentry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Na Truhlářce 39/64, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Bartůněk
- Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Zíková
- Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Differentiation Induction as a Response to Irradiation in Neural Stem Cells In Vitro. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11070913. [PMID: 31261863 PMCID: PMC6678856 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a significant role in brain cancer treatment; however, the use of this therapy is often accompanied by neurocognitive decline that is, at least partially, a consequence of radiation-induced damage to neural stem cell populations. Our findings describe features that define the response of neural stem cells (NSCs) to ionizing radiation. We investigated the effects of irradiation on neural stem cells isolated from the ventricular-subventricular zone of mouse brain and cultivated in vitro. Our findings describe the increased transcriptional activity of p53 targets and proliferative arrest after irradiation. Moreover, we show that most cells do not undergo apoptosis after irradiation but rather cease proliferation and start a differentiation program. Induction of differentiation and the demonstrated potential of irradiated cells to differentiate into neurons may represent a mechanism whereby damaged NSCs eliminate potentially hazardous cells and circumvent the debilitating consequences of cumulative DNA damage.
Collapse
|