1
|
Rios-Doria E, Cun HT, Filippova OT, Mueller JJ, Alektiar KM, Ellenson LH, Makker V, Lakhman Y, Leitao MM, Jhingran A, Soliman PT, Abu-Rustum NR. Isolated vaginal recurrence in women with stage I endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:9-15. [PMID: 37864854 PMCID: PMC11215939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma by location of first recurrence and describe characteristics of isolated vaginal recurrence. METHODS Patients with 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I endometrial carcinoma treated at two large cancer centers from 1/1/2009-12/31/2017 were identified. Sarcoma histology was excluded. Recurrences were grouped into isolated vaginal or extravaginal. Isolated vaginal recurrences were localized by anatomic location within the vaginal vault. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared with chi-square analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. RESULTS Of 2815 women identified, 278 (10%) experienced a recurrence. Sixty-one patients (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 42 (69%) at the vaginal apex; 217 (8%) had an extravaginal recurrence, including 18 with a vaginal component. Median time to recurrence was 11 months (range, 1-68) for isolated vaginal recurrence and 20 months (range, 1-98) for extravaginal recurrence (P < .004). Of 960 patients (34%) treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VBT), 156 (16%) recurred; 19 (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 16 (84%) at the vaginal apex. Three-year PFS rates for isolated vaginal recurrence were 97.6% (SE ± 0.4%) with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 96.9% (SE ± 1.1%) with open (P = .8), and for extravaginal recurrence were 91.8% (SE ± 0.7%) with MIS versus 90.8% (SE ± 1.8%) with open (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS Isolated vaginal recurrences in stage I endometrial cancer are detected earlier than non-vaginal recurrences. Surgical approach does not appear to impact recurrence. Adjuvant VBT after primary surgery carries a 1%-2% risk of isolated vaginal apex recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Han T Cun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Olga T Filippova
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noorian F, Abellana R, Zhang Y, Herreros A, Baltrons C, Lancellota V, Tagliaferri L, Sabater S, Torne A, Rovirosa A. Are 7.5 Gy×2 fractions more efficient than 6 Gy×3 in exclusive postoperative endometrial cancer brachytherapy? A clinical and dosimetrical analysis. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109909. [PMID: 37699447 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare two vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) schedules in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (PEC) patients considering vaginal-cuff relapses (VCR), late toxicities, dosimetry analysis and vaginal dilator use. MATERIAL AND METHODS 110 PEC patients were treated with exclusive high-dose-rate VBT using two schedules. Group-1:44-patients received 6 Gy×3fractions (September-2011-April-2014); Group-2:66-patients were treated with 7.5 Gy×2fractions with a dose limit of equivalent total doses in 2-Gy fr (EQD2(α/β=3)) of 68 Gy in the most exposed 2 cm3 of clinical target volume (CTV) (July-2015-November-2021). The dose was prescribed at 5 mm from the applicator surface. Were evaluated the overall radiation dose delivered to 90% of the CTV (D90), the CTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100) and the EQD2(α/β=3) received in the most exposed 2 cm3 to dose in CTV. Late toxicity was prospectively assessed using RTOG scores for bladder and rectum and objective LENT-SOMA criteria for late vaginal toxicity (LVT). STATISTICS Descriptive analysis, Chi-square, Student's t-tests and Kaplan and Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up was 60 months (15.9-60). There were no VCR or late toxicities in bladder or rectum. LVT ≥ G1 appeared in 26/44 (59.1%) in Group-1 and 25/66 (37.9%) in Group-2. The mean EQD2(α/β=3) received by the most exposed 2 cm3 of CTV was 63.7 Gy ± 10.0 in Group-1 and 60.5 Gy ± 3.8 in Group-2 (p = 0.063). There were no differences in adherence to vaginal dilator use ≥9 months, overall D90 and V100. CONCLUSION Considering the lack of vaginal relapses and similar LVT over time, 7.5 Gy×2fractions seem more efficient in terms of patient comfort, workload, and cost. This is the first study using dosimetry parameters to compare effectivity of schedules. Larger series are needed to confirm the present results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faegheh Noorian
- Radiation Oncology Dpt. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Fonaments Clínics Dpt. Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, C/ Casanovas 153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Rosa Abellana
- Fonaments Clínics Dpt. Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, C/ Casanovas 153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Yaowen Zhang
- Cancer Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No.7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
| | - Antonio Herreros
- Radiation Oncology Dpt. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Fonaments Clínics Dpt. Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, C/ Casanovas 153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Clara Baltrons
- Radiation Oncology Dpt. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Vallentina Lancellota
- U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
| | | | - Aureli Torne
- Gynecological Cancer Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Radiation Oncology Dpt. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Fonaments Clínics Dpt. Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, C/ Casanovas 153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kunz JN, Huang YJ, Casper AC, Suneja G, Burt LM, Jhingran A, Joyner MM, Harkenrider MM, Small W, Grant JD, Kidd EA, Boucher K, Gaffney DK. Dosimetric Evaluation of Organs at Risk From SAVE Protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:274-280. [PMID: 37023988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this work was to evaluate dosimetric characteristics to organs at risk (OARs) from short-course adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) in early endometrial cancer compared with standard of care (SOC) in a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS SAVE (Short Course Adjuvant Vaginal Brachytherapy in Early Endometrial Cancer Compared to Standard of Care) is a prospective, phase 3, multisite randomized trial in which 108 patients requiring VCB were randomized to an experimental short-course arm (11 Gy × 2 fractions [fx] to surface) and SOC arm. Those randomized to the SOC arm were subdivided into treatment groups based on treating physician discretion as follows: 7 Gy × 3 fx to 5 mm, 5 to 5.5 Gy × 4 fx to 5 mm, and 6 Gy × 5 fx to surface. To evaluate doses to OARs of each SAVE cohort, the rectum, bladder, sigmoid, small bowel, and urethra were contoured on planning computed tomography, and doses to OARs were compared by treatment arm. Absolute doses for each OAR and from each fractionation scheme were converted to 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD23). Each SOC arm was compared with the experimental arm separately using 1-way analysis of variance, followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey's honestly significant difference test. RESULTS The experimental arm had significantly lower doses for rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and urethra compared with the 7 Gy × 3 and 5 to 5.5 Gy × 4 fractionation schemes; however, the experimental arm did not differ from the 6 Gy × 5 fractionation scheme. For small bowel doses, none of the SOC fractionation schemes were statistically different than the experimental. The highest EQD23 doses to the examined OARs were observed to come from the most common dose fractionation scheme of 7 Gy × 3 fx. With a short median follow-up of 1 year, there have been no isolated vaginal recurrences. CONCLUSIONS Experimental short-course VCB of 11 Gy × 2 fx to the surface provides a comparable biologically effective dose to SOC courses. Experimental short-course VCB was found to reduce or be comparable to D2cc and D0.1cc EQD23 doses to rectum, bladder, sigmoid, small bowel, and urethra critical structures. This may translate into a comparable or lower rate of acute and late adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy N Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Y Jessica Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anthony C Casper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Lindsay M Burt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Melissa M Joyner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew M Harkenrider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Jonathan D Grant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Medical Center, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, Utah
| | - Elizabeth A Kidd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ken Boucher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang W, Wang T, Liu Z, He J, Sun X, Zhong W, Zhao F, Li X, Li S, Zhu H, Ma Z, Hu K, Zhang F, Hou X, Wei L, Zou L. Practice patterns of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I to II endometrial carcinoma: a real-world multi-institutional analysis in China. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:417. [PMID: 37553639 PMCID: PMC10410771 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02548-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to report clinical practice patterns of postoperative radiotherapy for stage I to II endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients treated in 13 Chinese medical centers. METHODS We included early stage EC patients treated by hysterectomy and adjuvant RT between 2003 and 2017 from 13 institutions. Patients were classified into 4 risk groups based on ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO recommendations (2014). RESULTS A total of 1,227 cases were analyzed. Along the 15 years of the study, an increasing tendency was found towards administration for vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) alone, while the proportion of external beam pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) alone remained stable in the corresponding period. When radiation modalities were stratified by risk groups, proportion of VBT alone significantly increased in all risk groups. The higher the risk, the later VBT became the main adjuvant treatment modality. However, EBRT alone or with VBT remained the main adjuvant method for high-risk patients. There were 13 dose-fractionation schemes for VBT alone with the scheme of 30 Gy in 6 fractions prescribed at 0.5cm under the vaginal mucosa accounting for most. There were 17 schemes for VBT boost and the most common schedule was 10 Gy in 2 fractions. The upper 3-5cm part of vagina was the most frequent target. 89.6% of the practitioners performed two-dimensional VBT technique. The median dose for EBRT was 50 Gy. From 2003 to 2017, conventional radiotherapy was gradually replaced by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy modality and intensity modulated radiotherapy. CONCLUSION We report a significant shift from EBRT to VBT alone for high-intermediate-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk EC patients from 2003 to 2017 while EBRT remained the main radiation modality for high-risk early stage patients. There has been remarkable heterogeneity among VBT dose fractionation schedules across China. TRIAL REGISTRATION The clinical trial ID was ChiCTR-PRC-17010712. It was authorized by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (N0. S-K139).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital Affiliated By Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China
| | - Zi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianli He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoge Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhong
- Gynaecological Oncology Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengjv Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sha Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The 940Th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinesc People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhanshu Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chi Feng University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Lichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University of PLA (the Fourth Military Medical University), Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
| | - Lijuan Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meftahi M, Fields E, Guy C, Song WY. The Design of a Novel Direction Modulated Brachytherapy Vaginal Cylinder Applicator for Optimizing Coverage of the Apex. Med Phys 2022; 49:3926-3935. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.15666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Moeen Meftahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
| | - Emma Fields
- Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
| | - Christopher Guy
- Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
| | - William Y. Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parsons MW, Huang YJ, Burt L, Suneja G, Gaffney D. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: a review of major clinical trials with a focus on fractionation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:311-315. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy in the adjuvant management of endometrial cancer has increased over time. Recommendations from the American Brachytherapy Society, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and European Society for Medical Oncology help to guide the application of vaginal cuff brachytherapy. However, wide variation in practice remains regarding treatment techniques. This article reviews the use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy in the post-operative management of endometrial cancer. It covers risk stratification, treatment rationale, outcomes, and treatment planning recommendations with a specific focus on dose-fractionation regimens. The authors performed a thorough literature review of articles pertinent to the goals of this review. Also presented are early results of the Short Course Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy in Early Endometrial Cancer Compared with Standard of Care (SAVE) trial of a two-fraction vaginal cuff brachytherapy regimen.Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer results in excellent disease control with minimal toxicity. The PORTEC-2 trial showed that vaginal cuff brachytherapy is non-inferior to external beam radiation for vaginal recurrence in patients at high-intermediate risk. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy may also be used as a boost following external beam radiation in combination with chemotherapy for high-risk histologies. Numerous techniques can be used for vaginal cuff brachytherapy, including various medical devices, dose-fractionation schedules, and treatment planning approaches. The early control results of the SAVE trial are promising and we are hopeful that this trial establishes two fraction regimens as a viable option for vaginal cuff brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lancellotta V, Macchia G, Dinapoli N, Autorino R, Campitelli M, Nardangeli A, Salvati A, Fionda B, Casà C, Cornacchione P, Rovirosa A, Kovács G, Morganti AG, Ferrandina MG, Gambacorta MA, Tagliaferri L. EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:341-348. [PMID: 35092552 PMCID: PMC8960610 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01455-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the late toxicity rates after two different high dose rate (HDR) adjuvant intravaginal interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) dose schedules in stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS Stage I-II patients with endometrial cancer treated with surgery (with or without lymphadenectomy) and adjuvant HDR-IRT between 2014 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients were treated with two schedules. In the first cohort (C1), 21 Gy were delivered in three weekly fractions (7 Gy) prescribed 0.5 cm from the applicator surface. In the second cohort (C2), 24 Gy were delivered in four weekly fractions (6 Gy). The clinical target volume was the upper third of the vagina for C1 and the upper 3 cm for C2. HDR-IRT technique and point prescription (5 mm depth from the applicator surface) were the same for all patients. Vaginal toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE 5.0 scale in terms of the presence versus absence of any toxicity grade. The correlation among toxicity and clinical covariates (age, lymphadenectomy, fractionation, stage) was tested by Pearson correlation test (univariate) and by logistic regression (multivariable). RESULTS 114 stage I and three stage II patients, median age 62 (range: 32-85) years, were included in this analysis. The mean follow-up was 56.3 months in C1 (40-76) and 20 months in C2 (8-42). Vaginal late toxicity was recorded in 40 and 15 patients in C1 and 2, respectively. Age, lymphadenectomy, and fractionation were significantly correlated with toxicity at univariate analysis (p value = 0.029, 0.006, and 0.002, respectively), while stepwise logistic regression confirmed only age and fractionation as significantly correlated parameters (p value = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). Three-year local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free and cause-specific survival rates were 96.6%, 94.8%, and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This analysis showed lower vaginal late toxicity rate in C2 compared to C1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Gemelli Molise Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Nicola Dinapoli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Autorino
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Nardangeli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Salvati
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Cornacchione
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Fonaments Clinics Department, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - György Kovács
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00128, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiotherapy Center, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Gabriella Ferrandina
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The role for vaginal cuff brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy in endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:177-185. [PMID: 35210017 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role and technique of a vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB) boost to adjuvant external beam (EB) radiation for endometrial cancer through a systematic review. METHODS AND MATERIALS Relevant trials were identified through a systematic search of the literature. RESULTS A total of 21 prospective and retrospective studies which had a patient cohort undergoing EB + VB was identified to evaluate for rates of vaginal and pelvic recurrences, overall survival, and toxicity. Additional database studies were utilized to demonstrate differences in local control and overall survival between EB and EB + VB. CONCLUSIONS While there is limited prospective evidence to guide the use of a VB boost after EB, the evidence suggests that patients with a higher risk of a vaginal recurrence such as those with cervical stromal involvement in select Stage III patients may derive local control and survival benefits from a VB boost. Additional individual risk factors such as grade, histology, extent of invasion, margin status, age, and the use of lower doses of EB should be considered when deciding when to add a VB boost.
Collapse
|