Upfront radiotherapy with brachytherapy for medically inoperable and unresectable patients with high-risk endometrial cancer

Clinical outcomes analysis of image-guided brachytherapy as definitive treatment for inoperable endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided brachytherapy combined with or without external beam radiotherapy (IGBT ± EBRT) as definitive treatment for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer (IOEC), in addition to establishing a risk classification to predict prognosis.

METHODS

Fifty-one IOEC patients who underwent IGBT ± EBRT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 42 patients (82.4%) were treated with IGBT + EBRT and 9 patients (17.6%) with IGBT alone. Establishing risk classification based on FIGO 2009 staging and biopsy pathology, stage III/IV, non-endometrioid, or Grade 3 endometrioid cancer were included in the high-risk group (n = 25), and stage I/II with Grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer was included in the low-risk group (n = 26).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 58.0 months (IQR, 37.0-69.0). Clinical complete remission (CR) was achieved in 92.2% of patients after radiotherapy (n = 47). The cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant failure were 19.6% (n = 10) and 7.8% (n = 4), respectively. A total of 20 patients died (39.2%), including 10 cancer-related deaths (19.6%) and 10 comorbidity-related deaths (19.6%). The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 76.9%, 71.2%, 59.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. No Grade 3 or above acute or late toxicities were reported. In univariate analysis, LRC, TTP, and CSS were significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for age, number of comorbidities, radiotherapy modality, and chemotherapy, the low-risk group was still significantly better than the high-risk group in terms of LRC (HR = 6.10, 95% CI: 1.18-31.45, P = 0.031), TTP (HR = 8.07, 95% CI: 1.64-39.68, P = 0.010) and CSS (HR = 6.29, 95% CI: 1.19-33.10, P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

IGBT ± EBRT is safe and effective as definitive treatment for IOEC patients, achieving satisfactory locoregional control, favorable survival outcomes, and low toxicity. Risk classification based on FIGO 2009 staging and biopsy pathology is an independent prognostic factor for LRC, TTP, and CSS.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by hysterectomy in locally advanced endometrial cancer: Outcomes from a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines

Objective

Managing endometrial cancer with suspected or gross cervical involvement lacks a standard approach. This study evaluated outcomes in patients with cervical and/or parametrial involvement treated with neoadjuvant radiation followed by hysterectomy.

Methods

Fourteen patients from 2007 to 2022 with locally advanced endometrial cancer and cervical and/or parametrial involvement were retrospectively analyzed. They received neoadjuvant external beam radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-30 fractions) and high-dose rate brachytherapy (5.5-7.0 Gy per fraction in 3-4 fractions), followed by extrafascial hysterectomy. Clinical data, pathologic response, and survival outcomes were assessed, along with factors associated with pathologic response.

Results

Most patients (86%) had stage III disease with cervical extension, 93% had parametrial involvement, and 14% had nodal involvement. Chemotherapy was given to 86% either concurrently or adjuvantly. Post-surgery, 86% had no pathologic cervical involvement, and 93% had negative surgical margins. Pathologic complete response was seen in 43%. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 14%. Median follow-up was 30 months, with recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of 86% and 100%, respectively. Lower grade tumors significantly correlated with pathologic complete response (Φ = 0.72, p = 0.026). No significant correlation was found between pathologic complete response and other factors. No late grade 3-4 toxicities were reported.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant radiation followed by hysterectomy, with or without chemotherapy, is a viable strategy for managing endometrial cancer with cervical and/or parametrial involvement. This approach enhances resectability, yielding high rates of pathologic complete response and negative resection margins, showing promise for this challenging patient group.

Stages I-III Inoperable Endometrial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis by the Gynaecological Cancer GEC-ESTRO Working Group of Patients Treated with External Beam Irradiation and 3D-Image Guided Brachytherapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Analyse the outcomes of stages I-III inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with external-beam-irradiation (EBRT) and 3D-image-guided-brachytherapy (IGBT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of IEC patients receiving EBRT + IGBT in eight European and one Canadian centres (2004-2019) were examined, including: pelvic ± para-aortic EBRT and lymph node boost; anaesthetic procedure, applicators, BT-planning imaging, clinical target volume (CTV), brachytherapy schedule, and EQD2 to the CTV(α/β=4.5Gy) and D2 cm3(α/β=3Gy) for organs at risk. Complications are evaluated using CTCAEv4 scores. The 2- and 5-year survival probability according to stages was estimated (cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)).

STATISTICS

descriptive analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

103 patients (stages: I-44, II-14, III-44) were included. Median follow-up: 28 months (7-170). All patients received pelvic ± para-aortic EBRT. Median D90-EQD2(α/β=4.5) to the CTV:73.3 Gy (44.6-132.7), 69.9 Gy (44.7-87.9 and 75.2 Gy (55.1-97) in stages I, II, and III, respectively. Thirty patients presented relapse (stages: 10-I, 3-II, 17-III): 24 uterine (stages: 7-I, 3-II, 14-III), 15 nodal (stages: 4-I, 1-II, 10-III), and 23 distant (stages: 6-I, 2-II, 15-III). Five year CSS was 71.2% (stages: 82%-I-II and 56%-III) and DFS, LRFS, LRRFS, and DMFS were 55.5%, 59%, 72%, and 67.2%, respectively. Late G3-G4 complications (crude): 1.3% small bowel, 2.5% rectum, and 5% bladder.

CONCLUSION

In stages I-III of the IEC, EBRT + IGBT offer good 2- and 5-year CSS of 88.7% and 71.2%, respectively, with the best outcomes in stages I-II. Prospective studies are needed to determine how better outcomes can be achieved.

Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to ensure that the dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) were not exceeded while increasing the prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) from 45 to 50.4 Gray (Gy) with the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. While trying for this purpose, a new dynamic IMRT technique named 90° angled collimated dynamic IMRT (A-IMRT) planning was developed by us.

METHODS

This study was based on the computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with postoperatively diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2 endometrial carcinoma. For each patient, conventional dynamic IMRT (C-IMRT, collimator angle of 0° at all gantry angles), A-IMRT (collimator angle of 90° at gantry angles of 110°, 180°, 215°, and 285°), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned. Planning techniques were compared with parameters used to evaluate PTV and OARs via dose-volume-histogram analysis using the paired two-tailed Wilcoxon's signed-rank test; p < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.

RESULTS

All plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV. Although the technique with the lowest mean conformality index was A-IMRT (0.76 ± 0.05) compared to both C-IMRT (0.79 ± 0.04, p = 0.000) and VMAT (0.83 ± 0.03, p = 0.000), it protected the OARs especially the bladder (V45 = 32.84 ± 2.03 vs. 44.21 ± 6.67, p = 0.000), rectum (V30 = 56.18 ± 2.05 vs. 73.80 ± 4.75, p = 0.000) and both femoral heads (V30 for right = 12.19 ± 1.34 vs. 21.42 ± 4.03, p = 0.000 and V30 for left = 12.58 ± 1.48 vs. 21.35 ± 4.16, p = 0.000) better than C-IMRT. While the dose constraints of the bladder, rectum and bilateral femoral heads were not exceeded in any patient with A-IMRT or VMAT, they were exceeded in 19 (95%), 20 (100%) and 20 (100%) patients with C-IMRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OARs are better protected when external beam radiotherapy is applied to the pelvis at a dose of 50.4 Gy by turning the collimator angle to 90° at some gantry angles with the dynamic IMRT technique in the absence of VMAT.

Definitive Radiation Therapy for Medically Inoperable Endometrial Carcinoma

Purpose

Upfront radiation therapy consisting of brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy is considered standard of care for patients with endometrial carcinoma who are unable to undergo surgical intervention. This study evaluated the cancer-free survival (CFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) of patients with endometrial carcinoma managed with definitive-intent radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of medically inoperable patients with biopsy-proven endometrial carcinoma managed with up-front, definitive radiation therapy at UMass Memorial Medical Center between May 2010 and October 2021. A total of 55 cases were included for analysis. Patients were stratified as having low-risk endometrial carcinoma (LREC; uterine-confined grade 1-2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma) or high-risk endometrial carcinoma (HREC; stage III/IV and/or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, or any stage serous or clear cell carcinoma or carcinosarcoma). The CFS, CSS, OS, and grade ≥3 toxic effects were reported for patients with LREC and HREC.

Results

The median age was 66 years (range, 42-86 years), and the median follow-up was 44 months (range, 4-135 months). Twelve patients (22%) were diagnosed with HREC. Six patients (11%) were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy alone and 49 patients (89%) were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy. Twelve patients (22%) were treated with radiation and chemotherapy. The 2-year CFS was 82% for patients with LREC and 80% for patients with HREC (log rank P = .0654). The 2-year CSS was 100% for both LREC and HREC patients. The 2-year OS was 92% for LREC and 80% for HREC (log P = .0064). There were no acute grade ≥3 toxic effects. There were 3 late grade ≥3 toxic effects owing to endometrial bleeding and gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Conclusions

For medically inoperable patients with endometrial carcinoma, up-front radiation therapy provided excellent CFS, CSS, and OS. The CSS and OS were higher in patients with LREC than in those with HREC. Toxic effects were limited in both cohorts.

Management of inoperable endometrial cancer

Some endometrial cancer (EMC) patients are not good candidates for primary surgery. The three major types of treatment for inoperable EMC are radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or their combination as neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. Radiation therapy alone (of different modes) has been used as the sole definitive therapeutic modality, particularly for early-stage disease that is limited to the uterine body and cervix with or without parametrial invasion. The most common treatment modality is neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is also occasionally used, depending mainly on the sites of the disease and the results of surgery. Data on neoadjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy are limited, with studies focusing on laboratory outcomes or having only a small number of patients. Most neoadjuvant treatments before surgery involved chemotherapy and fewer combined chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was generally performed, particularly in patients who had shown responses or at least stable disease to neoadjuvant treatment. Perioperative outcomes after neoadjuvant treatment were superior to those after primary surgery, whereas survival data were still inconsistent. Features that had or tended to have a favorable prognosis were younger age, early-stage disease, response to neoadjuvant treatment, low preoperative cancer antigen-125 level, and optimal surgery. Among different modalities of neoadjuvant treatment, which has become a frequent mode of treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common than radiation therapy alone or chemoradiation.

Radiation therapy in the definitive management of medically inoperable endometrial cancer

The incidence of endometrial cancer continues to increase worldwide with growing life expectancy and rates of obesity. While endometrial cancer is primarily a surgical disease managed with hysterectomy, a small proportion of patients are deemed to be poor surgical candidates due to their co-morbidities. These medically inoperable patients should be considered for curative treatment with definitive radiation therapy, and brachytherapy is an integral component of their care. Referral to a high-volume center early on in the care of potentially inoperable patients is crucial to optimize their management. These patients should be evaluated by a high-risk surgical and anesthesia team to confirm their medical inoperability. For inoperable patients, use of image-guided brachytherapy is encouraged. Brachytherapy applicator selection is determined based on a patient’s anatomy, uterine size, and extent of tumor. Advances in anatomic and functional imaging including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have improved clinical staging of these patients and have also allowed for the delivery of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy with improved accuracy. With recent consensus guidelines to guide local computed tomography and/or MRI volume-based delineation of targets and organs-at-risk, local outcomes have improved and treatments are delivered with less acute and late morbidity. Ongoing trials are looking at novel systemic agents, such as immunotherapy, to induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response and improve outcomes in these patients.

High dose rate192Ir versus high dose rate60Co brachytherapy: an overview of systematic reviews of clinical responses of gynecological cancers from 1984 to 2020

The Purpose. Radioisotope of192Iradium (192Ir) has a half-life (74 days) and is not easily accessible in developing countries. As a result, by the time source shipment clearance and the customs paperwork are completed, a large proportion of useful activity had already been decayed away. In fact,60Cobalt (60Co) remote afterloading systems are commercially available by many venders. As a result, it may well become an alternative source to192Ir and conform many of these challenges. The aim of this study is that to report clinical responses of different types of gynaecological cancers treated with high dose rate (HDR)192Ir and HDR60Co brachytherapy in order to check whether HDR60Co could be used as an alternative brachytherapy, source to HDR192Ir.Materials and Methods. A retrospective study of clinical responses of different types of gynaecological cancers, staged from I to IV according to recommendations of International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), treated by brachytherapy alone, radiotherapy alone (combined brachytherapy and radiotherapy) and combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (brachytherapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) between 1984 and December 2020 was conducted. The patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy 45-51 Gy boosted with HDR192Ir and HDR60Co afterloading brachytherapy of 18-30 Gy to point A.The results. The study scrutinized the data of 11086 patients with different types of gynaecological cancers. Most of the patients, 70 percent of them, were diagnosed with gynaecological cancers in stages II and III. For patients treated with192Ir brachytherapy source 5-years overall survival rate (OS), local control, 2-years, 5-years and 10-years disease free survival (DFS), complications of gastro-intestine (GI) and complications of genito-urinary (GU) were 63.5%, 92%, 72.6%, 64.07%, 43.75%, 3.9% and 5.92%, but for those treated with60Co they were 57.7%, 86.63%, 82.5%, 53.35%, 43.75%, 4.8% and 3.7%, respectively.Conclusions.The use of HDR60Co brachytherapy has the capacity to produce overall survival rate and disease control in patients with carcinoma of the gynaecology comparable to that reported for HDR192Ir brachytherapy. Currently, the toxicity and damage of the normal tissues and radiation-related second cancers are of a similar incidence to that of standard HDR192Ir brachytherapy. Source exchange frequency is not a serious concern because it requires less frequency of replacement, and commissioning can be accomplished within years; hence, replacing HDR192Ir with HDR60Co brachytherapy achieves significant cost saving. Therefore, we recommend that60Co source ought to be the first choice for low resource radiotherapy setting as it offers economic advantages over192Ir and have comparable clinical outcomes to that of192Ir source.

High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Inoperable Endometrial Cancer: a Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

Endometrial cancer is a common gynaecological cancer, is typically early stage and treated with surgery. For patients where surgery is difficult or dangerous, definitive radiation therapy is the next best option. This study included a single institution case series (step 1) and a systematic review of the literature (step 2). In step 1, all endometrial cancer cases that were treated with definitive image-guided brachytherapy at a single institution from 2008 to 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In step 2, a systematic review of Medline (PubMed) from 1975 to 2020 was carried out using the key words around endometrial cancer and brachytherapy, followed by a narrative synthesis. In total, in step 1, 31 cases were included in this study, stages I-IV, with 96.7% receiving external beam radiation. All patients received three fractions of 7.5 Gy or five fractions of 6 Gy high dose rate brachytherapy, with a median EQD2 of 75.55 (40-84.3). The 2-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) local control was 83.1% and the 2-year KM overall survival was 77.4%. There was no late toxicity ≥grade 3. In step 2, 19 articles were included in the final analysis, with between six and 280 patients. The local control ranged from 70 to 100%, with low toxicity. Definitive radiation therapy with image-guided brachytherapy seems to have good local control with low toxicity for patients who are poor surgical candidates.

Toxicity and outcomes associated with high-dose rate brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate toxicity in inoperable endometrial cancer (EC) treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with definitive RT for EC were retrospectively reviewed. EQD2 values were calculated for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. Acute and late toxicities were retrospectively graded. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included. The majority of patients had endometrioid histology (N = 46, 90.2%) and Grade 1 disease (N = 32, 62.75%). Thirty-seven patients (72.5%) were treated with image-guided BT (IGBT) and 14 (27.5%) with two-dimensional BT. Forty patients (78.4%) received EBRT + BT and 11 (21.57%) received BT alone. No grade 2 (G2) or higher toxicities were reported with BT alone. G2 or higher acute toxicities with EBRT + BT were G2 proctitis (N = 2, 5.0%) and G3 proctitis (N = 1, 2.5%). Late toxicities included G3 vaginal stenosis (N = 1, 2.5%), proctitis (N = 1, 2.5%), enteritis (N = 1, 2.5%), and one G4 gastrointestinal bleed. One- and 2-year local control were 100% with BT alone and 93% and 89%, respectively, with EBRT + BT. One- and 2-year locoregional control were 100% with BT and 97% and 93%, respectively, with EBRT + BT. Recurrence-free survival was 89% at 1 and 2 years with BT alone compared to 87% and 80% with EBRT + BT. One- and 2-year overall survival were 88% and 72% with BT alone compared to 94% and 84% with EBRT + BT. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer control between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with inoperable EC treated with definitive RT have low toxicity rates and durable local control.

Evaluation of Uterine Brachytherapy as Primary Treatment Option for Elderly Patients with Medically Inoperable Endometrial Cancer-A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

We aimed to gain more evidence regarding the feasibility, toxicity, and oncological outcome of primary brachytherapy in patients with medically inoperable endometrial cancer. Thirteen patients receiving primary brachytherapy ± external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for endometrial cancer due to medical inoperability were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local failure-free survival (LFFS). Univariate outcome analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Peri-interventional complications, acute and chronic toxicities were evaluated. Additionally, we performed a Pubmed search and review of the literature of the last 10 years. Mean age at time of diagnosis was 73.9 years (60.4-87.1 years). Eleven patients were staged FIGO IA/B and one patient each with FIGO IIIA and IIIC. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 2-/5-year LFFS were 76.2%/56.4%, respectively. High grading correlated with a worse LFFS (p = 0.069). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 2-/5-year PFS were 76.9%/53.8% and 2-/5-year-OS were 76.9%/69.2%, respectively. No acute toxicities > grade II and only two late toxicities grade II/III occurred. We observed three peri-interventional complications. The available evidence suggests high rates of local control after definitive brachytherapy for inoperable endometrial cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. Definitive brachytherapy +/- EBRT should be considered as the preferred approach for this patient group.