A national surveillance study of the current status of reirradiation using brachytherapy in Japan

Reirradiation for recurrent gynecologic cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan: A multicenter survey on practice patterns and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to examine the present status of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer in Japan and to determine the role of this therapy in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Each center provided information on patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

The study included 165 patients treated at 9 facilities from 2000 to 2018. The analysis of outcomes included 142 patients treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time for survivors was 30 months (range 1-130 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 53 % (95 %CI: 42-63 %), 44 % (35-53 %), and 61 % (50-70 %) for cervical cancer; 100 % (NA), 64 % (30-85 %), and 70 % (32-89 %) for endometrial cancer; and 54 % (13-83 %), 38 % (6-72 %), and 43 % (6-78 %) for vulvar and vaginal cancer, respectively. In multivariate analysis, interval to reirradiation (<1 year) was a significant risk factor for OS, PFS and LC; Gross Tumor Volume (≥25 cm3) was a significant risk factor for OS. Toxicities were analyzed in all enrolled patients (n = 165). Grade ≥ 3 late toxicities occurred in 49 patients (30 %). A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/β = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation.

Focal injection of a radiopaque viscous spacer before focal brachytherapy as re-irradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Close vicinity of the target volume and a sensitive organ may prevent an effective radiotherapy/brachytherapy. A liquid hydrogel spacer cannot be placed well focally in specific small areas or fatty tissue. The purpose of this study was to report the injection technique and results of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer.

METHODS

The radiopaque viscous spacer was applied focally using transrectal ultrasound guidance before focal brachytherapy in re-irradiated areas in two patients. The technical feasibility of the injection between the recurrence and the rectum / bladder, the resulting distance, visibility in different imaging modalities, stability within several months, dose distribution, toxicity and tumor control up to 18 months after treatment was analyzed.

RESULTS

After hydrodissection, the needle was moved from the base towards the apex during injection of each syringe, respectively. The viscous spacer could be successfully injected focally and resulted in a planned distancing of the target volume (right lobe and seminal vesicle area) and the rectum of at least 1 cm and additional distancing to the bladder of at least 5 mm. Both brachytherapy treatments were performed without relevant toxicities. The PSA nadirs indicated a satisfactory short-term response to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The viscous hydrogel spacer can be injected focally at a specific prostate lobe or seminal vesicles. A viscous spacer remains stable within fatty tissue in any areas that are accessible by an ultrasound guided needle injection to create a distance between the high brachytherapy dose within the target and the organ at risk.

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice.

METHODS

We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.