Acute and late complications and toxicities of skin brachytherapy

Optimizing surface mould brachytherapy for treatment of nasal basal cell carcinoma using customized applicators

PURPOSE

Surface mould brachytherapy (SMBT) is ideal in treating superficial skin cancer over the curved surface of the nasal ala. We describe the process of initiating and optimizing SMBT treatment at our institution including clinical workflow, generation of three dimensional (3D) printed custom applicators, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planning CT scans were used to acquire images for delineating target volumes. The applicator was designed with customized catheter positioning (3-5mm from target) to cover target volume while sparing dose to organs at risk (OAR) such as adjacent skin and nasal mucosa. Applicators were 3D printed, with transparent resin to aid visualization of underlying skin. Dosimetric parameters evaluated included CTV D90, CTV D0.1cc, and D2cc to OARs. Clinical outcomes assessed were local control, acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 [CTCAEv5.0]), and cosmesis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG]).

RESULTS

Ten patients were treated with SMBT with a median followup of 17.8 months. Dose prescription was 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions. Mean CTV D90 was 38.5 Gy (range 34.7-40.6), mean CTV D0.1cc 49.2 Gy (range 45.6-53.5), which was <140% of the prescription dose in all patients. Treatment was well tolerated, with acceptable Grade 2 acute, Grade 0-1 late skin toxicity, and good-excellent cosmesis for all patients. Two patients experienced local failure, and both underwent surgical salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

SMBT was successfully planned and delivered for superficial nasal BCC using 3D printed custom applicators. Excellent target coverage was achieved while minimizing dose to OAR. Toxicity and cosmesis rates were good-excellent.

Normal tissue complication probability of acute eyelids erythema following radiotherapy of head and neck cancers and skull-base tumors

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is broadly used as one of the main treatment methods for patients with head and neck cancers and skull base tumors. However, it can lead to normal tissue complications. Therefore, this study aimed to model normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of eyelid skin erythema after radiation therapy.

METHODS

The dataset of 45 patients with head and neck and skull base tumors was prospectively collected from their dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Grade 1 + eyelid skin erythema based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) was evaluated as the endpoint after a three-month follow-up. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) radiobiological model was developed based on generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). Model parameters were calculated by maximum likelihood estimation. Model performance was evaluated by ROC-AUC, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

After three months of follow-up, 13.33% of patients experienced eyelids skin erythema grade 1 or more. The parameters of the LKB model were: TD50 = 30 Gy, m = 0.14, and n = 0.10. The model showed good predictive performance with ROC-AUC = 0.80 (CI:0.66-0.94) and a Brier score of 0.20.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, NTCP of eyelid skin erythema was modeled based on the LKB radiobiological model with good predictive performance.

Advances in Skin Brachytherapy: Cosmesis and Function Preservation

Skin brachytherapy represents an excellent alternative treatment for patients with non-melanoma skin cancers. It offers superior conformity of dose distribution with rapid dose fall off, reducing the risk of radiotherapy-related treatment toxicity. A smaller treatment volume in brachytherapy, when compared with external beam radiotherapy, is conducive for hypofractionation, which is an attractive option for decreasing outpatient visits to the cancer centre, especially for elderly and frail patients. Skin brachytherapy is an excellent option to preserve function and cosmesis, especially in skin cancers located in the head and neck region. Electronic brachytherapy, image-guided superficial brachytherapy and 3D printed moulds are all emerging advances in skin brachytherapy.

HDR brachytherapy in keratinocyte skin carcinomas - Single center experience with analysis of clinical, dosimetric, and radiobiological factors in acute skin toxicity

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy techniques have been utilized to treat keratinocyte skin carcinoma (KSC). The objective of this study was to report the results of patients with KSC treated with HDR brachytherapy, with a variety of techniques and applicators. A statistical analysis of clinical, radiobiological, and technical factors has been made to analyze those factors related to skin acute toxicity, focused on acute epithelitis G3.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 2005 and August 2020, 93 patients with 120 histologically proven KSC have been treated in our Institution. BT treatment has been performed using superficial BT/plesiotherapy (Valencia applicator (22%), flaps (48%), customized molds (4%) or interstitial techniques (26%)). The indications of BT were primary/definitive in 38 treatments (32%) or adjuvant/postoperative in 82 (68%). In 14 (17%) of the 82 operated patients a skin graft. Mean comparison t tests were performed for quantitative variables, and percentage comparison Chi2 tests for qualitative. Multivariate binomial logistic regression models were done.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 36.5 months (range 5-141). Local control was achieved in 110 treatments (92%). Acute toxicity, dermatitis, was G1 7%; G2, 57% and G3 38%. The main factors statistically associated to the appearance of dermatitis G3 were the total dose, the volume treated, and the use of manufactured flaps. The main protective factor against dermatitis G3 was implant of skin graft.

CONCLUSIONS

In KSC BT the use of manufactured flap is accompanied by greater EG3, only with a relationship with the volume of treatment and total dose.

The State of the Art of Radiotherapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Due to the general aging population and the fashion trend of sun exposure, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is rising. The management of NMSC is difficult and necessitates a multidisciplinary team (i.e., pathologists, dermatologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists). When surgery is not an option or will cause unacceptably functional morbidity, radiation therapy (RT) may be a preferable tissue-preserving option. Whether used alone or in conjunction with other treatments, RT has been shown to be quite effective in terms of cosmetic results and local control. Contact hypofractionated RT, brachytherapy, and electronic brachytherapy are all promising new treatments. However, rigorous, randomized trials are missing, explaining the disparity in dose, fractionation, and technique recommendations. Therefore, it is essential that interdisciplinary teams better understand RT modalities, benefits, and drawbacks. Our review will provide the role and indications for RT in patients with NMSC.