1
|
Busschaert SL, Werbrouck A, De Ridder M, Putman K. The Application of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Oncology: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2025; 28:643-651. [PMID: 39608677 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) holds promise to control costs and enhance value in oncology, but the current landscape of its applications remains uncharted. This study aimed to: (1) document the applications of TD-ABC in oncology and unveil its strengths and limitations, (2) assess the extent to which studies adhere to Kaplan and Porter's method, and (3) appraise study quality. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to provide an empirical application of TD-ABC within oncology. Structured data extraction included key characteristics such as cancer type, perspective, and analysis setting. Quality was assessed using the TD-ABC Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement checklist. RESULTS A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria, two-thirds of which were published within the last 5 years. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries and analyzed common cancer types. The provider's perspective (85%) dominated, and studies typically relied on single-institution data (76%). No study assessed costs over a complete cycle of care and most focused on the costs of radiotherapy (56%) or surgery (20%). Articles generally did not adhere to the seven-step method, and average study quality was low (52%), particularly because of inadequate content in methods and results. CONCLUSIONS Oncology has emerged as a productive field for TD-ABC analyses, showcasing the effectiveness of TD-ABC in capturing the costs of healthcare processes in which medical devices are integral to care delivery. Nevertheless, concerns arise because of the low overall study quality and the lack of a consistent methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara-Lise Busschaert
- Department of Public Health, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiotherapy, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amber Werbrouck
- Department of Public Health, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Department of Public Health, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiotherapy, Research Centre on Digital Medicine (REDM), University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van den Berg M, van Elten H, Spaan J, Franx A, Ahaus K. Exploring cost changes with time-driven activity-based costing after service delivery redesign in Dutch maternity care. Health Serv Manage Res 2024:9514848241265770. [PMID: 39041951 DOI: 10.1177/09514848241265770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
The implementation of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has spread across international healthcare systems, aiming to improve decision-making by combining information about patient outcomes and costs of care. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) is introduced as a pragmatic yet accurate method to calculate costs of care pathways. It is often applied to demonstrate value-improving opportunities, such as interventions aimed at service delivery redesign. It is imperative for healthcare managers to know whether these interventions yield the expected outcome of improving patient value, for which TDABC is also suitable. However, its application becomes more complex and labour intensive if the intervention extends beyond activity-level changes in existing care pathways, to the implementation of entirely new care pathways. The complexity arises from the potential influence of such interventions on the costs of related care pathways. To fully comprehend the impact of such interventions on organizational costs, it is important to include these factors in the cost calculation. Given the substantial effort required for this analysis, this may explain the limited number of prior TDABC studies with similar objectives. This methodological development paper addresses this gap by offering a pragmatic enrichment of the TDABC methodology. This enrichment is twofold. First, it provides guidance on calculating a change in costs without the need for a total cost calculation. Second, to secure granularity, a more detailed level of cost-allocation is proposed. The aim is to encourage further application of TDABC to conduct financial evaluations of promising interventions in the domain of VBHC and service delivery redesign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud van den Berg
- Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hilco van Elten
- Department of Accounting, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam School of Business and Economics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julia Spaan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kees Ahaus
- Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franklin M, Pollard D, Sah J, Rayner A, Sun Y, Dube F, Sutton A, Qin L. Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2700-2722. [PMID: 38833143 PMCID: PMC11213812 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02893-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of global cancer incidence. Breast cancer has negative consequences for society and economies internationally due to the high burden of disease which includes adverse epidemiological and economic implications. Our aim is to systematically review the estimated economic burden of breast cancer in the United States (US), Canada, Australia, and Western Europe (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, and Switzerland), with an objective of discussing the policy and practice implications of our results. METHODS We included English-language published studies with cost as a focal point using a primary data source to inform resource usage of women with breast cancer. We focussed on studies published since 2017, but with reported costs since 2012. A systematic search conducted on 25 January 2023 identified studies relating to the economic burden of breast cancer in the countries of interest. MEDLINE, Embase, and EconLit databases were searched via Ovid. Study quality was assessed based on three aspects: (1) validity of cost findings; (2) completeness of direct cost findings; and (3) completeness of indirect cost findings. We grouped costs based on country, cancer stage (early compared to metastatic), and four resource categories: healthcare/medical, pharmaceutical drugs, diagnosis, and indirect costs. Costs were standardized to the year 2022 in US (US$2022) and International (Int$2022) dollars. RESULTS Fifty-three studies were included. Studies in the US (n = 19) and Canada (n = 9) were the majority (53%), followed by Western European countries (42%). Healthcare/medical costs were the focus for the majority (89%), followed by pharmaceutical drugs (25%), then diagnosis (17%) and indirect (17%) costs. Thirty-six (68%) included early-stage cancer costs, 17 (32%) included metastatic cancer costs, with 23% reporting costs across these cancer stages. No identified study explicitly compared costs across countries. Across cost categories, cost ranges tended to be higher in the US than any other country. Metastatic breast cancer was associated with higher costs than earlier-stage cancer. When indirect costs were accounted for, particularly in terms of productivity loss, they tended to be higher than any other estimated direct cost (e.g., diagnosis, drug, and other medical costs). CONCLUSION There was substantial heterogeneity both within and across countries for the identified studies' designs and estimated costs. Despite this, current empirical literature suggests that costs associated with early initiation of treatment could be offset against potentially avoiding or reducing the overall economic burden of later-stage and more severe breast cancer. Larger scale, national, economic burden studies are needed, to be updated regularly to ensure there is an ongoing and evolving perspective of the economic burden of conditions such as breast cancer to inform policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Pollard
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Janvi Sah
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| | - Annabel Rayner
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Yuxiao Sun
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - France Dube
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| | - Anthea Sutton
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Lei Qin
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brancalion FNM, de Souza LG, Berger S, Lima AFC. Lean methodology: contributions to improving work processes in health and nursing. Rev Bras Enferm 2024; 77:e20230322. [PMID: 38747811 PMCID: PMC11095908 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to investigate the contributions of applying the Lean methodology to improve work processes in health and nursing and its impact on associated financial aspects. METHOD an integrative review, carried out in six databases, whose sample of ten (100.0%) studies was analyzed and summarized descriptively. RESULTS the outcomes obtained were stratified into: benefits/barriers to Lean Healthcare implementation; economic aspects involving Lean Healthcare implementation; and process improvements through Lean Healthcare implementation. The majority of studies (60.0%) were carried out in university hospitals, contexts that need to continually improve the quality of services provided, generally with scarce and limited resources, which support the viability of maintaining the teaching, research and extension tripod. CONCLUSION three (30.0%) studies highlighted the financial aspects associated with Lean methodology application. The others only mentioned the possibility of financial gains through improving processes and reducing waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Simone Berger
- Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Politécnica. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turkheimer LM, Petroni GR, Berger AC, Schroen AT, Brenin DR, Lazar M, Libby B, Janowski EM, Showalter TN, Showalter SL. Novel Form of Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy with CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Interim Results of a Prospective Phase-II Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:10-20. [PMID: 37870228 PMCID: PMC12032993 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) is a novel method of IORT that uses customized CT-based treatment plans and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. We conducted a phase-II multi-institution trial to evaluate the efficacy of PB-IORT. STUDY DESIGN Between 2015 and 2022, 3 centers enrolled women aged 45 years and older with invasive or in situ carcinoma measuring 3 cm or smaller and N0 status (n = 358). Breast-conserving surgery was performed, and a multilumen balloon catheter was placed in the lumpectomy bed. CT images were used to create customized HDR brachytherapy plans that delivered 12.5 Gy to the tumor bed. The primary outcome assessed was the 5-year rate of index quadrant tumor recurrence. An interim analysis was conducted after one-third of eligible participants completed 5 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02400658). RESULTS The cohort comprised 153 participants with a median age of 64 years and median follow-up time of 5.9 years. The estimated 5-year index quadrant tumor recurrence rate and overall survival were 5.08% (95% CI 2.23 to 9.68) and 95.1%, respectively. Locoregional (ipsilateral breast and axilla) and distant recurrence rates were each 1.96%. Seven deaths occurred during the first 5 years of follow-up, with only 1 attributable to breast cancer. Overall, 68.6% of patients experienced any adverse effects, and 4 cases of breast-related severe toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the results of a planned interim analysis of a phase-II trial investigating PB-IORT and demonstrates the efficacy and safety of single-fraction, CT-based, HDR brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of PB-IORT as a treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Turkheimer
- From the Departments of Surgery (Turkheimer, Schroen, Brenin, SL Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Gina R Petroni
- Division of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA (Petroni)
| | - Adam C Berger
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Berger)
| | - Anneke T Schroen
- From the Departments of Surgery (Turkheimer, Schroen, Brenin, SL Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - David R Brenin
- From the Departments of Surgery (Turkheimer, Schroen, Brenin, SL Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Melissa Lazar
- Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (Lazar)
| | - Bruce Libby
- Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (Libby)
| | - Einsley M Janowski
- Radiation Oncology (Janowski, TN Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Radiation Oncology (Janowski, TN Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- From the Departments of Surgery (Turkheimer, Schroen, Brenin, SL Showalter), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali A, Phillips J, Ljuboja D, Shehab S, Pisano ED, Kaplan RS, Sarwar A. Prospective Evaluation of the Cost of Performing Breast Imaging Examinations Using a Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Method: A Single-Center Study. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:546-554. [PMID: 38416918 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Measuring the cost of performing breast imaging is difficult in healthcare systems. The purpose of our study was to evaluate this cost using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and to evaluate cost drivers for different exams. METHODS An IRB-approved, single-center prospective study was performed on 80 female patients presenting for breast screening, diagnostic or biopsy exams from July 2020 to April 2021. Using TDABC, data were collected for each exam type. Included were full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), US and MRI exams, and stereotactic, US-guided and MRI-guided biopsies. For each exam type, mean cost and relative contributions of equipment, personnel and supplies were calculated. RESULTS Screening MRI, CEM, US, DBT, and FFDM costs were $249, $120, $83, $28, and $30. Personnel was the major contributor to cost (60.0%-87.0%) for all screening exams except MRI where equipment was the major contributor (62.2%). Diagnostic MRI, CEM, US, and FFDM costs were $241, $123, $70, and $43. Personnel was the major contributor to cost (60.5%-88.6%) for all diagnostic exams except MRI where equipment was the major contributor (61.8%). Costs of MRI-guided, stereotactic and US-guided biopsy were $1611, $826, and $356. Supplies contributed 40.5%-49.8% and personnel contributed 30.7%-55.6% to the total cost of biopsies. CONCLUSION TDABC provides assessment of actual costs of performing breast imaging. Costs and contributors varied across screening, diagnostic and biopsy exams and modalities. Practices may consider this methodology in understanding costs and making changes directed at cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aamir Ali
- McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Houston, Department of Radiology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jordana Phillips
- Boston Medical Center at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Damir Ljuboja
- McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Houston, Department of Radiology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Etta D Pisano
- American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert S Kaplan
- Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
- Leadership Development, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ammar Sarwar
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah C. Intraoperative radiation and electronic brachytherapy in Brachytherapy: A look back and forward. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:4-5. [PMID: 36725199 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|