Effect of total callosotomy on KCNQ2-related intractable epilepsy

Surgical outcomes of patients with genetically refractory epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the surgical outcomes of genetically refractory epilepsy and identify prognostic factors for these outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for relevant studies, published between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2023, was performed using specific search terms. All studies addressing surgical outcomes and follow-up of genetically refractory epilepsy were included. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, 2020 (i.e., "PRISMA") reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 3833 studies retrieved, 55 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were eligible for meta-analysis at the study level. Pooled outcomes revealed that 74 % of patients who underwent resective surgery (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89; z = 9.47, p < 0.05) achieved Engel I status at the last follow-up. In the study level analysis, pooled outcomes revealed that 9 % of patients who underwent vagus nerve stimulation achieved seizure-free status (95 % CI 0.00-0.31; z = 1.74, p < 0.05), and 61 % (95 % CI 0.55-0.89; z = 11.96, p < 0.05) achieved a 50 % reduction in seizure frequency at the last follow-up. Fifty-three studies comprising 249 patients were included in an individual-level analysis. Among patients who underwent lesion resection or lobectomy/multilobar resection, 65 % (100/153) achieved Engel I status at the last follow-up. Univariate analysis indicated that female sex, somatic mutations, and presenting with focal seizure symptoms were associated with better prognosis (p < 0.05). Additionally, 75 % (21/28) of patients who underwent hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy achieved Engel I status at the last follow-up. In the individual-level analysis, among patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation, 21 % (10/47) were seizure-free and 64 % (30/47) experienced >50 % reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous presurgical evaluation and selection of appropriate surgical procedures can, to a certain extent, effectively control seizures. Therefore, various surgical procedures should be considered when treating patients with genetically refractory epilepsy.

Genetic testing before epilepsy surgery - An exploratory survey and case collection from German epilepsy centers

INTRODUCTION

Genetic testing in people with epilepsy may support presurgical decision-making. It is currently unclear to what extent epilepsy centres use genetic testing in presurgical evaluation.

METHODS

We performed an exploratory survey among members of the German Society for Epileptology to study the current practice of genetic testing in presurgical evaluation at the respective sites. Survey participants contributed educational case reports.

RESULTS

The majority of participants consider genetic testing to be useful in individuals with familial syndromes or phenotypic features suggesting a genetic etiology. We report 25 cases of individuals with a confirmed genetic diagnosis that have previously undergone epilepsy surgery. Our cases demonstrate that a genetic diagnosis has an impact on both the decision-making process during presurgical evaluation, as well as the postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSION

Genetic testing as part of the presurgical work-up is becoming increasingly established in epilepsy centres across Germany. mTORopathies and genetic hypothalamic hamartomas seem to be associated with a generally favourable surgical outcome. Synaptopathies and channelopathies may be associated with a worse outcome and should be considered on a case-by-case level. Prospective studies are needed to examine the impact of an established genetic diagnosis on postsurgical outcome.