Binocular interactions in the guinea pig's visual-evoked potentials

Stimulating both eyes with matching stimuli enhances V1 responses

Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of primates play a key role in combining monocular inputs to form a binocular response. Although much has been gleaned from studying how V1 responds to discrepant (dichoptic) images, equally important is to understand how V1 responds to concordant (dioptic) images in the two eyes. Here, we investigated the extent to which concordant, balanced, zero-disparity binocular stimulation modifies V1 responses to varying stimulus contrast using intracranial multielectrode arrays. On average, binocular stimuli evoked stronger V1 activity than their monocular counterparts. This binocular facilitation scaled most proportionately with contrast during the initial transient. As V1 responses evolved, additional contrast-mediated dynamics emerged. Specifically, responses exhibited longer maintenance of facilitation for lower contrast and binocular suppression at high contrast. These results suggest that V1 processes concordant stimulation of both eyes in at least two sequential steps: initial response enhancement followed by contrast-dependent control of excitation.

Co-existence of myopia and amblyopia in a guinea pig model with monocular form deprivation

Background

Form deprivation myopia is a type of ametropia, with identifiable causes in humans, that has been induced in many animals. The age of onset of myopia induced by monocular form deprivation coincides with the period of visual development in guinea pigs. However, visual acuity of form-deprived eyes in guinea pigs is not understood yet. In this study, we investigated whether monocular form deprivation would affect visual acuity in infant guinea pigs by evaluating the development of myopia and amblyopia after monocular form deprivation, and whether form deprivation myopia and amblyopia occurred simultaneously or successively.

Methods

Twenty pigmented guinea pigs (2 weeks old) were randomly assigned to two groups: monocularly form-deprived (n=10), in which facemasks modified from latex balloons covered the right eye, and normal controls (n=10). Refraction, axial length, and visual acuity were measured at 4 intervals (after 0, 1, 4, and 8 weeks of form deprivation), using cycloplegic streak retinoscopy, A-scan ultrasonography (with an oscillation frequency of 10 MHz), and sweep visual evoked potentials (sweep VEPs), respectively. Sweep VEPs were performed with correction of the induced myopic refractive error.

Results

Longer deprivation periods resulted in significant refractive errors in form-deprived eyes compared with those in contralateral and normal control eyes; the axial lengths of form-deprived eyes increased significantly after 4 and 8 weeks of form deprivation. These results revealed that myopia was established at 4 weeks. The acuity of form-deprived eyes was unchanged compared to that at the pretreatment time point, while that of contralateral eyes and eyes in normal control guinea pigs improved; there were significant differences between the deprived eyes and the other two open eyes from 1 to 8 weeks of form deprivation, showing that amblyopia was possibly established during 1 week of form deprivation.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of using sweep VEPs to estimate the visual acuity of guinea pigs. Further, our results revealed that amblyopia likely occurred earlier than myopia; amblyopia and myopia coexisted after a long duration of monocular form deprivation in guinea pigs. Understanding this relationship may help provide insights into failures of treatment of amblyopia associated with myopic anisometropia.

Guinea pig ciliary muscle development

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a method for quantifying guinea pig ciliary muscle volume (CMV) and to determine its relationship to age and ocular biometric measurements.

METHODS

Six albino guinea pigs' eyes were collected at each of five ages (n = 30 eyes). Retinoscopy and photography were used to document refractive error, eye size, and eye shape. Serial sections through the excised eyes were made and then labeled with an α-smooth muscle actin antibody. The ciliary muscle was then visualized with an Olympus BX51 microscope, reconstructed with Stereo Investigator (MBF Bioscience), and analyzed using Neurolucida Explorer (MBF Bioscience). Full (using all sections) and partial (using a subset of sections) reconstruction methods were used to determine CMV.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the full and partial volume determination methods (p = 0.86). The mean (±SD) CMV of the 1-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 90-day-old eyes was 0.40 (±0.16) mm, 0.48 (±0.13) mm, 0.67 (±0.15) mm, 0.86 (±0.35) mm, and 1.09 (±0.63) mm, respectively. Ciliary muscle volume was significantly correlated with log age (p = 0.001), ocular length (p = 0.003), limbal circumference (p = 0.01), and equatorial diameter (p = 0.003). It was not correlated with refractive error (p = 0.73) or eye shape (p = 0.60). Multivariate regression determined that biometric variables were not significantly associated with CMV after adjustment for age.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional reconstruction was an effective means of determining CMV. These data provide evidence that ciliary muscle growth occurs with age in tandem with eye size in normal albino guinea pigs. Additional work is needed to determine the relationship between CMV and abnormal ocular growth.

Selective potentiation of crossed vs. uncrossed inputs from lateral geniculate nucleus to visual cortex by the basal forebrain: potential facilitation of rodent binocularity

Cholinergic projections originating in the basal forebrain (BF) play important roles in the heterosynaptic facilitation of synaptic strength in various sensory cortices, including the primary visual cortex (V1). Here, using urethane-anesthetized rats, we find that pairing burst stimulation of the BF with single pulse stimulation of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) does not consistently increase field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) in V1 elicited by ipsilateral LGN stimulation. However, longer latency fPSPs recorded in V1 in response to stimulation of the contralateral LGN, reflecting crossed, polysynaptic inputs, show significant potentiation when paired with preceding BF stimulation. This synaptic enhancement requires relatively short time intervals between paired BF burst and LGN pulse stimulation (40 ms) and is abolished by systemic or local V1 muscarinic receptor blockade (scopolamine), while systemic nicotinic receptor blockade (mecamylamine) is ineffective. Together, these data provide evidence for a differential capacity for cholinergic/muscarinic-dependent plasticity induction among different signals in V1, with inputs reaching V1 from the contralateral LGN exhibiting potentiation in the face of stable strength in ipsilateral LGN-V1 projections. This preferential readiness for potentiation in crossed fiber systems could serve to amplify binocular responses in V1 elicited by synchronized excitation of ipsi- and contralateral LGN neurons.

Input-selective potentiation and rebalancing of primary sensory cortex afferents by endogenous acetylcholine

Acetylcholine (ACh) plays important roles in the modulation of activity and plasticity of primary sensory cortices, thus influencing sensory detection and integration. We examined this in urethane-anesthetized rats, comparing cholinergic modulation of short latency, large amplitude field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) in the visual cortex (V1) evoked by stimulation of the ipsilateral lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), reflecting direct thalamocortical inputs, with longer latency, smaller amplitude fPSPs elicited by contralateral LGN stimulation, reflecting indirect, polysynaptic inputs. Basal forebrain (BF) stimulation (100 Hz) produced a significant (approximately 45%), gradually developing potentiation of the smaller, contralateral fPSPs, while ipsilateral fPSPs showed less enhancement (approximately 15%), shifting the relative strength of dominant/ipsi- and weaker/contralateral inputs to V1. Systemic or local, cortical blockade of muscarinic receptors (scopolamine) reduced potentiation of contralateral fPSP without affecting ipsilateral enhancement, thus preventing the relative amplification of contralateral inputs following BF stimulation. Systemic nicotinic receptor blockade (mecamylamine) resulted in depression of ipsilateral, and reduced enhancement of contralateral fPSPs after BF stimulation. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade (systemic MK-801) abolished ipsilateral fPSP enhancement without affecting contralateral potentiation. Neither drug reduced the amplification of contralateral relative to ipsilateral signals in V1. In a second experiment in the barrel cortex, BF stimulation enhanced multiunit activity elicited by whisker deflection in a muscarinic-sensitive manner. Similar to the observations in V1, this effect was more pronounced for weaker multiunit activity driven by a surround whisker than activity following principal whisker deflection. These experiments demonstrate that ACh release following BF stimulation exerts surprisingly selective effects to amplify non-dominant inputs to sensory cortices. We suggest that, by diminishing the imbalance between different afferent signals, ACh release during states of behavioral activation acts to induce a long-lasting facilitation of the detection and/or integration of signals in primary sensory fields of the cortical mantle.