The glutamate-rich region of the larger lamprey neurofilament sidearm is essential for proper neurofilament architecture

The functions of CAP superfamily proteins in mammalian fertility and disease

BACKGROUND

Members of the cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPS), antigen 5 (Ag5) and pathogenesis-related 1 (Pr-1) (CAP) superfamily of proteins are found across the bacterial, fungal, plant and animal kingdoms. Although many CAP superfamily proteins remain poorly characterized, over the past decade evidence has accumulated, which provides insights into the functional roles of these proteins in various processes, including fertilization, immune defence and subversion, pathogen virulence, venom toxicology and cancer biology.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this article is to summarize the current state of knowledge on CAP superfamily proteins in mammalian fertility, organismal homeostasis and disease pathogenesis.

SEARCH METHODS

The scientific literature search was undertaken via PubMed database on all articles published prior to November 2019. Search terms were based on following keywords: 'CAP superfamily', 'CRISP', 'Cysteine-rich secretory proteins', 'Antigen 5', 'Pathogenesis-related 1', 'male fertility', 'CAP and CTL domain containing', 'CRISPLD1', 'CRISPLD2', 'bacterial SCP', 'ion channel regulator', 'CatSper', 'PI15', 'PI16', 'CLEC', 'PRY proteins', 'ASP proteins', 'spermatogenesis', 'epididymal maturation', 'capacitation' and 'snake CRISP'. In addition to that, reference lists of primary and review article were reviewed for additional relevant publications.

OUTCOMES

In this review, we discuss the breadth of knowledge on CAP superfamily proteins with regards to their protein structure, biological functions and emerging significance in reproduction, health and disease. We discuss the evolution of CAP superfamily proteins from their otherwise unembellished prokaryotic predecessors into the multi-domain and neofunctionalized members found in eukaryotic organisms today. At least in part because of the rapid evolution of these proteins, many inconsistencies in nomenclature exist within the literature. As such, and in part through the use of a maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of the vertebrate CRISP subfamily, we have attempted to clarify this confusion, thus allowing for a comparison of orthologous protein function between species. This framework also allows the prediction of functional relevance between species based on sequence and structural conservation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This review generates a picture of critical roles for CAP proteins in ion channel regulation, sterol and lipid binding and protease inhibition, and as ligands involved in the induction of multiple cellular processes.

Assembly properties of lamprey neurofilament subunits and their expression after spinal cord transection

In mammals neurofilaments (NF) are formed by coassembly of three subunits: NFL, NFM, and NFH (light, medium, and heavy). It had been believed that lampreys have only one subunit, NF180. However, a previous study showed that NF180 could not self-assemble but could coassemble with rat NFL, suggesting the existence of additional NF subunits in lamprey. More recently, we cloned three additional NF subunits. These new subunits and NF180 have now been transfected in combinations into SW13cl.2Vim(-) cells, which lack endogenous cytoplasmic intermediate filaments. None of the subunits could self-assemble. No combination of NF subunits could form filaments in the absence of lamprey NFL (L-NFL). Assembly occurred at 28°C, but not at 37°C. L-NFL could form thick NF bundles with NF180 but not with NF132 and NF95, which formed only fine filamentous arrays. To determine which parts of the NF subunits are required for filament or bundle formation, we constructed deletion mutants of NF180 and cotransfected them with L-NFL. As with mammalian NF, only constructs with intact head and core domains could form filaments with L-NFL. However, the full length of NF180 was required to form NF bundles. As with NF180, in situ hybridization indicated that mRNA for L-NFL and NF132 was downregulated in identified reticulospinal neurons by 5 weeks after spinal cord transection, but was reexpressed at 10 weeks selectively in those neurons whose axons have a high probability of regenerating. This is consistent with a possible role of NFs in the mechanism of axon regeneration.