Effect of pulsed magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve on cerebral blood flow

High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes ipsilesional functional hyperemia and motor recovery in mice with ischemic stroke

Neurovascular decoupling plays a significant role in dysfunction following an ischemic stroke. This study aimed to explore the effect of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neurovascular remodeling after ischemic stroke. To achieve this goal, we compared functional hyperemia, cerebral blood flow regulatory factors, and neurochemical transmitters in the peri-infract cortex 21 days after a photothrombotic stroke. Our findings revealed that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increased the real-time cerebral blood flow in healthy mice and improved neurobehavioral outcomes after stroke. Furthermore, high-frequency (5-Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed stronger functional hyperemia recovery and increased the levels of post-synaptic density 95, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, phosphorylated-endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and vascular endothelial growth factor in the peri-infract cortex compared with low-frequency (1-Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. The magnetic resonance spectroscopy data showed that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduced neuronal injury and maintained excitation/inhibition balance. However, 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation showed more significant regulation of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters after stroke than 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. These results indicated that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could more effectively promote neurovascular remodeling after stroke, and specific repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequencies might be used to selectively regulate the neurovascular unit.

Peripheral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS) for Idiopathic Facial Nerve Palsy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of peripheral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of idiopathic facial paralysis, to explore an ideal treatment scheme for idiopathic facial paralysis, and to provide evidence for clinical rehabilitation.

Methods

65 patients with idiopathic facial nerve palsy with the first onset were recruited and randomly divided into rTMS group and control group. Both groups received conventional treatment, rTMS group received additional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the affected side once a day, 5 times a week for 2 weeks. House-Brackmann (HB) grading scale, Sunnybrook facial grading system (SFGS), and modified Portmann scale (MPS) were used to assess facial nerve function before and after treatment, and the time for patients to return to normal facial nerve function and adverse reaction (AR) was also the main observation index.

Results

After a 2-week intervention, HB, SFGS, and MPS increased in both groups (P < 0.01); the improvement of HB, SFGS, and MPS in rTMS group was significantly higher than that in control group (P < 0.01). The effective improvement rate of the TMS group after 2 weeks was 90.0%, and that of the control group was 53.3%, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a safe and effective noninvasive method for the treatment of idiopathic facial paralysis, which can significantly accelerate the recovery of facial nerve function and provide a new treatment idea for further improving the prognosis of patients with idiopathic facial paralysis.

Transpelvic Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Penile Microvascular Perfusion in a Rat Model: A Novel Interventional Strategy to Prevent Penile Fibrosis after Cavernosal Nerve Injury

PURPOSE

Penile microvascular dysfunction is a known contributor to erectile dysfunction (ED) and penile fibrosis has been shown to impair microvascular perfusion (MVP). Our objectives were to: (i) determine beneficial effects of TPMS to modulate penile MVP, (ii) determine its mechanism, (iii) evaluate impact of cavernosal nerve injury (CNI) on penile MVP, and (iv) determine time-course of cavernosal tissue elastin changes after CNI in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult male rats (n=5) were anesthetized and subjected to TPMS (13%, 15%, and 17%) and MVP changes were recorded using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Another group of male rats were subjected to either bilateral cavernosal nerve injury (CNI; n=7) or sham surgery (n=7). After recovery, animals were monitored for MVP using LSCI before and after TPMS. Rat penile tissues were harvested and analyzed for fibrosis using a marker for elastin.

RESULTS

Rat TPMS resulted in a stimulus dependent increase in MVP; maximal perfusion was observed at 17%. L-N(G)-Nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) resulted in a marked decrease in TPMS induced MVP increase (393.33 AU vs. 210.67 AU). CNI resulted in 40% to 50% decrease in MVP. CNI produced a remarkable increase in elastin deposits that are noticeable throughout the cavernosal tissues post injury.

CONCLUSIONS

TPMS is a novel and non-invasive intervention to improve penile MVP after CNI. Potential application includes treatment of ED and sexual function preservation following cancer treatment, possibly through improved penile hemodynamics that might help prevent penile hypoxia and fibrosis.

The Potential Role of Neuromodulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) continues to be a difficult cerebrovascular disease with limited pharmacologic treatment options. Cerebral vasospasm (CV) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality after SAH. Despite the advances in the understanding of its pathophysiology and tremendous efforts to date, nimodipine is currently the sole Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for patients with SAH, with benefits that are marginal at best. The neuromodulation therapies are promising, especially those that target CV and DCI to improve functional outcomes. The aim of this review is therefore to summarize the available evidence for each type of neuromodulation for CV and DCI, with a special focus on its pathophysiological mechanisms, in addition to their clinical utility and drawbacks, which we hope will lead to future translational therapy options after SAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating the use of neuromodulation for SAH. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 21 articles published from 1992 to 2021 and eight clinical trials were chosen.

RESULTS

The studies reviewed provide a compelling demonstration that neuromodulation is a potentially useful strategy to target multiple mechanisms of DCI and thus to potentially improve functional outcomes from SAH. There are several types of neuromodulation that have been tested to treat CV and DCI, including the trigeminal/vagus/facial nerve stimulation, sphenopalatine ganglion and spinal cord stimulation, transcranial direct electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and electroacupuncture. Most of them are in the preclinical or early phases of clinical application; however, they show promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

DCI has a complex pathogenesis, making the unique anatomical distribution and pleiotropic capabilities of various types of neuromodulation a promising field of study. We may be at the cusp of a breakthrough in the use of these techniques for the treatment of this stubbornly difficult disease.

Stimulating the Facial Nerve to Treat Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common devastating disease that has increased yearly in absolute number of cases since 1990. While mechanical thrombectomy and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) have proven to be effective treatments, their window-of-efficacy time is very short, leaving many patients with no viable treatment option. Over recent years there has been a growing interest in stimulating the facial nerves or ganglions to treat AIS. Pre-clinical studies have consistently demonstrated an increase in collateral blood flow (CBF) following ganglion stimulation, with positive indications in infarct size and neurological scores. Extensive human trials have focused on trans-oral electrical stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion, but have suffered from operational limitations and non-significant clinical findings. Regardless, the potential of ganglion stimulation to treat AIS or elongate the window-of-efficacy for current stroke treatments remains extremely promising. This review aims to summarize results from recent trial publications, highlight current innovations, and discuss future directions for the field. Importantly, this review comes after the release of four important clinical trials that were published in mid 2019.

Trigeminal Nerve Control of Cerebral Blood Flow: A Brief Review

The trigeminal nerve, the fifth cranial nerve, is known to innervate much of the cerebral arterial vasculature and significantly contributes to the control of cerebrovascular tone in both healthy and diseased states. Previous studies have demonstrated that stimulation of the trigeminal nerve (TNS) increases cerebral blood flow (CBF) via antidromic, trigemino-parasympathetic, and other central pathways. Despite some previous reports on the role of the trigeminal nerve and its control of CBF, there are only a few studies that investigate the effects of TNS on disorders of cerebral perfusion (i.e., ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury). In this mini review, we present the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms of trigeminal nerve control of CBF, the anatomic underpinnings for targeted treatment, and potential clinical applications of TNS, with a focus on the treatment of impaired cerebral perfusion.

A Pilot Study of Facial Nerve Stimulation on Cerebral Artery Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients

Background: The objective of this pilot study was to assess the safety and efficacy of VitalFlow stimulation in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients with vasospasm for the purpose of guiding the design of larger, controlled studies in vasospasm patients, a largely untreated condition [1]. Methods: Six patients with angiographic vasospasm developing post-aSAH were treated with VitalFlow stimulation. Digital subtraction angiograms were obtained at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and then 30 minutes post-stimulation. A single 2-minute period of stimulation was delivered to the patients using parameters previously shown to be safe, tolerable, and effective at increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF) in healthy volunteers. Results: VitalFlow stimulation improved tissue perfusion as assessed by parenchymography and reversed the constriction of vasospastic arteries. Two patients had only partial improvement and so were treated with intraarterial nimodipine after VitalFlow stimulation, whereas four patients had complete resolution of the vasospasm after VitalFlow stimulation per the treating neuroendovascular surgeon’s evaluation. Clinical examination showed improvement in Hunt and Hess Scale scores assessed post-stimulation. Conclusions: Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve with the VitalFlow stimulator appears to be a safe and effective means to reverse angiographic vasospasm in aSAH patients. Clinical Impact: This study provides Class IV evidence that non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the facial nerves reduce angiographic vasospasm in aSAH patients.

Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve has been tested in preclinical studies as a new, non-invasive emergency treatment of ischemic stroke that acts by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF). The objective of the studies reported herein was to identify minimal stimulation parameters that increase CBF in large animals and then test those stimulation parameters in healthy volunteers for safety, tolerability, and effectiveness at increasing CBF. This translational research is necessary preparation for clinical studies in ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

Initial experiments in anesthetized Yorkshire pigs were undertaken in order to identify the lowest stimulus power and duration that increase CBF. A full 3 × 3 factorial design was used to evaluate magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve at various stimulation powers (1.3, 1.6, and 1.9 Tesla field strength at coil surface) and for various durations (2, 3.5, and 5 min). CBF was measured with contrast MRI perfusion imaging and the internal carotid arteries were assessed with MR angiography. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation with parameters identified in the pig study was then applied to 35 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed with adverse event reports and by medical examination. Tolerability was defined as each volunteer's ability to withstand at least 2 min of stimulation. Volunteers could determine the maximum power of stimulation they received during a ramp-up period.

RESULTS

In pigs, unilateral facial nerve stimulation increased CBF by as much as 77% over pre-stimulation baseline when administered across a range of 1.3-1.9 Tesla power and for 2- to 5-min duration. No clear dose-response relationship could be observed across this range, but lower powers and durations than these were markedly less effective. The effect of a single stimulation lasted 90 min. A second stimulation delivered 100 min after the first stimulation sustained the increased CBF without evidence of tachyphylaxis. In human, bilateral facial nerve stimulation caused only non-serious adverse events that were limited to the 2-min stimulation period. Tolerability was greatly improved by gentle encouragement from the study staff, which enabled most volunteers to tolerate 1.6-1.8 Tesla of stimulation power. CBF measures taken approximately 10 min after stimulation demonstrated on average a 32 ± 6% increase in CBF, with ≥ 25% increases in CBF occurring in 10 of the 31 volunteers who had adequate CBF measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimal effective stimulation parameters defined by increased CBF, as identified in the pig study, translated into safe, tolerable, and effective stimulation of healthy volunteers. These results support the future development and evaluation of non-invasive facial nerve stimulation for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke. Trial Registration retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov NRV_P1_01_15 on June 6, 2017.

Magnetic facial nerve stimulation in animal models of active seizure

PURPOSE

As part of our efforts to develop a non-invasive facial nerve stimulator as an emergency treatment for ischemic stroke, we considered possible safety consequences if the technology was misapplied to stroke mimics, e.g., seizure. We hypothesized that magnetic facial nerve stimulation would worsen epileptiform activity in two animal models of active seizures. The rat intraperitoneal kainate model and pig intracortical penicillin model were employed. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation was delivered unilaterally at a variety of stimulation parameters, and the effect on ictal epileptiform activity measured by electroencephalography was determined according to an established categorical scale.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

In 6 rats and 3 pigs evaluated with 83 stimulation trials, only a single stimulation trial was associated with worsening epileptiform activity according to a standard categorization scheme. Surprisingly, a reduction in the severity of the epileptiform activity was observed in 20 of 50 stimulation trials using patterned stimulation (3 pulses at 30Hz repeated at 0.5-10Hz) versus 2 of 33 stimulation trials using simple monotonic patterns (P<0.005, chi-squared test). The reduction of epileptiform activity after stimulation lasted a few minutes and was reproducible. Major Conclusions Epileptiform activity measured by electroencephalography was not reliably worsened by repetitive facial nerve stimulation with pulsed magnetic energy, even when significant brain exposure to the magnetic field occurred as in the rat model. To the contrary, a temporary reduction in epileptiform activity was often, but not invariably, observed with certain stimulation parameters.

Facial nerve stimulation as a future treatment for ischemic stroke

Stimulation of the autonomic parasympathetic fibers of the facial nerve system (hereafter simply “facial nerve”) rapidly dilates the cerebral arteries and increases cerebral blood flow whether that stimulation is delivered at the facial nerve trunk or at distal points such as the sphenopalatine ganglion. Facial nerve stimulation thus could be used as an emergency treatment of conditions of brain ischemia such as ischemic stroke. A rich history of scientific research has examined this property of the facial nerve, and various means of activating the facial nerve can be employed including noninvasive means. Herein, we review the anatomical and physiological research behind facial nerve stimulation and the facial nerve stimulation devices that are in development for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Effects of noninvasive facial nerve stimulation in the dog middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Facial nerve stimulation has been proposed as a new treatment of ischemic stroke because autonomic components of the nerve dilate cerebral arteries and increase cerebral blood flow when activated. A noninvasive facial nerve stimulator device based on pulsed magnetic stimulation was tested in a dog middle cerebral artery occlusion model.

METHODS

We used an ischemic stroke dog model involving injection of autologous blood clot into the internal carotid artery that reliably embolizes to the middle cerebral artery. Thirty minutes after middle cerebral artery occlusion, the geniculate ganglion region of the facial nerve was stimulated for 5 minutes. Brain perfusion was measured using gadolinium-enhanced contrast MRI, and ATP and total phosphate levels were measured using 31P spectroscopy. Separately, a dog model of brain hemorrhage involving puncture of the intracranial internal carotid artery served as an initial examination of facial nerve stimulation safety.

RESULTS

Facial nerve stimulation caused a significant improvement in perfusion in the hemisphere affected by ischemic stroke and a reduction in ischemic core volume in comparison to sham stimulation control. The ATP/total phosphate ratio showed a large decrease poststroke in the control group versus a normal level in the stimulation group. The same stimulation administered to dogs with brain hemorrhage did not cause hematoma enlargement.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the development and evaluation of a noninvasive facial nerve stimulator device as a treatment of ischemic stroke.