A pharmacological characterization of GABA, THIP and DS2 at binary α4β3 and β3δ receptors: GABA activates β3δ receptors via the β3(+)δ(−) interface

The importance of ligand gated ion channels in sleep and sleep disorders

On average, humans spend about 26 years of their life sleeping. Increased sleep duration and quality has been linked to reduced disease risk; however, the cellular and molecular underpinnings of sleep remain open questions. It has been known for some time that pharmacological modulation of neurotransmission in the brain can promote either sleep or wakefulness thereby providing some clues about the molecular mechanisms at play. However, the field of sleep research has developed an increasingly detailed understanding of the requisite neuronal circuitry and key neurotransmitter receptor subtypes, suggesting that it may be possible to identify next generation pharmacological interventions to treat sleep disorders within this same space. The aim of this work is to examine the latest physiological and pharmacological findings highlighting the contribution of ligand gated ion channels including the inhibitory GABA_A and glycine receptors and excitatory nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and glutamate receptors in the sleep-wake cycle regulation. Overall, a better understanding of ligand gated ion channels in sleep will help determine if these highly druggable targets could facilitate a better night's sleep.

Differential assembly diversifies GABAA receptor structures and signalling

Type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAARs) are pentameric ligand-gated chloride channels that mediate fast inhibitory signalling in neural circuits1,2 and can be modulated by essential medicines including general anaesthetics and benzodiazepines3. Human GABAAR subunits are encoded by 19 paralogous genes that can, in theory, give rise to 495,235 receptor types. However, the principles that govern the formation of pentamers, the permutational landscape of receptors that may emerge from a subunit set and the effect that this has on GABAergic signalling remain largely unknown. Here we use cryogenic electron microscopy to determine the structures of extrasynaptic GABAARs assembled from α4, β3 and δ subunits, and their counterparts incorporating γ2 instead of δ subunits. In each case, we identified two receptor subtypes with distinct stoichiometries and arrangements, all four differing from those previously observed for synaptic, α1-containing receptors4-7. This, in turn, affects receptor responses to physiological and synthetic modulators by creating or eliminating ligand-binding sites at subunit interfaces. We provide structural and functional evidence that selected GABAAR arrangements can act as coincidence detectors, simultaneously responding to two neurotransmitters: GABA and histamine. Using assembly simulations and single-cell RNA sequencing data8,9, we calculated the upper bounds for receptor diversity in recombinant systems and in vivo. We propose that differential assembly is a pervasive mechanism for regulating the physiology and pharmacology of GABAARs.

Delta-containing GABAA receptors in pain management: Promising targets for novel analgesics

Communication between nerve cells depends on the balance between excitatory and inhibitory circuits. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, regulates this balance and insufficient GABAergic activity is associated with numerous neuropathological disorders including pain. Of the various GABA_A receptor subtypes, the δ-containing receptors are particularly interesting drug targets in management of chronic pain. These receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels composed of α, β and δ subunits and can be activated by ambient levels of GABA to generate tonic conductance. However, only a few ligands preferentially targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors have so far been identified, limiting both pharmacological understanding and drug-discovery efforts, and more importantly, understanding of how they affect pain pathways. Here, we systemically review and discuss the known drugs and ligands with analgesic potential targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors and further integrate the biochemical nature of the receptors with clinical perspectives in pain that might generate interest among researchers and clinical physicians to encourage analgesic discovery efforts leading to more efficient therapies.

Structural Determinants for the Mode of Action of Imidazopyridine DS2 at δ-Containing γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors

Despite the therapeutic relevance of δ-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs) and the need for δ-selective compounds, the structural determinants for the mode and molecular site of action of δ-selective positive allosteric modulator imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine DS2 remain elusive. To guide the quest for insight, we synthesized a series of DS2 analogues guided by a structural receptor model. Using a fluorescence-based fluorometric imaging plate reader membrane potential assay, we found that the δ-selectivity and the pharmacological profile are severely affected by substituents in the 5-position of the imidazopyridine core scaffold. Interestingly, the 5-methyl, 5-bromo, and 5-chloro DS2 analogues, 30, 35, and 36, were shown to be superior to DS2 at α4β1δ as mid-high nanomolar potency δ-selective allosteric modulators, displaying 6-16 times higher potency than DS2. Of these, 30 also displayed at least 60-fold selectivity for α4β1δ over α4β1γ2 receptor subtypes representing a potential tool for the selective characterization of δ-containing GABA_ARs in general.

Efficient expression of concatenated α1β2δ and α1β3δ GABAA receptors, their pharmacology and stoichiometry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

GABA_A receptors containing δ-subunits are notorious for being difficult to study in vitro due to heterogeneity of expressed receptor populations and low GABA-evoked current amplitudes. Thus, there are some published misconceptions and contradictory conclusions made regarding the pharmacology and stoichiometry of δ-containing receptors. The aim of this study was to obtain robust homogenous expression of α1βδ receptors for in-depth investigation.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Novel δ-containing pentameric concatenated constructs were designed. The resulting α1β2δ and α1β3δ GABA_A receptor concatemers were investigated by two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology using Xenopus laevis oocytes.

KEY RESULTS

First, while homogenous α1βδ GABA_A receptor pools could not be obtained by manipulating the ratio of injected cRNAs of free α1, β2/3, and δ subunits, concatenated pentameric α1β2δ and α1β3δ constructs resulted in robust expression levels of concatemers. Second, by using optimised constructs that give unidirectional assembly of concatemers, we found that the δ subunit cannot directly participate in GABA binding and receptor activation. Hence, functional δ-containing receptors are likely to all have a conventional 2α:2β:1δ stoichiometry arranged as βαβαδ when viewed counterclockwise from the extracellular side. Third, α1β2/3δ receptors were found to express efficiently in X. laevis oocytes but have a low estimated open probability of ~0.5% upon GABA activation. Because of this, these receptors are uniquely susceptible to positive allosteric modulation by, for example, neurosteroids.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our data answer important outstanding questions regarding the pharmacology and stoichiometry of α1δ-containing GABA_A receptors and pave the way for future analysis and drug discovery efforts.

Allosteric GABAA Receptor Modulators-A Review on the Most Recent Heterocyclic Chemotypes and Their Synthetic Accessibility

GABAA receptor modulators are structurally almost as diverse as their target protein. A plethora of heterocyclic scaffolds has been described as modulating this extremely important receptor family. Some made it into clinical trials and, even on the market, some were dismissed. This review focuses on the synthetic accessibility and potential for library synthesis of GABAA receptor modulators containing at least one heterocyclic scaffold, which were disclosed within the last 10 years.

The Delta-Subunit Selective GABA A Receptor Modulator, DS2, Improves Stroke Recovery via an Anti-inflammatory Mechanism

Inflammatory processes are known to contribute to tissue damage in the central nervous system (CNS) across a broad range of neurological conditions, including stroke. Gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS, has been implicated in modulating peripheral immune responses by acting on GABA _A receptors on antigen-presenting cells and lymphocytes. Here, we investigated the effects and mechanism of action of the delta-selective compound, DS2, to improve stroke recovery and modulate inflammation. We report a decrease in nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation in innate immune cells over a concentration range in vitro. Following a photochemically induced motor cortex stroke, treatment with DS2 at 0.1 mg/kg from 1 h post-stroke significantly decreased circulating tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, and IL-6 levels, reduced infarct size and improved motor function in mice. Free brain concentrations of DS2 were found to be lower than needed for robust modulation of central GABA _A receptors and were not affected by the presence and absence of elacridar, an inhibitor of both P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Finally, as DS2 appears to dampen peripheral immune activation and only shows limited brain exposure, we assessed the role of DS2 to promote functional recovery after stroke when administered from 3-days after the stroke. Treatment with DS2 from 3-days post-stroke improved motor function on the grid-walking, but not on the cylinder task. These data highlight the need to further develop subunit-selective compounds to better understand change in GABA receptor signaling pathways both centrally and peripherally. Importantly, we show that GABA compounds such as DS2 that only shows limited brain exposure can still afford significant protection and promote functional recovery most likely via modulation of peripheral immune cells and could be given as an adjunct treatment.

Concatenated γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors revisited: Finding order in chaos

Subunit concatenation is a powerful technique used to control the assembly of structurally diverse heteromeric receptors such as GABA_ARs. Liao et al. find that existing GABA_AR concatemers do not assemble as expected and describe refinements that allow expression of uniform receptor populations.

γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs), the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the mammalian central nervous system, are arguably the most challenging member of the pentameric Cys-loop receptors to study due to their heteromeric structure. When two or more subunits are expressed together in heterologous systems, receptors of variable subunit type, ratio, and orientation can form, precluding accurate interpretation of data from functional studies. Subunit concatenation is a technique that involves the linking of individual subunits and in theory allows the precise control of the uniformity of expressed receptors. In reality, the resulting concatemers from widely used constructs are flexible in their orientation and may therefore assemble with themselves or free GABA_AR subunits in unexpected ways. In this study, we examine functional responses of receptors from existing concatenated constructs and describe refinements necessary to allow expression of uniform receptor populations. We find that dimers from two commonly used concatenated constructs, β-23-α and α-10-β, assemble readily in both the clockwise and the counterclockwise orientations when coexpressed with free subunits. Furthermore, we show that concatemers formed from new tetrameric α-10-β-α-β and α-10-β-α-γ constructs also assemble in both orientations with free subunits to give canonical αβγ receptors. To restrict linker flexibility, we systematically shorten linker lengths of dimeric and pentameric constructs and find optimized constructs that direct the assembly of GABA_ARs only in one orientation, thus eliminating the ambiguity associated with previously described concatemers. Based on our data, we revisit some noncanonical GABA_AR configurations proposed in recent years and explain how the use of some concatenated constructs may have led to wrong conclusions. Our results help clarify current contradictions in the literature regarding GABA_AR subunit stoichiometry and arrangement. The lessons learned from this study may guide future efforts in understanding other related heteromeric receptors.

GABA beyond the synapse: defining the subtype-specific pharmacodynamics of non-synaptic GABAA receptors

KEY POINTS

Physiologically relevant combinations of recombinant GABAA receptor (GABAR) subunits were expressed in HEK293 cells. Using whole-cell voltage clamp and rapid drug application, we measured the GABAR-subtype-specific properties to convey either synaptic or extrasynaptic signalling in a range of physiological contexts. α4βδ GABARs are optimally tuned to submicromolar tonic GABA and transient surges of micromolar GABA concentrations. α5β2γ2l GABARs are better suited to higher tonic GABA levels, but also convey robust responses to brief synaptic and perisynaptic GABA fluctuations. α1β2/3δ GABARs function well at prolonged, micromolar (>2 μm) GABA levels, but not to low tonic (<1 μm GABA) or synaptic/transient GABAergic signalling. These results help illuminate the context- and isoform-specific modes of GABAergic signalling in the brain.

ABSTRACT

GABAA receptors (GABARs) mediate a remarkable diversity of signalling modalities in vivo. Yet most published work characterizing responses to GABA has focused on the properties needed to convey fast, phasic synaptic inhibition. We therefore aimed to characterize the most prevalent (α4βδ, α5β3γ2L) and least prevalent (α1β2δ) non-synaptic GABAR currents, using whole-cell voltage clamp recordings of recombinant GABAR expressed in HEK293 cells and drug application protocols to recapitulate the GABA concentration profiles occurring during both fast synaptic and slow extrasynaptic signalling. We found that α4βδ GABARs were very sensitive to submicromolar GABA, with a rank order potency of α4β2δ ≥ α4β1δ ≈ α4β3δ GABARs. In comparison, the GABA EC50 was up to 20 times higher for α1β2γ2L GABARs, with α1β2δ and α5β3γ2L GABARs having intermediate GABA potency. Both α4βδ and α5β3γ2L GABAR currents exhibited slow, but substantial, desensitization as well as prolonged rates of deactivation. These GABAR current properties defined distinct 'dynamic ranges' of responsiveness to changing GABA for α4β2δ (0.1-1 μm), α5β3γ2L (0.5-7 μm) and α1β2γ2L (0.6-9 μm) GABARs. Finally, α1β2δ GABARs were notable for their relative lack of desensitization and extremely quick deactivation. In summary, our results help delineate the roles that specific GABARs may play in mediating non-synaptic GABA signals. Since ambient GABA levels may be altered during development as well as by drugs and disease states, these findings may help future efforts to understand disrupted inhibition underlying a variety of neurological illnesses, such as epilepsy.

High-level production and purification in a functional state of an extrasynaptic gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor containing α4β3δ subunits

The inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors are implicated in numerous physiological processes, including cognition and inhibition of neurotransmission, rendering them important molecular targets for many classes of drugs. Functionally, the entire GABAAR family of receptors can be subdivided into phasic, fast acting synaptic receptors, composed of α-, β- and γ-subunits, and tonic extrasynaptic receptors, many of which contain the δ-subunit in addition to α- and β-subunits. Whereas the subunit arrangement of the former group is agreed upon, that of the αβδ GABAARs remains unresolved by electrophysiological and pharmacological research. To resolve such issues will require biophysical techniques that demand quantities of receptor that have been previously unavailable. Therefore, we have engineered a stable cell line with tetracycline inducible expression of human α4-, β3- and N-terminally Flag-tagged δ-subunits. This cell line achieved a specific activity between 15 and 20 pmol [3H]muscimol sites/mg of membrane protein, making it possible to obtain 1 nmole of purified α4β3δ GABAAR from sixty 15-cm culture dishes. When induced, these cells exhibited agonist-induced currents with characteristics comparable to those previously reported for this receptor and a pharmacology that included strong modulation by etomidate and the δ-subunit-specific ligand, DS2. Immunoaffinity purification and reconstitution in CHAPS/asolectin micelles resulted in the retention of equilibrium allosteric interactions between the separate agonist, anesthetic and DS2 sites. Moreover, all three subunits retained glycosylation. The establishment of this well-characterized cell line will allow molecular level studies of tonic receptors to be undertaken.

α subunits in GABAA receptors are dispensable for GABA and diazepam action

The major isoform of the GABA_A receptor is α₁β₂γ₂. The binding sites for the agonist GABA are located at the β₂+/α₁− subunit interfaces and the modulatory site for benzodiazepines at α₁+/γ₂−. In the absence of α₁ subunits, a receptor was formed that was gated by GABA and modulated by diazepam similarly. This indicates that alternative subunits can take over the role of the α₁ subunits. Point mutations were introduced in β₂ or γ₂ subunits at positions homologous to α₁− benzodiazepine binding and GABA binding positions, respectively. From this mutation work we conclude that the site for GABA is located at a β₂+/β₂− subunit interface and that the diazepam site is located at the β₂+/γ₂− subunit interface. Computational docking leads to a structural hypothesis attributing this non-canonical interaction to a binding mode nearly identical with the one at the α₁+/γ₂− interface. Thus, the β₂ subunit can take over the role of the α₁ subunit for the formation of both sites, its minus side for the GABA binding site and its plus side for the diazepam binding site.

Structural Studies of GABAA Receptor Binding Sites: Which Experimental Structure Tells us What?

Atomic resolution structures of cys-loop receptors, including one of a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA receptor) subtype, allow amazing insights into the structural features and conformational changes that these pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) display. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of more than 30 cys-loop receptor structures of homologous proteins that revealed several allosteric binding sites not previously described in GABAA receptors. These novel binding sites were examined in GABAA receptor homology models and assessed as putative candidate sites for allosteric ligands. Four so far undescribed putative ligand binding sites were proposed for follow up studies based on their presence in the GABAA receptor homology models. A comprehensive analysis of conserved structural features in GABAA and glycine receptors (GlyRs), the glutamate gated ion channel, the bacterial homologs Erwinia chrysanthemi (ELIC) and Gloeobacter violaceus GLIC, and the serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor was performed. The conserved features were integrated into a master alignment that led to improved homology models. The large fragment of the intracellular domain that is present in the structure of the 5-HT3 receptor was utilized to generate GABAA receptor models with a corresponding intracellular domain fragment. Results of mutational and photoaffinity ligand studies in GABAA receptors were analyzed in the light of the model structures. This led to an assignment of candidate ligands to two proposed novel pockets, candidate binding sites for furosemide and neurosteroids in the trans-membrane domain were identified. The homology models can serve as hypotheses generators, and some previously controversial structural interpretations of biochemical data can be resolved in the light of the presented multi-template approach to comparative modeling. Crystal and cryo-EM microscopic structures of the closest homologs that were solved in different conformational states provided important insights into structural rearrangements of binding sites during conformational transitions. The impact of structural variation and conformational motion on the shape of the investigated binding sites was analyzed. Rules for best template and alignment choice were obtained and can generally be applied to modeling of cys-loop receptors. Overall, we provide an updated structure based view of ligand binding sites present in GABAA receptors.