Ascending projection of jaw-closing muscle-proprioception to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei in rats

Cerebellar Nuclei Receiving Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals through the Mossy Fiber Pathway from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus in Rats

Proprioception from muscle spindles is necessary for motor function executed by the cerebellum. In particular, cerebellar nuclear neurons that receive proprioceptive signals and send projections to the lower brainstem or spinal cord play key roles in motor control. However, little is known about which cerebellar nuclear regions receive orofacial proprioception. Here, we investigated projections to the cerebellar nuclei from the supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5), which conveys the orofacial proprioception arising from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). Injections of an anterograde tracer into the Su5 resulted in a large number of labeled axon terminals bilaterally in the dorsolateral hump (IntDL) of the cerebellar interposed nucleus (Int) and the dorsolateral protuberance (MedDL) of the cerebellar medial nucleus. In addition, a moderate number of axon terminals were ipsilaterally labeled in the vestibular group Y nucleus (group Y). We electrophysiologically detected JCMS proprioceptive signals in the IntDL and MedDL. Retrograde tracing analysis confirmed bilateral projections from the Su5 to the IntDL and MedDL. Furthermore, anterograde tracer injections into the external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives other proprioceptive input from forelimb/neck muscles, resulted in only a limited number of ipsilaterally labeled terminals, mainly in the dorsomedial crest of the Int and the group Y. Taken together, the Su5 and ECu axons almost separately terminated in the cerebellar nuclei (except for partial overlap in the group Y). These data suggest that orofacial proprioception is differently processed in the cerebellar circuits in comparison to other body-part proprioception, thus contributing to the executive function of orofacial motor control.

The Cerebellar Cortex Receives Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus via the Mossy Fiber Pathway in Rats

Proprioceptive sensory information from muscle spindles is essential for the regulation of motor functions. However, little is known about the motor control regions in the cerebellar cortex that receive proprioceptive signals from muscle spindles distributed throughout the body, including the orofacial muscles. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the pattern of projections in the rat cerebellar cortex derived from the supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5), which conveys orofacial proprioceptive information from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). Injections of an anterograde tracer into the Su5 revealed that many bilateral axon terminals (rosettes) were distributed in the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex (including the simple lobule B, crus II and flocculus) in a various sized, multiple patchy pattern. We could also detect JCMS proprioceptive signals in these cerebellar cortical regions, revealing for the first time that they receive muscle proprioceptive inputs in rats. Retrograde tracer injections confirmed that the Su5 directly sends outputs to the cerebellar cortical areas. Furthermore, we injected an anterograde tracer into the external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives proprioceptive signals from the forelimb and neck muscle spindles, to distinguish between the Su5- and ECu-derived projections in the cerebellar cortex. The labeled terminals from the ECu were distributed predominantly in the vermis of the cerebellar cortex. Almost no overlap was seen in the terminal distributions of the Su5 and ECu projections. Our findings demonstrate that the rat cerebellar cortex receives orofacial proprioceptive input that is processed differently from the proprioceptive signals from the other regions of the body.

Efferent and afferent connections of supratrigeminal neurons conveying orofacial muscle proprioception in rats

The supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5) is a key structure for controlling jaw movements; it receives proprioceptive sensation from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs) and sends projections to the trigeminal motor nucleus (Mo5). However, the central projections and regulation of JCMS proprioceptive sensation are not yet fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the efferent and afferent connections of the Su5 using neuronal tract tracings. Anterograde tracer injections into the Su5 revealed that the Su5 sends contralateral projections (or bilateral projections with a contralateral predominance) to the Su5, basilar pontine nuclei, pontine reticular nucleus, deep mesencephalic nucleus, superior colliculus, caudo-ventromedial edge of the ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus, parafascicular thalamic nucleus, zona incerta, and lateral hypothalamus, and ipsilateral projections (or bilateral projections with an ipsilateral predominance) to the intertrigeminal region, trigeminal oral subnucleus, dorsal medullary reticular formation, and hypoglossal nucleus as well as the Mo5. Retrograde tracer injections into the Su5 demonstrated that the Su5 receives bilateral projections with a contralateral predominance (or contralateral projections) from the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, granular insular cortex, and Su5, and ipsilateral projections (or bilateral projections with an ipsilateral predominance) from the dorsal peduncular cortex, bed nuclei of stria terminalis, central amygdaloid nucleus, lateral hypothalamus, parasubthalamic nucleus, trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus, parabrachial nucleus, juxtatrigeminal region, trigeminal oral and caudal subnuclei, and dorsal medullary reticular formation. These findings suggest that the Su5, which receives JCMS proprioception, has efferent and afferent connections with multiple brain regions that are involved in emotional and autonomic functions as well as orofacial motor functions.

Rostral Intralaminar Thalamus Engagement in Cognition and Behavior

The thalamic rostral intralaminar nuclei (rILN) are a contiguous band of neurons that include the central medial, paracentral, and central lateral nuclei. The rILN differ from both thalamic relay nuclei, such as the lateral geniculate nucleus, and caudal intralaminar nuclei, such as the parafascicular nucleus, in afferent and efferent connectivity as well as physiological and synaptic properties. rILN activity is associated with a range of neural functions and behaviors, including arousal, pain, executive function, and action control. Here, we review this evidence supporting a role for the rILN in integrating arousal, executive and motor feedback information. In light of rILN projections out to the striatum, amygdala, and sensory as well as executive cortices, we propose that such a function enables the rILN to modulate cognitive and motor resources to meet task-dependent behavioral engagement demands.

Widespread corticopetal projections from the oval paracentral nucleus of the intralaminar thalamic nuclei conveying orofacial proprioception in rats

The oval paracentral nucleus (OPC) was initially isolated from the paracentral nucleus (PC) within the intralaminar thalamic nuclei in rats. We have recently shown that the rat OPC receives proprioceptive inputs from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). However, it remains unknown which cortical areas receive thalamic inputs from the OPC, and whether the cortical areas receiving the OPC inputs are distinct from those receiving inputs from the other intralaminar nuclei and sensory thalamic nuclei. To address this issue, we injected an anterograde tracer, biotinylated dextranamine (BDA), into the OPC, which was electrophysiologically identified by recording of proprioceptive inputs from the JCMSs. Many BDA-labeled axonal fibers and terminals from the OPC were ipsilaterally observed in the rostral and rostroventral regions of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), the rostral region of the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), and the most rostrocaudal levels of the granular insular cortex (GI). In contrast, a BDA injection into the caudal PC, which was located slightly rostral to the OPC, resulted in ipsilateral labeling of axonal fibers and terminals in the rostrolateral region of the medial agranular cortex and the rostromedial region of the lateral agranular cortex. Furthermore, injections of a retrograde tracer, Fluorogold, into these S1, S2, and GI regions, resulted in preferential labeling of neurons in the ipsilateral OPC among the intralaminar and sensory thalamic nuclei. These findings reveal that the rat OPC has widespread, but strong corticopetal projections, indicating that there exist divergent corticopetal pathways from the intralaminar thalamic nucleus, which process JCMS proprioceptive sensation.

Proprioceptive thalamus receiving forelimb and neck muscle spindle inputs via the external cuneate nucleus in the rat

Proprioceptive signals from body muscles have historically been considered to project to the rostrodorsal shell of the ventrobasal thalamic complex [the ventral posterolateral nucleus (VPL) and ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM)]. However, we have recently found that proprioception from rat jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs) is conveyed via the supratrigeminal nucleus to the caudo-ventromedial edge of the VPM, but not to the rostrodorsal shell of the VPM. Therefore, proprioception from other body muscles may also project to thalamic regions other than the rostrodorsal shell of the VPL. We thus examined the thalamic projection from the rat external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives proprioceptive inputs from forelimb and neck muscles. After injection of anterograde tracer into the ECu, axon terminals were contralaterally labeled in the ventromedial part (VPLvm) of the VPL, but not in the rostrodorsal shell of the VPL. After anterograde tracer injection into the cuneate nucleus (Cu), axon terminals were widely labeled in the contralateral VPL including the VPLvm. In the VPLvm, we electrophysiologically confirmed the proprioceptive inputs responsive to electrical stimulation of the ECu or median nerve and to the pressure of forelimb/neck muscles or wrist flexion. After retrograde tracer injection into the VPLvm, neurons were contralaterally labeled in the ECu and Cu. After retrograde tracer injection into the VPL where no such proprioceptive inputs were recorded, no ECu neurons were labeled. These findings indicate that proprioception from forelimb/neck muscle spindles and JCMSs is somatotopically transmitted to the ventromedial floor of the ventrobasal thalamic complex, but not to its rostrodorsal shell.