1
|
Lisi I, Moro F, Mazzone E, Marklund N, Pischiutta F, Kobeissy F, Mao X, Corrigan F, Helmy A, Nasrallah F, Pietro VD, Ngwenya LB, Portela LV, Semple BD, Schneider ALC, Arrastia RD, Menon DK, Smith DH, Wellington C, Loane DJ, Wang KKW, Zanier ER. Exploiting blood-based biomarkers to align preclinical models with human traumatic brain injury. Brain 2025; 148:1062-1080. [PMID: 39514789 PMCID: PMC11967814 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Rodent models are important research tools for studying the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and developing new therapeutic interventions for this devastating neurological disorder. However, the failure rate for the translation of drugs from animal testing to human treatments for TBI is 100%. While there are several potential explanations for this, previous clinical trials have relied on extrapolation from preclinical studies for critical design considerations, including drug dose optimization, post-injury drug treatment initiation and duration. Incorporating clinically relevant biomarkers in preclinical studies may provide an opportunity to calibrate preclinical models to identical (or similar) measurements in humans, link to human TBI biomechanics and pathophysiology, and guide therapeutic decisions. To support this translational goal, we conducted a systematic literature review of preclinical TBI studies in rodents measuring blood levels of clinically used GFAP, UCH-L1, NfL, total-Tau (t-Tau) or phosphorylated-Tau (p-Tau) published in PubMed/EMBASE up to 10 April 2024. Although many factors influence clinical TBI outcomes, many of those cannot routinely be assessed in rodent studies (e.g. intracranial pressure monitoring). Thus we focused on blood biomarkers' temporal trajectories and discuss our findings in the context of the latest clinical TBI biomarker data. Of 805 original preclinical studies, 74 met the inclusion criteria, with a median quality score of 5 (25th-75th percentiles: 4-7) on the CAMARADES checklist. GFAP was measured in 43 studies, UCH-L1 in 21, NfL in 20, t-Tau in 19 and p-Tau in seven. Data from rodent models indicate that all biomarkers exhibited injury severity-dependent elevations with distinct temporal profiles. GFAP and UCH-L1 peaked within the first day after TBI (30- and 4-fold increases, respectively, in moderate-to-severe TBI versus sham), with the highest levels observed in the contusion TBI model. NfL peaked within days (18-fold increase) and remained elevated up to 6 months post-injury. GFAP and NfL show a pharmacodynamic response in 64.7% and 60%, respectively, of studies evaluating neuroprotective therapies in preclinical models. However, GFAP's rapid decline post-injury may limit its utility for understanding the response to new therapeutics beyond the hyperacute phase after experimental TBI. Furthermore, as in humans, subacute NfL levels inform on chronic white matter loss after TBI. t-Tau and p-Tau levels increased over weeks after TBI (up to 6- and 16-fold, respectively); however, their relationship with underlying neurodegeneration has yet to be addressed. Further investigation into biomarker levels in the subacute and chronic phases after TBI will be needed to fully understand the pathomechanisms underpinning blood biomarkers' trajectories and select the most suitable experimental model to optimally relate preclinical mechanistic studies to clinical observations in humans. This new approach could accelerate the translation of neuroprotective treatments from laboratory experiments to real-world clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Lisi
- Department of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Federico Moro
- Department of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mazzone
- Department of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Niklas Marklund
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund 222 42, Sweden
| | - Francesca Pischiutta
- Department of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Firas Kobeissy
- Department of Neurobiology, Center for Neurotrauma, Multiomics & Biomarkers, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
| | - Xiang Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China
| | - Frances Corrigan
- School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Adel Helmy
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Fatima Nasrallah
- Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
| | - Valentina Di Pietro
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Laura B Ngwenya
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 670715, USA
| | - Luis V Portela
- Department of Biochemistry, ICBS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS 90040-060, Brasil
| | - Bridgette D Semple
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Andrea L C Schneider
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ramon Diaz Arrastia
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Douglas H Smith
- Center for Brain Injury and Repair and the Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Cheryl Wellington
- Department of Pathology, Djavad Mowafaghain Centre for Brain Health, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - David J Loane
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 152-160, Ireland
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Department of Neurobiology, Center for Neurotrauma, Multiomics & Biomarkers, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
| | - Elisa R Zanier
- Department of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinez PJ, Song JJ, Castillo JI, DeSisto J, Song KH, Green AL, Borden M. Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition, and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2024; 10:7451-7465. [PMID: 39497639 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2024]
Abstract
Blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) using focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles (MBs) has emerged as a promising technique for delivering therapeutics to the brain. However, the influence of various FUS and MB parameters on BBBO and subsequent sterile inflammatory response (SIR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of MB size and composition, as well as the number of FUS sonication points, on BBBO and SIR in an immunocompetent mouse model. Using MRI-guided MB + FUS, we targeted the striatum and assessed extravasation of an MRI contrast agent to assess BBBO and RNaseq to assess SIR. Our results revealed distinct effects of these parameters on BBBO and SIR. Specifically, at a matched microbubble volume dose (MVD), MB size did not affect the extent of BBBO, but smaller (1 μm diameter) MBs exhibited a lower classification of SIR than larger (3 or 5 μm diameter) MBs. Lipid-shelled microbubbles exhibited greater BBBO and a more pronounced SIR compared to albumin-shelled microbubbles, likely owing to the latter's poor in vivo stability. As expected, increasing the number of sonication points resulted in greater BBBO and SIR. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed strong associations between passive cavitation detection measurements of harmonic and inertial MB echoes, BBBO, and the expression of SIR gene sets. Our findings highlight the critical role of MB and FUS parameters in modulating BBBO and subsequent SIR in the brain. These insights inform the development of targeted drug delivery strategies and the mitigation of adverse inflammatory reactions in neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payton J Martinez
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
| | - Jane J Song
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
| | - Jair I Castillo
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
| | - John DeSisto
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Kang-Ho Song
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
| | - Adam L Green
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Mark Borden
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinez PJ, Song JJ, Castillo J, DeSisto J, Song KH, Green AL, Borden M. Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.28.591538. [PMID: 38746278 PMCID: PMC11092473 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.28.591538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) using focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles (MBs) has emerged as a promising technique for delivering therapeutics to the brain. However, the influence of various FUS and MB parameters on BBBO and subsequent sterile inflammatory response (SIR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of MB size and composition, as well as the number of FUS sonication points, on BBBO and SIR in an immunocompetent mouse model. Using MRI-guided MB+FUS, we targeted the striatum and assessed extravasation of an MRI contrast agent to assess BBBO and RNAseq to assess SIR. Our results revealed distinct effects of these parameters on BBBO and SIR. Specifically, at a matched microbubble volume dose (MVD), MB size did not affect the extent of BBBO, but smaller (1 μm diameter) MBs exhibited a lower classification of SIR than larger (3 or 5 μm diameter) MBs. Lipid-shelled microbubbles exhibited greater BBBO and a more pronounced SIR compared to albumin-shelled microbubbles, likely owing to the latter's poor in vivo stability. As expected, increasing the number of sonication points resulted in greater BBBO and SIR. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed strong associations between passive cavitation detection measurements of harmonic and inertial MB echoes, BBBO and the expression of SIR gene sets. Our findings highlight the critical role of MB and FUS parameters in modulating BBBO and subsequent SIR in the brain. These insights inform the development of targeted drug delivery strategies and the mitigation of adverse inflammatory reactions in neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payton J. Martinez
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
| | - Jane J. Song
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
| | - Jair Castillo
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
| | - John DeSisto
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora CO 80045, United States
| | - Kang-Ho Song
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
| | - Adam L. Green
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora CO 80045, United States
| | - Mark Borden
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO 80303, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silvestro S, Raffaele I, Quartarone A, Mazzon E. Innovative Insights into Traumatic Brain Injuries: Biomarkers and New Pharmacological Targets. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2372. [PMID: 38397046 PMCID: PMC10889179 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health issue affecting many people across the world, causing significant morbidity and mortality. TBIs often have long-lasting effects, disrupting daily life and functionality. They cause two types of damage to the brain: primary and secondary. Secondary damage is particularly critical as it involves complex processes unfolding after the initial injury. These processes can lead to cell damage and death in the brain. Understanding how these processes damage the brain is crucial for finding new treatments. This review examines a wide range of literature from 2021 to 2023, focusing on biomarkers and molecular mechanisms in TBIs to pinpoint therapeutic advancements. Baseline levels of biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NF-L), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), Tau, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in TBI, have demonstrated prognostic value for cognitive outcomes, laying the groundwork for personalized treatment strategies. In terms of pharmacological progress, the most promising approaches currently target neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic mechanisms. Agents that can modulate these pathways offer the potential to reduce a TBI's impact and aid in neurological rehabilitation. Future research is poised to refine these therapeutic approaches, potentially revolutionizing TBI treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emanuela Mazzon
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, Via Provinciale Palermo, SS 113, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (S.S.); (I.R.); (A.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin Y, Zhang J, Lu D, Zhang Y, Xu J, Wang S, Cheng X, Qin J, Zhang L, Li H, Zhang X, Li W. Uqcr11 alleviates oxidative stress and apoptosis after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2023; 370:114582. [PMID: 37884186 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability that involves brain dysfunction due to external forces. Here, we found lower levels of Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, complex III subunit XI (Uqcr11) expression in the cerebral cortex of TBI mice. A neuronal damage model was constructed using H2O2 or hypoxia reoxygenation (H/R) in vitro. We found that Uqcr11 overexpression attenuated the H2O2-or H/R-induced damage by preventing oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis in HT22 cells. Moreover, up-regulated Uqcr11 contributed to the restoration of motor, learning, and memory in C57BL/6 mice after TBI, and its underlying mechanism may be associated with promoting neuron survival and inhibited oxidative stress. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that oxidative stress as well as neuronal apoptosis can be ameliorated post-TBI by Uqcr11 overexpression, which provides a potential therapeutic target for TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujian Lin
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Dongqing Lu
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Yuzheng Zhang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Jinwen Xu
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Xiang Cheng
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Jianbing Qin
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Haoming Li
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Xinhua Zhang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China; Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China; Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province and Ministry of Education, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China.
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Human Anatomy, Institute of Neurobiology, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China; Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, No.19 Qixiu Road, No.3 Building of Qixiu Campus, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|