Effectiveness, response, and dropout of dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder in an inpatient setting

Predicting dropout and non-response to psychotherapy for personality disorders: A study protocol focusing on therapist, patient, and the therapeutic relationship

BACKGROUND

The abandonment of psychotherapeutic treatments is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics, therapist traits, and the therapeutic relationship. Despite the well-documented importance of these factors, limited empirical research has focused on the role of the therapeutic relationship and the characteristics of therapist-patient dyads in predicting treatment dropout. This study protocol outlines a longitudinal research project aimed at predicting dropout and non-response in psychotherapy for individuals with personality disorders. The research seeks to identify predictive factors related to psychotherapy outcomes, focusing on patient, therapist, and dyadic elements. Specifically, the study will examine the influence of therapist characteristics (e.g., personality traits, countertransference, responsiveness) on treatment outcomes, explore the impact of relational factors (e.g., treatment expectations, epistemic trust, therapeutic alliance) on therapy effectiveness, and assess how the therapeutic alliance within therapist-patient dyads affects the likelihood of dropout and non-response.

METHODS

The longitudinal study will include 100 therapist-patient dyads (200 participants) recruited from various Mental Health Services in Milan, Italy. Validated instruments will be administered to both patients and therapists at four-time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (3 months), T2 (6 months), and T3 (1 year). Data will be collected at baseline and at the one-year mark to evaluate the relationships between therapist, patient, and dyadic factors and treatment outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Identifying predictive variables associated with high dropout rates can help preempt treatment discontinuation, reducing the financial and operational burdens on mental health services. Understanding these factors will enable the development of targeted interventions to improve treatment engagement and reduce attrition. This approach could enhance outcomes for individuals with personality disorders and lead to more efficient resource allocation and sustainable delivery of mental health care.

Patient-related factors associated with patient retention and non-completion in psychosocial treatment of borderline personality disorder: A systematic review

The potential efficacy of psychosocial interventions in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is impacted by significant treatment non-completion (TNC), with meta-analytic studies reporting rates of attrition of between 25% and 28%. Increasing patient retention could facilitate outcomes and improve resource utilization, given limited healthcare services. A systematic search of PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science Core Collection identified 33 articles that met the criteria for inclusion. Although substantial heterogeneity in terms of methodology and quality of analysis limited conclusions that could be drawn in the narrative review, a few consistent patterns of findings were elucidated, such as Cluster B personality disorder comorbidities and lower therapeutic alliance were associated with TNC. Interestingly, the severity of BPD symptoms was not a predictor of TNC. These findings are discussed in terms of their potential theoretical contribution to TNC. Clinically, there may be value in applying mindfulness and motivational interviewing strategies early on in treatment for individuals who present uncertainty about engaging in treatment. Further research to develop this empirical landscape includes focusing on high-powered replications, examining burgeoning lines of research, and investigating dynamic predictors of TNC.

Empirical examination of long-term and intensive psychodynamic psychotherapy for severely disturbed patients

Objectives This study examines the effectiveness and efficiency of intensive psychodynamic psychotherapy for severely impaired patients. Method: 104 patients in four public mental health centers underwent intensive psychodynamic psychotherapy. The number and duration of psychiatric hospitalizations were monitored for these patients from one year before therapy to eight years after. Several outcome variables were measured every six months, six times in total over two and a half years, using a longitudinal design. A multi-level analytic approach was applied to account for repeated measurements and missing data. Results: Significant improvement was found in all three symptomatic outcome measures (SCL-90, OQ-45, BDI) throughout treatment. The numbers of psychiatric hospitalizations and psychiatric hospitalization days decreased significantly from the level they were in the year before the start of psychodynamic treatment to three years after the start of treatment. These results were maintained for at least up to eight years. After capitalization, the overall cumulative 127.47-day decrease in hospitalization days equals savings of 115,850 NIS. The average cost of treatment after capitalization was 26,770 NIS. The insurer's estimated direct savings is 89,080 NIS (24,054 $). Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that psychodynamic psychotherapy is clinically effective and economically efficient for severely impaired patients.

Originalbeiträge (Originals). Wirksamkeit und Grenzen einer DBT-basierten tagesklinischen Behandlung für Patient:innen mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung

Effectiveness and limitations of a DBT-informed day-patient treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder Introduction: Borderline personality disorder, a highly prevalent personality disorder is associated with remarkable impairment and is considered one of the most challenging mental illnesses to treat. Dialectical Behavioral Therapy has been recommended by the American Psychiatric Association as a specific treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder. So far, little is known about its effectiveness in a day-patient setting.

METHODS

This retrospective longitudinal study investigates changes in symptom burden during an average of 11 weeks of DBT-informed treatment at discharge, and three months after discharge. The symptomatology of n = 178 patients with borderline personality disorder treated from 2009 to 2017 was investigated with established borderline-specific (BSL) and -unspecific questionnaires (BSI-18, BDI) at admission, discharge, and 3-months follow-up by calculating mixed models, effect sizes, and response rates.

RESULTS

80 % of the patients completed the treatment regularly. In borderline-specific impairments, there were moderate and highly significant improvements with good effects and a response rate of 48 %. Approximately 20 % showed a symptom level equivalent to that of the general population. The strongest effect sizes of approximately .8 were obtained for general psychopathology, with a response rate of 66 %. Results remained stable at follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Similar effects to inpatient treatment with good acceptance and efficacy could be achieved. Effect sizes differed for borderline-specific and unspecific symptoms, suggesting that DBT has different effects on different symptom areas. When comparing responders and non-responders, outpatient psychotherapy appeared to have a positive impact on the therapeutic effect. Furthermore, the results suggest that changes in borderline personality disorder extend over a longer period of time, which may indicate the limitations of curative treatment.

Comparison of 8-vs-12 weeks, adapted dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) for borderline personality disorder in routine psychiatric inpatient treatment-A naturalistic study

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is widely acknowledged as an effective treatment for individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, the optimal treatment duration within DBT remains a topic of investigation. This retrospective, naturalistic non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of 8 week and 12 week DBT interventions with equivalent content, focusing on the change of BPD-specific symptomatology as the primary outcome and depressive symptoms as the secondary outcome. Overall, 175 patients who participated in DBT and received either 8 week or 12 week intervention were included in the analysis. Routine inpatient treatment was adapted from standard DBT with the modules: skill training, interpersonal skills, dealing with feelings, and mindfulness. Measurements were taken at baseline, mid-point, and endpoint. The borderline symptom list-23 (BSL-23) was used for the assessment of borderline-specific symptoms, while the Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) was used for the assessment of depressive symptoms. Statistical analysis was conducted using linear mixed models. Effect sizes were calculated for both measures. The results of the analysis indicated an improvement in both groups over time. Effect sizes were d = 1.29 for BSL-23 and d = 1.79 for BDI-II in the 8 week group, and d = 1.16 for BSL-23 and d = 1.58 for BDI-II in the 12 week group. However, there were no differences in the change of BPD-specific symptoms or the severity of depressive symptoms between the 8 week and 12 week treatment duration groups. Based on these findings, shorter treatment durations, like 8 weeks, could be a viable alternative, offering comparable therapeutic benefits, potential cost reduction, and improved accessibility. However, further research is needed to explore factors influencing treatment outcomes and evaluate the long-term effects of different treatment durations in DBT for BPD.Trial registration: drks.de (DRKS00030939) registered 19/12/2022.

Depression with comorbid borderline personality disorder - could ketamine be a treatment catalyst?

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is diagnosed in 10-30% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), and the frequency of MDD among individuals with BPD reaches over 80%. The comorbidity of MDD and BPD is associated with more severe depressive symptoms and functional impairment, higher risk of treatment resistance and increased suicidality. The effectiveness of ketamine usage in treatment resistant depression (TRD) has been demonstrated in numerous studies. In most of these studies, individuals with BPD were not excluded, thus given the high co-occurrence of these disorders, it is possible that the beneficial effects of ketamine also extend to the subpopulation with comorbid TRD and BPD. However, no protocols were developed that would account for comorbidity. Moreover, psychotherapeutic interventions, which may be crucial for achieving a lasting therapeutic effect in TRD and BPD comorbidity, were not included. In the article, we discuss the results of a small number of existing studies and case reports on the use of ketamine in depressive disorders with comorbid BPD. We elucidate how, at the molecular and brain network levels, ketamine can impact the neurobiology and symptoms of BPD. Furthermore, we explore whether ketamine-induced neuroplasticity, augmented by psychotherapy, could be of use in alleviating core BPD-related symptoms such as emotional dysregulation, self-identity disturbances and self-harming behaviors. We also discuss the potential of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) in BPD treatment. As there is no standard approach to the application of ketamine or KAP in individuals with comorbid TRD and BPD, we consider further research in the field as imperative. The priorities should include development of dedicated protocols, distinguishing subpopulations that may benefit most from such treatment and investigating factors that may influence its effectiveness and safety.

Therapeutic alliance and dropout in patients with borderline pathology receiving residential dialectical behavior therapy

BACKGROUND

This study focused on the impact of therapeutic alliance on therapy dropout in a naturalistic sample of patients with borderline pathology receiving dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) in a residential setting. We assumed that low therapeutic alliance shortly after admission would be associated with elevated dropout.

METHODS

44 participants with borderline pathology (≥ 3 DSM-5 borderline personality disorder criteria) in a residential DBT program completed a quality assurance questionnaire set assessing demographic information, pretreatment psychopathology and therapeutic alliance during the first seven days of their residential stay. Predictors of dropout were investigated using binary logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The dropout rate was 34.1% (n = 15). In binary logistic regression analyses with variables covering demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities and childhood trauma history, only the therapeutic alliance significantly predicted dropout (z = -2.371, p = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the importance of therapy process variables, here the therapeutic alliance at the beginning of treatment, as predictors of therapy dropout in borderline pathology. If this finding is replicated, it shows the potential importance of monitoring the therapeutic relationship throughout the therapeutic process.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT05289583, retrospectively registered on March 11, 2022.

Patient perspectives on non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing evidence for the effectiveness of psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), estimates show that approximately half of those in treatment do not clinically improve or reach reliable change criteria. There are limited qualitative descriptions of treatment factors associated with non-response from the perspectives of those struggling to improve.

METHOD

Eighteen people (72.2% female, mean age 29.4 (SD = 8)) with experience of receiving psychotherapeutic treatment for BPD were interviewed to obtain their perspectives on hindering factors in treatment and what may be helpful to reduce non-response. The data in this qualitative study was analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four domains were created from the insights patients shared on non-response and what may be needed to mitigate it. The focus of Domain 1 was that therapy cannot be effective until two factors are in place. First, the patient needs sufficient safety and stability in their environment in order to face the challenges of therapy. Second, they need to be able to access therapy. Domain 2 described factors the patients themselves contribute. The themes in this domain were described as phases that need to be progressed through before therapy can be effective. These phases were ceasing denial that help is warranted and deserved, taking responsibility for behaviours that contribute to unwellness, and committing to the hard work that is required for change. Domain 3 described how the lack of a safe alliance and ruptures in the safety of the relationship with the therapist can contribute to non-response. Domain 4 was comprised of factors that patients identified as supportive of moving through the barriers to response. The first theme in this domain was prioritising the safety of the therapy relationship. The second theme was giving a clear diagnosis and taking a collaborative approach in sessions. The final theme described the importance of focusing on practical goals with the patient to create tangible life changes.

CONCLUSION

This study found that non-response is complex and multifaceted. First, it is clear that systems need to be in place to support access to adequate care and foster life stability. Second, considerable effort may be needed at the engagement phase of therapy to clarify expectations. Third, attention to specific interpersonal challenges between patients and therapists is an important focus. Finally, structured work to improve relationships and vocational outcomes is indicated.

Real world effectiveness of repeated ketamine infusions for treatment-resistant depression with comorbid borderline personality disorder

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has high rates of comorbidity with mood disorders, including treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Comorbidity of BPD with depression is associated with poorer response to antidepressants. Intravenous ketamine is a novel treatment for TRD that has not been specifically evaluated in patients with comorbid BPD. In this retrospective analysis of data collected from participants who received care at the Canadian Rapid Treatment Centre of Excellence (CRTCE; Braxia Health; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04209296), we evaluated the effectiveness of intravenous ketamine in a TRD population with comorbid BPD (N=100; n=50 BPD-positive compared with n=50 BPD-negative). Participants were administered four doses of intravenous ketamine (0.5-0.75mg/kg over 40 minutes) over two weeks. The primary outcome measures were changes in depressive symptom severity (as measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16-item (QIDS-SR₁₆)) and borderline symptom severity (as measured by Borderline Symptom List 23-item (BSL-23)). Both BPD-positive and BPD-negative groups improved significantly on the QIDS-SR₁₆, QIDS-SR₁₆ suicide ideation item, anxiety, and functionality scales with large effect sizes. There was no significant difference between groups. The BPD-positive group exhibited significant reduction of 0.64 on BSL-23 scores and a significant reduction of 5.95 on QIDS-SR₁₆ scores. Patients with TRD and comorbid BPD receiving ketamine exhibited a significant reduction in symptoms of depression, borderline personality, suicidality, and anxiety.

[Evidence-based inpatient psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder]

BACKGROUND

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequent (prevalence in Germany between 0.7% and 4.5%) [11] and is associated with a high level of psychological stress and frequent emergency inpatient admissions. The provision of disorder-specific outpatient psychotherapy is still insufficient also in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the available data on the effectiveness of inpatient psychotherapy for BPD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A qualitative review on the effectiveness and therapy outcome predictors was conducted based on a literature search in PubMed.

RESULTS

Overall, very few randomized controlled trials are available; in contrast uncontrolled studies are predominant. Most evidence is available for dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) but other approaches, including psychodynamic procedures, have also been studied.

DISCUSSION

The currently available data suggest an efficacy of inpatient psychotherapy for BPD; however, randomized trials with larger samples and sufficient representation including male patients are largely lacking. There is also no substantial direct evidence for the superiority of inpatient compared to outpatient psychotherapy.

Investigating predictors of treatment response in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for borderline personality disorder using LASSO regression

OBJECTIVE

Prior studies of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for borderline personality disorder (BPD) have yielded heterogeneous findings on what factors differentiate individuals with or without sufficient treatment response, highlighting the need for further research.

METHOD

We investigated a sample of 105 individuals with BPD receiving a 6-month course of DBT. Participants were categorized as sufficient or insufficient responders using clinical and statistical change indices (based on emotion dysregulation, BPD symptom severity, utilization of DBT skills, and functional impairment). Sociodemographic, clinical severity, and treatment process factors were tested as potential predictors of treatment response using a machine learning approach (LASSO regression).

RESULTS

Two cross-validated LASSO regression models predicted treatment response (AUCs > .75). They suggested that higher homework completion rate, retention in treatment, and greater baseline severity were the most important predictors of DBT treatment response indicated by BPD symptom severity and utilization of DBT skills. Favorable effects of some aspects of therapeutic alliance during initial sessions were also found.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research may benefit from consolidating the criteria of treatment response, identifying clinically relevant variables, and testing the generalizability of findings to enhance knowledge of insufficient treatment response in DBT for BPD.

The effect of IV ketamine in patients with major depressive disorder and elevated features of borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

Comorbid borderline personality disorder and major depressive disorder is common and often not adequately responsive to standard antidepressant therapies. Ketamine is a potentially life-saving option.

METHODS

153 adult patients with MDD were assessed with the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Borderline Subscale. Data was normally distributed with a mean + SD of 38.95 + 11.54. Patients >1 SD above the mean were assigned to the MDD + BF group. All others were assigned to the MDD-BF group. Patients were administered IV ketamine 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine over 40 min. Mood was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II at baseline, 3 and 24 h post-ketamine. Scores between the MDD + BF and MDD-BF group at each time point were compared using t-test or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. The primary outcome was response at 24 h.

RESULTS

The LS mean change in BDI at 24 h was -23.8 (15.3) for MDD + BF and -21.0 (13.5) for MDD-BF (F [1151] = 0.043, p = 0.51). The LS mean change in BDI at 3 h was -21.3 (13.2) for MDD + BF and -19.6 (13.2) for MDD-BF (F[1151] = 0.045, p = 0.83). The LS mean change in BDI at 14 days was -23.2 (15.3) for MDD + BF and -15.3 (15.2) for MDD-BF (F[1130] = 4.24, p = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

People in the MDD + BF group were not necessarily diagnosable with borderline personality disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that IV ketamine is effective in MDD patients with and without elevated borderline features. This can provide clinicians some reassurance about using ketamine in this population.

Is borderline personality disorder really an emotion dysregulation disorder and, if so, how? A comprehensive experimental paradigm

BACKGROUND

Leading theories suggest that borderline personality disorder (BPD) is an emotion dysregulation disorder involving lower basal vagal tone, higher baseline emotion, heightened emotional reactivity, delayed emotional recovery, and emotion regulation deficits. However, the literature to date lacks a unifying paradigm that tests all of the main emotion dysregulation components and comprehensively examines whether BPD is an emotion dysregulation disorder and, if so, in what ways. This study addresses the empirical gaps with a unified paradigm that assessed whether BPD is characterized by five leading emotion dysregulation components compared to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and healthy control (HC) groups.

METHODS

Emotion was assessed across self-report, sympathetic, and parasympathetic indices. Participants with BPD, GAD, and HCs (N = 120) first underwent baseline periods assessing basal vagal tone and baseline emotional intensity, followed by rejection-themed stressors assessing emotional reactivity. Participants then either reacted normally to assess emotional recovery or attempted to decrease emotion using mindfulness or distraction to assess emotion regulation implementation deficits.

RESULTS

Individuals with BPD and GAD exhibited higher self-reported and sympathetic baseline emotion compared to HCs. The BPD group also exhibited self-reported emotion regulation deficits using distraction only compared to the GAD group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is minimal support for several emotion dysregulation components in BPD, and some components that are present appear to be pervasive across high emotion dysregulation groups rather than specific to BPD. However, BPD may be characterized by problems disengaging from emotion using distraction.

Non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review

HIGHLIGHT

This is the first systematic review to investigate non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.

BACKGROUND

Psychotherapy is the recommended treatment for borderline personality disorder. While systematic reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder, effect sizes remain small and influenced by bias. Furthermore, the proportion of people who do not respond to treatment is seldom reported or analysed.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain an informed estimate of the proportion of people who do not respond to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.

METHODS

Systematic searches of five databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library, occurred in November 2020. Inclusion criteria: participants diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, treated with psychotherapy and data reporting either (a) the proportion of the sample that experienced 'reliable change' or (b) the percentage of sample that no longer met criteria for borderline personality disorder at conclusion of therapy. Exclusion criteria: studies published prior to 1980 or not in English. Of the 19,517 studies identified, 28 met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the review comprising a total of 2436 participants. Average treatment duration was 11 months using well-known evidence-based approaches. Approximately half did not respond to treatment; M = 48.80% (SD = 22.77).

LIMITATIONS

Data regarding within sample variability and non-response are seldom reported. Methods of reporting data on dosage and comorbidities were highly divergent which precluded the ability to conduct predictive analyses. Other limitations include lack of sensitivity analysis, and studies published in English only.

CONCLUSION

Results of this review suggest that a large proportion of people are not responding to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder and that factors relating to non-response are both elusive and inconsistently reported. Novel, tailored or enhanced interventions are needed to improve outcomes for individuals not responding to current established treatments.

Trajectories and Processes of Symptom Change Over Time in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder

Despite ample evidence for Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) as an effective treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), close examination of the trajectory of change in BPD symptoms over the course of DBT is lacking. There also remain questions regarding the directionality of changes in different domains of BPD symptoms, such as improvements in dysfunctional behaviors and thoughts/feelings. In order to provide more fine-grained information about the treatment process in DBT, the current study aimed to (a) examine the trajectories of change of BPD-associated negative thoughts/feelings and behaviors, and positive behaviors, and (b) test the temporal relationship between changes in negative behaviors and thoughts/feelings. The study involved 55 adult clients attending a 6-month outpatient DBT program for BPD who completed assessments of BPD symptoms every four sessions. Growth curve models suggested that clients experienced a faster rate of decrease in negative behaviors during the initial phase of treatment, whereas steady rates of improvement were found for negative thoughts/feelings and positive behaviors, respectively, throughout treatment. Further, a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model found that the within-person fluctuations in negative behaviors preceded the within-person changes in negative thoughts/feelings at a subsequent time point during the later phase of treatment, whereas within-person fluctuations in thoughts/feelings were followed by changes in negative behaviors at the beginning and end of the treatment. These results highlighted the complexity of patterns and processes of change in BPD symptomatology during the course of DBT.

[Impact of dissociative phenomena on treatment outcome of inpatient psychotherapy of patients with borderline personality disorder]

Impact of dissociative phenomena on treatment outcome of inpatient psychotherapy of patients with borderline personality disorder Objectives: Although dissociative phenomena belong to the diagnostic criteria of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and are of high clinical relevance, their predictive significance with regard to the treatment outcome has hardly been investigated. Because some therapeutic and experimental studies suggest that dissociation can impede emotional learning and thus adversely affect the response to psychotherapy, we examined this issue in patients with BPD. Methods: In this naturalistic psychotherapy study we assessed 342 patients with BPD at the beginning and end of inpatient dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT) with self-report measures for dissociation (Questionnaire on dissociative symptoms, FDS, as German version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale, DES) as well as general and borderline specific pathology (Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI; Borderline Symptom List, BSL) and quality of life (SF-12). Results: Both the general mental distress (BSI) and the borderline-specific pathology (BSL) as well as the psychosocial quality of life improved less in patients with initially severe dissociative symptoms than in those with less pronounced symptoms; this effect was mainly driven by the subscale derealisation of the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), and was found particularly in women. Conclusion: Consistent with earlier findings, dissociative phenomena proved to be negative predictors of the therapeutic outcome in BPD women completing inpatient DBT. Whether this also applies to outpatient and other evidence-based treatment approaches for BPD remains to be clarified. Our results indicate the necessity to identify and treat dissociative symptoms as early as possible for a successful psychotherapy.

Searching in the dark: Shining a light on some predictors of non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a prevalent and serious mental health condition. People can experience recovery or remission after receiving psychotherapy for BPD; however, it is estimated that about 45% of people in well conducted treatment trials do not respond adequately to current psychological treatments.

AIM

To further advance psychotherapies for BPD by identifying the factors that contribute to the problem of non-response.

METHOD

184 consecutive participants with BPD in community treatment were naturalistically followed up over 12 months and measures of personality and social functioning were examined. Logistic regressions were used to determine which baseline factors were associated with the likelihood of being a non-responder after 12 months of psychotherapy. After 12 months, 48.4% of participants were classed as non-responders due to a lack of reduction in BPD symptoms according to the Reliable Change Index (RCI) method.

RESULTS

At baseline intake, patients who endorsed an adult preoccupied attachment relationship style and increased anger were more likely to be a non-responder regarding BPD symptoms at 12 months. In addition, those with preoccupied attachment patterns in their adult relationships were more likely to be non-responders regarding general psychological distress at follow up. Higher baseline levels of paranoia and endorsement of a dismissive adult relationship style was associated with being a non-responder in regard to global functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous research, almost half of the sample did not achieve reliable change at 12-month follow up. A relationship style characterised by preoccupied insecurity and high anger seemed to be particularly challenging in being able to benefit from psychotherapy. This style may have affected both relationships outside, but also inside therapy, complicating treatment engagement and alliance with the therapist. Early identification and modification of treatment based on challenges from these relationship styles may be one way to improve psychotherapy outcomes for BPD.

Investigating predictive factors of dialectical behavior therapy skills training efficacy for alcohol and concurrent substance use disorders: A machine learning study

BACKGROUND

Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training (DBT-ST) as stand-alone treatment has demonstrated promising outcomes for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) and concurrent substance use disorders (SUDs). However, no studies have so far empirically investigated factors that might predict efficacy of this therapeutic model.

METHODS

275 treatment-seeking individuals with AUD and other SUDs were consecutively admitted to a 3-month DBT-ST program (in- + outpatient; outpatient settings). The machine learning routine applied (i.e. penalized regression combined with a nested cross-validation procedure) was conducted in order to estimate predictive values of a wide panel of clinical variables in a single statistical framework on drop-out and substance-use behaviors, dealing with related multicollinearity, and eliminating redundant variables.

RESULTS

The cross-validated elastic net model significantly predicted the drop-out. The bootstrap analysis revealed that subjects who showed substance-use behaviors during the intervention and who were treated with the mixed setting (i.e., in- and outpatient) program, together with higher ASI alcohol scores were associated with an higher probability of drop-out. On the contrary, older subjects, higher levels of education, together with higher scores of DERS awareness subscale were negatively associated to drop-out. Similarly, lifetime co-diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar, and gambling disorders, together with bulimia nervosa negatively predicted the drop-out. The machine learning model did not identify predictive variables of substance-use behaviors during the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The DBT-ST program could be considered a valid therapeutic approach especially when AUD and other SUDs co-occur with other psychiatric conditions and, it is carried out as a full outpatient intervention.

Pathologische Dissoziation bei Patienten mit einer Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung

Trotz der hohen Relevanz dissoziativer Phänomene bei der Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung (BPS) ist das Konzept der pathologischen Dissoziation bisher kaum in diesem Kontext untersucht worden. Zur Operationalisierung von pathologischer Dissoziation wurden diverse Indizes vorgeschlagen, deren klinische Nützlichkeit in der vorliegenden Studie ebenso untersucht wurde wie ihre Häufigkeit, klinischen Korrelate und prädiktive Bedeutung. Hierzu bearbeiteten 487 stationäre BPS-Patienten bei Aufnahme Selbstbeurteilungsverfahren zu Dissoziation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, DES-28) sowie allgemeiner und Borderline-typischer Pathologie (Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten [PHQ-D], Borderline Symptom Liste [BSL-95]). Diejenigen Patienten, die mindestens 6 Wochen an der stationären Dialektisch-Behavioralen Therapie (DBT) teilgenommen hatten, füllten am Ende erneut den PHQ‑D und die BSL-95 aus (n zwischen 342 und 361). Je nach Operationalisierung der Dissoziation litten zwischen knapp 20 % und 37 % der BPS-Patienten unter pathologischer Dissoziation. Diese war eng mit allgemeiner und Borderline-typischer Symptomatik bei Aufnahme assoziiert. Ein hohes Ausmaß an pathologischer Dissoziation zu Behandlungsbeginn prädizierte ein schlechteres symptombezogenes Therapieergebnis. Konsistent mit einer Vielzahl anderer Studien unterstreichen diese Befunde die Relevanz von Dissoziation bei der BPS. Die aus nur 8 Items der DES-28 bestehende DES-Taxon (DES-T) kann pathologische Dissoziation anwendungs- und auswertungsfreundlich erheben, erweist sich als mindestens ebenso relevant wie die DES-28 und hat für das symptombezogene Behandlungsergebnis sogar eine höhere prädiktive Relevanz. Daher empfiehlt sich ein Screening aller BPS-Patienten auf pathologische Dissoziation mit der DES‑T.

Applying adherent DBT Principles to treatment in a partial hospital setting: An analysis over 5-years of outcomes from intake to discharge

OBJECTIVES

A small number of studies to date have examined Partial Hospital (PH) that utilize a Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) model. Preliminary findings suggest DBT PH programs can be effective in various symptom reduction.

METHODS

This study examined clinically relevant outcomes and included a heterogeneous clinical sample over a five-year period. Specifically, the present study assessed pre-post data to examine changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and overall degree of suffering from intake to discharge in a DBT PH.

RESULTS

Findings showed symptom reduction from intake to discharge for depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and suffering for all 5 years. This DBT PH program was successful at reducing various symptoms in a sample of psychiatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians might consider the advantages of placing patients in PH programs versus an inpatient stay or consider utilizing DBT-informed PH programs after an inpatient hospitalization as a form of step-down care.

Outcomes of brief versions of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for diagnostically heterogeneous groups in a routine care setting

INTRODUCTION

Brief versions of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) may enhance patient outcomes in diverse service settings. This study examined the effectiveness of two DBT-informed treatments for diagnostically heterogeneous groups in routine practice: 5-day group training in DBT skills (DBT-5) and a 12-week DBT program (DBT-12).

METHODS

: Depression, anxiety, stress, borderline symptoms, self-esteem, and general mental wellbeing were measured at pre-and post-treatment in a sample of inpatients and outpatients (N=395). Rates of clinically significant change on these measures were calculated and effect sizes benchmarked against prior DBT outcome studies. Readmission rates were used to measure treatment response maintenance.

RESULTS

: Scores on all measures improved significantly from pre- to post-treatment. DBT-5 and DBT-12 yielded similar effect sizes compared to prior DBT outcome studies. At least 43.5% of patients were classified as recovered or improved regarding borderline symptoms at the end of both DBT-5 and DBT-12. Readmission rates were also low (5%-6.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Brief DBT-informed treatments may offer a fast reduction in symptoms and quicker return to functioning.

Why is an evidence-based classification of personality disorder so elusive?

Despite recent revisions, the classification of personality disorder remains a matter of dispute, and there is little evidence of consistent progress toward an evidence-based system. This essay examines four issues impeding taxonomic progress and explores how they might be addressed. First, the phenomenological and aetiological complexity of personality disorder poses a formidable challenge to traditional taxonomic methods. Second, current classifications incorporate assumptions such as a stringent version of medical model and an essentialist philosophy that are inconsistent with empirical evidence. Third, despite the claims of trait psychology, a viable alternative to categorical diagnosis is not available. Contemporary trait models have not gained widespread clinical acceptance and substantial conceptual and methodological limitations compromise their clinical value. Finally, the processes used to revise official classifications are biased toward conservative revisions and difficult to shield from non-scientific influences. It is suggested that rather making further attempts to develop a general monolithic classification that meets all needs, consideration be given to developing a more flexible and multifaceted framework that combines diagnosis and assessment. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Predictors of dropout among adolescents with borderline personality disorder attending mentalization-based group treatment

Background: Premature termination from treatment or dropout is prevalent among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). To our knowledge, no studies have examined which factors predisposes dropout from therapy among adolescents with BPD. The current study examined sociodemographic, clinical and psychological predictors of dropout among adolescents who attended a one-year treatment program with mentalization-based group treatment (MBT-G).Methods: Participants were 89 female adolescent patients aged 14-18 years who attended MBT-G in a Danish child and adolescent psychiatric service and 56 matched controls who received non-manualized individual sessions (treatment as usual). Forty (45%) dropped out and 49 (55%) completed treatment in MBT-G. Pretreatment predictors included (1) sociodemographic variables such as age, schooling, relationship status and after-school job, (2) clinical measures of self-reported adolescent borderline personality features, depression, self-harm, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and (3) psychological measures on self-reported reflective functioning (i.e., mentalizing) and attachment to peers and parents.Results: Binary logistic regression analyses revealed that lower reflective functioning was the only significant predictor of dropout in MBT-G. No sociodemographic or clinical variables predicted dropout. No significant predictors of dropout were identified among participants who received treatment as usual.Conclusions: Adolescents with BPD who report low reflective functioning are at increased risk of dropping out of MBT-G treatment but not treatment as usual. These findings highlight that clinicians need to consider level of reflective functioning among adolescents with BPD in MBT or in group therapy and adapt psychotherapy to the needs of the patient in order to reduce dropout.

DBT-informed treatment in a partial hospital and intensive outpatient program: the role of step-down care

Few studies to date have examined Partial Hospital (PH) and Intensive Outpatient (IOP) programs that utilize a Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)-informed model. Preliminary findings suggest that DBT-informed PH programs are effective in reducing clinical symptoms; however, less is known about IOP programs as well as step-down care models. The present study utilized clinically relevant outcome indices and included a heterogeneous clinical sample. Specifically, the present study assessed pre-post data to examine changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and overall degree of suffering from intake to discharge in DBT-informed PH and IOP programs as well as a step-down condition (PH to IOP). Participants included 205 adults (ages M = 35.28, SD = 12.49). The sample was predominantly female (N = 139, 67.8%) and Caucasian (N = 181, 88.3%). The sample was divided into three distinct groups: PH program patients, PH to IOP program step-down patients, and IOP patients. Findings indicated significant symptom reduction from intake to discharge for all three conditions. There were no significant differences in mean change scores in symptom reduction between the three groups. Severity of depression symptoms at intake predicted program placement. However, type of program did not predict significant changes in symptoms from intake to discharge. This DBT-informed PH and IOP program was successful at reducing various psychiatric symptoms in the sample. Clinicians might consider the advantages of placing patients with higher symptoms of depression into PH programs with the intention of transitioning to step-down care through IOP programs that utilize DBT.

Kindheitstraumatisierungen bei Patienten mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung

Während Kindheitstraumatisierungen zentrale psychosoziale Risikofaktoren für die Entwicklung einer Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung (BPS) darstellen, ist ihre Relevanz für die Symptomschwere der Erkrankung und das Therapieergebnis bisher unzureichend und mit inkonsistenten Ergebnissen untersucht worden. In dieser naturalistischen Studie an 482 stationären Psychotherapiepatienten mit einer BPS wurde daher der differenzielle Einfluss verschiedener Kindheitstraumatisierungen (gemessen mit dem Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CTQ) auf die selbstberichtete Psychopathologie hinsichtlich Depressivität (Beck-Depressions-Inventar II [BDI-II], Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten [PHQ]), Ängstlichkeit und Somatisierung (PHQ), BPS-spezifischer Symptomatik (Borderline-Symptom-Liste, BSL) sowie gesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität (Kurzform des Fragebogens zum Gesundheitszustand, SF-12) zu Behandlungsbeginn und bei Abschluss einer Dialektisch-Behavioralen Therapie analysiert. Weil sich Frauen und Männer in Symptomschwere und Häufigkeit verschiedener Kindheitstraumatisierungen unterscheiden, erfolgten geschlechtsdifferenzielle Analysen. Bei Patientinnen trugen Kindheitstraumatisierungen bis maximal knapp 7 % zur Varianzaufklärung der Symptombelastung bei Aufnahme bei; lediglich emotionaler Missbrauch hatte einen signifikanten und unabhängigen Einfluss. Bei Männern fanden sich keine relevanten Zusammenhänge zwischen dem CTQ und den Ergebnismaßen. Weder bei Männern noch bei Frauen wirkten sich Kindheitstraumatisierungen auf das symptombezogene Behandlungsergebnis aus. Die Ergebnisse werden im Kontext der bisherigen Befundlage zum Zusammenhang zwischen Kindheitstraumatisierungen, Symptomschwere und Therapieergebnis bei psychischen Störungen im Allgemeinen und der BPS im Besonderen diskutiert.

Drawing the borderline: Predicting treatment outcomes in patients with borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

A routinely collected big data set was analyzed to determine the effectiveness of naturalistic inpatient treatment and to identify predictors of treatment outcome and discontinuation.

METHODS

The sample included 878 patients with borderline personality disorder who received non-manualized dialectic behavioral therapy in a psychosomatic clinic. Effect sizes (Hedge's g) were calculated to determine effectiveness. A bootstrap-enhanced regularized regression with 91 potential predictors was used to identify stable predictors of residualized symptom- and functional change and treatment discontinuation. Results were validated in a holdout sample and repeated cross validation.

RESULTS

Effect sizes were small to medium (g = 0.28-0.51). Positive symptom-related outcome was predicted by low affect regulation skills and no previous outpatient psychotherapy. Lower age, absence of work disability, high emotional and physical role limitations and low bodily pain were associated with greater improvement in functional outcome. Higher education and comorbid recurrent depressive disorder were the main predictors of treatment completion. The predictive quality of the models varied, with the best being found for symptom-related outcome (R2 = 18%).

CONCLUSION

While the exploratory process of variable selection replicates previous findings, the validation results suggest that tailoring treatment to the individual patient might not be based solely on sociodemographic, clinical and psychological baseline data.

A hierarchical analysis of the latent trait of borderline personality disorder and its possible clinical implications

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental disorder which is accompanied by impaired functioning, complex psychosocial problems and incurs large costs. However, it rarely has been examined whether BPD symptoms form a hierarchical (Mokken) scale, which would imply that symptoms are ordered along a latent dimension of borderline severity. In this study the data from 1,198 inpatients of a psychosomatic clinic were examined. A non-parametric Mokken analysis was employed to investigate if the BPD symptoms measured by the impulsivity and emotion dysregulation scale (IES-27) formed a hierarchical scale. 16 of the 27 items, mainly regarding emotion dysregulation, formed a monotonous Mokken scale with a very strong hierarchy of BPD symptoms. These results imply that single BPD symptoms provide information about BPD severity, suggesting several important consequences regarding escalation of BPD, diagnosis and treatment, e.g. how to optimize treatment planning.

Predictors of Dropout From a 20-Week Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Group for Suicidal Behaviors and Borderline Personality Disorder

Treatment dropout among individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with negative psychosocial outcomes. Identifying predictors of dropout among this population is critical to understanding how to improve treatment retention. The present study extends the current literature by examining both static and dynamic predictors of dropout. Chronically suicidal outpatients diagnosed with BPD (N = 42) were randomly assigned to a 20-week dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills training group. Static and dynamic predictors were assessed at baseline, 5, 10, 15, 20 weeks, and 3 months post-intervention. A post-hoc two-stage logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict dropout propensity. Receiving disability benefits at baseline and decreases in mindfulness were associated with significantly increased probability of dropout. Clinicians working with chronically self-harming outpatients diagnosed with BPD would benefit from prioritizing clinical interventions that enhance mindfulness in order to decrease dropout propensity.

An evaluation of predictors of dropout from an Emotional Coping Skills programme in a community mental health service

Drop-out from mental health services is a significant problem, leading to inefficient use of resources and poorer outcomes for clients. Adapted dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), often termed Emotional Coping Skills (ECS) programmes, show some of the highest rates of drop-out from therapy recorded in the literature. The present study aimed to add to the evidence base, by evaluating predictors of drop-out from an ECS programme in a UK-based Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). An existing data set of 49 clients, consisting of clients’ responses on a number of questionnaires, was evaluated for predictors of drop-out. Predictors of drop-out included symptom severity, substance use and client demographics. Independent-samples t-tests and chi-square cross tabs analyses revealed no significant differences between drop-outs and completers of therapy on any of the variables. This suggests that contrary to common assumptions and previous findings, clients using substances, who are highly anxious, or who experience a greater degree of emotion dysregulation, are not more likely to drop out from ECS programmes compared with other individuals. The clinical implications of these findings and future research are discussed within the wider context of the evidence base.

Key learning aims

(1)

Do treatment outcomes differ after 3 months DBT inpatient treatment based on borderline personality disorder subtypes?

Heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder (BPD) drives the search for BPD subtypes to optimize the assessment and treatment of these patients. Therefore, the aims of the present study were (1) to replicate previously identified BPD subtypes based on reactive and regulative temperament; (2) to compare them on symptomatology and coping; and (3) to investigate whether these subtypes show different treatment responses after 3 months of inpatient dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT). A total of 145 BPD inpatients were assessed by means of measures of temperament, symptomatology and coping. Through model-based clustering on the Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Activation Scales (BISBAS) and Effortful Control Scale (ECS), we identified three BPD subtypes: an Emotional/Disinhibited subtype (15%, high BAS and low ECS); a Low Anxiety subtype (41%, low BIS) and an Inhibited subtype (44%, low BAS). After 3 months of DBT, 75 patients completed the measures for a second time. Repeated measure ANOVAs demonstrated a general improvement on all symptoms and coping strategies. In addition, the BPD subtypes showed trajectory differences in clinical and borderline specific symptomatology and dissociation. These findings indicate that BPD subtypes based on temperament demonstrate different treatment responses, which can contribute to the search of more BPD subtype tailored treatment interventions. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Premature Termination of Psychotherapy in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Cluster-Analytic Study

The goal of the present study was to establish profiles of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who dropped out early from an outpatient psychotherapy program. From a sample of 56 BPD patients who dropped out after the first of a three-year program, a TwoStep cluster analysis procedure was performed, using the five factors of the Treatment Attrition-Retention Scale for Personality Disorders (Gamache et al., J Pers Disord 1-21, 2017) and the Global Assessment of Functioning score (Spitzer et al., Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] Scale. In Sederer LI, Dickey B [Eds], Outcomes assessment in clinical practice [pp 76-78]. Baltimore, MD: Walter and Williams) as clustering variables. Four clusters emerged: Higher-functioning, Narcissistic features/entitlement, Pseudo-normality, and Highly dysfunctional. Differences between the clusters were found on sex, occupational status, and presence of antisocial features. These findings could help both identify BPD patients at potential risk of dropping out of psychotherapy and adjust interventions accordingly to reduce premature termination.

Premature psychotherapy termination in an outpatient treatment program for personality disorders: a survival analysis

OBJECTIVE

Psychological treatment for patients with personality disorders (PD) is plagued with a high proportion of early dropouts, and attempts to identify risk factors for attrition have generated very few conclusive results. The purpose of the present study is to identify significant predictors of early treatment termination in a long-term psychotherapy program for PD.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively retrieved from 174 files of patients who began long-term psychotherapy in an outpatient treatment program in Quebec City, Canada. Socio-demographic, initial disturbance, and diagnostic variables were considered for prediction, along with a measure specifically designed to identify PD patients at risk of dropping out early from psychotherapy, the Treatment Attrition-Retention Scale for Personality Disorders (TARS-PD). Survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to identify significant predictors.

RESULTS

Results using univariate Cox proportional hazards regressions revealed that unemployment, Global Assessment of Functioning scores, and recent hetero-aggressive behavior were significant predictors of early dropout in the first six months of therapy. Adjusting for these three confounders, four of the factor scores from the TARS-PD (Narcissism, Secondary gains, Low distress, and Cluster A features) were significantly associated with dropout in univariate Cox proportional hazards regressions. Secondary gains and Narcissism remained significant predictors after entering all five TARS-PD factors in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into consideration specific treatment prognosis variables, such as those measured by the TARS-PD, might be more useful for dropout prediction in PD patients in comparison with more general demographic and diagnostic variables.

German Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS): psychometric properties from a representative population survey

BACKGROUND

Suicidal ideation has been identified as one of the major predictors of attempted or actual suicide. Routinely screening individuals for endorsing suicidal thoughts could save lives and protect many from severe psychological consequences following the suicide of loved ones. The aim of this study was to validate the German version of the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) in a sample representative for the Federal Republic of Germany.

METHODS

All 2450 participants completed the first part of the Scale, the BSS-Screen. A risk group of n = 112 individuals (4.6%) with active or passive suicidal ideation was identified and subsequently completed the entire BSS.

RESULTS

Satisfactory internal reliability (α = .97 for the BSS-Screen; α = .94 for the entire BSS) and excellent model fit indices for the one-dimensional factorial structure of the BSS-Screen (CFI = .998; TLI = .995; RMSEA = .045 [95%-CI: .030-.061]) were confirmed. Measurement invariance analyses supported strict invariance across gender, age, and depression status. We found correlations with related self-report measures in expected directions comparable to previous studies, indicating satisfactory construct validity.

LIMITATIONS

Our study involved cross sectional data, hence neither predictive validity nor retest-reliability were examined. As only the risk group of n = 112 individuals completed the entire measure, confirmatory factor analyses could not be conducted for the full BSS.

CONCLUSION

The German translation of the BSS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing suicidal ideation in the general population. Using it as a screening device in general and specialized medical care could substantially advance suicide prevention.

Development and Validation of the Treatment Attrition-Retention Scale for Personality Disorders

This study is an investigation of the psychometric properties of the Treatment Attrition-Retention Scale for Personality Disorders (TARS-PD), an instrument developed to identify patients with personality disorder (PD) at risk of early dropout from psychotherapy. In a first study, assessment files from 320 patients referred for PD evaluation at an outpatient clinic were examined to assess the instrument's inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and discriminant validity. Results showed that the global scale could be scored with excellent reliability. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors: Narcissism, Psychopathy, Secondary gains, Low motivation, and Cluster A features. A second study focused on the scale's predictive validity. The TARS-PD showed high specificity (94%) in identifying dropouts, using a cut-off of ≥ 10. Both global and factor scores from the TARS-PD were significant predictors of treatment status (dropout vs. continuation) at 6 months. The scale should be considered promising for PD evaluation and treatment planning.

Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder in Emergency Departments

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients, when in crisis, are frequent visitors of emergency departments (EDs). When these patients exhibit symptoms such as aggressiveness, impulsivity, intense anxiety, severe depression, self-harm, and suicidal attempts or gestures, diagnosis, and treatment of the BPD becomes challenging for ED doctors. This review will, therefore, outline advice to physicians and health-care providers who face this challenging patient population in the EDs. Crisis intervention should be the first objective of clinicians when dealing with BPD in the emergency. For the patients with agitation, symptom-specific pharmacotherapy is usually recommended, while for non-agitated patients, short but intensive psychotherapy especially dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has a positive effect. Although various psychotherapies, either alone or integrated, are preferred modes of treatment for this group of patients, the effects of psychotherapies on BPD outcomes are small to medium. Proper risk management along with developing a positive attitude and empathy toward these patients will help them in normalizing in an emergency setting after which treatment course can be decided.

Impact of therapist change after initial contact and traumatic burden on dropout in a naturalistic sample of inpatients with borderline pathology receiving dialectical behavior therapy

BACKGROUND

This study focused on the predictors of therapy dropout in a naturalistic sample of patients with borderline pathology receiving dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) in an inpatient setting. We assumed that the change of the therapist between DBT-briefing and start of DBT-treatment as well as comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and childhood trauma history were associated with elevated dropout.

METHODS

Eighty-nine participants with borderline pathology (≥ 3 borderline personality disorder criteria) receiving an inpatient DBT program completed a quality assurance questionnaire set assessing demographic information and pretreatment psychopathology during the days of their inpatient stay. Beyond that, changes of therapists were documented. The predictor analyses were investigated with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

The dropout rate was 24.7%. A change of therapist between DBT-briefing and treatment as well as high childhood emotional abuse was associated with premature termination of treatment. Higher values of physical neglect during childhood were associated with a protective effect on treatment dropout. Surprisingly, this was also true for comorbid PTSD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the importance of therapy process variables as predictors of therapy dropout in borderline pathology. A change of therapist between DBT-briefing and treatment was associated with an increased vulnerability for dropping out of treatment and should therefore be avoided if possible. Against our hypotheses, a comorbid PTSD was even protective with regard to DBT dropout. Therefore, this severely suffering patient group should not be rejected from treatment assuming them to be too unstable for psychotherapy. However, results need to be replicated. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03018639, retrospectively registered on January 9, 2017.

Effects of mindfulness training on different components of impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: results from a pilot randomized study

BACKGROUND

Impulsivity is considered a core characteristic of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Previous research on the effects of mindfulness training (MT) has shown that it might modify impulsivity-related aspects of BPD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of MT on various facets of impulsivity in BPD patients.

METHODS

Subjects with BPD diagnosis (n = 64) were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of MT (n = 32) or interpersonal effectiveness skills training (IE; n = 32). All participants were assessed pre- and post-intervention with a self-reported measure of impulsivity and five behavioral neuropsychological tasks to evaluate response inhibition, tolerance for delay rewards, and time perception.

RESULTS

An interaction effect of time × group was only observed for some of the behavioral paradigms used. Participants in the MT group improved their ability to delay gratification and showed changes in time perception, consistent with a decrease in impulsivity. No differences were observed between treatments in terms of trait impulsivity and response inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Mindfulness training might improve some aspects of impulsivity but not others. Further study is warranted to better determine the effects of mindfulness training on the components of impulsivity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02397031.

Predicting dropout in outpatient dialectical behavior therapy with patients with borderline personality disorder receiving psychiatric disability

BACKGROUND

Rates of treatment dropout in outpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) in the community can be as high as 24 % to 58 %, making dropout a great concern. The primary purpose of this article was to examine predictors of dropout from DBT in a community mental health setting.

METHODS

Participants were 56 consumers with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who were psychiatrically disabled participating in a larger feasibility trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy- Accepting the Challenges of Exiting the System. The following variables were examined to see whether they predicted dropout in DBT: age, education level, baseline level of distress, baseline level of non-acceptance of emotional responses, and skills module in which a consumer started DBT skills group. These variables were chosen based on known predictors of dropout in consumers with BPD and in DBT, as well as an interest in what naturally occurring variables might impact dropout.

RESULTS

The dropout rate in this sample was 51.8 %. Results of the logistic regression show that younger age, higher levels of baseline distress, and a higher level of baseline non-acceptance of emotional responses were significantly associated with dropout. The DBT skills module in which an individual started group did not predict dropout.

CONCLUSIONS

The implications of these findings are that knowledge of consumer age and pretreatment levels of distress and non-acceptance of emotional responses can impact providers' choice of commitment and treatment strategies to reduce dropout. Future research should examine these strategies, as well as the impact of predictor variables on outcome and reasons for dropout.

Effectiveness of Short-Term Inpatient Psychotherapy Based on Transactional Analysis With Patients With Personality Disorders: A Matched Control Study Using Propensity Score

Controlled studies on the effectiveness of inpatient psychotherapy with patients with personality disorders (PD) are rare. This study aims to compare 3-month short-term inpatient psychotherapy based on transactional analysis (STIP-TA) with other psychotherapies (OP) up to 36-month follow-up. PD patients treated with STIP-TA were matched with OP patients using the propensity score. The primary outcome measure was general psychiatric symptomatology; secondary outcomes were psychosocial functioning and quality of life. In 67 pairs of patients, both STIP-TA and OP showed large symptomatic and functional improvements. However, STIP-TA patients showed more symptomatic improvement at all time points compared to OP patients. At 36 months, 68% of STIP-TA patients were symptomatically recovered compared to 48% of OP patients. STIP-TA outperformed OP in terms of improvements in general psychiatric symptomatology and quality of life. Superiority of STIP-TA was most pronounced at 12-month follow-up, but remained intact over the course of the 3-year follow-up.

Prevalence of Internet gaming disorder in German adolescents: diagnostic contribution of the nine DSM-5 criteria in a state-wide representative sample

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is included as a condition for further study in Section 3 of the DSM-5. Nine criteria were proposed with a threshold of five or more criteria recommended for diagnosis. The aims of this study were to assess how the specific criteria contribute to diagnosis and to estimate prevalence rates of IGD based on DSM-5 recommendations.

DESIGN

Large-scale, state-representative school survey using a standardized questionnaire.

SETTING

Germany (Lower Saxony).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 11 003 ninth-graders aged 13-18 years (mean = 14.88, 51.09% male).

MEASUREMENTS

IGD was assessed with a DSM-5 adapted version of the Video Game Dependency Scale that covered all nine criteria of IGD.

FINDINGS

In total, 1.16% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96, 1.36] of respondents were classified with IGD according to DSM-5 recommendations. IGD students played games for longer periods, skipped school more often, had lower grades in school, reported more sleep problems and more often endorsed feeling 'addicted to gaming' than their non-IGD counterparts. The most frequently reported DSM-5 criteria overall were 'escape adverse moods' (5.30%) and 'preoccupation' (3.91%), but endorsement of these criteria rarely related to IGD diagnosis. Conditional inference trees showed that the criteria 'give up other activities', 'tolerance' and 'withdrawal' were of key importance for identifying IGD as defined by DSM-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a state-wide representative school survey in Germany, endorsement of five or more criteria of DSM-5 internet gaming disorder (IGD) occurred in 1.16% of the students, and these students evidence greater impairment compared with non-IGD students. Symptoms related to 'give up other activities', 'tolerance' and 'withdrawal' are most relevant for IGD diagnosis in this age group.

Reasons for premature termination of dialectical behavior therapy for inpatients with borderline personality disorder

Although one of the main aims of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is to increase the retention rates, premature termination rates for DBT inpatient programs were found to be over 30%. The aim of the study was to identify the reasons for, and to analyze, patient characteristics that are associated with premature termination. We studied 541 inpatients with BPD, who were consecutively admitted for an open-door 3-month DBT inpatient treatment in Berlin, Germany. All participants completed several self-rating measures and participated in clinical interviews. Fourteen percent, who did not complete the full 84 days of assigned treatment, were expelled, mainly due to treatment-disturbing behaviors, or substance abuse or possession. Nearly 19% dropped out of treatment, mostly due to lack of motivation, arguments with others, and poor tolerance of emotional distress. Using non-parametric conditional inference trees, expulsion was associated with anorexia nervosa and alcohol abuse, whereas more than 9 suicide attempts, antisocial personality disorders, and more than 86 weeks in a psychiatric hospital were risk factors for dropout. We discussed measures and interventions that might lead to an adaptation of DBT inpatient programs. Future research should examine the symptom course and utilization of health-care services of non-completers.

Comorbid atypical depression in borderline personality disorder is common and correlated with anxiety-related psychopathology

BACKGROUND

The core features of borderline personality disorder (BPD) are affective instability, unstable relationships and identity disturbance. Axis I comorbidities are frequent, in particular affective disorders. The concept of atypical depression is complex and often underestimated. The purpose of the study was to investigate the comorbidity of atypical depression in borderline patients regarding anxiety-related psychopathology and interpersonal problems.

METHODS

Sixty patients with BPD were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis I and II Disorders (SCID I, SCID II) as well as the Atypical Depression Diagnostic Scale (ADDS). Additionally, patients completed a questionnaire (SCL-90-R, BDI, STAI, STAXI, IIP-C).

RESULTS

Forty-five BPD patients (81.8%) had a comorbid affective disorder of which 15 (27.3%) were diagnosed with an atypical depression. In comparison to patients with major depressive disorder or no comorbid depression, patients with atypical depression showed significant higher scores in psychopathological symptoms regarding anxiety and global severity as well as interpersonal problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of atypical depression in borderline patients is correlated with psychopathology, anxiety, and interpersonal problems and seems to be of clinical importance for personalized treatment decisions.