Pavlovian occasion setting in human fear and appetitive conditioning: Effects of trait anxiety and trait depression

Loneliness and the persistence of fear: Perceived social isolation reduces evaluative fear extinction

Loneliness has been linked to a host of harmful physical and mental health outcomes, detrimental effects that may stem from increases in threat-responding caused by altered fear learning in lonely individuals. In particular, the heightened threat-vigilance that is a hallmark of loneliness may augment the processes by which fear learning occurs, ultimately resulting in a greater number of perceived threatening cues in the environment. However, almost no research has examined how loneliness alters fear learning processes in humans. Here, we investigated the effect of loneliness on fear learning during an evaluative learning procedure in which participants (n = 782) were taught to associate fearful, positive, or neutral control stimuli with neutral images. Results showed that reduced extinction of evaluative fear associations occurred in high (vs. low) lonely individuals, but there was no difference in extinction of evaluative appetitive (also known as positive or reward) associations, suggesting this effect is specific to fear learning. In addition to shedding light on the link between loneliness and poor health, these results represent an important step forward in the growing understanding of the powerful impact of social bonds on fear learning processes.

Aversive conditioning is impaired in impulsive individuals: A study on learning asymmetries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Appetitive and aversive conditioning are thought to be involved in the development and maintenance of mental disorders including anxiety, mood, eating, and substance use disorders. However, few studies measure the relative strength of appetitive and aversive associations, and their relevance to the risk of mental disorders. This study aims to address this gap.

METHODS

We tested how readily healthy volunteers acquire appetitive vs. aversive associations. 150 participants associated complex 3D objects with either gain or loss and made decisions to gain or avoid losing points. We investigated the relationship of a learning asymmetry with neuroticism, impulsivity, and anhedonia, to test the hypothesis that a stronger learning asymmetry corresponds to more extreme scores on these traits.

RESULTS

Impulsivity was positively associated with the learning asymmetry (R2 = .10). This resulted from an inverse relation with the strength of aversive associations, indicating that impulsive individuals are worse at aversive learning. However, appetitive associations did not differ significantly. No correlations with neuroticism or anhedonia were found.

LIMITATIONS

Conditioning studies typically use primary reinforcers and a CS-. Lacking these may make these results less comparable to other studies.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the learning asymmetry can measure individual differences linked to personality traits, and that impulsivity, normally linked with appetitive learning, also influences aversive learning. These results enable additional studies of learning asymmetry in relation to mental disorders, which could include measurements of mental health symptoms to provide further insight into how appetitive and aversive learning interacts with mental disorders.

Reduced generalization of reward among individuals with subthreshold depression: Behavioral and EEG evidence

Altered stimulus generalization has been well-documented in anxiety disorders; however, there is a paucity of research investigating this phenomenon in the context of depression. Depression is characterized by impaired reward processing and heightened attention to negative stimuli. It is hypothesized that individuals with depression exhibit reduced generalization of reward stimuli and enhanced generalization of loss stimuli. Nevertheless, no study has examined this process and its underlying neural mechanisms. In the present study, we recruited 25 participants with subthreshold depression (SD group) and 24 age-matched healthy controls (HC group). Participants completed an acquisition task, in which they learned to associate three distinct pure tones (conditioned stimuli, CSs) with a reward, a loss, or no outcome. Subsequently, a generalization session was conducted, during which similar tones (generalization stimuli, GSs) were presented, and participants were required to classify them as a reward tone, a loss tone, or neither. The results revealed that the SD group exhibited reduced generalization errors in the early phase of generalization, suggesting a diminished ability to generalize reward-related stimuli. The event-related potential (ERP) results indicated that the SD group exhibited decreased generalization of positive valence to reward-related GSs and heightened generalization of negative valence to loss-related GSs, as reflected by the N1 and P2 components. However, the late positive potential (LPP) was not modulated by depression in reward generalization or loss generalization. These findings suggested that individuals with subthreshold depression may have a blunted or reduced ability to generalize reward stimuli, shedding light on potential treatment strategies targeting this particular process.

Neural mechanisms of social comparison in subthreshold depression

Social comparison is a common phenomenon in our daily life, through which people get to know themselves, and plays an important role in depression. In this study, event-related potential (ERP) was used to explore the temporal course of social comparison processing in the subthreshold depression group. Electrophysiological recordings were acquired from 30 subthreshold depressed individuals and 31 healthy individuals while they conducted the adapted dot estimation task. The ERP results revealed that there was a significant difference of feedback-related negativity (FRN) in the process of social comparison. Especially only in the subthreshold depression, the FRN amplitudes of worse off than some, better off than many comparisons were larger than those of upward comparisons and downward comparisons. Our results suggested that the abnormal reward sensitivity for worse off than some, better off than many comparisons might be prodromal symptoms in the subthreshold depression.

Manipulating expectancy violations to strengthen the efficacy of human fear extinction

Recent theoretical and clinical articles have emphasized a role for expectancy violations in improving the effectiveness of exposure therapy. Expectancy violations are critical to extinction learning and strengthening these violations has been suggested to improve the formation and retention of extinction memories, which should result in lasting symptom reductions after treatment. However, more detailed mechanistic insights in this process are needed to better inform clinical interventions. In two separate fear-conditioning experiments, we investigated whether stronger expectancy violations (Exp1) or fostering awareness of expectancy violations (Exp2) during extinction could reduce the subsequent return of fear. We measured fear potentiated startle (FPS) and skin conductance responses (SCR) as physiological indices of fear, and US expectancy ratings to assess our manipulations. While we successfully created stronger expectancy violations in Exp1, we found no evidence that these stronger violations reduced the return of fear at test. Interestingly, fostering awareness of violations (Exp2) reduced differential SCRs, but not FPS responses. These findings provide novel insights into the effect of US expectancies on fear extinction in the lab, but they also illustrate the complexity of capturing clinically relevant processes of change with fear-conditioning studies.

Association of polymorphisms rs4680 of the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase gene and rs6265 of the Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor gene with the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems

Background

The Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) comprises limbic circuitry implicated in avoidance behaviors. Its increased activation has been identified as a risk factor for anxiety and depressive disorders. In addition, both Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) have been postulated as candidate genes that constitute a vulnerability for the onset of anxiety and depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible association between the rs4680 polymorphism of the COMT gene and the rs6265 polymorphism of the BDNF gene with the BIS and the Behavioral Activation System (BAS) in a population sample from Colombia.

Methods

Genetic information was obtained by extracting DNA from blood samples of 80 participants and using Taqman probes designed for each polymorphism. In addition, participants completed a BIS/BAS scale in order to establish a neuropsychological classification.

Results

The frequency of the Met allele of the BDNF gene was greater in the group with BIS sensitivity compared to the group with BAS sensitivity. On the contrary, the frequency of the Met allele of the COMT gen did not show a significant association with the BIS.

Conclusions

The rs6265 polymorphism of BDNF gene is associated with the BIS which in turn constitutes a risk factor for anxiety and depression.

The effect of information seeking behaviors in fear control

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Individuals experiencing conditioned fear reactions often resort to avoidance and escape behaviors as attempts to decrease fear. Nevertheless, these strategies are not always available. In such cases, people seek information to mitigate aversive events. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of information seeking behaviors on self-reported fear, predictability, and physiological responses.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. In group one, individuals were given the choice to perform an instrumental behavior which provided information about the occurrence of either an aversive or a neutral event (100% contingency). In group two, individuals were also allowed to perform an instrumental behavior. However, such behavior provided partial information (50% contingency).

RESULTS

Individuals in group one presented lower levels of fear compared to individuals assigned to group two.

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the results may be restricted to undergraduate students.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggests that when avoidance and escape are not available, individuals seek information that provides control over fear. Clinical implications are discussed.

Ambiguity drives higher-order Pavlovian learning

In the natural world, stimulus-outcome associations are often ambiguous, and most associations are highly complex and situation-dependent. Learning to disambiguate these complex associations to identify which specific outcomes will occur in which situations is critical for survival. Pavlovian occasion setters are stimuli that determine whether other stimuli will result in a specific outcome. Occasion setting is a well-established phenomenon, but very little investigation has been conducted on how occasion setters are disambiguated when they themselves are ambiguous (i.e., when they do not consistently signal whether another stimulus will be reinforced). In two preregistered studies, we investigated the role of higher-order Pavlovian occasion setting in humans. We developed and tested the first computational model predicting direct associative learning, traditional occasion setting (i.e., 1st-order occasion setting), and 2nd-order occasion setting. This model operationalizes stimulus ambiguity as a mechanism to engage in higher-order Pavlovian learning. Both behavioral and computational modeling results suggest that 2nd-order occasion setting was learned, as evidenced by lack and presence of transfer of occasion setting properties when expected and the superior fit of our 2nd-order occasion setting model compared to the 1st-order occasion setting or direct associations models. These results provide a controlled investigation into highly complex associative learning and may ultimately lead to improvements in the treatment of Pavlovian-based mental health disorders (e.g., anxiety disorders, substance use).