The evolution of adjuvant endocrine therapy: Developments since St Gallen 2005

A hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women's experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore women's experiences of taking adjuvant endocrine therapy as a treatment for breast cancer and how their beliefs about the purpose of the medication, side effects experienced and interactions with health professionals might influence adherence.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured, one-to-one interviews.

SETTING

2 hospitals from a single health board in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

30 women who had been prescribed tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole or letrozole) and had been taking this medication for 1-5 years.

RESULTS

Women clearly wished to take their adjuvant endocrine therapy medication as prescribed, believing that it offered them protection against breast cancer recurrence. However, some women missed tablets and did not recognise that this could reduce the efficacy of the treatment. Women did not perceive that healthcare professionals were routinely or systematically monitoring their adherence. Side effects were common and impacted greatly on the women's quality of life but did not always cause women to stop taking their medication, or to seek advice about reducing the side effects they experienced. Few were offered the opportunity to discuss the impact of side effects or the potential options available.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most women in this study took adjuvant endocrine therapy as prescribed, many endured a range of side effects, often without seeking help. Advice, support and monitoring for adherence are not routinely offered in conventional follow-up settings. Women deserve more opportunity to discuss the pros, cons and impact of long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy. New service models are needed to support adherence, enhance quality of life and ultimately improve survival. These should ideally be community based, in order to promote self-management in the longer term.

Targeting the insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway: figitumumab and other novel anticancer strategies

INTRODUCTION

There are clear preclinical data that support the involvement of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling pathway in oncogenesis and cancer progression. Such evidence has led to the design and conduct of drug development programs targeting the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) over the past 10 years.

AREAS COVERED

This review details the structure and function of different members of the IGF system and related pathways, describes the rationale for targeting IGF-IR in cancer and updates the current advances in drug development. The preclinical development of figitumumab, the furthest developed mAb against IGF-IR, is examined as well as the reported data from Phase I - III clinical trials. Future prospects for this target and pathway are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

While there have been both successes and failures in the development of novel targeted therapeutics targeting the IGF pathway, the evaluation of such agents should continue, with greater emphasis placed on combinatorial strategies and the development of predictive biomarkers that enhance antitumor responses through appropriate patient selection.