The value of a combination of wire localization and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for clustered microcalcifications

Mammographically detected breast clustered microcalcifications localized by chest thin-section computed tomography

BACKGROUND

To explore the capability and clinical significance of chest thin-section computed tomography (CT) for localization of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.

METHODS

A total of 69 patients with 71 mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications received surgical biopsy under the guidance of mammography (MG), CT was used to localize calcifications combined with MG if calcifications can be seen on CT. Intraoperative mammography of the specimens were performed in all cases for identification of the resected microcalcifications. The clinical, imaging and pathological information of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 42 (59.15%) cases of calcifications were localized by CT + MG, 29 (40.85%) cases were guided only by the mammography. All suspicious calcifications on the mammography were successfully removed. Pathological results showed 42 cases were cancer, 23 cases were benign, and 6 cases were atypical hyperplasia. The mean age in the CT + MG group was older than that of the MG group (54.12 vs. 49.27 years; P = 0.014). The maximum diameter of clusters of microcalcifications on mammography in the CT + MG group was larger than that of the MG group [(cranio-caudal view, 1.52 vs. 0.61 mm, P = 0.000; mediolateral oblique (MLO) view, 1.53 vs. 0.62 mm, P = 0.000)]. The gray value ratio (calcified area / paraglandular; MLO, P = 0.004) and the gray value difference (calcified area - paraglandular; MLO, P = 0.005) in the CT + MG group was higher than that of the MG group. Multivariate analysis showed that the max diameter of clusters of microcalcifications (MLO view) was a significant predictive factor of localization by CT in total patients (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

About half of the mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications could be localized by thin-section CT. Maximum diameter of clusters of microcalcifications (MLO view) was a predictor of visibility of calcifications by CT. Chest thin-section CT may be useful for localization of calcifications in some patients, especially for calcifications that are only visible in one view on the mammography.

A systematic review and meta-analysis: value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions

Background

In recent years, according to global statistics, breast cancer is the main disease affecting women. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) has become a frequently used method for breast cancer detection because of its accuracy, simplicity, and fewer complications.

Methods

In PubMed, Medline, EMbase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials, the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to March 2021, and the keywords included breast tumor, breast cancer-related diseases, breast lesions, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, sensitivity and specificity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

Results

A total of 10 articles were included using a random-effects model that pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and other accuracy measures of VAB. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) characteristic curve was used to summarize the overall accuracy. The sensitivity range was 0.94 to 1.00 (mean, 0.981; 95% CI, 0.972-0.987) with a specificity range of 0.87-1.00 (mean, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.997-0.999). The preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was 93.84 (95% CI, 41.55-211.95), the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.09), the sensitivity and specificity of χ² were 37.10 (P=0.011) and 32.00 (P=0.043), respectively, while those of PLR, NLR, and duration of response (DOR) were 46.98 (P=0.001), 54.92 (P=0.001), and 43.49 (P=0.002), respectively. Differences were considerable.

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, a total of 10 articles were included. VAB is an accurate type of biopsy to detect female breast cancer. The results of the meta-analysis were stable, and VAB had high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (nearly 100%).

Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications

Microcalcification is one of the significant indications for or can even be the sole mammographic feature of breast cancer, especially occult breast cancer. Biopsy and pathologic examination are the most important methods used to identify the nature of suspicious microcalcifications. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (S-VAB) is the most commonly used biopsy method for microcalcifications currently because of the high detection rate of mammography for microcalcifications. However, in recent years, several clinical studies have gradually found that ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (US-VAB) could be an alternative to S-VAB for microcalcifications to some extent, and has its own advantages of flexibility, real-time performance, comfort and high accessibility compared with mammography. An overview of US-VAB of microcalcifications is provided with respect to success rate, diagnostic accuracy, advantages and limitations. On the basis of numerous studies and clinical experience, US-VAB proved to be a valid alternative to S-VAB, with comparable diagnostic accuracy if the microcalcification foci could be detected by ultrasound. And for patients with ultrasound-invisible microcalcifications who are not suitable for or tolerable of S-VAB, US-VAB combined with mammography localization of microcalcifications can also be considered.

Non-stereotactic method involving combination of ultrasound-guided wire localization and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for microcalcification

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic breast biopsy is a standard intervention for evaluation of "microcalcification-only" lesions. However, an expensive stereotactic device and radiologic expertise are necessary for this procedure. We herein report a non-stereotactic technique involving the combination of wire localization and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) under ultrasound (US) guidance.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with category 3 or 4a microcalcification only as shown by mammography underwent the above-mentioned non-stereotactic combination method involving US-guided wire localization and VABB. The location of the microcalcification was measured by manual stereotaxis, and the microcalcification was confirmed by specimen mammography after the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean number ± standard deviation of removed cores and calcified cores was 28.4±13.4 and 2.2±0.9, respectively. In one case, the procedure was repeated 3 times. The histologic diagnoses were fibrocystic change (n=14), fibroadenoma (n=4), sclerosing adenosis (n=1), usual ductal hyperplasia (n=2), and atypical ductal hyperplasia (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

"Microcalcification-only" breast lesions can be easily evaluated with the combination of non-stereotactic US-guided wire localization and VABB. This would be an effective diagnostic technique for breast lesion which reveals only microcalcification.

Biopsy sampling of breast lesions: comparison of core needle- and vacuum-assisted breast biopsies

Needle biopsy is now the initial investigation of choice for the pre-operative diagnosis of breast lesions. This includes core needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with or without radiologic assistance. The performance indices of both of these biopsy techniques were evaluated. In a large cohort of patients with breast lesions including 464 cases (285 CNB and 179 VAB), with confirmed outcomes, the diagnostic accuracy was compared using parameters including quantitation of the sampling based on the total number of cores taken, cores containing breast parenchyma, and cores with lesion; and non-epithelial changes including necrosis and calcification. CNB showed a 99% PPV, 94% NPV, 96% sensitivity, and 99% specificity, whereas VAB demonstrated a 100% PPV, 100% NPV, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. The correct diagnosis in CNB was proportional to the number of cores extracted, whereas accuracy of VAB was independent of the total number of cores taken. There was a positive correlation between the presence of calcification and malignancy in CNB, but not detected under VAB. CNB and VAB were equally efficient in palpable lesions, in detecting necrosis, and calcification. Large calcification was found to be associated with malignancy in both CNB and VAB. In non-palpable lesions, VAB was more effective in the detection of calcification. The diagnostic accuracy of VAB appeared to be independent of number of cores sampled, whereas CNB required a minimum of 3-4 cores to achieve high diagnostic accuracy.

Lateral decubitus positioning stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with true lateral mammography

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) has been used to evaluate microcalcifications or non-palpable breast lesions on mammography. Although stereotactic VAB is usually performed in a prone or upright position, an expensive prone table is necessary and vasovagal reactions often occur during the procedure. For these reasons, the lateral decubitus position can be applied for stereotactic VAB, and true lateral mammography can be used to detect the lesion. We report on 15 cases of lateral decubitus positioning for stereotactic VAB with true lateral mammography for non-palpable breast lesions or microcalcifications. The mean procedure time was approximately 30.1 minutes, and no complications occurred during the procedures. Fourteen cases had benign breast lesions and one case had a ductal carcinoma in situ. The lateral decubitus stereotactic VAB with true lateral mammography can be applied for microcalcifications or non-palpable breast lesions and helps to minimize anxiety and vasovagal reactions in patients.