1
|
Houvenaeghel G, de Nonneville A, Cohen M, Classe JM, Reyal F, Mazouni C, Faure C, Martinez A, Chauvet MP, Daraï E, Coutant C, Colombo PE, Gimbergues P, Azuar AS, Rouzier R, Tunon de Lara C, Crochet P, Rua S, Gonçalves A. Contribution of endocrine therapy in oestrogen receptor-positive pT1a-b breast cancer: Results of a retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 176:58-69. [PMID: 36194904 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few data have been reported regarding endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with small pT1a-b ER-postive breast cancer (BC). Thus, we conducted a study to detect possible survival improvements due to ET in such patients. METHODS Our retrospective observational study included 5545 patients with pT1a-b ER-positive BC treated in 15 French centres, excluding patients with HER2-positive status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ER-negative status, unknown pN status or in situ BC. We estimated disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) via univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS Most patients (80.3%: 4453) received ET and-when compared to those without ET-experienced increases of 2.5% and 3.3% in DFS and 1.9% and 4.3% in RFS after 5 and 7 years of follow-up, respectively, with little difference in OS. In Cox regression analysis, no ET was significantly associated with decreased DFS (hazard ratio, HR = 1.275, p = 0.047, 95% CI[1.003-1.620]) but not OS or RFS in all patients, while in 2363 patients with pT1a-b ER-positive grade 2-3 BC, no ET was significantly associated with decreased DFS (HR = 1.502, p = 0.049, 95% CI[1.001-2.252]), but not OS (HR = 1.361, p = 0.272). ET omission was not significantly associated with decreased survival in 3047 patients with pT1a-b ER-positive grade 1 BC. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that while ET provided a beneficial impact on survival to patients with pT1a-bN0 ER-positive BC-and especially in those with grade 2-3 tumours-no such impact was observed in grade 1 tumours. Consequently, ET should be discussed with these patients, particularly in those with pT1a grade 1 tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | - Alexandre de Nonneville
- Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Chafika Mazouni
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Alejandra Martinez
- Centre Claudius Regaud, Oncopole, 20-24 Rue Du Pont St Pierre, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 Rue de La Chine, Paris, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue Du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- Centre Val D'Aurelles, ICM - 208, Avenue des Apothicaires Parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | | | | | - Roman Rouzier
- Hôpital René Huguenin, 35 Rue Dailly, Sa]int Cloud, France
| | | | - Patrice Crochet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynocology, Hôpital de La Conception, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Sandrine Rua
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Houvenaeghel G, Barrou J, Jauffret C, Rua S, Sabiani L, Van Troy A, Buttarelli M, Blache G, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, Bannier M. Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Front Oncol 2021; 11:637049. [PMID: 33747960 PMCID: PMC7971115 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies reported the feasibility and safety of robotic-NSM (R-NSM). The aim of our prospective study was to compare R-NSM and conventional-NSM (C-NSM). Methods We analyzed patients who were operated on with and without robotic assistance (R-NSM or C-NSM) and who received immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with implant or latissimus dorsi-flap (LDF). The main objective was complication rate and secondary aims were post-operative length of hospitalization (POLH), duration of surgery, and cost. Results We analyzed 87 R-NSM and 142 C-NSM with implant-IBR in 50 and 135 patients, with LDF-IBR in 37 and 7 patients, respectively. Higher durations of surgery and costs were observed for R-NSM, without a difference in POLH and interval time to adjuvant therapy between R-NSM and C-NSM. In the multivariate analysis, R-NSM was not associated with a higher breast complication rate (OR=0.608) and significant factors were breast cup-size, LDF combined with implant-IBR, tobacco and inversed-T incision. Grade 2-3 breast complications rate were 13% for R-NSM and 17.3% for C-NSM, significantly higher for LDF combined with implant-IBR, areolar/radial incisions and BMI>=30. A predictive score was calculated (AUC=0.754). In logistic regression, patient's satisfaction between C-NSM and R-NSM were not significantly different, with unfavorable results for BMI >=25 (OR=2.139), NSM for recurrence (OR=5.371) and primary breast cancer with radiotherapy (OR=4.533). A predictive score was calculated. In conclusion, our study confirms the comparable clinical outcome between C- NSM and R-NSM, in the price of longer surgery and higher cost for R-NSM. Predictive scores of breast complications and satisfaction were significantly associated with factors known in the pre-operative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.,CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Julien Barrou
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.,CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Camille Jauffret
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Sandrine Rua
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Sabiani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Aurore Van Troy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Max Buttarelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Blache
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.,CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Bannier
- CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quilichini O, Barrou J, Bannier M, Rua S, Van Troy A, Sabiani L, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, Houvenaeghel G. Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: Results of a mono-centric 4-years cohort. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 61:172-179. [PMID: 33437474 PMCID: PMC7787913 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Oncological safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes seems to be similar between breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). We report our experience of IBR for consecutive mastectomies realized in a recent period of four years in order to determined immediate surgical results according to type of mastectomy and type of reconstruction, as mains objectives. Methods All mastectomies with IBR during years 2016–2019 were included. A retrospective analysis with prospective data collection was performed. Results We analyzed 748 IBR: 353 nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), 391 skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM) and 4 standard mastectomies, 551 with definitive implant or expanders and 196 with latissimus dorsi-flap (LDF). More NSM were performed during the 2 last years and more LDF were performed for high BMI, high breast cup-size, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and local recurrence. We realized 111 robotic NSM and 125 robotic LDF. Longer duration of surgery was significantly associated with the robotic procedures. The overall complications crude rate was 31.4% with 9.9% of re-operations and 5.8% of implant loss. Grade 2–3 complications were significantly associated with smoking. Breast complications occurred in 32.9% of mastectomies with principally skin or nipple-areola-complex suffering or necrosis, hematomas and infections. A predictive score was determined to evaluate risk of complications before surgery. Conclusion Mastectomy with IBR seems to be a safe technique with an acceptable complication rate which is increased by tobacco use, high breast cup-size and IBR-type. Mastectomy with immediate breast to determined immediate surgical results. More Nipple Sparing Mastectomy performed during the 2 last years. More Latissimus dorsi-flap performed for high BMI, high breast cup-size, after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Quilichini
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Julien Barrou
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Bannier
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Sandrine Rua
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Aurore Van Troy
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Sabiani
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy for node negative, high Recurrence Score TM breast cancer: in defense of de-escalation. NPJ Breast Cancer 2019; 5:24. [PMID: 31428677 PMCID: PMC6690957 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
5
|
Lazzaretti MG, Ponti A, Mano MP, Barca A, Casella D, Frigerio A, Giordano L, Mantellini P, Paduos A, Pitarella S, Ravaioli A, Taffurelli M, Tomatis M, Segnan N. Reducing harms from treatment. Sixteen years of surgery of the axilla for screen-detected breast cancers in Italy. Breast 2018; 42:15-22. [PMID: 30138762 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Available evidence on axillary surgery has accumulated dramatically in the last two decades in favor of less invasive care. The aim of this paper is to study 16-years trends in the surgical management of the axilla in a large population-based data set of screen-detected breast cancers in Italy and to document at what extent recommendations have been adopted in actual clinical care. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study documenting the surgical management of the axilla in primary breast cancer patients over time. We retrieved from the Italian database of screen-detected cancers 41213 cases diagnosed in women aged 50-69 between years 2000 and 2015 in twelve Italian Regions. RESULTS In pN0 cases, an increasing trend (p < 0.001) in the number of patients who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as the only axillary staging procedure was observed. In pN + cases SLNB was the only staging procedure in an increasing number of patients (p < 0.001) especially since the publication of the ACOSOG-Z0011 paper. In ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) SLNB was more frequent in mastectomies and in high grade and large lesions. However, 45% of low grade, small DCIS over the whole time period had some form of axillary surgery. CONCLUSION This large series of screen-detected cases documents a strong time trend in the direction of reducing axillary surgery and hence potential harms from treatment. The continuing practice of SLNB in low risk DCIS is of concern in an era of increasing awareness towards overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Ponti
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
| | - Maria Piera Mano
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Alessandra Barca
- Area Prevenzione e Promozione della Salute, Ufficio Screening, Regione Lazio, Italy
| | - Denise Casella
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Alfonso Frigerio
- SSD Screening, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Livia Giordano
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Mantellini
- SC Prevenzione Secondaria Screening, Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Firenze, Italy
| | - Adriana Paduos
- Department of Surgery, ASL Biella, Italy, and Fondazione Edo Tempia, Italy
| | - Sabina Pitarella
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mario Taffurelli
- Chief of Breast Surgery, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mariano Tomatis
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Nereo Segnan
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy; Director of WHO Collaborating Centre for Cancer Early Detection and Screening, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|