Influence of the subtype on local recurrence risk of breast cancer with or without radiation therapy

A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4-192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our "5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin" method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.

Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival and Assessing the Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Treatment in pT1-2N0M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Study

Background

Accurate survival prediction of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is essential in the decision-making of adjuvant treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to develop a nomogram that predicts overall survival and assists adjuvant treatment formulation.

Methods

A total of 16,977 patients with pT1-2N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 from the SEER database were enrolled. Independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression hazards method and utilized to compose the nomogram. The survival benefit of adjuvant treatment on OS were analyzed after stratification by nomogram sum-score.

Results

Patients were randomized 7:3 into the training and validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis revealed that age at diagnosis, grade, tumor size, laterality, and mastectomy type were independent prognostic factors of OS and were integrated to develop a nomogram for predicting prognosis. Patients were stratified into 3 prognostic subgroups according to the sum-score of our nomogram. There were no significant differences found in OS between surgery alone and other adjuvant treatment strategies in low risk group. In moderate risk group, patients receiving chemotherapy or the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy showed better OS than those receiving surgery alone or radiotherapy alone. For patients in high risk group, the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy could maximally improve the overall survival rate of patients.

Conclusion

A novel nomogram for OS prediction and risk stratification in patients with pT1-2N0M0 TNBC was developed. This cohort study reveals the prognostic roles of different adjuvant treatment strategies in subgroups, which may provide a reference for the decision-making of postoperative treatment, eventually improving prognosis for individual patients.

Expression of Stanniocalcin-1 as a Predictor of Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients

Introduction: About 40% of breast cancer patients will experience a recurrence and the life expectancy will decrease from 95% to 40%. Stanniocalcin-1 is a biomarker that is thought to have potential as a risk factor for recurrence. Objective: To determine the role of Stanniocalcin-1 (STC1) expression as a risk factor for recurrence in breast cancer patients. Methods: Cross sectional observational study on breast cancer patients, assessed the clinicopathological character and seen whether the patient's condition had a recurrence. Immunohistochemical staining with STC1 antibody was performed on the patient's paraffin block. Reading of immunohistochemical preparations using the Allred score method by looking at 5 fields of view. Data analysis regarding the relationship between STC1 and recurrence was carried out using the Chi-Square test or Fisher's Exact test, then Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the significant relationship between risk factors for recurrence. Results: Expression of STC1 was significantly different in patients who had recurrence and who did not experience recurrence (p= 0.000). There was a significant relationship between STC1 expression with age, tumor size, lymph node status, type of cancer, estrogen receptor status and stage at diagnosis. (p<0.005). Conclusion: It can be concluded that STC1 has a strong relationship with recurrence, so it has the potential to be used as a predictor of recurrence in breast cancer.

Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer, compared with other molecular subtypes, poses particular challenges for optimizing the timing and the extent of locoregional treatments. In the past, the combination of increased rates of both locoregional and distant recurrences led to a preference of radical surgery and extensive radiation therapy; however, since the introduction of more effective chemotherapy, a sharp de-escalation in the extent of locoregional treatments followed. Current evidence confirms that less aggressive surgery in combination with tailored radiation therapy offers improved oncological outcomes combined with better quality of life. However, further research is required to optimize locoregional treatments, considering the significant heterogeneity in biological behavior and tumor response to systemic treatments.

Evaluation of Adjuvant Treatments for T1 N0 M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Adjuvant chemotherapy remains the only recommended treatment for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the existing evidence is not enough to recommend adjuvant therapies to patients with T1 N0 M0 TNBC.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of different adjuvant therapies with survival outcome in patients with T1 N0 M0 TNBC stratified by cancer stage and age.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Postoperative patients diagnosed as having T1 N0 M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 who were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry program were included in this population-based cohort study. Data analysis was performed from March 27, 2019, to August 10, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Kaplan-Meier curve and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the different treatments.

RESULTS

A cohort of 7739 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 59.5 [12.4] years; all female) were included in the present study. The 5-year OS of the total patients was 91.7% (95% CI, 90.9%-92.5%), and median follow-up was 45 months (95% CI, 44-46 months). Patients aged 70 years and older or with T1a TNBC were more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy than chemotherapy. Although any adjuvant therapy could improve OS in T1 N0 M0 TNBC, only chemotherapy was associated with significantly better breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS adjusted hazard ratio: 0.657; 95% CI, 0.460-0.939; P = .02). Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery was associated with better OS and BCSS in patients aged 70 years and older but not in those younger than 70 years. For patients with T1c BC, chemotherapy after breast-conserving surgery or other surgery was associated with improved OS, whereas only chemotherapy after other surgery was associated with better BCSS.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this cohort study suggest that adjuvant therapies could improve OS in patients with T1 N0 M0 TNBC, whereas only chemotherapy was associated with better BCSS. Older patients with early-stage TNBC may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Administration of adjuvant therapies to patients with different ages and cancer stages should be discussed carefully, which necessitates guidance from updated guidelines.

Heterogeneity and vascular permeability of breast cancer brain metastases

Improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic breast cancer have led to a prolongation in patient survival. Unfortunately, these advances are also associated with an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM), with the result that many patients succumb due to BM treatment failure. Intracranial delivery of many chemotherapeutic agents and other therapeutics is hindered by the presence of an impermeable blood-brain barrier (BBB) designed to protect the brain from harmful substances. The formation of BM compromises the integrity of the BBB, resulting in a highly heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier (BTB) with varying degrees of vascular permeability. Here, we discuss how blood vessels play an important role in the formation of brain micrometastases as well as in the transformation from poorly permeable BM to highly permeable BM. We then review the role of BTB vascular permeability in the diagnostics and the choice of treatment regimens for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) and discuss whether the vasculature of primary breast cancers can serve as a biomarker for BM. Specifically, we examine the association between the vascular permeability of BCBM and their accumulation of large molecules such as antibodies, which remains largely unexplored.