First-line bevacizumab and eribulin combination therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety in the GINECO phase II ESMERALDA study

Eribulin combined with antiangiogenic agents in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter study

Background

The relative lack of specifically targeted agents for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) makes the need for new agents or combination therapies to maximize clinical benefit while reducing toxicity critical.

Objectives

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of eribulin combined with antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of Chinese women with HER2-negative MBC.

Methods

A total of 85 consecutive MBC patients with HER2-negative who were treated with eribulin + antiangiogenic agents between October 2020 and April 2023 in four institutions were retrospectively included in this study. Patients received eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 (day 1 and 8) plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (day 1, 64 patients) or anlotinib 10 mg daily (day 1-14, 16 patients) or apatinib 250 mg daily (5 patients) on a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary end-points included toxicities, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

The study included 85 HER2-negative MBC patients, with 41 patients (48.2%) in the first to second line group and 44 patients (51.8%) in the greater than or equal to third line group. The median age was 54.0 years. Thirty patients in the first to second line group and 14 patients in the greater than or equal to third line group had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ORR and DCR were 34.1% (29/85) and 75.3% (64/85). The median PFS (mPFS) of total population was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.7), and median OS (mOS) was immature. The mPFS was 7.7 and 4.3 months in the first to second and greater than or equal to third line treatment (p = 0.003), respectively. TNBC patients in first to second line therapy showed a significantly longer PFS (6.5 months versus 2.0 months, p = 0.021) compared to greater than or equal to third line. The incidences of cardiovascular toxicity were 29.4% in grades 1-2 and no grades 3-4. Hematologic toxicity (leukopenia and neutropenia) was the most common grade ⩾3 AEs, and AEs were more common in patients in greater than or equal to third line.

Conclusion

The results suggest that eribulin combined with antiangiogenic therapy has a meaningful clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HER2-negative MBC.

Effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life of eribulin-based therapy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: A real-world analysis

INTRODUCTION

Eribulin is currently recommended for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pre-treated with taxanes and anthracyclines. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of eribulin and its impact on health-related quality of life in heavily pre-treated patients with MBC.

METHODS

Data from MBC patients who had received eribulin-based therapy at Beijing Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and July 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse effects (AEs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 118 patients who had received eribulin to treat MBC were included. Median PFS was 4.2 months and median OS had not been reached. The ORR was 13.6% (16/118) and DCR was 75.4% (89/118). The median PFS in patients who received eribulin in second-line (26/118), third-line (29/118), or fourth-line or later (63/118) was 4.5, 4.2, and 3.9 months, respectively. The median OS in patients who received eribulin in third- or later line (n = 92) was 14.1 months. Patients who received eribulin combination therapy had a significantly longer median PFS compared with those who received eribulin monotherapy (4.5 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.007) and there was a trend towards a longer median OS (not reached vs. 12.1 months). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (22.9%), leukocytopenia (13.6%) and asthenia/fatigue (8.5%), without significant differences in safety between eribulin monotherapy and combination therapy. Quality of life was similar in patients who received eribulin monotherapy and combination therapy, except for cognitive function and nausea and vomiting symptoms, which were better with combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that eribulin-based therapy is an effective treatment option and well tolerated for heavily pre-treated patients with MBC. Eribulin combination therapy might improve PFS and HRQoL compared with eribulin monotherapy.

A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Eribulin mesylate is a novel, nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus eribulin plus the oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-center, open-label, phase II clinical study (NCT05206656) conducted in a Chinese hospital, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy were randomized (1 : 1) to receive eribulin alone or in combination with anlotinib. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

From June 2020 to April 2022, a total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to either eribulin monotherapy or eribulin plus anlotinib combination therapy, with 40 patients in each group. The data cut-off was 10 August 2022. The median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-5.5 months] for eribulin and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.5-6.9 months) for eribulin plus anlotinib (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; P = 0.04). The objective response rates were 32.5% versus 52.5% (P = 0.07), respectively, and disease control rates were 67.5% versus 92.5% (P = 0.01), respectively. Patients <50 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, visceral metastasis, number of treatment lines of four or more, hormone receptor negative (triple-negative), and HER2 low expression appeared to benefit more from combined treatment. The most common adverse events in both groups were leukopenia (n = 28, 70.0%, patients in the eribulin monotherapy group versus n = 35, 87.5%, patients in the combination therapy group), aspartate aminotransferase elevations (n = 28, 70.0%, versus n = 35, 87.5%), neutropenia (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 31, 77.5%), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 30, 75.0%).

CONCLUSION

Eribulin plus anlotinib can be considered an alternative treatment option for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Treatment response to eribulin and anlotinib in lung metastases from rare perianal adenoid cystic carcinoma: a case report

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare salivary glands tumor and often displays aggressive behavior with frequent relapse and metastasis. The terminal ACC lacks standard treatment guidelines and is always accompanied by poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of rare perianal ACC who received resection and palliative adjuvant radiation. Five years later, PET-computed tomography (CT) showed perianal recurrence and multiple pulmonary metastases. Combined chemotherapy with doxorubicin, carboplatin and cyclophosphamide was applied for two cycles but ineffective. Further next-generation sequencing analysis of perianal tissue demonstrated the v-myb avian myelobastosis viral oncogene homolog and nuclear factor I/B fusion gene and two novel BCL-6 corepressor (BCOR) mutations (p.F1106Tfs*5 and p.L1524Hfs*8). The therapy was switched to eribulin and anlotinib and has been performed for eight cycles. At recent follow-ups, MRI and CT examinations revealed the diminishing perianal and pulmonary lesions. This study presented the first case of perianal ACC with multiple pulmonary metastases and particular BCOR mutations, who presented a durable response to eribulin and anlotinib, providing a potential therapeutic option for advanced refractory ACC.

Clinical and preclinical features of eribulin-related peripheral neuropathy

Different microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) possess distinct modes of action and their clinical use in cancer treatment is often limited by chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). Eribulin is a member of the halichondrin class of antineoplastic drugs, which is correlated with a high antimitotic activity against metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. Current clinical evidence suggests that eribulin treatment, unlike some of the other MTAs, is associated with a relatively low incidence of severe peripheral neuropathy. This suggests that different MTAs possess unique mechanisms of neuropathologic induction. Animal models reliably reproduced eribulin-related neuropathy providing newer insights in CIPN pathogenesis, and they are highly suitable for in vivo functional, symptomatic and morphological characterizations of eribulin-related CIPN. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most recent literature on eribulin with a focus on both clinical and preclinical data, to explain the molecular events responsible for its favorable neurotoxic profile.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in breast cancer: Molecular pathway, potential targets, and current treatment strategies

As the highest incidence of female malignancy, breast cancer is likewise the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The development of cancer relies on neo-vascularization, which provides sufficient nutrition and oxygen, and supplies a pathway for distant metastasis. Angiogenesis represents the formation of new blood vessels, and is a principal pathogenetic action in breast cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major angiogenesis regulator that modulates the maintenance and function of mature vascular networks. Therefore, the VEGF pathway is a promising oncotherapeutic target. This review elaborates an update on the prognostic value of VEGF in breast cancer, summarizes clinical experience and lessons of anti-VEGF therapeutics, meanwhile, provides an overview of biomarkers that predict the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic treatment.

Real-world effectiveness of eribulin in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer in China: a multicenter retrospective study

Background:

Eribulin is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor approved in China for patients with advanced breast cancer who show progression after ⩾2 lines of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of eribulin and explore potential predictive factors for the efficacy of eribulin among Chinese women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in real-world practice.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 272 consecutive MBC patients who were treated with eribulin between November 2019 and October 2020 in 9 institutions nationwide were included in this study. Eribulin was administered intravenously at a dose of 1.4 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 5.0.

Results:

Eribulin showed a median PFS of 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–4.6); however, the OS data were immature. The ORR was 17.6% and the CBR was 24.6%. A total of 51.8% of patients received eribulin monotherapy, while 48.2% of patients were treated with eribulin plus targeted therapy or other chemotherapy. The number of metastatic sites, duration of previous taxane treatment for MBC, and combination with bevacizumab were significant in Cox multivariate analysis (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, and p = 0.046, respectively) and were significantly associated with PFS of eribulin. The most common AEs with eribulin treatment were hematological toxicities, including neutropenia, leukopenia, and anemia.

Conclusion:

Eribulin was effective with a manageable toxicity profile in clinical practice. Furthermore, when prescribed in combination with other agents, eribulin did not increase the toxic effects of each agent. Eribulin monotherapy or plus other agents is an alternative for the heavily pretreated patients with MBC.