Adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

The use of Cyclin-Dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors has profoundly changed the challenge of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors. We conducted an umbrella review to explore the impact of CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with ET on breast cancer by summarizing and assessing the meta-analysis (MA) and systematic review (SR) evidence.

METHODS

Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to August 1st, 2022. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality, report quality, and evidence quality using the AMSTAR-2 scale, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE grading systems, respectively. We summarized all efficacy outcomes of CDK4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer and reported them in narrative form.

RESULTS

Our study included 24 MAs and SRs. The strongest evidence demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with ET significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) in advanced breast cancer (ABC). A large body of moderate to high evidence showed a significant association between combination therapy and objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit response (CBR) benefit in ABC. Low evidence suggested some degree of benefit from combination therapy in second progression-free survival (PFS2) and time to subsequent chemotherapy (TTC) outcomes in ABC and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) outcomes in early breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET have great confidence in improving PFS, OS, ORR, and CBR outcomes in patients with ABC, which provides more rational and valid evidence-based medicine for CDK4/6 inhibitor promotion and clinical decision support.

The adverse events of CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/ HER2- breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Background: The clinical selection of three CDK4/6 inhibitors presents a challenging issue, owing to the absence of distinct clinical case characteristics, biomarkers, and their comparable clinical benefits in progression-free survival and overall survival To inform clinical treatment decisions, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy for hazard ratio+/HER2-breast cancer. Methods: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception until 1 August 2022. The results were summarized narratively, and we assessed the methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of AEs by AMSTAR-2, PRISMA, and GRADE. Results: Our analysis included 24 meta-analyses systematic reviews that evaluated the quality of AEs in 13 cases of early breast cancer (EBC) and 158 cases of advanced breast cancer The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors was found to significantly increase AEs of any grade and AEs of grade 3 or higher in early breast cancer, along with a significant increase in the risk of treatment discontinuation. In advanced breast cancer, high and moderate-quality evidence indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased AEs across all grades, including grade 3/4 AEs, leucopenia, grade 3/4 leucopenia, neutropenia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, grade 3/4 anemia, nausea, grade 3/4 constipation, fatigue, pyrexia, venous thromboembolism abdominal pain, and cough. However, they did not significantly elevate the incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea. Subgroup analysis revealed that palbociclib primarily increased hematologic toxicity, particularly grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Ribociclib was mainly associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia, prolonged QT interval, and alopecia. Abemaciclib was closely linked with diarrhea and elevated blood creatinine levels. Conclusion: The AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors vary, necessitating individualized and precise clinical selection for optimal management. This approach should be based on the patient's medical history and the distinct characteristics of different CDK4/6 inhibitors to improve the patient's quality of life. Systematic Review Registration: [https://systematicreview.gov/], identifier [CRD42022350167].

Efficacy of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and standard endocrine therapy (ET) in the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) has yielded conflicting results. We performed a pooled analysis of the adjuvant efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by including data from the NATALEE trial, the most recent trial on this topic.

METHODS

We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 7 June 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET combination versus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage BC.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving a total of 17,749 patients were included. According to the pooled analysis of these four studies, significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was observed with the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard ET (HzR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). IDFS benefit was irrespective from menopausal status, Ki-67 index, tumor grade, and previous chemotherapy. CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET had a significant improvement in iDFS in stage 3 whereas there was a trend toward better iDFS in stage 2 (HzR for stage 3: 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.78; HzR for stage 2: 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard ET in the adjuvant treatment of HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage BC improves iDFS.

Addition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors to fulvestrant for advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: To analyze whether adding PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors to fulvestrant could restore endocrine therapy sensitivity for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 analysis software. Results: Nine studies that included a total of 3199 patients were analyzed. Compared with fulvestrant alone, the addition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors significantly prolonged progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate of patients in both the total and PI3K-pathway-activated population. The number of grade 3-5 adverse events was also significantly higher. Conclusion: The addition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR to fulvestrant resulted in potential benefits; however, there may be a higher risk, which needs to be carefully managed.

Current Molecular Combination Therapies Used for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death for women worldwide. While monotherapy (single agent) treatments have been used for many years, they are not always effective, and many patients relapse after initial treatment. Moreover, in some patients the response to therapy becomes weaker, or resistance to monotherapy develops over time. This is especially problematic for metastatic breast cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. Recently, combination therapies (in which two or more drugs are used to target two or more pathways) have emerged as promising new treatment options. Combination therapies are often more effective than monotherapies and demonstrate lower levels of toxicity during long-term treatment. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of current combination therapies, including molecular-targeted therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. We also describe the molecular basis of breast cancer and the various treatment options for different breast cancer subtypes. While combination therapies are promising, we also discuss some of the challenges. Despite these challenges, the use of innovative combination therapy holds great promise compared with traditional monotherapies. In addition, the use of multidisciplinary technologies (such as nanotechnology and computer technology) has the potential to optimize combination therapies even further.

Efficacy and Safety of Initial 5 Years of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To identify the optimal initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE to obtain relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2022. Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival and the secondary outcome was severe adverse effects (SAEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out to indirectly compare all regimens and the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to obtain rankings.

Results: Eleven studies with 49,987 subjects were included. For DFS, exemestane (EXE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.87–0.96], anastrozole (ANA) (0.94, 0.90–0.97), letrozole (LET) (0.93, 0.89–0.97), tamoxifen (TAM) followed by EXE (0.91, 0.87–0.96), and TAM followed by ANA (0.92, 0.87–0.98) were more favorable than TAM, with TAM followed by EXE ranking as the first of SUCRA. For OS, only TAM followed by ANA showed significant superiority than TAM (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86–0.97) and ranked as the first of SUCRA. For SAEs, EXE (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.04–2.98), ANA (1.58, 1.03–2.43), and LET (1.63, 1.02–2.57) showed greater associations with bone fracture than TAM. However, no significant difference in the incidences of cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and cerebrovascular events was found among all comparisons.

Conclusion: The sequential use of aromatase inhibitors, which has the best curative effects and relatively mild side effects, may be the optimal treatment mode for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal EBC patients. In addition, the three kinds of aromatase inhibitors achieved roughly equal efficacy, but caused different types of SAEs.

Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier [registration number].

Expanding the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer from Metastatic Setting to Adjuvant Setting

More than two-thirds of patients with breast cancer present with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease at their initial diagnosis. HR-positive breast cancer’s growth depends on Cyclin D1, a direct transcriptional target of estrogen receptors (ER). The recent introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in both endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant settings and in both pre-and post-menopausal women. Multiple large randomized clinical trials had demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and, more recently, in overall survival (OS). Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and death among patients with HR-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, up to 20% of these patients will experience local, regional or distal recurrences in the first ten years. Such resistance to ET motivated researchers to try CDK4/6 inhibitors in EBC, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. While many clinical trials are still ongoing, at least one study and two meta-analyses had shown beneficial results, based on which the US Food and Drug Administration had recently approved the use of one of these agents, abemaciclib, in combination with ET for the adjuvant therapy of patients with high-risk EBC. In this paper, we review the recently published and ongoing landmark clinical trials attempting to expand the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, in combination with ET, in the adjuvant setting of EBC.

Cancer Stem Cells and Their Vesicles, Together with Other Stem and Non-Stem Cells, Govern Critical Cancer Processes: Perspectives for Medical Development

Stem cells, identified several decades ago, started to attract interest at the end of the nineties when families of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), concentrated in the stroma of most organs, were found to participate in the therapy of many diseases. In cancer, however, stem cells of high importance are specific to another family, the cancer stem cells (CSCs). This comprehensive review is focused on the role and the mechanisms of CSCs and of their specific extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are composed of both exosomes and ectosomes. Compared to non-stem (normal) cancer cells, CSCs exist in small populations that are preferentially distributed to the niches, such as minor specific tissue sites corresponding to the stroma of non-cancer tissues. At niches and marginal sites of other cancer masses, the tissue exhibits peculiar properties that are typical of the tumor microenvironment (TME) of cancers. The extracellular matrix (ECM) includes components different from non-cancer tissues. CSCs and their EVs, in addition to effects analogous to those of MSCs/EVs, participate in processes of key importance, specific to cancer: generation of distinct cell subtypes, proliferation, differentiation, progression, formation of metastases, immune and therapy resistance, cancer relapse. Many of these, and other, effects require CSC cooperation with surrounding cells, especially MSCs. Filtered non-cancer cells, especially macrophages and fibroblasts, contribute to collaborative cancer transition/integration processes. Therapy developments are mentioned as ongoing preclinical initiatives. The preliminary state of clinical medicine is presented in terms of both industrial development and future treatments. The latter will be administered to specific patients together with known drugs, with the aim of eradicating their tumor growth and metastases.