Supramaximal responses can be elicited in hand muscles by magnetic stimulation of the cervical motor roots

Central and Peripheral Motor Conduction Studies by Single-Pulse Magnetic Stimulation

Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is the simplest type of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Muscle action potentials induced by applying TMS over the primary motor cortex are recorded with surface electromyography electrodes, and they are called motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). The amplitude and latency of MEPs are used for various analyses in clinical practice and research. The most commonly used parameter is the central motor conduction time (CMCT), which is measured using motor cortical and spinal nerve stimulation. In addition, stimulation at the foramen magnum or the conus medullaris can be combined with conventional CMCT measurements to evaluate various conduction parameters in the corticospinal tract more precisely, including the cortical-brainstem conduction time, brainstem-root conduction time, cortical-conus motor conduction time, and cauda equina conduction time. The cortical silent period is also a useful parameter for evaluating cortical excitability. Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is further used to analyze not only the central nervous system but also the peripheral nervous system, such as for detecting lesions in the proximal parts of peripheral nerves. In this review article we introduce four types of single-pulse magnetic stimulation-of the motor cortex, spinal nerve, foramen magnum, and conus medullaris-that are useful for the diagnosis, elucidation of pathophysiology, and evaluation of clinical conditions and therapeutic effects. Single-pulse magnetic stimulation is a clinically useful technique that all neurologists should learn.

Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

The review provides a comprehensive update (previous report: Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119(3):504-32) on clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Most TMS measures rely on stimulation of motor cortex and recording of motor evoked potentials. Paired-pulse TMS techniques, incorporating conventional amplitude-based and threshold tracking, have established clinical utility in neurodegenerative, movement, episodic (epilepsy, migraines), chronic pain and functional diseases. Cortical hyperexcitability has emerged as a diagnostic aid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single-pulse TMS measures are of utility in stroke, and myelopathy even in the absence of radiological changes. Short-latency afferent inhibition, related to central cholinergic transmission, is reduced in Alzheimer's disease. The triple stimulation technique (TST) may enhance diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures to detect upper motor neuron involvement. The recording of motor evoked potentials can be used to perform functional mapping of the motor cortex or in preoperative assessment of eloquent brain regions before surgical resection of brain tumors. TMS exhibits utility in assessing lumbosacral/cervical nerve root function, especially in demyelinating neuropathies, and may be of utility in localizing the site of facial nerve palsies. TMS measures also have high sensitivity in detecting subclinical corticospinal lesions in multiple sclerosis. Abnormalities in central motor conduction time or TST correlate with motor impairment and disability in MS. Cerebellar stimulation may detect lesions in the cerebellum or cerebello-dentato-thalamo-motor cortical pathways. Combining TMS with electroencephalography, provides a novel method to measure parameters altered in neurological disorders, including cortical excitability, effective connectivity, and response complexity.

Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

•

We studied excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation.

•

CRMS elicited direct and reflex responses in hand muscles.

•

CRMS is painless and well tolerated and, therefore, applicable to clinical studies.

Objectives

To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction.

Methods

In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progressively increasing intensity and level of muscle contraction. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the silent period (SP) were compared to those obtained with plexus, midarm and wrist stimulation. Additionally, in a smaller number of subjects, we obtained the peristimulus time histogram (psth) of single motor unit firing in the FDI, examined the effects of vibration and recorded the modulation of sustained EMG activity in muscles of the lower limbs.

Results

Increasing CRMS intensity led to larger CMAP with no relevant changes in SP1 or SP2, except for lower amplitude of the burst interrupting the silent period (BISP). Increasing the level of muscle contraction led to reduced CMAP, shorter SP duration and increased BISP amplitude. The psth analysis showed the underlying changes in the motor unit firing frequency that corresponded to the changes seen in the CMAP and the SP with surface recordings. Progressively distal stimulation led to CMAPs of shorter latency and increased amplitude, SPs of longer latency and shorter duration, and a BISP of longer latency. Vibration led to reduction of the SP. CRMS induced SPs in muscles of the lower limb.

Conclusions

CRMS induces excitatory and inhibitory responses in hand muscles, fitting with the expected behavior of mixed nerve stimulation at very proximal sites.

Significance

Characterization of the effects of CRMS on hand muscles is of physiological and potentially clinical applicability, as it is a painless and reliable procedure.

Modulation of H-reflex responses and frequency-dependent depression by repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation: From rats to humans and back to chronic spinal cord injured rats

The lack of propagation of signals through survived fibers is among the major reasons for functional loss after incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Our recent results of animal studies demonstrate that spinal electromagnetic stimulation (SEMS) can enhance transmission in damaged spinal cord, and this type of modulation depends on the function of NMDA receptors at the neuronal networks below the injury level. Here, our pilot human study revealed that administration of repetitive SEMS induced long‐lasting modulation of H‐responses in both healthy and participants with chronic SCI. In order to understand the mechanisms underlying these effects, we have used an animal model and examined effects of SEMS on H‐responses. Effects of SEMS on H‐responses, frequency‐dependent depression (FDD) of H‐reflex, and possible underlying mechanisms have been examined in both naïve and rats with SCI. Our results demonstrate that consistent with the effects of SEMS on H‐reflex seen in humans, repetitive SEMS induced similar modulation in excitability of peripheral nerve responses in both non‐injured and rats with SCI. Importantly, our results confirmed the reduced FDD of H‐reflex in SCI animals and revealed that SEMS was able to recover FDD in rats with chronic SCI. Using intraspinal injections of the NMDA receptor blocker MK‐801, we have identified NMDA receptors as an important contributor to these SEMS‐induced effects in rats with SCI. These results identify SEMS as a novel non‐invasive technique for modulation of neuro‐muscular circuits and, importantly, modulation of spinal networks after chronic SCI.

Standards of instrumentation of EMG

Standardization of Electromyography (EMG) instrumentation is of particular importance to ensure high quality recordings. This consensus report on "Standards of Instrumentation of EMG" is an update and extension of the earlier IFCN Guidelines published in 1999. First, a panel of experts in different fields from different geographical distributions was invited to submit a section on their particular interest and expertise. Then, the merged document was circulated for comments and edits until a consensus emerged. The first sections in this document cover technical aspects such as instrumentation, EMG hardware and software including amplifiers and filters, digital signal analysis and instrumentation settings. Other sections cover the topics such as temporary storage, trigger and delay line, averaging, electrode types, stimulation techniques for optimal and standardised EMG examinations, and the artefacts electromyographers may face and safety rules they should follow. Finally, storage of data and databases, report generators and external communication are summarized.

Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength

Cross-education describes the strength gain in the opposite, untrained limb following a unilateral strength training program. Since its discovery in 1894, several studies now confirm the existence of cross-education in contexts that involve voluntary dynamic contractions, eccentric contraction, electrical stimulation, whole-body vibration and, more recently, following mirror feedback training. Although many aspects of cross-education have been established, the mediating neural mechanisms remain unclear. Overall, the findings of this review show that the neural adaptations to cross-education of muscle strength most likely represent a continuum of change within the central nervous system that involves both structural and functional changes within cortical motor and non-motor regions. Such changes are likely to be the result of more subtle changes along the entire neuroaxis which include, increased corticospinal excitability, reduced cortical inhibition, reduced interhemispheric inhibition, changes in voluntary activation and new regions of cortical activation. However, there is a need to widen the breadth of research by employing several neurophysiological techniques (together) to better understand the potential mechanisms mediating cross-education. This fundamental step is required in order to better prescribe targeted and effective guidelines for the clinical practice of cross-education. There is a need to determine whether similar cortical responses also occur in clinical populations where, perhaps, the benefits of cross-education could be best observed.

Usefulness of cervical root magnetic stimulation in assessing proximal motor nerve conduction

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the reliability and utility of cervical root magnetic stimulation in exploring proximal motor conduction.

METHODS

In 20 patients with demyelinating polyneuropathy (DPN), 20 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 25 healthy subjects, evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from abductor digiti minimi muscle in response to electrical stimulation up to Erb's point and magnetic stimulation up to the cervical roots.

RESULTS

In all healthy and ALS subjects, magnetic root stimulation confirmed the absence of conduction abnormalities, including those in whom supramaximal responses at Erb's point were not achieved. In the DPN group, conduction block and/or temporal dispersion was revealed by magnetic root stimulation in 9 out of 20 patients (45%), 3 more than those detected at Erb's point.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical root stimulation allowed clear distinction between motor neuronopathy and DPN. It is recommended as part of the routine evaluation of patients suspected of having DPN, especially when distal nerve studies are inconclusive.

Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee

These guidelines provide an up-date of previous IFCN report on “Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application” (Rossini et al., 1994). A new Committee, composed of international experts, some of whom were in the panel of the 1994 “Report”, was selected to produce a current state-of-the-art review of non-invasive stimulation both for clinical application and research in neuroscience.

Since 1994, the international scientific community has seen a rapid increase in non-invasive brain stimulation in studying cognition, brain–behavior relationship and pathophysiology of various neurologic and psychiatric disorders. New paradigms of stimulation and new techniques have been developed. Furthermore, a large number of studies and clinical trials have demonstrated potential therapeutic applications of non-invasive brain stimulation, especially for TMS. Recent guidelines can be found in the literature covering specific aspects of non-invasive brain stimulation, such as safety (Rossi et al., 2009), methodology (Groppa et al., 2012) and therapeutic applications (Lefaucheur et al., 2014).

This up-dated review covers theoretical, physiological and practical aspects of non-invasive stimulation of brain, spinal cord, nerve roots and peripheral nerves in the light of more updated knowledge, and include some recent extensions and developments.

Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation alter phrenic motoneurons and respiratory neuromechanical outputs in humans? A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, crossover study

Although compelling evidence has demonstrated considerable neuroplasticity in the respiratory control system, few studies have explored the possibility of altering descending projections to phrenic motoneurons (PMNs) using noninvasive stimulation protocols. The present study was designed to investigate the immediate and long-lasting effects of a single session of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), a promising technique for modulating spinal cord functions, on descending ventilatory commands in healthy humans. Using a double-blind, controlled, randomized, crossover approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and (2) spontaneous ventilation, as measured by respiratory inductance plethysmography. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase in DiMEP amplitude during stimulation that persisted for at least 15 min after current offset. Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent increase in tidal volume. In addition, (1) short-interval intracortical inhibition, (2) nonlinear complexity of the tidal volume signal (related to medullary ventilatory command), (3) autonomic function, and (4) compound muscle action potentials evoked by cervical magnetic stimulation were unaffected by tsDCS. This suggests that tsDCS-induced aftereffects did not occur at brainstem or cortical levels and were likely not attributable to direct polarization of cranial nerves or ventral roots. Instead, we argue that tsDCS could induce sustained changes in PMN output. Increased tidal volume after cathodal tsDCS opens up the perspective of harnessing respiratory neuroplasticity as a therapeutic tool for the management of several respiratory disorders.

Motor cortical excitability in peritoneal dialysis: a single-pulse TMS study

The aim of this paper is to investigate cortical excitability in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) without any symptoms suggestive of uremic encephalopathy. We performed transcranial magnetic stimulation for 52 PD patients and 28 normal subjects. We compared the active motor threshold (AMT), resting motor threshold (RMT), root latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and cortical silent period (CSP) in PD patients to those in normal subjects. AMT, RMT, CMCT, and CSP were not significantly different between PD patients and normal subjects. However, root latency was significantly prolonged in PD patients compared to normal subjects. The root latency correlated linearly with HbA1c or duration of PD in the patients. The results suggest that the corticospinal tract and the cortical and spinal excitabilities are preserved but the peripheral nerves are disturbed in PD patients. The severity of peripheral neuropathy corresponds to the severity of DM and the duration of PD. We uncovered no evidence suggestive of any subclinical abnormality of the motor cortical excitability in PD patients.

[Acute fulminant brachial plexopathy with good recovery: electrophysiological features]

We report a case of fulminant brachial plexopathy with radicular involvement. A 25-year-old man developed acute total monoplegia in the left upper limb. Needle electromyography showed extensive acute denervation in the C5-T1 spinal segments, and peripheral sensory nerve conduction was normal, mimicking a pre-ganglionic lesion. However, left median somatosensory evoked potentials revealed abnormal Erb's point potential, suggesting a brachial plexus lesion. Corticosteroid treatment resulted in good recovery. These findings suggest that the primary pathophysiology was conduction block and this can explain the good clinical recovery in this patient.