Prediction of in-vivo kinematics and contact track of total knee arthroplasty during walking

Biomechanical effects of muscle loading on early healing of femoral stem fractures: a combined musculoskeletal dynamics and finite element approach

Femoral stem fractures (FST) are often accompanied by muscle injuries, however, what muscle injuries affect fracture healing and to what extent is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the extent to which different muscles affect FST healing through a combined musculoskeletal dynamics and finite element approach. Modeling the lower extremity musculoskeletal system for 12 different muscle comprehensives. Muscle and joint reaction forces on the femur were calculated and these data were used as boundary conditions input to the FSTs model to predict the degree of muscle influence on fracture healing. Finally, we will investigate the extent to which muscle influences FST healing during knee flexion. Muscle and joint forces are highly dependent on joint motion and have a significant biomechanical influence on interfragmentary strain (IFS) healing. The psoas major (PM), gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscles play a major role in standing, with GM > PM > GL, whereas the gluteus medius posterior (GMP), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis superior (VLS), and adductor magnus distalis (AMD) muscles play a major role in knee flexion, with VLS > VM > VI > AMD > GMP. Mechanical stimulus-controlled healing can be facilitated when the knee joint is flexed less than 20°. Different muscles exert varying degrees of influence on the healing of fractures. Therefore, comprehending the impact of particular muscles on fracture site tissue FST healing can aid orthopedic surgeons in formulating improved surgical and rehabilitation strategies.

Computational analysis of knee joint stability following total knee arthroplasty

The overall objective of this study was to introduce knee joint power as a potential measure to investigate knee joint stability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Specific aims were to investigate whether weakened knee joint stabilizers cause abnormal kinematics and how it influences the knee joint kinetic (i.e., power) in response to perturbation. Patient-specific musculoskeletal models were simulated with experimental gait data from six TKA patients (baseline models). Muscle strength and ligament force parameter were reduced by up to 30% to simulate weak knee joint stabilizers (weak models). Two different muscle recruitment criteria were tested to examine whether altered muscle recruitment pattern can mask the influence of weakened stabilizers on the knee joint kinematics and kinetics. Level-walking knee joint kinematics and kinetics were calculated though force-dependent kinematic and inverse dynamic analyses. Bode analysis was then recruited to estimate the knee joint power in response to a simulated perturbation. Weak models resulted in larger anterior-posterior (A-P) displacement and internal-external (I-E) rotation compared to baseline (I-E: 18.4 ± 8.5 vs. 11.6 ± 5.7 (deg), A-P: 9.7 ± 5.6 vs. 5.5 ± 4.1 (mm)). Changes in muscle recruitment criterion however altered the results such that A-P and I-E were not notably different from baseline models. In response to the simulated perturbation, weak models versus baseline models generated a delayed power response with unbounded magnitudes. Perturbed power behavior of the knee remained unaltered regardless of the muscle recruitment criteria. In conclusion, impairment at the knee joint stabilizers may or may not lead to excessive joint motions but it notably affects the knee joint power in response to a perturbation. Whether perturbed knee joint power is associated with the patient-reported outcome requires further investigation.

Biomechanics and wear comparison between mechanical and kinematic alignments in total knee arthroplasty

The uses of mechanical and kinematic alignments in total knee arthroplasty are under debate in recent clinical investigations. In this study, the differences in short-term biomechanics and long-term wear volume between mechanical and kinematic alignments in total knee arthroplasty were investigated, based on a subject-specific musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model during walking gait simulation. An increase of 8.2% in the peak tibiofemoral medial contact force, a posterior contact translation by maximum 4.7 mm and a decrease of 5.5% in the wear volume after a 10-million-cycle simulation were predicted in the kinematic alignment, compared with the mechanical alignment. Nevertheless, the tibiofemoral contact mechanics, the range of motions and the long-term wear were not markedly different between mechanical and kinematic alignments. Furthermore, the mechanical alignment with a posterior tibial slope similar to that under the kinematic alignment was found to produce similar anterior-posterior translation and the range of motion, and an approximate wear volume, compared with the kinematic alignment. The ligament forces under the kinematic alignment were influenced markedly by as much as 25%, 50% and 77% for the medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and posterior cruciate ligament forces, respectively. And, a maximum increase of 40% for patellofemoral contact force was predicted under the kinematic alignment. These findings suggest that the kinematic alignment is an alternative alignment principle but no marked advantages in biomechanics and wear to the mechanical alignment. The adverse effects of the kinematic alignment on patella loading and soft tissue forces should be noticed.