Mutifractals based multimodal 3D image registration

Local similarity of activity patterns during auditory and visual processing

Neuroimaging studies have shown that brain activity is variable and changes according to stimuli and the environmental context, reflecting brain coding or information representations at different processing levels. However, little is known about activity organization that reflects coding strategies. Here, we explored and compared two different coding approaches, spatial via cross-correlation and intensity-based coding using mutual information. Using two fMRI datasets and different seeds, we searched for the spatial and intensity-based similarities with the seeds in brain activity. Our results showed that, apart from the seed regions, significant regions detected by intensity-based similarity analysis differ completely from those found using cross-correlation. These findings may indicate that information shared through spatial coding differs from that transmitted via non-spatial coding processes. Our results suggest that brain coding is organized in several different ways to optimize information processing.

A coarse-to-fine registration method for three-dimensional MR images

Three-dimensional (3D) multimodal magnetic resonance (MR) image registration aims to align similar things in different MR images spatially. Such a technology is useful in auxiliary disease diagnosis and surgical treatment. However, inconsistent intensity correspondence and large initial displacement contribute to the difficulty in registering multimodal MR volumes. A coarse-to-fine method is proposed in this study for pairwise 3D MR image rigid registration. Firstly, the proposed method extracts image feature points to form unregistered point sets and performs coarse registration based on point set registration to reduce the initial displacements of offset images effectively. Then, this method calculates a grey histogram based on voxels in the adaptive region of interest and further improves registration accuracy by maximizing mutual information of coarse-registered images. Some representative registration methods are compared on the basis of three MR image datasets to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Experimental results show that the proposed method improved more in registration success rate and accuracy compared with conventional registration methods, especially when initial displacements are large.