Few-shot learning of Parkinson’s disease speech data with optimal convolution sparse kernel transfer learning

Differentiation of speech in Parkinson's disease and spinocerebellar degeneration using deep neural networks

INTRODUCTION

Assessing dysarthria features in patients with neurodegenerative diseases helps diagnose underlying pathologies. Although deep neural network (DNN) techniques have been widely adopted in various audio processing tasks, few studies have tested whether DNNs can help differentiate neurodegenerative diseases using patients' speech data. This study evaluated whether a DNN model using a transformer architecture could differentiate patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) from patients with spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) using speech data.

METHODS

Speech data were obtained from 251 and 101 patients with PD and SCD, respectively, while they read a passage. We fine-tuned a pre-trained DNN model using log-mel spectrograms generated from speech data. The DNN model was trained to predict whether the input spectrogram was generated from patients with PD or SCD. We used fivefold cross-validation to evaluate the predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Average ± standard deviation of the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the trained model for the fivefold cross-validation were 0.93 ± 0.04, 0.87 ± 0.03, 0.83 ± 0.05, and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DNN model can differentiate speech data of patients with PD from that of patients with SCD with relatively high accuracy and AUC. The proposed method can be used as a non-invasive, easy-to-perform screening method to differentiate PD from SCD using patient speech and is expected to be applied to telemedicine.

Computerized analysis of speech and voice for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Speech impairment is an early symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study has summarized the literature related to speech and voice in detecting PD and assessing its severity.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2010 to 2021 to investigate analysis methods and signal features. The keywords "Automatic analysis" in conjunction with "PD speech" or "PD voice" were used, and the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched. A total of 838 papers were found on the first run, of which 189 were selected. One hundred and forty-seven were found to be suitable for the review. The different datasets, recording protocols, signal analysis methods and features that were reported are listed. Values of the features that separate PD patients from healthy controls were tabulated. Finally, the barriers that limit the wide use of computerized speech analysis are discussed.

RESULTS

Speech and voice may be valuable markers for PD. However, large differences between the datasets make it difficult to compare different studies. In addition, speech analytic methods that are not informed by physiological understanding may alienate clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential usefulness of speech and voice for the detection and assessment of PD is confirmed by evidence from the classification and correlation results.